Santa Rosa Police investigating late-night crash that injured teen
The crash happened around 10:20 p.m. at the intersection of College Avenue and Beaver Street.
Police said they received several 911 calls about the crash, and one of the calls was from the driver who told them the teen was still lying in the roadway.
First responders found the unconscious teen on the westbound lanes of College Avenue. He was taken to a trauma center with life-threatening injuries and was later taken to a different Bay Area trauma center.
The driver, whose identity police said they will not yet be releasing, stayed at the scene and cooperated.
Police said she told officers that she was driving westbound on College Avenue and that she hit the teen when she got near the Beaver Street Intersection. She told officers that he had entered the roadway from the north side of College Avenue, police said.
Neither alcohol nor drugs appeared to be a factor in the crash, according to police.
Investigators are looking for surveillance video in the area and are trying to find out if the 14-year-old was in the crosswalk at the time of the crash.
Police said the teen may have been with someone else at the time of the crash and was possibly riding a skateboard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Michael Lebow Launches Healthcare Made-Easy Grant to Support Future Innovators in Patient-Centered Care
ATLANTA, GA / / August 19, 2025 / Atlanta-based vascular surgeon Dr. Michael Lebow announces the Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant, a national academic opportunity designed to support undergraduate students committed to improving the future of healthcare through innovation, accessibility, and patient-first care models. This initiative reflects Dr. Michael Lebow's ongoing dedication to equipping the next generation of healthcare professionals with the resources and mindset needed to transform patient care in meaningful ways. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant is open to undergraduate students enrolled in accredited colleges and universities across the United States. Applicants must be pursuing or intending to pursue careers in healthcare-related fields, including nursing, pre-med, public health, and allied health disciplines. Through a competitive application process, students are invited to submit a 500-700-word original essay addressing the question: "As a future healthcare professional, how do you plan to make healthcare more accessible, efficient, or compassionate? Share how your personal journey or values align with Dr. Michael Lebow's mission to improve patient care through innovation, service, and minimally invasive approaches." All entries will be evaluated based on clarity, originality, relevance to the prompt, and the applicant's demonstrated commitment to improving the healthcare system. The application deadline is April 15, 2026, and the selected recipient will be announced on May 15, 2026. Dr. Michael Lebow, who leads this initiative, is a board-certified vascular surgeon known nationally for his work in restoring circulation and preventing amputations through minimally invasive vascular techniques. As the founder of the Limb Preservation Center in Jonesboro, Georgia, Dr. Michael Lebow remains at the forefront of vascular health and procedural innovation. Throughout his career, he has consistently advocated for systems of care that emphasize precision, compassion, and practical accessibility. With an educational background from Brown University and the University of Virginia School of Medicine, followed by advanced surgical training at Louisiana State University and a vascular surgery fellowship at the University of Tennessee, Dr. Michael Lebow brings both academic rigor and clinical leadership to his work. His extensive experience directing endovascular programs and mentoring medical professionals informs his deep commitment to guiding the future of healthcare leadership. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant serves as an extension of this commitment. It aims to identify and assist students who are ready to challenge outdated systems and elevate patient care through creative problem-solving, service-driven leadership, and modern approaches in healthcare delivery. By launching this grant, Dr. Michael Lebow further solidifies his role in shaping a healthcare environment that not only adapts to current challenges but also anticipates the needs of future patients. His emphasis on efficient, minimally invasive techniques and collaborative care models reflects the direction in which the next generation of healthcare professionals must lead. The Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant is not bound to any particular city or state, allowing students from across the United States to apply. The opportunity is designed to reward thought leaders in healthcare whose values mirror those of Dr. Michael Lebow - service, integrity, compassion, and innovation. Contact Information: Spokesperson: Dr. Michael LebowOrganization: Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy GrantWebsite: SOURCE: Dr. Michael Lebow Healthcare Made-Easy Grant View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Healthcare costs can make or break your retirement
The best laid plans for retirement can be totally upended by an unexpected medical emergency, especially if you don't have a reserve of savings to draw from. On this episode of Decoding Retirement, host Robert "Bob" Powell speaks with Sudipto Banerjee, global retirement strategist at T. Rowe Price, about what you can do to factor healthcare costs into your retirement planning. Sudipto discusses maximizing tax efficiency with Health Savings Accounts, whether you should consider a Medigap policy, and whether de-risking some of your investments as you enter retirement may be the right Finance's Decoding Retirement is hosted by Robert Powell. Find more episodes of Decoding Retirement at When it comes to planning, you know, if you're close to retirement and you're really thinking about planning, what you're probably really thinking in your mind is your cash flow that, you know, how much once I retire, you know, how much income I have coming in and how much spending, you know, I outflow do I have, right? How much will you need to pay for healthcare in retirement? Well, a number of institutions have published estimates over the past two decades plus that have lately frightened you into a state of fear and maybe even inertia. Consider the Employee Benefit Research Institute has shown that a 65-year-old couple needs $350,000 to have a 90% chance of covering all healthcare expenses in retirement, and that doesn't include long-term in the world will you pay for all that healthcare? Well, here to help me decode all that is Suduo Banerjee. He is a global retirement strategist at TO Price. Sudoko, welcome. Thank you. Thank you forhaving me. It's a pleasure. Uh, we're old friends, and I, I know the tale well, but I, I want to start here with the EBR numbers, which is a research institution, a nonpartisan one I should add that you once worked at, where we showed, and you showed perhaps maybe Paul Fronston and others showed that a 65 year old couple needs $350,000 to pay for healthcare and retirement andFor someone who might be listening, maybe they're in their 50s or 60s or so, that's a big number and thinking, I don't even have that in my, I maybe I have that in my 401k in my IRA, but what am I gonna use for living expenses? Yeah, yeah, I mean, um, so, you know, my, my first point there would be not to really focus on that number, that one single number that you mentioned where $350,000. Um, but really to understand that, you know, it's one way of looking at healthcare costs. It's basically, it's what a couple will spend over 30 years, right? It's just the sum of, of that, butwhen it comes to planning, you know, if you're close to retirement and you're really thinking about planning, what you're probably really thinking in your mind is your cash flow, that, you know, how much once I retire, you know, how much income I have coming in and how much spending, you know, I outflow do I have, right? Um, and for that, of course, you know, you need to figure out your income side and then you are looking at your spending side and right there there's one big element which is healthcare, right?So I think that's why people should focus on that, you know, doing the cash flow analysis, and which means asking how much am I going to spend on healthcare on an annual basis, right? And then you know the, all the other elements that you know, housing, you know, food, etc. right?And then how that matches up with how much income are you expecting, whether a mismatch or not, then go from there, right? But to focus on that one single number, uh, I think it does not help as much with planning because, you know,Healthcare is not something that you retire, you know, a day, then you got a check of $250,000 to someone and healthcare is taken care of. It doesn't work like know, it's an ongoing process. Every year you have to make decisions. So I would say that focus on that cash flow and the annual numbers. So we have done a lot of research as you mentioned, where we provide you know a lot of different numbers but looking from that annual, you know, uh, point of view, um, so I would say, you know, maybe start there. Yeah, I mean, this is just rough back of the napkin. I'm not going to do a present value of that per se, but if I take a look at, let's call it $300,000 for a couple aged 65/30 years, I'm looking at what, uh, what is that, uh, maybe $10,000 per a couple or $5000 per person over the course of 30 years, which seems like a much more manageable expense given that you might have cash flow and you might have assets to pay for this, and you might have Social Security benefits to pay for this. I know we're gonna dive deeper into but before we do so, I, I wanna talk a little bit about, uh, Medicare Advantage versus, uh, Medi gap, uh, uh, traditional Medicare, and, uh, what you, your, your research has shown around what might be a better way to manage healthcare costs as you think about removing the risk that you might face, or the, the unplanned for costs, let's say. Yeah, yeah. I mean, it's, it's a, it's a really important decision. I think, you know, when it comes to healthcare and retirement, that's the choice of the plan. I mean, exactly what plan you choose, whether you go with traditional Medicare, whether you go the Medicare Advantage or you add a Medi gap. I think that's a really important decision, so people should pay a lot of attention to that. Uh, but particularly when it comes to the, the choice of whether you uh want to add a Medicare policy, you know, with your traditional Medicare or not.I think uh there's two questions really to answer here. So the first one is, can you afford it? Right? Because as you might have seen from the research that we have published and others have done similar work that, you know, Medi gap on average it costs more, you know, annually maybe around $2000 so there is a question of affordability, right? Can you afford that additional, you know, $2000 or so? If you can, that's great, right? Uh, so that then the next question then becomes is basically, why are you, um, what do you want Mia?Basically, right. So usually the, the reason that people want to add Medi gap, you know, to their coverage is to limit their out of pocket expenses, right? Because with traditional Medicare, you have the deductibles, you have the co-insurance and all that. Once you add Medi-gap to that, you know, you my out of pocket expenses, you know, are, are, you know, they, they will be checked. But when we did the research, when we look at the numbers, so on average, people who have Medi gap, you know, they are spending, their out of pocket spending isYou know, similar to people who have other types of coverage, it's not less. Uh, it's only at the extreme end where you see that people who have Mediga, you know, they have uh lower numbers, um, and the reason for that is basically people who have Mediap, they just use more because they know they have that protection, they just use more healthcare. So when people are thinking about this, I just want to make sure that they understand that the expectation, if they have the expectation that, you know, I will have lower out of pocket expenses, that might not happen because what we see is people just end up using more healthcare. Yeah, I, I, I should mention too that this is almost an irreversible decision. If you decide to go with Medicare Advantage when you sign up for Medicare, and you should become unhealthy over the course of retirement, trying to switch from Medicare Advantage to a um original Medicare with a Mediga policy is probably virtually impossible. So you need to think about the 5, 1015 years into your retirement and make that decision not based on today, but perhaps on what the future may hold andAnd though you may pay more for Mediga now in the present, uh, maybe you'll pay less over the course of your retirement for healthcare because you won't be exposed to those, uh, large out of pocket costs that you might face with the Medicare Advantage plan, for instance, should you become unhealthy. You're right, and yeah, it's a personal decision. People know they, they have their own medical histories and all that. So based on that, you need to make a decision, but you're absolutely right, yeah, you have to be aware of that, you know, the down the line, you, it might be an irreversible decision, yeah. Um, there's another, uh, sort of healthcare decision that people need to think about, but maybe in their 30s, 40s, and 50s, which is if they have an HSA available to them, uh, in their employer through a high deductible health plan, uh, they have an opportunity to take advantage of a triple tax-free account that in some ways offers more advantages than, say, a 401k. yeah, what do they need to know?Yeah, I mean, I don't know that, you know, if all your, you know, listeners are aware ofUh, the, the triple tax advantage of HSA assuming they are, um, it is really unique because there is no other, uh, place where you, that the money is basically virtually never taxed, you know, uh, so the contributions are not taxed, the growth is not taxed, and the distributions, of course, they have to be like eligible, you know, for healthcare purposes, so then they're not taxed either. Um, so when it comes to HSAs in, I think, to use, um, how to maximize the value of HSA, I think there is a, a theoretical answer and there is sort of a practical answer to it. So the theoretical answer is that I would say yes, maximize your HSC contributions, right? So there is acontribution limit and, and would you do that? So, would you, would you do that before your your pre-tax 401k like with in terms of sequencing your contribution, would it be?Oh no, the, the 41K comes first because you know with the 401k if you have match, right, that's an instant like you know, whatever, uh whatever per your employer is matching, that's an instant return on your on your contributions, right? So that comes first, but once you sort of, you know, maximize your 401k match and all, all that, right, um, at that point, it might make sense to, you know, put all your money up to the contribution limits in your there are caveats to that. So, uh, the, the, so one is that, you know,The the value of HSA is really, you know, if you keep it invested over the long term, right? So then the let the money grow and then you take the money out in retirement, right? So then you get all the tax advantages, right? Uh, but if you're putting in the money in HSA and taking the money out whenever you need, you know, for healthcare purposes, then you are not using it correctly. And so in that case, you know, you might be better off putting the money in somewhere else, right?Um,So I, so if you know, the other part is you mentioned that high deductibles, so HSS are attached with high deductible plans. So to keep the money invested, they have to meet those high deductibles, right, which might not be, you know, possible for everyone, right? So for the, the practical answer to me seems like, you know, yes, put money to your, into your HSA as much as you can, but try to keep it that if you need, you know, money for healthcare purposes, you try to get the money from somewhere else. So then whatever money you are keeping in your HSA you're actually taking the advantage of the growth and the tax advantage as well. Uh, so, we have to take a short break, but when we come back, I, I want to talk about long term care, which I mentioned at the start of the program, but it's a really important topic that people worry about, so don't go away. Welcome back to Decoding Retirement. I'm speaking with Suddu Bill Banerjee. He is the global retirement strategist at T Rowe Price. Suddu though, I said that we were going to talk about long-term care costs, but I, the first thing I want to talk about is since we were just talking about investing your HSA, I, I want to talk a little bit about the research has traditionally shown that you should allocate your assets based on your age, that you would take 100 minus your age, and that would be the percent allocations that you would split between stocks and bonds, but you have a contrary point of view? Uh, not contrary, so we actually just published some new research, um, uh, just, you know, this week, and it's, uh, it's using data from our, you know, 401k recordkeeping business and we worked with some academics from MIT and Stanford, butThe, the, the key, the, the interesting finding was that so we try to estimate their preferences, like, you know, their equity allocation preferences and how that changes with age, and we also track their actual, you know, how they manage their allocations. So when we looked at preferences, so at younger ages, you know, the preferences are pretty similar, like, you know, it's pretty homogeneous for they all want to be highly invested in equities, which makes sense, you know, people have very little money, they want to grow their portfolio. They all want to be highly invested in equities. But when we look at the older, you know, groups, 50 and above, we see there is a lot more heterogeneity in their allocation preferences. So some people don't want equities at all. Some people want to be, you know, fully invested in equities, and there are a lot of people, you know, in middle, you know, some most people are in that 60 to 80% range in that age group. Uh, so, so that tells us that, you know, there is, there needs to be more personalized solutions, you know, as people get closer to when we track what they're actually doing with their money in their 401k, the interesting finding was that, you know, as people get older, they are more actively making changes to their, uh, uh, to a 401k, which makes sense, right? But the more interesting part was that the older they're getting, we see more and more of them making their their portfolios more aggressive, so they have a higher equity allocation. They're moving towards a higher equity so, so that, that's a very interesting, um, and we did not really dive into the reason why people are, you know, uh choosing higher equity allocation at older ages. We have some theories, like, you know, it could be that just trying to catch up, they're, you know, lagging behind. There are also some research which suggests that as people get older, they are they gain more investing knowledge, their risk preferences, you know, they might be more tolerant of risk and things like that, but that's, you know, for our future research, but this is what we found that, you know, people at older ages, basically there's a lot of, you know, variation. So that's our point. The point trying to make is that more personalized solutions probably make sense at that age. Yeah, I mean, it sounds like the actual advice in this case would be to at least not do this willy-nilly arbitrarily, but to know why you're becoming more aggressive with your asset allocation and, and not just sort of, uh, you know, flip a coin and say, I'm going to invest more in whatever international equities this day because my neighbor has, or whatever the case may right, so I promise we would talk about long-term care, um, which is the, it's the one thing that many people worry about, right? They, they, they think that they will face some sort of tragedy at some point and they'll end up in a nursing home. They don't know how they'll pay for it. They don't know whether they should buy a long-term care insurance policy. They don't know the degree to which they could self-fund their home equity is a break class option. They talk about qualifying for Medicaid to pay for long-term care, but your research seems to suggest that it's a very idiosyncratic risk that, in the main, not that many people will need long term care. So, but to me, I don't know if I'm going to be in the 3% or the 97%, right? Yeah, so it's, it's, it's a tough decision, honestly, because what, this is a classic example of what we call tail risk that, you know, for most people, if you look at the average, you know, people don't spend anything on long term care out of pocket, right? Um, but a very small percentage, you know, uh, will spend a large amount, right? And this is sort of a classic case where, you know, you, you would think that, you know, it' insurance, right? It's, it's, it's a uh situation to be addressed by insurance because uh it's a tail risk, but as you know very well that the long term care, you know, insurance market has not, um, you know, um uh perform or function, you know, very well over the years, you know, they're having a lot of problems and the least of which is that the, the policies are very expensive so people, you know, they don't want to you know, spending so much on, on these policies and never needing the care, so that's the uncertainty of it. Um, in terms of how to think about, you know, whether you insure, you get insurance, whether you sell fund, I so, so for some people, it's an easy decision like if it's you lower end of the, you know, income spectrum or so that most of you don't have, you know, a lot of liquid assets. Most of your income is going from Social Security, you go with Medicaid, right? You're on the opposite end with the higher end, you're probably able to, you know, self-fund yourself. It's people in the middle, uh, who you really have to think about it, whether they want to protect their assets, uh, from, you know, um, uh, Medicaid or I think it's, it's a tough decision. There's no like rule what they should do, but I think we can provide some guidelines as to if you are thinking about, you know, getting, uh, long term care insurance, if you're seriously thinking about long term care insurance, what things you should have in mind. So, uh, so my colleagues, you know, uh, at Trice, they have done an excellent job. They have produced a very good guide on long term care you know, if your listeners are interested, I would highly doubt it, um, towards that. But some of the key takeaways want is when is the right period to get a long-term care insurance, um, because the, the trick is you don't want to be too late when, you know, you have health issues crop up and your premiums will really go up and you don't want to get it too early when you are spending your premium in your, uh, spending on premiums for a long I think somewhere between 55 and 65 is, you know, um, a good uh period to consider long term care insurance. And then the other one is really to figure out, you know, what's your living situation going to be if you know that, you know, if you think that, you know, I'm going to be at home and then I'm going to move into a continuing care, right? So then it's easier to get the type of insurance that you want because there are some umbrella policies which would cover, you know, almost any living arrangement, and those are more you have more targeted, you know, if you have figured out your living situation and you get a more targeted policy, then your cost might be lower. So there are all these different things and there are, you know, benefit limits and all that. So keep all that in mind, to do your research, basically. Yeah. I want to save time to talk about your years in college as a Buckeye sup though, but, but first, I, I want to double back on a topic that we begin with, with in terms of paying for health care expenses over the course of retirement. In your research, correct me if I'm wrong, you've shown that for costs, your Medicare Part B, your Medicare Advantage, your Part D, uh, premiums, whatever those may be, that you would pay for those perhaps out of cash flow as you go through retirement, but for other expenses out of pocket deductibles, copays, etc. that you might use a different bucket of money. Is that fair to say? Yeah, yeah,exactly. So the way, I mean, I mean, we talk about it is, you know, think of premiums and you're out of pocket as two separate elements. So premiums, the reason is that premiums are basically, you know, they're predictable, they're face. Even the year to year changes are minimal. So you have a very good idea how much you are going to need for your health insurance premiums, right? So you can basically build that into your cash flow, your into your income flow, right? Uh, the, the, the more trickier part is the out of pocket expenses where you might not know exactly how you know, something might happen, you know, in some years. So the idea is that you keep sort of a cash reserve for that and we have shared numbers, you know, based on your age and whatever, uh, how much you might expect. So you keep, you know, whatever you're comfortable with $5000 10,000 dollars, you keep that as a reserve. You spend that at the end of the year, you fill that up, you know, again, and start the new year. So that's, that's how we think about it, yeah. Yeah, I should remind our listeners that they can go to the T. Rowe Price website where you have at least 3 if not more research papers that sort of hand walk people how to uh approach this paying for healthcare in retirement. So, and they're, they're quite good that we can only do a sort of a uh a shallow dive here today, I said I wanted to talk about your college years. You, uh, you wrote plays, you directed plays in college as a Buckeye, and I'm curious, what, uh, parallels do you see between maybe writing and directing plays and, you know, you're sort of your role today now as a retirement, uh, strategist. Um, that's, that's a, you know, a difficult connection, but, um, I, I gave up on that dream a long time ago because I just realized it's, it's really hard, uh, to make a career, you know, in, in creative arts, um, but I, I do see one connection, which is really writing, uh, because I, I like to write, and what that has stayed with me over the years andUh, I really, so I value the, the, the skill of writing now more and more because when I'm writing about, you know, all the research papers or anything like that, I think you get a clarity of thought when you are writing in, in that way, I sort of envy you know, journalists like you who get to write on a more daily basis. Um, but, uh, but I think that, that has stayed with me and that has helped me because I still like to, you know, spend some time, you know, it doesn't happen every day, but write some of these thoughts, uh, because that really helps me even think about the research itself, yeah. Yeah, I, I forget exactly whose quote this is, but uh they said something to this effect that writing is easy. I just wait till beads of blood form on my forehead and then the words spill though, I'm afraid we've run out of time. 23 minutes goes by in the blink of an eye, but thank you ever so much for talking with us and sharing your knowledge and wisdom. Uh, we'll have you back on a future episode to, to talk about things we didn't get to today. So thank you. Yeah, absolutely. And thank you for having me. It was an absolute pleasure, um, and, you know, look forward to staying in touch. Thank you. So that wraps up this episode of Decoding Retirement. We hope we provided you with some actionable advice to help you plan for or live in retirement. If you have questions about money or retirement, you can email me at YF podcast@ and I'll answer your questions in a future episode. And lastly, remember you can listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement wherever you find your favorite podcasts. This content was not intended to be financial advice and should not be used as a substitute for professional financial services. Are you ready to master the markets and dare I say, become a better leader in the process? Well, Yahoo Finance has you covered with our new full suite of original podcast content, whetherIf you're a seasoned investor, but you're just starting your financial journey, we offer invaluable market insights and strategies to help boost your portfolio, build your wealth, and make you a successful investor. Join us on Yahoo the Yahoo Finance app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
R.I. prosecutor told police to turn off a body-worn camera during her arrest. Do officers have to comply?
'I want you to turn your body cam off,' Devon Flanagan tells an officer during the Aug. 14 confrontation, Content Warning: Profanity. Body camera footage shows R.I. Special Assistant Attorney General Devon Flanagan and Veronica Hannan being arrested in Newport. 'Protocol is that you turn it off if a citizen requests to turn it off,' Flanagan said. Is that true? Not really, experts say. 'The state's body-worn camera policy is very clear that the request to turn off the cameras is something that an officer should consider, if asked by a victim or a witness to a crime – not to somebody who was suspected of the crime,' said Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up 'And it remains within the discretion of the police officer in any event,' Brown added. 'It's not an obligation.' Advertisement Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association President Thomas Oates III said officers in the Newport incident were 'well within policy.' 'I don't know that young lady, what knowledge she has of body-worn camera policy or what she thought it was, but whatever she was saying, she was inaccurate,' said Oates, who is also the chief of police in Woonsocket. Under the Advertisement Police could also decide to deactivate a camera in 'areas where there may be a reasonable expectation of privacy and [in] other sensitive locations,' the policy states. Those areas could include private residences, locker rooms, law offices, schools, daycare facilities, certain places in hospitals or clinics, and where 'First Amendment rights are being exercised,' including places of worship, newsrooms, and where peaceful protests are taking place, the policy states. Officers recording in those areas 'shall be mindful not to record beyond what is necessary to capture contact with members of the public, effect an arrest, or search for an individual,' according to the policy. Whether police mute or stop the recording, or only record audio in those areas should based on whether an officer 'observes activities or circumstances of a sensitive or private nature,' or if there are people present who are not involved with the police matter; who are minors; and who are witnesses and want anonymity, the policy states. Brown noted the alleged incident in Newport 'was out in public.' 'These are precisely the circumstances where the body cameras should be activated,' he said. Officers 'acted appropriately in not turning the camera off,' Brown said. Timothy Rondeau, a spokesperson for the Attorney General's Office, said on Monday that Flanagan's request is not part of the statewide body-worn camera policy, and confirmed the policy applies only to victims and witnesses of crimes. According to Oates, departments adopted provisions of the statewide policy to receive funding when Advertisement The Newport police Lieutenant Robert Salter, a department spokesperson, wrote in an email the department would not comment further on Tuesday regarding last week's incident. According to Oates, the decision for police to record depends on the circumstances. 'Obviously a case where there's an alleged disturbance involved, or someone potentially acting in a disorderly manner and is argumentative and doesn't want to comply with the commands of the police officers to clear them from an area, we're never going to turn the body camera off,' Oates said. Oates has not heard of many people requesting not to be recorded, he said. 'This is why it's important that body-worn cameras are existent,' Oates said. 'In a lot of cases, what it does is it causes people who are behaving badly to ... calm down and not behave badly when they know that they're being recorded and their actions are being documented.' It doesn't always work that way though, Oates said. Related : In Newport on Aug. 14, officers arrived around 9:51 p.m. at 24 Bannister's Wharf – the Clark Cooke House restaurant – after receiving a report of an intoxicated woman – later identified as Veronica Hannan – refusing to leave, police wrote in a report. During the encounter caught on video, Flanagan, who was with Hannan, repeatedly tells officers to turn off the camera. She also tells them several times, 'I'm an A.G.,' and as she is placed in a cruiser, she says, 'You're going to regret this.' Advertisement Police identified Flanagan as Devon Hogan, 34, of Warwick. The Attorney General's Office confirmed that Hogan and Flanagan are the same person. She was charged with willful trespass – a misdemeanor – and was given a summons to appear in court. Salter would not provide the court date on Tuesday. Flanagan has not returned requests for comment, and it was unclear on Tuesday whether she had obtained an attorney. Speaking on He said he gives police credit 'for treating her like everybody else,' and acknowledged Flanagan was incorrect about camera policy. 'She's embarrassed herself – humiliated herself – treated the Newport Police Department horribly,' Neronha said, adding that it was 'inexcusable behavior.' Still, it has been difficult to find and retain 'capable lawyers,' Neronha noted. If Flanagan keeps her job, she will not 'go on as if nothing happened,' Neronha said. 'There'll be a strong sanction here,' he said. Officers can also be seen on the video struggling to apprehend Hannan, 34, of Westport, Conn. She was arrested and charged with willful trespass, disorderly conduct, and resisting arrest – all misdemeanors, police said. Court records show Hannan was arraigned on Friday in Newport County District Court, where a plea of not guilty was entered. She was released on $1,000 personal recognizance and a pre-trial conference is scheduled for Aug. 27. 'Veronica is obviously overwhelmed by this experience. It happened so quickly and with a lot of energy,' John R. Grasso, an attorney representing Hannan, wrote in an email requesting comment on Tuesday. 'Once we have the facts and she processes it, maybe we can speak more then.' Advertisement A now-removed LinkedIn profile listed Hannan as a senior manager for data and AI product management at PepsiCo. PepsiCo did not immediately return a request for comment on Tuesday. Asked about any concerns the ACLU has about government officials making comments to police such as those Flanagan allegedly made, Brown said officials can say 'whatever they want' during run-ins with the law. 'The question is how police officers react and whether they end up giving special treatment to somebody because they're a government official,' Brown said. 'In this case, they didn't.' Christopher Gavin can be reached at
