Muda to discuss Syed Saddiq's presidency after acquittal
PUTRAJAYA : Muda will discuss Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman's position in the party after the Muar MP was acquitted of corruption and money laundering charges this morning.
The party's acting president Amira Aisya Abdul Aziz said the party would hold a meeting later today.
'We will deliberate on the matter tonight,' she told reporters outside the Court of Appeal here.
Yesterday, Amira told FMT that Syed Saddiq's future in Muda would depend on the outcome of his appeal against his conviction.
She said while Syed Saddiq had not held the party's presidency since 2023, he remains a key figure in Muda due to his role as its founder and sole representative in Parliament.
Syed Saddiq was convicted by the Kuala Lumpur High Court of abetting in criminal breach of trust (CBT), misappropriation of assets, and money laundering in November 2023.
The former youth and sports minister was sentenced to seven years' jail, fined RM10 million, and ordered to be given two strokes of the rotan. The sentence was stayed pending his appeal.
He later announced that he would temporarily step down as Muda president, adding that he would not be involved in the party's decision-making processes.
Earlier this morning, the Court of Appeal ruled that Syed Saddiq should have been acquitted without his defence being called during the trial.
Justice Noorin Badaruddin said the prosecution had failed to prove the ingredients of the predicate charges of abetting in CBT and dishonest misappropriation.
Amira said she was happy with the court's decision, and that it proved Syed Saddiq's honesty.
Syed Saddiq meanwhile said that any decision on whether he reclaims the Muda presidency would be 'made together'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
29 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Deputy minister: Boeing aircraft deal won't push up national debt
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 19 — The second phase purchase of Boeing aircraft valued at US$9.5 billion (US$1 = RM4.22) will not impact Malaysia's debt levels nor affect its fiscal deficit, said Deputy Finance Minister Lim Hui Ying. Lim said that the aircraft purchase is part of the plan outlined in the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). 'At present, everything is within our expectations,' Lim said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat today. She was responding to a supplementary question from Datuk Nik Muhammad Zawawi Salleh (PN-Pasir Puteh), who asked about the government's contingency measures to control the national debt burden after Malaysia committed to buying aircraft from the United States (US. In response to Nik Muhammad's initial question about the government's justification for allowing the national debt to remain high amid geopolitical uncertainties, Lim stated that the increase in government debt is due to the need to finance the fiscal deficit to cover development expenditures (DE). 'This financing will directly increase the government's debt level as long as the government's financial position remains in deficit,' she elaborated. Lim also clarified that the government does not rely solely on debt to finance DE, which is also funded by various other sources such as tax revenue and non-tax income. 'To date, the government has never borrowed beyond the statutory limits allowed under the relevant federal government debt laws. As of the end of June 2025, Malaysia Government Securities, Government Investment Issues, and Malaysian Islamic Treasury Bills stand at 62.7 per cent, which does not exceed the 65 per cent Gross Domestic Product (GDP) limit set under Act 637 and Act 275,' she said. Lim added that offshore borrowings amounted to RM22.8 billion and remained below the RM35 billion limit set under Act 403, while Malaysian Treasury Bills totalling RM2 billion are within the RM10 billion limit set under Act 188. — Bernama
Malay Mail
29 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysia still criminalises ‘grossly offensive' online remarks, but here's why today's ruling on ‘offensive' speech was lauded
The Court of Appeal's decision today only makes it no longer a crime in Malaysia to make 'offensive' online remarks, but it does not affect a newer version of the law, which was updated this year to criminalise 'grossly offensive' online remarks. But the Court of Appeal's decision today was still seen as 'progressive' as it that criminalising 'offensive' online remarks goes against the constitutional right to freedom of speech. Instead of trying to 'shoot the messenger', the Court of Appeal said the authorities should have investigated activist Heidy Quah's allegations in a Facebook post to see whether they were true or not. PUTRAJAYA, Aug 19 — The Court of Appeal's decision today which ruled that offensive online remarks made with intention to annoy another person is no longer a crime in Malaysia has been praised for being progressive and good for democracy. After activist Heidy Quah won her constitutional challenge against the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 233, her lawyer New Sin Yew said the decision vindicates his client and civil society who argued that both words are problematic and inconsistent with the right to freedom of speech. 'So it's a good decision and I think it's an early Merdeka celebration for many of us,' he told reporters, also saying it was a 'progressive' decision. Noting that the Malaysian government had recently amended Section 233 to replace the word 'offensive' with the word 'grossly offensive', New said this means the government also recognises the problems with the word 'offensive'. ''Offensive' is a much lower standard compared to 'grossly offensive', but that's not to say that 'grossly offensive' is not in itself problematic, it still is,' he said. New said the older version of Section 233 — which criminalises 'offensive' online remarks —- had been abused and was used against political dissidents, activists, civil society and human rights defenders, and that today's court decision only affects this older version. As for the new version of Section 233 — which criminalises 'grossly offensive' online remarks, New said civil society is expected to closely watch and observe how the government uses it. The Malaysian government had in December 2024 started the process in Parliament to amend Section 233, and this new version became law and took effect on February 11, 2025. The new version of Section 233 replaced the word 'offensive' with 'grossly offensive', but did not modify the word 'annoy'. Section 233 now also has higher penalties for making such online remarks, including increasing the original penalty (maximum RM50,000 fine or maximum one-year jail term or both) to a heavier punishment (maximum RM500,000 fine or maximum two-year jail term or both). Commenting on today's decision, Quah told reporters that the decision would mean a lot for democracy in Malaysia. 'For the longest time, we realise that the civil society space has been working in a place of fear, where they may get arrested or charged for speaking truth to power,' she said. 'I think it's really important that Malaysians are given the place to speak out against injustice, because as what the court has said, when we raise a concern — for example about issues of conditions of detention centres — you know it's really important then that we investigate the allegation and not the whistleblower,' she said, stressing the importance of freedom of speech for Malaysia to progress. Quah was previously charged in July 2021 under Section 233 for making a Facebook post that was alleged to be offensive with the intent to annoy, with her remarks in June 2020 revolving around matters such as alleged conditions in immigration detention centres amid the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2022, Quah was given a 'discharge not amounting to acquittal' (DNAA), which meant she was released from the charge but could be charged under the same law again. Today, the Court of Appeal noted that Quah's Facebook post should have prompted an investigation into her allegation, instead of being turned into a 'shoot the messenger' situation. 'The message communicated by the appellant would ordinarily sound the alarm for a full and thorough investigation into what is alleged, rather than an attempt to 'shoot the messenger',' judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng said when reading out the broad grounds of the court's unanimous ruling. The judge said a message cannot be offensive with intent to annoy if it was found to be true, and that there are already other existing laws to charge Quah if her message was found to be false. The judge later said treating the truth as offensive and annoying would risk 'rewarding opacity and cover-up rather than promoting transparency and accountability'. Ultimately, the Court of Appeal's decision to invalidate the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 is based on these four main legal reasons:
Malay Mail
29 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Johor police record statements from seven people in probe into alleged bullying of cancer-stricken 10-year-old boy
JOHOR BAHRU, Aug 19 — Police said today they have taken statements from seven individuals as part of investigations into the alleged bullying case involving a 10-year-old boy who is suffering from cancer. Johor police chief CP Ab Rahaman Arsad said the individuals included the medical officer who treated the victim, a school student, a family member and other witnesses. 'There is a possibility that we will call other witnesses to complete the investigation depending on the results of the victim's medical report,' he said after visiting the boy Izzul Islam Azuan Isaidi at the KPJ Puteri Hospital here. 'At present, the victim is still being monitored and the hospital cannot issue a report until he has fully completed his treatment. 'Police will wait for the victim's full medical report before investigating the allegation that he suffered a concussion after being allegedly bullied and beaten by his schoolmates,' he added. MORE TO COME
