Council leader wants to press UK Government on green energy infrastructure support
East Ayrshire Council Leader Douglas Reid will table a motion that cites Kilmarnock project as example.
East Ayrshire Council will press the UK Government on the level of support it will provide to help the transition to net zero, if a motion to council is approved.
SNP Council Leader, Councillor Douglas Reid, says that it is vital that the Labour Government provides clarity on the issue, emphasising the need to back companies to ensure the necessary infrastructure is in place.
He cited an agreement between HALO Kilmarnock and the subsea cabling manufacturer XLCC that could see the latter set up a headquarters in the HALO Enterprise and Innovation Centre, along with more than 300 jobs.
His motion states: 'XLCC plan to bring 1200 new jobs to Ayrshire with the UK's first high voltage direct current (HVDC) cable factory in Hunterston and this partnership will result in more than 300 high-quality jobs being brought to Kilmarnock.'
This would cover a wide range of professional disciplines including finance, sales, marketing, HR, skills development, digital and cyber security, design, engineering and project management, he added.
Cllr Reid's motion continues: 'An investment of this magnitude will boost the economy and be a catalyst for regenerating the engineering sector both locally and regionally.
'This agreement in principle is to be welcomed as it will increase energy resilience within the UK while supporting our communities with high quality jobs.
'However, I am aware that clarification is required from the UK Government on proposals to deliver the green investment strategy and how they will support UK companies to develop and fund major infrastructure projects in the short term prior to worldwide contracts being realised over the next five years which will support the Just Transition towards Net Zero.
'I would therefore propose that the Council write to the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero to request an early meeting to clarify the UK Government's proposals to progress the delivery of this project at pace.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rift between farmers and government remains despite £2.7bn boost
A rift between farmers and the government still exists despite a spending review providing £2.7bn boost to agriculture, a farming leader has told BBC Politics farmer Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers' Union, said the government's changes to inheritance tax for agricultural land will have a "human impact" which is "simply not acceptable"."This is a very real threat to the farming business. While that hangs over the farming industry, this relationship (with the government) will not be repaired," he government said food security is vital and it is taking further action and providing extra funds to support British farmers. Under the government's plans, from April 2026, inherited agricultural assets worth more than £1m, which were previously exempt, will be subject to inheritance tax at 20% - half the usual President Tom Bradshaw said: "At a time when we're increasing our defence spending that tells us we live in a volatile world."The other side is food security. We need to make sure we still continue to invest in this country's food production."He said it is not an "either/or" situation with regards to food or land management."I think they need to prioritise both at a time of global insecurity," he said the government needs to "take the brakes off investment, because farms are investing in reservoirs, buildings and poultry sheds today". "They are committed to food production for the next decade and beyond," he said."The relationship with the government is overshadowed by the budget and the announcement on inheritance tax and yesterday (the spending review) was another missed opportunity for the chancellor to recognise this needed to be changed," he Bradshaw has criticised the "devastating family farm tax which will mean many farming families continue to be left in the lurch, unable to afford the future tax bill".He said there was a rift with the government despite being supportive of spending review and trade deals."On trade policy so far the government has looked after us pretty well," he said."They said they weren't going to cross those red lines on animal health and welfare standards and they have stuck to that." Farming minister Daniel Zeichner MP (Lab, Cambridge) said: "Food security is vital to our national security, which is the foundation of our Plan for Change, and our commitment to farming remains steadfast."That's why we are investing £2.7bn a year into sustainable food production and nature's recovery, with funding for our Environmental Land Management schemes increasing by 150%."However, we must go further to support farmers across the country. "We are slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU, have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to recommend reforms to boost farmers' profits, and we're ensuring farmers get a fair share of food contracts for our schools, hospitals, and prisons." BBC Verify Many of the claims from the government have been hotly contested by farmers, and BBC Verify has come under scrutiny over some of the figures it has relied on to try to establish the number of farms impacted by the debate has revolved around estimates provided by farmers' groups, including that the new tax could "harm" up to 70,000 farms over Verify found that the figure was likely to be somewhere closer to the number provided by the government - about 500 estates per groups say the changes have been "built on bad data". The government says it wants to make the inheritance tax system fairer and discourage wealthy people from investing in land solely to avoid the tax. BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday 15 June at 10:00 GMT on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', minister says
The Scottish Secretary attempted to defend not informing the Government at Holyrood about alterations to the payment by suggesting Westminster would 'never' consult devolved governments on devolved policy. But Scotland's Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said Murray "doesn't seem to understand the system", as she laid out how the Labour Government had made it "almost impossible" for the Scottish Government to know how to proceed with its own devolved winter payment. After making the Winter Fuel Payment means-tested last year – meaning only those on pension credit or other benefits would receive it – Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a major policy U-turn last week, with pensioners south of the Border earning up to £35,000 a year now set to get £200 for those aged up to 80 and £300 for those aged over 80. READ MORE: SNP Government rule out Scottish independence convention The current plan in Scotland – which has its own devolved Pension Age Winter Heating Payment – is for all pensioner households to receive £100 regardless of income, while those on pension credit will receive up to £305 depending on age. That was announced on the back of the initial cut made to the UK payment, but Reeves's latest announcement will mean – as things stand – pensioners in England and Wales earning less than £35,000 will get a larger payment than those in Scotland. Scotland will receive more money as a result of the UK change via Barnett consequentials, but Somerville told the Sunday National exact funding implications have not yet been made clear by the UK Government, making it 'almost impossible' for the Scottish Government to decide whether it can alter its own devolved payment. (Image: PA) Murray (above) said that if Labour had consulted the Scottish Government on the policy, it would 'be screaming blue murder at the fact that we're encroaching on the devolution settlement'. But Somerville said: 'If Ian Murray actually understood how the system works, he would know that changes in aspects that are devolved to Scotland, changes that happen down in England, have an implication for a Scottish budget,' she said. 'I don't think it's surprising, and I wouldn't have thought it was asking too much, for the UK Government to therefore talk to the Scottish Government when a decision they're going to make has major funding implications for the Scottish Government. 'I'm afraid Ian Murray, deliberately or otherwise, doesn't seem to understand the system.' Somerville insisted the only way Scotland will only ever be able to escape continued wranglings with the UK Government over social security is through gaining independence. She said she had 'long lost patience' with the Labour UK Government having "no respect" for Scotland after she found out through social media about the fresh changes to the Winter Fuel Payment. Somerville insisted Scotland must have full powers over social security. READ MORE: UK Government must 'urgently engage' with Scotland over migration 'I read about it [the Winter Fuel Payment change] first on social media before a meeting with the Treasury, where they couldn't tell me what the financial implications for Scotland were, and we are still trying to work out the details of how their scheme works and impacts on Scotland,' she said. 'So, there is deep disappointment. But when you have a system as we do, that is so reliant on the UK Government both in terms of its policy decisions and the finances, we are always going to be in this position. 'This is an inevitable consequence of having a Union and having a Union with a government which seems to take decisions with no thought to the implications for Scotland. 'There's clearly only one way we get past that and that's for the Scottish Parliament to have full control of our social security.' It is not the first time this year the Labour Government has left its Scottish counterpart in limbo when it comes to social security. (Image: PA) Earlier this year, the UK Government announced that from 2028/29 onwards, people would only be able to prove their eligibility for the health element of Universal Credit (UC) via the assessment for Personal Independence Payments (PIP). PIP has been replaced in Scotland by the devolved Adult Disability Payment, but the UK Government has still not confirmed whether Scots looking to obtain the UC health element can prove their eligibility via this new system. Somerville (above) told The National in March she had been seeking clarity on this matter from the previous UK Government and never got answers – a trend which she says is continuing under Labour. She said the Labour Government's failure to communicate effectively with Scotland should prove to people a switch in power at Westminster will never result in vulnerable people being better protected. 'Understandably some people thought one of the answers to further protecting vulnerable people in society – or indeed people who just have a right to support like disabled people and carers – was to elect a Labour government,' she said. 'So, we've had a Labour government elected, and the first thing they did was cut the Winter Fuel Payment from pensioners. They followed that with cuts to disabled benefits in the rest of the UK. 'If anyone needed further proof that the answer isn't a change of government in Westminster, we've unfortunately seen that. 'The only way we can protect people from those types of changes is we have those decisions being made up here by a Scottish Government through independence.' Somerville said she wanted to reassure Scottish pensioners they 'will have a winter heating payment this year' while the Government in Edinburgh continues to seek answers on the funding implications of Labour's latest U-turn. A UK Government spokesperson said: "Decisions on Scotland's Pension Age Winter Heating Payment are a matter for the Scottish Government. The Scottish Government will mechanically receive additional funding to reflect the increase in spending in England and Wales through a Block Grant Adjustment, as agreed in the Scottish Government's Fiscal Framework. "Regarding the comments about the Scottish Secretary, Ian Murray joined an HMT briefing with the Cabinet Secretary for Finance on Wednesday where she was informed ahead of publication of the Spending Review that it would mean an extra £9.1 billion for the Scottish Government over the next three years. That's more money than ever before for them to invest in Scottish public services."
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
NSW Nationals vote to dump net zero by 2050, increasing pressure on Littleproud to follow suit
The New South Wales Nationals have voted to abandon Australia's commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 at the party's weekend state conference in Coffs Harbour, increasing pressure on the federal Nationals leader, David Littleproud, to follow suit. Attendees at the conference said the motion, moved by the Tweed state electorate council, passed easily with 60 to 65% support, after vigorous debate for nearly an hour among the 300-odd delegates. Young Nationals chair, Jayden Whaites, drew applause for his passionate speech in support of dropping the target. Whaites told the conference there was no point in having a target without a clear pathway to achieve it. He said real farms were being replaced with solar farms and causing angst among farming communities. The chairman of the NSW Nationals, Rick Colless, said others in favour of abandoning the target pointed out that Australia's major trading partners, notably the US, were walking away from net zero by 2050. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email He said those who were in favour of maintaining the target expressed concern about what it would mean for Australia's trade relations, as countries who do not commit to the Paris agreement and its targets could face tariffs in the future. The NSW Nationals platform does not bind the state or federal parliamentary parties in the same way as Labor's platform does, but it is a strong signal to both state and federal leaders. 'The grassroots members get the opportunity to express their concerns. The resolutions then go to the state and federal party. It doesn't commit them to the position; its more a recommendation,' Colless said. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion Littleproud is already facing pressure from his fellow Queenslanders to formally drop the net zero target. Some Queensland MPs, including Matt Canavan and the federal Nationals deputy leader, Kevin Hogan, were at the NSW conference over the weekend. After a brief split in the Coalition, the Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, has promised to discuss a new energy policy within the joint party room in Canberra. The Coalition's current policy backs a net zero target by 2050, something business groups have supported because it provides certainty. The NSW Nationals also voted on a separate resolution calling on the party to 'embrace coal' as an energy source, keep exisiting coal-fired power stations open and to build new high-efficiency, low -missions coal power stations in the future. Littleproud has been contacted for comment.
