SC asks UGC to finalize anti-bias rules amid plea by mothers of Vemula, Payal Tadvi
New Delhi, Apr 24 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the University Grants Commission (UGC) to proceed with the finalization and notification of draft regulations aimed at curbing caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions.
The bench clarified that these regulations will operate in addition to the recommendations that may emerge from a task force constituted by a coordinate bench of the court to examine the broader issue of student suicides and systemic discrimination.
The directions came during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Radhika Vemula and Abeda Salim Tadvi, mothers of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi, both of whom died by suicide following alleged caste discrimination.
The PIL calls for systemic reforms and enforcement of accountability in academic institutions.
A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh heard the matter, with senior advocate Indira Jaising representing the petitioners and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for the Union government.
Indira Jaising passionately argued that while a task force has been formed by another bench, immediate steps are necessary to prevent further tragedies.
'We are concerned about the living, and what can be done to prevent this from happening in the future,' Jaising said, stressing that existing regulations are outdated and lack the necessary clarity on caste-based discrimination.
Justice Kant concurred that the petitioners had 'successfully demonstrated' the obsolescence of current frameworks and emphasized that the task force should be supported in crafting comprehensive, forward-looking solutions.
However, the courtroom saw moments of tension as Jaising objected to repeated interruptions from SG Mehta, accusing him of displaying a 'male chauvinist attitude' and alleging differential treatment of women advocates. At one point, she attempted to walk out of the courtroom, stating, 'Let my junior counsel argue.'
Justice Surya Kant intervened to maintain decorum, urging both parties to remain calm. Jaising later apologized to the bench for raising her voice, while Mehta acknowledged, 'My Lords, it is very difficult to be a judge.'
Resuming her arguments, Jaising informed the bench that the coordinate bench had already acknowledged pending matters related to UGC regulations and formed a task force headed by a sitting Supreme Court judge with subject experts. In this context, the current bench issued the following key directions:
UGC may proceed with finalization and notification of the draft regulations.
The notified regulations shall function alongside recommendations made by the task force, once submitted.
The petition, rooted in the tragic loss of two young lives, underscores the urgent need for institutional reform and enforcement of safeguards against caste-based discrimination in academic spaces. The matter remains under judicial consideration.
UNI SNG PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Backwardness only criteria for OBC classification, says Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday told the assembly that OBC classification hasn't been done on religion, the only benchmark for it being the backwardness of a community. "A high court division bench order led to the exclusion of several groups from the OBC category. The West Bengal government took the matter to the Supreme Court," Banerjee said. In compliance with the HC order, a public notification was issued, she said. All action was taken, abiding by the law, and it has been submitted to court, she said. There were a total of 140 recognised groups among OBCs. Banerjee said out of 140, around 61 are from the majority Hindu community and 79 from the minority community.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Consider delinking RTE funds from Samagra Shiksha dues, says HC
Chennai: Madras high court has directed the Union govt to consider delinking Right to Education Act (RTE) component from Samagra Shiksha Scheme dues to Tamil Nadu govt and disburse the money for reimbursing private schools. A division bench of Justice G R Swaminathan and Justice V Lakshminarayanan passed the order on a plea moved by V Easwaran of Marumalarchi Iyakkam, based out of Coimbatore. "Duties under RTE Act are independent. Responsibilities such as fund allocation for implementing RTE Act lie with both Central and State govts. The Union must provide the specified percentage of funds to the State under the act," the bench said. According to petitioner, admissions under the RTE Act have not yet started this year due to non-payment of dues to private schools. In response, TN submitted that due to the non-allocation of funds by Union govt, the amount meant for private schools could not be provided. The state pointed out that although the central govt did not allocate the funds, it paid the private institutions from its own coffers between 2021 and 2023. The state further informed the high court that it has moved Supreme Court against the non-allocation of funds. The Union govt, on its part, informed the court that the funds were not released since the state failed to implement the new education policy.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Telangana HC junks plea challenging Harish Rao's election win
Hyderabad: The Telangana high court on Tuesday dismissed an election petition challenging the election of T Harish Rao as MLA from Siddipet Assembly Constituency, calling the allegations vague, baseless and lacking material facts. Justice K Sarath pronounced the order while allowing an interlocutory application filed by Harish, who urged the court to reject the election petition filed by his political rival, G Chakradhar Goud, who had contested against Harish in Siddipet. Chakardhar had alleged malpractices, including improper acceptance of nomination, suppression of criminal cases and discrepancies in property disclosures. The court noted that Chakardhar failed to raise objections during scrutiny or provide evidence of improper nomination acceptance. The MLA had disclosed pending criminal cases and convictions in his affidavit (Form 26), while the petitioner provided no specifics on alleged suppression. The complainant's claims that agricultural land was misrepresented as non-agricultural land lacked authenticated revenue documents, the court said. Though he made allegations against Harish's poll expenditure, he did not submit records or demonstrate violations. The judge also looked at allegations of manipulated voting percentages (45% to 85% in an hour) and said that there was no booth-wise data or copies of the complaints made to the authorities to substantiate these allegations. The election petition lacked concise material facts as required under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the judge said. He also said that Chakaradhar's reliance on unverified WhatsApp audio and video clips without corroborative evidence was insufficient. Citing Supreme Court precedents in Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, Harishankar Jain cases, the judge said bald allegations without triable issues warrant summary dismissal.
