SC asks UGC to finalize anti-bias rules amid plea by mothers of Vemula, Payal Tadvi
New Delhi, Apr 24 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the University Grants Commission (UGC) to proceed with the finalization and notification of draft regulations aimed at curbing caste-based discrimination in higher education institutions.
The bench clarified that these regulations will operate in addition to the recommendations that may emerge from a task force constituted by a coordinate bench of the court to examine the broader issue of student suicides and systemic discrimination.
The directions came during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Radhika Vemula and Abeda Salim Tadvi, mothers of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi, both of whom died by suicide following alleged caste discrimination.
The PIL calls for systemic reforms and enforcement of accountability in academic institutions.
A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh heard the matter, with senior advocate Indira Jaising representing the petitioners and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appearing for the Union government.
Indira Jaising passionately argued that while a task force has been formed by another bench, immediate steps are necessary to prevent further tragedies.
'We are concerned about the living, and what can be done to prevent this from happening in the future,' Jaising said, stressing that existing regulations are outdated and lack the necessary clarity on caste-based discrimination.
Justice Kant concurred that the petitioners had 'successfully demonstrated' the obsolescence of current frameworks and emphasized that the task force should be supported in crafting comprehensive, forward-looking solutions.
However, the courtroom saw moments of tension as Jaising objected to repeated interruptions from SG Mehta, accusing him of displaying a 'male chauvinist attitude' and alleging differential treatment of women advocates. At one point, she attempted to walk out of the courtroom, stating, 'Let my junior counsel argue.'
Justice Surya Kant intervened to maintain decorum, urging both parties to remain calm. Jaising later apologized to the bench for raising her voice, while Mehta acknowledged, 'My Lords, it is very difficult to be a judge.'
Resuming her arguments, Jaising informed the bench that the coordinate bench had already acknowledged pending matters related to UGC regulations and formed a task force headed by a sitting Supreme Court judge with subject experts. In this context, the current bench issued the following key directions:
UGC may proceed with finalization and notification of the draft regulations.
The notified regulations shall function alongside recommendations made by the task force, once submitted.
The petition, rooted in the tragic loss of two young lives, underscores the urgent need for institutional reform and enforcement of safeguards against caste-based discrimination in academic spaces. The matter remains under judicial consideration.
UNI SNG PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
10% Maratha reservation to continue this year, hearing on fresh pleas from July 18
The Maratha reservation issue will once again come under judicial scrutiny, with a newly constituted full bench of the Bombay High Court set to begin hearings on fresh pleas from July 18. However, the 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs given to the Maratha community will continue this bench, comprising Justices Ravindra Ghuge, NJ Jamadar and Sandeep Marne, announced on Wednesday that they would devote half-days, full working days and even some Saturdays - ordinarily court holidays - to complete the hearing hearing pertains to challenges against the Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2024, which grants 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the Maratha community. Under this order, any admission or job appointment made under the SEBC Act remains subject to final court directions. The matter was previously heard by a bench led by then-Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya. However, proceedings halted after his transfer to the Delhi High Court in January. Following this, some students approached the Supreme Court, citing harm to their admission prospects due to the ongoing legal uncertainty. The top court subsequently directed the Bombay High Court to constitute a new full bench, which has now taken Wednesday's hearing, senior advocate Pradeep Sancheti, representing the petitioners, urged the bench to expedite proceedings as the academic admission cycle was underway. He argued that, unlike job appointments, delayed admissions would be harder to rectify, even with the interim order in General Dr Birendra Saraf, appearing for the Maharashtra government, said the state needed more time to respond to the latest petition filed in court. He maintained that the interim order provided adequate safeguards and questioned the urgency shown by the petitioners. He also suggested that the petitioners withdraw the new plea if they were unwilling to allow time for the state to considering the submissions, the bench scheduled the hearing for five weeks SEBC Act, passed on February 20 last year by the Eknath Shinde-led Maharashtra government, followed recommendations by the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) led by retired Justice Sunil Shukre. The commission had concluded that "exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations" warranted reservation for the Maratha community beyond the 50 per cent cap mandated by the Supreme legislation, which came just ahead of the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, sparked a series of public interest litigations and petitions challenging its constitutional validity. Simultaneously, numerous intervention applications have been filed by Maratha organisations defending the reservation and opposing the addition to the reservation issue, petitions have also been filed questioning the legality of Justice Shukre's appointment as chairperson of the Watch
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
SC seeks HC's response on lady judge's plea over 'demoralising' remarks in performance report after CCL request
New Delhi [India], June 11 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notices to the Jharkhand High Court and the State government, seeking their responses to a plea filed by a lady judge who sought removal of certain remarks made in her annual performance report. The petitioner, a single parent and a District and Additional Sessions Judge in Dumka, Jharkhand alleged that following her request for 194 days of Child Care Leave (CCL), certain 'painful and demoralising' remarks were made in her Annual Confidential Report (ACR) for the assessment year 2023-2024 issued by the Vigilance Registrar of the High Court. After hearing the matter today, a bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan directed the respondent HC and the State, to file their responses to the lady judge's plea within four weeks time and listed the matter for further hearing in the first week of August. The judge had initially approached the Supreme Court after the High Court rejected her CCL request seeking 194 days of leave. The apex court then directed the High Court to reconsider the matter, following which she was granted 94 days of leave, by the High Court. During the hearing on Wednesday, the Supreme Court was informed of a fresh grievance with regard to certain negative remarks made in her ACR. In her application, the judge submitted that while the remarks were stated to be 'suggestive' and non-adverse, they were demoralising and have caused her mental agony. As per the lady judge's plea she has had an impeccable career record of having disposed of huge number of cases. Thus, she sought that the said remarks in her ACR report be expunged. After hearing submissions, the top-court directed the High Court and the State government to file their responses within four weeks and posted the matter to be heard next in the first week of August. Advocate Anup Kumar is representing the petitioner judge. (ANI)
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Month-long family pensioners' redressal drive in July
New Delhi, June 11 (UNI) The Government's Department of Pension and Pensioners welfare (DoPPW) will launch a ]special campaign 2.0 for redressal of 2210 grievances of family pensioners and super senior pensioners next month. According to a DoPPW statement here, Dr. Jitendra Singh, Union Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions will kick-start the month-long drive. 'A total number of 2210 pension grievances have been taken up and shared with the 51 ministries/departments/organisations for redressal under the campaign,' said the statement. At a preparatory meeting under the chairmanship of Secretary (Pension) on June 11, the guidelines issued for ensuring smooth and seamless execution of the Special Campaign 2.0 were deliberated upon in detail. Secretary (Pension) underscored that the prime objective of the campaign is to provide qualitative redressal of the grievances. Hence, it was emphasised that the grievances should be closed on the government's portal(CPENGRAMS) only after their conclusive redressal. UNI AJ SSP
