New report decries fossil fuel industry influence in climate education
But the guide, made by Inside Education, a long-running education charity in Alberta that creates resources for schools, mentions nothing about greenhouse gasses, emissions or climate change.
That's a problem, said Anne Keary, co-author of the report released this week by the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and the climate advocacy group For Our Kids.
Inside Education is one of the groups highlighted in the report for accepting money from fossil fuel companies, though it says they don't influence content.
Keary said similar examples exist in multiple provinces, including B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick.
When it comes to teacher resources, "it's both a matter of what they are saying and what they're not saying," explained the independent researcher and historian, who is active in climate advocacy in Toronto.
Environmental advocates are sounding the alarm about fossil fuel industry influence on energy, climate and environmental education in Canada's classrooms, with a new report that cites efforts ranging from direct funding of school science fairs, field trips and school activities to sponsoring educational resource creators to partnerships developing curriculum with government.
Resources felt 'easy-to-use, reputable,' says teacher
Retired Alberta science teacher Tylene Appel remembers her early days as an educator, scrambling to create engaging lessons in the 1990s. She recalls being thrilled to find locally relevant, curriculum-aligned, Alberta-branded material to help her teach high schoolers about energy sources and usage.
"I felt these materials were amazing. They were so ready and easy to use," recalled Appel.
"They really made you feel confident that the material was reputable — that it was factual and that it was evidence-based and that it was in the best interest of our students to use it."
Over time, however, Appel — who has a background in biology, taught for more than 30 years and, after retirement, worked as a substitute teacher until spring 2024 — noticed a bias to these resources: a reliance on fossil fuels and individual action on environmental concerns rather than exploration of collective or systemic change.
When she probed further, she found ties to funding from fossil fuel companies.
Having seen funding cuts, Appel said Alberta teachers are trying to do more with less, so when they encounter educational resources that are "easy-to-use, bright and shiny" — and avoid complicated or tough discussions — these can be very appealing.
After looking deeper, Appel noticed many assignments of a certain type: suggesting students track things like personal energy usage or recycling, for instance, and encouragement on how they could improve on it.
Missing were projects exploring the bigger picture, she said, like "'What are the health impacts of air pollution on your health?' ... 'If wind and solar were used, how would that compare [to fossil fuels] in costs or in job creation?'"
WATCH | Researcher outlines climate education in Canada and how educators feel teaching it:
'Gaps of inconsistency' in Canadian climate change education, says researcher
1 year ago
Duration 3:03
Education researcher Ellen Field offers a quick portrait of how climate change education fares across Canadian jurisdictions, how prepared our teachers feel in offering it and whether a climate strategy is a priority for school boards.
Fossil fuel companies step in
Despite the clear evidence humans are causing climate change, primarily by burning fossil fuels, and students calling for better education about it, the subject is unevenly taught in Canadian classrooms, with only about a third of teachers confident in tackling it.
It's against this backdrop that fossil fuel companies step in to influence what students learn — and not only in those provinces heavily tied to the industry, according to Keary
Resources offered for classrooms may reference that burning coal, oil and gas drives climate change or mention greenhouse gas emissions, she said, but downplay or distance the role of the fossil fuel industry.
Deeper discussion of renewable energy sources or transitioning away from fossil fuels is not present, Keary noted.
She also blasted fossil fuel companies sponsoring initiatives like school food gardens or tree-planting activities.
While students planting trees is wonderful, "it is a very concerning thing when the industry associates itself with tree-planting, puts its logo beside tree-planting and young people get the message that the fossil fuel industry is a supporter of tree-planting, a supporter of nature and a supporter of healthy ecosystems, when nothing could be further from the truth."
Conflict of interest, says researcher
The report coincides with research by Emily Eaton, a University of Regina's Geography and Environmental Studies professor who investigates the influence and impact of the fossil fuel industry on society and institutions. She was not involved with the report, but it points to some of her work.
Corporations have shifted from denial of human-caused climate change toward "climate delay," a strategy she describes as downplaying the scale and scope of the crisis and the degree of action needed to address it.
Given a climate emergency where the fossil fuel industry is responsible for more than three-quarters of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, "they have a conflict of interest in terms of presenting those ideas," Eaton said.
"We need actually to study what the oil and gas industry is doing, in our classrooms, but we need that to happen in a way that's independent."
In past research, Eaton found resources spotlighting industry were regularly accessed by Saskatchewan teachers in communities heavily connected to fossil fuel companies. Though curriculum expectations might require teaching about climate change, she said, some teachers felt social pressure to include industry perspectives as a balance.
While it's important for students to understand the science of climate change, there are other subject areas — discussions about politics and influence, for instance — that "we're not teaching our students about," she noted.
"How to analyze that [different] stakeholders have perspectives and interests, and how do we take those into account?"
Inside Education responds
CBC News reached out to companies named in the report — including Cenovus Energy, Suncor Energy, Imperial Oil, ConocoPhllips, MEG Energy, Enbridge Inc., TC Energy and Fortis BC — and they either declined or did not respond to requests for comment.
The report identified Inside Education, a long-running Albertan non-profit that creates environmental and natural resource material for schools, as a recipient of fossil fuel funding. It's executive director denies being influenced by sponsors.
Inside Education provides "engaging and fact-based learning experiences that equip students with the knowledge and critical thinking skills necessary to understand topics from multiple viewpoints," Kathryn Wagner said in a statement, which added that its sponsors also include all levels of government.
Programs are created by staff, "most of whom have degrees in education, science or both, with the advice and input of educators and content experts from a wide variety of backgrounds," she said. They "are in no way led, approved or dictated by any of our funders or board members."
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) declined to comment on the report itself, but a spokesperson touted federal funding for recent climate education efforts, including Cape Breton University research into the energy literacy of students and teachers and a Canadian Association of Science Centres and Science up First initiative to address climate change misinformation.
Keary applauds ECCC for its work on a national policy to improve environmental learning, but notes that groups it consulted with included environmental groups identified in the CAPE/FOK report as past or current recipients of funding from the fossil fuel industry, like Earth Rangers or Ducks Unlimited.
She and her colleagues want action at every level of government, and are calling on:
The federal government to not work with groups that receive fossil fuel funding when developing climate education policy and to better support provinces in boosting climate change education.
Provinces to ban fossil fuel promotion or partnerships in schools, dedicate funding to boosting high quality climate change education and to integrate it age-appropriately into all subjects across K-12.
Municipalities to work with school boards to engage students in local climate action.
School boards to establish a vetting process to keep fossil fuel-funded resources out of classes and to ban fossil fuel sponsorships.
"The very industry that is causing the climate pollution and the global warming that we're seeing, the climate disasters that are occurring... those companies should not then be the ones generating the materials about environmental science and climate science for our students," said Appel, the retired science teacher.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
11 minutes ago
- CTV News
Saskatchewan Premier Moe, federal minister to meet on China canola tariff
A 1957 Helio Courier is seen on a landing strip bordered by the pilot's canola crop near Cremona, Alta., Thursday, July 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh SASKATOON — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is set to meet today with federal Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald, along with industry groups, to discuss the steep Chinese tariff on Canadian canola seed. Kody Blois, the parliamentary secretary for Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister Daryl Harrison are also to attend the meeting in Saskatoon. A press conference is scheduled following the discussion. China imposed the tariff of nearly 76 per cent last week, causing the price of one of Canada's most valuable crops to fall and wiping out millions of dollars in its value. It comes one year after China launched an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola, a move in response to Canada's 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles. Farmers and Ottawa have rejected the dumping claim, saying exporters have followed rules-based trade. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2025.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Ontario pipeline corridor proposal faces pushback over lack of Indigenous consultation, environmental risks
Social Sharing Note: This is the second story in a three-part look at the East-West Energy Corridor project. You can read the initial story here. A group representing seven First Nations in northern Ontario says the province's push for a cross-country pipeline is moving ahead without their voices and is in conflict with federally funded conservation work already underway. If approved, the East-West Canadian Energy Corridor would carry oil and gas from Alberta to refineries in southern Ontario. But Lawrence Martin, lands and resources director for the Mushkegowuk Council, is frustrated that the province has not yet met with the council or the seven First Nation communities it represents, even though projects are being proposed on their territory along the James Bay coast. "It's as if we're invisible throughout this whole discussion, everything that's happening in the territory on the land or on the water. So it's quite amazing," Martin said. Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the corridor is a nation-building project meant to strengthen energy security and boost exports, in part to respond to U.S. economic threats such as tariffs. The province also wants to explore the idea of new port outlets on James Bay, Hudson Bay and the Great Lakes, according to a news release this month. It has tied the proposed project to its broader push for critical mineral development in the north, and its effort to position the province as a hub for energy and manufacturing. Ford has said the corridor would bring thousands of jobs and attract global investment. Ontario has promised to "develop an Indigenous engagement roadmap" while studying the pipeline proposal, but Martin dismissed that as "lip service." He said he only learned of the province's request for proposals, to study the feasibility of the energy corridor, when contacted by CBC. CBC also reached out to Ford's office and the office of George Pirie, minister of northern economic development and growth, for comment. "The recent request for proposals is an initial step in determining the feasibility of energy corridors and new trade infrastructure across the province," Sam McCormick, a spokesperson for Pirie, said in a statement. "Our government has begun productive conversations with First Nations communities who share the vision of unlocking economic opportunity and critical infrastructure in their communities. These meetings with First Nation communities will directly inform the development and next steps of these nation-building projects," it said. Conflict with conservation work Martin said Ontario's interest in a deep-sea port on James Bay clashes with research the council has conducted with Parks Canada. Those studies, aimed at establishing national marine conservation areas (NMCAs), indicate the coast is unsuitable for large shipping infrastructure due to shallow waters, tides and ice cover. In December 2022, the federal government announced it would commit $800 million to support four major Indigenous-led marine conservation projects across Canada. The proposed marine conservation area on the James Bay and Hudson Bay was one of them. It would cover a 91,000-square-kilometre area along the southwestern shorelines of James Bay and north along Hudson Bay. Martin said Mushkegowuk Council recently re-entered negotiations with Parks Canada. "The feasibility study is done and we have determined through that study that it is feasible to have an NMCA in James Bay and Hudson Bay. "Now we have to start negotiating with the federal government on what the operations would look like and how we would have the Indigenous-led conservation ideas merged into the existing policies of the federal government," said Martin, who thinks an agreement could be finalized in the next year. Ontario's corridor plan, Martin argued, undermines that federal work. "It's a contradicting situation for the federal government. They're funding the feasibility study to establish a national marine conservation area, and specifically some of the 'do not do these things' include dredging. Dredging is part of the rules of having an NMCA in place." He hopes the community's ideas will be incorporated in establishing any NMCA. "But however the outcome, it's probably going to be the same as what we're seeing here from a common-sense logistical perspective. James Bay is not that kind of body of water that would accommodate deep sea." James Bay is within tidal waters, with tides coming in roughly every five to six hours, moving the earth on the bottom of the sea. Martin said if there's any kind of dredging, it would have to be continuous. It would also have to address the ice that's on James Bay. "We were just out there about a month ago, and there's still lots of ice out on James Bay and certainly a lot of ice in Hudson Bay. So you're talking about ice breakers and so forth, so it's going to be a lot of disturbance. ... that part is scary," Martin said. "Meeting invitations were sent to First Nations communities in regions impacted by the potential for a new energy corridor — these meetings are underway," said McCormick, the spokesperson for Pirie. "Our government has also met with First Nations partners regarding the proposed national marine conservation areas." It's always a concern when we are digging into our natural resources and when that can actually have ecological impacts on other natural resources such as our Great Lakes. Heather Exner-Pirot, director of energy, natural resources and environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, also questioned the economic case for oil and gas exports from James Bay because of ice and the short shipping season. "Even on the more southernly edge of the bay, you have a longer season. Even then, it's only a couple of months, certainly not all year. What your problem is going to be is Hudson Strait and what is that season going to be over the tip of northern Quebec and underneath Nunavut for the rest of the year," said Exner-Pirot. "What this means is that you can't export every day, and it's very difficult to build a pipeline and LNG [liquefied natural gas] export terminal if you're only using it for four to five or six months a year. That's half your business, half your revenues, half your usage gone immediately. I don't even think with nine or 10 months you could be that viable or competitive." Where a northern port might make more sense, she said, is for critical minerals. Mining operations in Quebec, Labrador and Nunavut already stockpile ore during the winter and ship it out during the open-water season. Is energy security worth it? Ontario's feasibility study for an east-west corridor will also consider the viability of a new or expanded refinery along the pipeline route. The province said boosting refining capacity could create jobs and open up new export opportunities. Exner-Pirot said the only rationale for building a new refinery would be to reduce dependence on American facilities. "The case for the federal government getting involved as a nation-building project is about energy independence — how much do we think we need to spend to be energy independent from the United States, knowing that they're extremely energy dependent on us, and take up to 4 million barrels a day from us." As of 2024, Canada has 17 refineries with a total capacity of 1.93 million barrels per day, according to Canada Energy Regulator. The agency, under Natural Resources Canada, is responsible for licensing, supervising, regulating and enforcing applicable Canadian laws concerning interprovincial and international oil, gas and electric utilities. Alberta has the largest share of refining capacity at 30 per cent, followed by Ontario and Quebec holding 21 per cent, New Brunswick at 17 per cent, Saskatchewan at eight per cent and Newfoundland at one per cent. Alberta holds the largest portion of Canada's refining capacity at 30 per cent, followed by Ontario and Quebec each with 21 per cent. New Brunswick accounts for 17 per cent, Saskatchewan for eight per cent and Newfoundland for one per cent, according to the Canada Energy Regulator. In 2023, Canadian refineries operated at 89 per cent capacity on average and consumed 1.6 million barrels of crude oil per day. Canada was the primary foreign supplier of crude oil to the U.S., accounting for 60 per cent of total U.S. crude oil imports and 23 per cent of U.S. refinery crude oil intake. Scientists warn of Great Lakes risks Mike McKay, director of the Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research at the University of Windsor in southwestern Ontario, said the corridor aligns with government goals to boost trade and reduce dependence on the U.S. — but comes with risks. "It's always a concern when we are digging into our natural resources and when that can actually have ecological impacts on other natural resources such as our Great Lakes," McKay said. "I would say the Great Lakes are the most important natural resources in North America. [They provide] over 20 per cent of the world's surface freshwater drinking water for tens of millions of people, both sides of the Canada–U.S. border and many First Nations and tribal groups as well." McKay explained that if you took the eight states and the two provinces that make up the Great Lakes basin, the region would account for the third largest gross domestic product (GDP) in the world. "Part of that is because the lakes serve as drivers, whether it's industrialization, the agricultural activity surrounding the lakes, but they're important economic drivers in our region." Yet researchers still know little about how oil behaves in freshwater, according to McKay. The Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research and Algoma University in Sault Ste. Marie are studying the effects through a project, funded through Natural Resources Canada, that's led by Lake Superior State University in Sault Ste. Marie, Mich. It involves building mesocosms — a small, human-made ecosystem designed for scientific research that includes all the components of a natural ecosystem on a smaller scale — to simulate what may happen if oil is spilled in a wetland environment, for example. He said simulations were run last fall and this summer, with another one planned for this fall. "We need to be prepared in case there is an oil spill given that we already have pipelines that traverse the Great Lakes and plans for maybe even more within the basin." Call for meaningful dialogue Martin said the Mushkegowuk Council has repeatedly tried to sit down with the Ontario government to talk about the studies that have been done, to try to establish James Bay an NMCA through the federal government. "Despite the number of times we've been trying to set up meetings and establish a relationship with Ontario, it just hasn't happened," Martin said. "However, the federal government does have all of our studies that we have done and also with the universities that were involved in these particular studies. But will they come to us to seek that kind of information? I don't think so. But if they do, we're still willing to work with them to provide our two cents." Martin said he would like the province to contact Mushkegowuk Council, since it works with all First Nations along the coast of James Bay: Moose Cree First Nation, Fort Albany First Nation, Attawapiskat First Nation, Kashechewan First Nation, Chapleau Cree First Nation, Taykwa Tagamou Nation and Missanabie Cree First Nation. "We're working with all those communities on this conservation plan, and they are deeply involved with the studies and sharing the knowledge that they have. They also share how much they care for the way James Bay and Hudson Bay are being used now by the people and by the animals," he said.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Was Battle River-Crowfoot the last hurrah for the long ballot protest?
In attempting to give Monday's federal byelection in Alberta the longest ballot in Canadian history, a group of electoral reform advocates may have instead created the shortest one — and with further policy changes possibly on the horizon, the future of such protests is unclear. Elections Canada issued special write-in ballots — where voters simply fill in the name of their preferred candidate — after the group known as the Longest Ballot Committee organized over 200 candidates to run against Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre in Battle River-Crowfoot. Combined, the candidates affiliated with the group received just over 300 votes — 0.6 per cent of the ballots cast. More than 70 long-ballot candidates received no vote at all. Despite the name of his group, organizer Tomas Szuchewycz doesn't seem bothered that no long ballot was printed, or that his candidates earned only a fraction of the votes. "Overall it's been a really fantastic experience," he told CBC News. The Longest Ballot Committee has organized dozens of candidates to run in byelections over the past five years, forcing Elections Canada to adapt its rules to accommodate dozens of names on a single ballot. Prior to Battle River-Crowfoot, the largest number of candidates the group had gotten on a ballot was 91, resulting in a metre-long document that caused counting delays and irritated some voters. By using a write-in ballot, Szuchewycz said Canada's elections body found a "great solution" in the face of his group's efforts. "Elections Canada showed that the ballot hysteria is a non-issue. There are other ways to solve the problem of large ballots than to try to prevent people from exercising their Charter rights," he said. "[For us] it's about getting the message out that our election rules need to be passed to an independent, non-partisan body." The Longest Ballot Committee wants a citizens' assembly in charge of electoral reform, and says political parties are too reluctant to make government more representative of the electorate. Politicians looking to change election rules The group's efforts have certainly caught the attention of politicians who are willing to make changes to Canada's electoral system — but only to make it harder to organize long ballot protests. Poilievre — who has twice run in a riding where the long-ballot candidates have organized, including his victory in Battle River-Crowfoot on Monday — is pushing for the government to bring in legislation that would prevent Szuchewycz and his group from running dozens of candidates in any one riding. "We have to take action because this is a scam. It is unfair, it is unjust and it must stop," Poilievre said on the campaign trail earlier this summer. One of the suggestions Poilievre made is to change the rules around the number of signatures a candidate is required to gather to run — from the current 100 to 0.5 per cent of a riding's population. The Liberals say they are open to some changes. House leader Steve MacKinnon's office has said the government "shares the concerns about the longest ballot initiative" and is "examining the issue." Jayson Cowan, a Battle River-Crowfoot candidate affiliated with the Longest Ballot Committee, said making it harder for candidates to gather signatures could prevent people like him from getting on the ballot. Although the long ballot initiative has been framed as a protest, Cowan said that wasn't the case for him. He argues there aren't enough politicians who are Indigenous or from the disabled community. A member of the Métis Nation of Alberta, Cowan previously tried to run as an Independent, but he struggled to gather enough signatures, in part due to mobility issues. He credits the Longest Ballot Committee for helping get his name on the ballot for the first time. "I don't know that I would have had that experience any other way," he said. Both Cowan and Szuchewycz cautioned that raising the bar regarding the number of signatures might also force smaller parties out of the picture. Chief Electoral Officer Stéphane Perrault, the head of Elections Canada, offered his own suggestions on how to prevent long ballots in front of a House committee last fall. The long ballot group is able to put forward so many candidates by having electors sign multiple candidates' nomination forms. Perrault argued that rather than raising the number of signatures a candidate is required to gather, "certain penalties" should be imposed on individuals who sign — or encourage others to sign — multiple nomination papers. He didn't say what he thinks those penalties should be. Despite indications of rule changes on the horizon, Szuchewycz said the group is garnering more interest from people seeking to run. "We've been able to put out our message that politicians shouldn't be in charge of their own election rules because it's obviously a conflict of interest, and that message is really resonating with people," he said. Even though the committee has been able to recruit more candidates, it hasn't necessarily translated into success on the ballot. Last year in a Toronto byelection, long-ballot candidate Félix-Antoine Hamel achieved a first in Canadian electoral history by receiving zero votes in a contested riding. While Hamel's result was a novelty just a year ago, dozens more long-ballot candidates have laid a goose egg since — including 75 in Battle River-Crowfoot (although results there still need to be finalized). Brian Wishart, one of the long-ballot candidates who received no votes, said he isn't fixated on the result. "For me, it's about bringing attention to some of the flaws in our election system," he told CBC News. A resident of London, Ont., Wishart voted using a ranked ballot in the city's 2018 mayoral election, but was dismayed when the Ontario government later scrapped the initiative. "It was absolutely fantastic. It's the best I've ever felt about voting in my life," he said. Cowan, who doesn't live in Battle River-Crowfoot and was unable to vote for himself, received just one vote on Monday. "I want to believe that I got through to somebody … [for] somebody who's disabled, who can't get around [to] get through to people, I think that's fantastic," Cowan said, adding that he would run again if the opportunity presents itself. "I really do think that it's an experience that everybody should have…. I want regular people giving it a shot. That would be amazing." Szuchewycz said the Long Ballot Committee intends to keep going in some capacity, but how will depend on what rule changes are pushed through Parliament. "We'll have to see what exactly the legislation is that they pass. Maybe it becomes impossible to do this, maybe it's just slightly harder, or maybe it's even easier. Who knows?" he said. "We'll just have to wait and see."
