logo
Lean budget threatens to spark public college turf war

Lean budget threatens to spark public college turf war

Boston Globe13-06-2025
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
At this May's meeting, after a presentation about an upcoming advertising campaign for state financial aid programs, Pedraja expressed concern that helping low-income students attend four-year schools would take money away from free community college.
Advertisement
'We are very concerned that shouting from the treetops that our public four-year institutions are free for certain students based on income will further deplete very limited financial aid for the whole system,' Pedraja said.
Advertisement
Pedraja said that financial aid money is expected to be tight next year, and free community college is codified in statute, while the MASSGrant Plus expansion is not. 'Not to take away from the importance of marketing toward these students and making education available for all, which I do believe, we ought to be cautious about over-promising to students who are most in need of support,' Pedraja said.
In a follow-up interview, Pedraja doubled down on his concern that the state is 'over-promising' by advertising free four-year college for low-income students. He again emphasized the distinction between free community college, which is codified in law, and other financial aid, which comes from a pot of money that can run out.
Practically, however, this is a distinction without a difference — at least legally, if not politically.
Pedraja is correct that free community college is codified in the
Department of Higher Education spokesperson Nicole Giambusso confirmed that free community college and the MASSGrant Plus expansion are both subject to annual appropriations.
The House and Senate budget proposals for fiscal 2026 both include money for all these programs, although the Senate's funding level is somewhat higher. State Senator Jo Comerford, Senate chair of the Joint Committee on Higher Education, said lawmakers see these programs as coming from different pockets of money. 'One does not cannibalize each other,' Comerford told me.
Advertisement
When free community college was established, expanding aid for all low-income students was seen as key to ensuring that students who are qualified to attend a four-year university won't be channeled into community college just because it's free. After all, according to
There are potential funding sources — like money collected from the surtax on income over $1 million — that could be tapped to keep both programs running.
'I don't think it should be either/or,' Bridgewater State University President Frederick Clark told me. 'I don't think the segments should be working at cross purposes. We should be leaning in to make sure funding is adequate for financial aid for all students.'
It is true that in a tight budget year, lawmakers have to make choices. Policy makers should be honest in crafting their budget around what can realistically be funded.
In our interview, Pedraja said he 'would love for everybody to have more access to higher education.' But the troubling implication of his statement is that if there is a Sophie's choice to be made, Massachusetts should prioritize aid for community college students, regardless of income, over low-income students at four-year schools.
If the state wants to help the most students achieve their academic potential, that is the wrong approach. Instead, the guiding principle should be helping each student attend the college that's right for them.
Advertisement
As these financial aid programs continue, state policy makers should collect data to determine their impact. Which aid programs are boosting college enrollment and also college completion rates and postgraduation employment? Are other ways of improving college success working, like
If hard choices have to be made about funding, they should be based on which programs most help students succeed.
Shira Schoenberg can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Georgia GOP fears bruising primary in race to unseat Ossoff
Georgia GOP fears bruising primary in race to unseat Ossoff

The Hill

time42 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Georgia GOP fears bruising primary in race to unseat Ossoff

Republicans are bracing for what could be another brutal primary as they look to unseat Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) next year. Former football coach Derek Dooley and Reps. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.) and Mike Collins (R-Ga.) have all launched bids for the Republican nod to take on Ossoff. Not long after Dooley — who's seen as Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp's (R) preferred candidate — entered the race, the two congressmen quickly trained their fire on the political outsider. The early friction underscores the tall task ahead of Republicans: Avoiding a messy primary that leaves the nominee bruised and battered heading into the general election, while also dodging a major clash between Kemp and President Trump, who has yet to weigh in on his preferred candidate. 'As Republican strategists, we're always concerned that we're better at eating our own than winning in November,' said Heath Garrett, a friend of Dooley's since law school who is not involved in the campaign, 'and so, we also have to balance that with the reality that voters want a choice.' 'But can we mitigate the collateral damage so that we can all still win in November?' Garrett added. Dooley, whose father is former UGA football coach and Georgia icon Vince Dooley, became the latest entry in the Republican contest to take on Ossoff when he launched his campaign for Senate earlier this month. The younger Dooley has leaned hard into his own football background, best known for his time coaching at University of Tennessee, while touting himself as a political outsider. More importantly, he's seen as Kemp's preferred pick in the race after the governor declined an opportunity to run himself despite much courting from his party. A source close to the campaign told The Hill that Dooley has visited at least 16 counties since his launch, saying there was a 'really, really positive response to him entering the race.' Carter so far has a financial edge in the race with more cash on hand than Collins, who's been in the race for several weeks. Carter has loaned himself $2 million so far, though observers are watching to see how much money he ultimately pours into his bid. Carter's campaign has sought to align itself to the president, with a campaign spokesperson asserting that the congressman 'has stood with Trump from Day One.' 'Georgians know the difference between a fighter who stands with Trump versus a product of the same establishment machine that tried to stop him,' the spokesperson said. 'Collins, who has also sought to align himself to Trump, has started to establish himself as a serious candidate several weeks after launching his bid, including organizing a 159-county operation across the state and racking up endorsements from even some of Kemp's allies.' By comparison, the Georgia GOP is formally organized in only 142 counties. 'To get organized in all 159 counties in two weeks is relatively unheard of in Georgia,' said one Georgia Republican strategist, who requested anonymity to speak candidly. 'I think there's probably some prevailing thought in D.C., like, 'Oh, it's a congressman, like, how much widespread support can he really have, right, across the state?'' the strategist said. 'But Mike has clearly built an infrastructure very quickly.' The next marker observers will be watching for is third quarter fundraising reports, which will highlight how serious all three candidates are. All three men are also vying for the coveted Trump endorsement. A source close to Carter told said the Savannah-area congressman met with the White House about the race; a source close to the Collins campaign said Collins has talked to Trump about his Senate bid. Dooley has also visited the White House. Just hours into Dooley's entry, the tenor of the race quickly turned negative, with Carter and Collins attacking the former football coach. 'I will tell you this, and we're all proud of our dads, and I'm sure both my opponents are proud of their dads as well. But at the same time, we better take this serious,' Carter said while speaking to Henry County Republicans earlier this month, a thinly veiled shot at Dooley. 'You got to have somebody who can go toe to toe with this kid, and I'm that person who can go toe to toe with him,' he added, referring to Ossoff. Meanwhile, Collins's campaign has taken to mocking Dooley, such as when the former football coach posted that 'In coaching, we have a saying, 'Your film is your resume.'' ''Your film is your resume.' So true, Coach!' replied Collins's campaign, posting a clip of Louisiana State University defeating University of Tennessee, where Dooley formerly coached, 16-14 in a 2010 SEC game. In his first interview since launching his Senate bid, conservative radio show host and former Kemp aide Martha Zoller noted Dooley had only been in the race for about a week. 'It doesn't feel that way,' Dooley chimed in, 'because there's never – there's never been a candidate who's not a candidate, and never been in politics, get attacked more in a three-week span.' Georgia Republicans are no strangers to messy primaries, including 2020 when then-Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) challenged then-Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) for the Republican Senate nomination. The two traded barbs and negative attack ads, with Loeffler ultimately beating Collins by six points. But she was later defeated in the runoff against then-Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock. 'There are a lot of concerns, particularly after going through 2020, 2021, in the Senate race there and the runoff and the Kelly Loeffler situation — there are a lot of concerns by a lot of Republicans about that,' said conservative radio show host Erick Erickson, referring to concerns about a messy primary. 'But also it's notable Collins and Carter firing so hard at Dooley right now, who's got low-name ID, because I do think they realize he can be a competitive threat,' he added. Republicans are equally — if not more — eager to avoid a clash between Kemp and the president, who have a historically complicated relationship ever since the Georgia governor flouted Trump's ask to overturn the 2020 election results in his state. Several reports last month indicated Trump's and Kemp's orbits were at odds yet again, particularly over Kemp's reported push for Dooley. A GOP operative confirmed to The Hill that there had been a sense of 'annoyance' between Trump's and Kemp's camps over how to handle the race, but there have been efforts to smooth things over. 'Both sides recognize it's best if they're on the same side in the end,' the operative said. 'I think it's still TBD where that ends up.' A GOP source familiar also told The Hill 'there have been successful efforts to lower' the temperature. Still, there's a split between some members of the party over who should take the lead on the search to find the best consensus candidate. 'Kemp knows how to win statewide. Last time they picked a candidate, Herschel Walker didn't do so well,' one Senate GOP member said, referring to the dynamic with the White House and noting that members still remember the debacle that led to wins by Ossoff and Warnock in January 2021. 'His instincts are not necessarily the best. Kemp's are, and they need to get over the chemistry issue.' Meanwhile, others are eager to see the White House gets involved. 'I think most people here are still holding out hope that the White House steps in before the end of the year. Now is that wishful thinking? Maybe,' the Georgia Republican strategist said, who wasn't concerned yet about a messy primary. But 'every day that goes by is another day that Ossoff is untouched, is raising more money and … is padding his cash advantage over our nominee.'

Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal
Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Nvidia and AMD Stocks Face Fresh Risk as Democrats Oppose Trump's China Chip Deal

Top Senate Democrats are urging President Trump to rethink his plan that allows artificial intelligence chip sales to China. In an open letter, they warned that the deal could contradict U.S. national security goals. The policy gives chip makers Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) the right to sell advanced AI chips to China if they share 15% of sales revenue with the U.S. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The Senators said that any move which gives China more access to high-grade chips could strengthen its AI sector. They pointed out that such an outcome could hurt U.S. defense and tech goals. Therefore, they urged Trump to pause and weigh the risks before moving forward. The letter reflects rising concern in Washington about the role of AI chips in both global trade and military use. What It Could Mean for the Companies and Investors For investors, the core issue is whether this letter leads to a policy shift. If Trump does not change course, the deal stands, and both Nvidia and AMD keep access to China, the largest global chip market. However, if Trump rethinks the move and imposes new curbs, the financial hit could be sharp. Nvidia earns most of its revenue from selling chips designed for data centers, particularly those used in AI. China has been a major market for these products, accounting for nearly a quarter of Nvidia's revenue even after earlier trade restrictions. If new rules cut off those sales, the company could lose billions in annual revenue. Such a setback could weigh heavily on Nvidia's growth outlook and its share price. As for AMD, it has a smaller share of the AI chip space, but its plans depend on growth in this market. If it loses China sales, the company may fall short of its targets for data center gains. In turn, this could slow its race with Nvidia and limit returns for investors who are betting on strong AI growth. As a result, the open letter marks a sign of ongoing tension that could hit chip makers in real ways. While the outcome of the policy fight is not set, the risk for both Nvidia and AMD is that a large source of demand may shrink at a time when growth in AI is key to their value story. By using TipRanks' Comparison Tool, we've compared Nvidia and AMD to gain a broader look at both companies' financials and overall sentiment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store