Wrongly jailed man hits out at ‘insulting' compensation increase
The Ministry of Justice has announced that the compensation cap will rise by 30% for those who were convicted of a crime they did not commit.
Those wrongfully imprisoned for more than 10 years will receive £1.3 million instead of £1 million, while those with sentences of less than 10 years will receive £650,000 rather than £500,000.
It is the first increase to the payment since the scheme's introduction in 2008.
But Andrew Malkinson, who has been campaigning with the law charity Appeal to get the compensation scheme overhauled, described the change as 'insulting'.
He was wrongly convicted and jailed in 2004 for the rape of a 33-year-old woman in Salford, Greater Manchester, spending 17 years in prison.
Mr Malkinson – who was released in 2020 after DNA evidence proved he was not the attacker – said: 'This change is an improvement but a below-inflation increase is insulting.
'The state stole years of my life and robbed me of my physical and mental health, yet it still wants to arbitrarily limit the compensation I receive to try to put myself back together.
'I'll keep fighting to abolish this cruel and arbitrary cap, along with the brutal rules currently denying compensation to the vast majority of wrongfully convicted people.'
The compensation scheme is intended to help individuals restart and rebuild their lives.
It is one route through which an individual can receive compensation for a wrongful conviction, with other options including suing public bodies.
Those claiming after miscarriages of justice within the armed forces will also see the same rise in the cap.
Toby Wilton, solicitor at Hickman & Rose who represent Mr Malkinson in his claims for compensation, said: 'While this proposal is welcome, it does not go nearly far enough. The current maximum cap on compensation of £1 million was introduced in 2008.
'Before that, compensation was not capped at all and applicants received compensation broadly in line with what they would receive in a court of law.
'The government should return to this system, removing the arbitrary cap which unfairly penalises those who, like Andrew Malkinson, have suffered the longest lasting and most serious miscarriages of justice.
'A 30% increase in the cap, whilst welcome, does not come close to addressing this unfairness.
'Increased by RPI inflation, the measure the courts use to uprate compensation amounts, £1 million in 2008 would be closer to £2 million today. Increased by CPI, it would be £1.65 million, more than double this proposed increase.
'The Government and Parliament should think again.'
Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood believes the additional support will help victims of miscarriages of justice.
She said: 'Fairness is the ideal that underpins our justice system. Where it has failed to meet that ideal, victims of devastating miscarriages of justice must be able to rebuild their lives.
'This uplift will ensure victims are compensated for the crimes they did not commit and the years they cannot get back.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Children locked under stairs hear horrifying screams - then see grim clue in basement
* WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT * Fred and Rose West's children were often strapped to their beds in their home. But, claims one child, little was worse than the sight of fresh concrete It's an address that chills the blood of even the most hardened police officer: 25 Cromwell Street, Gloucester. This November will mark 30 years since the monster that is Rose West was found guilty on 10 counts of murder. She became only the second woman - after Moors murder Myra Hindley - to be handed a Whole Life Order, meaning she will never be freed. Her husband Fred West took the other way out. He hanged himself in his cell on January 1, 1995 and never faced justice. Between them the pair of them killed nine young women between 1973 and 1987 at Cromwell Street - including their own 16-year-old daughter Heather. They buried them in the garden and cellar of their small six-room, three storey terraced home. Rose was also convicted of murdering eight-year-old Charmaine - Fred's stepdaughter from his first marriage to Rena Costello, who was found at their previous address. Meanwhile West admitted to killing Rena, 26, and his heavily-pregnant mistress Anne McFall, 18, in the late 1960s. All the bodies were mutilated, missing body parts, and most were unclothed, suggesting there may have been a sexual assault. It's believed one of the women found buried. in the cellar, could have been held hostage for up to six days before she was killed. But the gruesome lovers Fred and Rose were not living alone in their so-called House of Horrors. They had children: Some were Fred's, some just Rose's (a byproduct of her prostitution work), and some belonged to them both. All were terrified. 'My dad was a solid monster,' said one of the youngest siblings, Barry. 'But she [Rose] was a complete psycho. That's what people don't know: My mum was, child abuse-wise, the main person. My mum was completely sick in the head. She beat me way more than my dad did, and enjoyed it, absolutely enjoyed it.' Barry was speaking in an interview given two years before his death by misadventure, aged 40, in 2020. He was 13 when Fred and Rose were finally caught and he was placed into care, but struggled with what he had endured and suffered from mental health issues and drug use during his adult life. His interview was only published for the first time today, as part of the Mirror's exclusive serialisation of the a new book The Fred West Tapes: Secrets of the Fred & Rose West Murder Investigation. Now an author and TV producer, Howard Sounes helped break the West story while a Mirror reporter in 1994. He's since become a the leading expert on the case and recently gained access to more than 100 hours of Fred West's unheard police interviews. The details of the West's crimes are horrific. It's thought Fred and Rose picked up vulnerable young women from bus stops around Gloucester, or preyed on the female lodgers that came to rent one of their cut-price rooms. The pair were believed to have made the women fulfil their sexual needs before ultimately becoming their next kill. It was understood West took the bodies and dismembered them in the tub of the family bathroom - using a kitchen knife so as not to scratch the bath enamel. Lynda Gough, 19, was the first Cromwell Street victim. She was the eldest daughter of a senior fire brigade officer and had learning difficulties. It was understood she had left home just before her 20th birthday, presumably trying to embrace her independence by getting her own lodgings. Instead, it's believed West and Rose lured her into their depraved activities - and when it went too ended up buried under what would later become a new extension for a new bathroom. Seven more victims soon followed - all vulnerable young women. Two were buried in the garden - where they would later add the remains of their own daughter Heather - and five were in the cellar. Shockingly, the cellar was also where the youngest West children were made to sleep. In his new book Howard explains: "When the West children were young they were made to sleep in the cellar, often locked in there at night, sometimes strapped to their beds. "Rose was her children's gaoler, wearing the keys to the cellar around her neck." However, while the children are open about the abuse they faced at the hands of their parents and their friends, most of them maintained they had no idea what was going on with the murders. But not all of them. One later spoke to Howard to make a claim that was truly disturbing. "Years later, however, one child (whom I won't identify) claimed that there were days when they were locked in a cupboard under the stairs while they heard shouting and screaming," he explains. "When they came out they saw fresh concrete had been poured in the cellar." It fits the reality, but it is impossible to know if the child saw what they thought they saw or was mistaken. However it was true that each of the five girls in. the cellar had been dismembered, placed in wells in the floor and then concreted over. Childhood at Cromwell Street was simply joyless. Rose sent her girls to school with short hair, like boys, wearing boys' shoes because they lasted longer. She made her daughters clean their hair with washing-up liquid rather than shampoo and she didn't allow the purchase of deodorant, which the girls were teased about. The West boys went to school in their sisters' hand-me-downs, allowing their hair to grow long like girls. Many developed squints and speech defects, which can be indications of child abuse. Barry even contemplated killing his father to end their misery. "I tried stabbing him when I was eleven with a screwdriver. He just laughed at me," he claimed. 'Why didn't we all run away? I suppose that's the hold he had, the power. My dad was like God. You couldn't beat him. You couldn't run away. He would find you.' The children knew there was an unspoken Code of Silence. Their sister Heather had been vocal about wanting to leave home as soon as she was 16. One day she disappeared. The children were told she'd moved away and cut contact, but it became a family 'joke': if you crossed Fred and Rose, you'd end up like Heather - under the patio, three paving stones up and nine across. Barry told Howard: 'That was what was going to happen to all of us when we got old enough. If we didn't turn out like him, we was against him. And if we was against him, we would have to go in the garden – under the patio. He made us understand that.' The family 'joke' finally reached the ears of the police. In 1994, when concerns began to grow about the whereabouts of Heather who had not been seen for seven years, the police moved in. And it turned out the Heather being under the patio was every bit as real as they feared.
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kamala Harris' former advisor left flustered after being asked simple question about economy
A former senior adviser to Kamala Harris was left visibly flustered during a live television segment after he failed to accurately answer a basic question about the current U.S. inflation rate. During a Friday appearance on Fox News ' America Reports, anchor Sandra Smith pressed Mike Nellis, once a Senior Advisor to former Vice President Harris, on the latest economic data, asking, 'Do you know what the inflation rate is?' 'Yeah, it's like about three or four percent,' Nellis responded. But Smith quickly fired back, correcting him. 'No. It's below three. And it's been a long time since it's gotten there. I mean, you're looking at 2.5 percent inflation now.' According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 2.7 percent year-over-year in June. While slightly above Smith's figure, the inflation rate has remained below 3 percent for several consecutive months, reflecting a significant cooldown from its 9.1 percent peak in June 2022 - the highest in four decades, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Despite the data, Nellis insisted that inflation continues to rise. 'Inflation is still going up,' he said. 'And it's rising, according to the latest stats.' 'That's not the case,' Smith countered. 'Inflation has come down. Inflation by nature is growth in prices, but the growth has slowed.' Earlier in the segment, Nellis blamed Republicans and President Donald Trump for ongoing economic concerns. 'Right now the president of the United States is Donald Trump. Republicans are in control of Congress,' Nellis said. 'They're currently in recess rather than doing anything about inflation.' He went on to claim that beef and alcohol prices hit record highs over the July 4 weekend and criticized Trump's promises to reduce prices immediately after taking office. 'Donald Trump promised to make grocery prices go down on day one,' Nellis said. 'We're six months in and everything's more expensive.' Smith pushed back, noting that 'prices have definitely come down,' but that 'they can go down more.' Meanwhile, some economic indicators suggest relief for American consumers, according to AAA, average gas prices hit a four-year low in June. The tense exchange came just days after the Democratic Party had its own messaging blunder when its official X account posted a graphic blaming inflation from 2021 to 2024 on 'Trump's America' - even though Joe Biden and Harris were in charge the whole time. The post later deleted. The White House later shared the same graphic again, this time fixing the mistake and crediting the Biden administration. That slip-up highlights the tough spot Democrats are in as they face growing criticism over the party's handling of the economy. A new Wall Street Journal poll this week showed that 63 percent of voters view the Democratic Party unfavorably - the worst rating they've seen in 35 years. Just 33 percent said they view the party favorably, and only 8 percent said they had a 'very favorable' view, according to the poll. In contrast, Republicans, while also viewed more unfavorably than favorably, had stronger numbers - sitting at just 19 percent. President Trump's job approval stands at 46 percent, higher than the 40 percent approval rating he received at the same point in his first term, according to the WSJ. When asked which party they trusted more on major issues such as inflation, tariffs, and immigration, voters consistently favored Republicans. 'The Democratic brand is so bad that they don't have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,' Democratic pollster John Anzalone, who conducted the WSJ poll with Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio, said. 'Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they're for and what their economic message is, they're going to have problems.' Republicans currently hold a financial edge as well, with campaign filings showing the Republican National Committee has over $80 million on hand, compared to $15 million held by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the WSJ reported.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Four more traders appeal rate-rigging convictions after Supreme Court ruling
Four traders are appealing to have their rate-rigging convictions overturned after the Supreme Court quashed two rate-rigging cases on Merchant, Jonathan Mathew, Philippe Moryoussef, and Christian Bittar are seeking acquittal following the victory of traders Tom Hayes and Carlo of the traders were convicted of manipulating the interest rates used for loans between banks, know as Libor in the UK, an issue at the heart of the 2008 financial crisis."Following the Supreme Court's landmark decision yesterday to quash the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, all four of our clients now intend to appeal against their convictions," said law firm Hickman & Rose. "In those circumstances, they don't intend to comment further at this time," the firm four convictions came after an investigation from the Serious Fraud Office into whether traders had been manipulating Libor for became the focus of allegations of wrongdoing following the financial crisis in 2008 and has now been discontinued, while its European equivalent Euribor is being the Supreme Court has now ruled in favour of Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo, the four traders' appeal is likely to be a more straightforward process than for Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo who argued their case for Serious Fraud Office declined to comment on the appeal from the four traders on it said on Wednesday in response to the ruling on Mr Hayes and Mr Palombo's case that it had "considered this judgement and the full circumstances carefully and determined it would not be in the public interest for us to seek a retrial".The Libor scandal came to light in 2012, when it was discovered that banks were artificially inflating rates to profit from trading and were also lowering them to mask the troubles they faced following the outbreak of the global financial in 2023, the BBC uncovered evidence of a much larger, state-led "rigging" of interest rates, under pressure from central banks and governments across the world during the financial Hayes and Mr Palombo argued they were wrongly prosecuted for what were normal commercial practices in order to appease public anger towards the banks over the financial crisis.
