Op Sindoor Outreach: Supriya Sule-led delegation concludes Qatar visit, heads to South Africa
A multi-party Indian parliamentary delegation led by Lok Sabha MP Supriya Sule concluded its visit to Qatar, marking the completion of the first leg of a four-nation outreach tour aimed at projecting India's united stand against terrorism.
According to a press release issued by the Embassy of India in Doha, 'Qatar was the first leg of the four-nation visit of the delegation planned following the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack, Operation Sindoor, and the subsequent developments.'
During the two-day visit, the Indian delegation held high-level meetings with key Qatari dignitaries including Mohamed bin Abdulaziz bin Saleh Al Khulaifi, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs; Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Faisal bin Mohammed Al Thani, Minister of State for Interior Affairs; and Hamda bint Hassan Al Sulaiti, Deputy Speaker of the Shura Council.
The delegation also participated in a roundtable discussion with scholars and policy experts at the Middle East Council for Global Affairs and met editorial teams from leading newspapers such as Al Sharq and Peninsula.
A special community reception was held on May 26, where Indian expatriates expressed solidarity with India's anti-terrorism efforts.
The Indian side emphasised New Delhi's 'zero-tolerance policy towards cross-border terrorism' and explained that 'Operation Sindoor was calibrated, targeted and proportionate, demonstrating India's commitment to countering terrorism without escalating tensions.'
The delegation also called for an end to distinctions between terrorists and their backers and highlighted the urgency of dismantling cross-border terror infrastructure.
The Qatari leadership reiterated its own zero-tolerance approach to terrorism and condemned the Pahalgam attack. The Indian delegation thanked Qatar for its swift condemnation and diplomatic support.
The press release noted that 'Qatar MOFA had issued a statement on April 23 expressing strong condemnation of the attack in Pahalgam,' and mentioned that bilateral conversations were held between Qatar's Amir HH Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al-Thani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi on May 6, followed by discussions between the Qatari and Indian foreign ministers on May 7.
The delegation praised the Indian community in Qatar for upholding values of 'tolerance, pluralism, and unity' and resisting divisive narratives.
Members of the delegation include Supriya Sule (MP), Rajiv Pratap Rudy (MP), Manish Tewari (MP), Anurag Thakur (MP), Vikramjit Singh Sahney (MP), Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu (MP), former ministers Anand Sharma and V. Muraleedharan, and Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin.
The delegation is now headed to South Africa for the second leg of its diplomatic mission.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No tolerance for terror, allies must understand, says India
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and external affairs minister S Jaishankar reiterated India's 'zero tolerance' policy for terrorism and the need for decisive international action against terror and those who support it during meetings with British foreign secretary David Lammy on Saturday. Modi said India valued Britain's backing for the fight against cross-border terrorism while Jaishankar said India's partners should understand the 'zero tolerance' policy for terrorism as the country will never accept the perpetrators of terrorism being treated at par with victims. The remarks by the top Indian leadership, made against the backdrop of several countries hyphenating India and Pakistan during last month's military clashes, reiterated to the world community New Delhi's new approach to fighting cross-border terrorism backed by Islamabad. Britain's foreign office had said before Lammy's meeting with Indian interlocutors that he would address how the current peace between India and Pakistan can be supported for regional stability. ALSO READ | UK expresses support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism Modi said in a social media post after meeting Lammy that he values 'UK's support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism'. He also appreciated Lammy's 'substantive contribution to the remarkable progress in our Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, further strengthened by the recently concluded FTA'. A statement from the external affairs ministry said Modi had 'underscored the need for a decisive international action against terrorism and those who support it' - an apparent reference to Pakistan. The two leaders discussed regional and global issues and Lammy 'strongly condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed support for India's fight against cross-border terrorism', the statement said. Modi also expressed satisfaction at the conclusion of the free trade agreement (FTA) and the double contribution convention and expressed satisfaction at the deepening of the bilateral comprehensive strategic partnership. He welcomed continued collaboration under the Technology Security Initiative (TSI), especially its potential to 'shape trusted and secure innovation ecosystems'. Modi also reiterated his invitation to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to visit India. ALSO READ | Terrorism no proxy war, but planned one: Modi Lammy arrived in New Delhi on Saturday morning for meetings to review the bilateral partnership, especially trade and strategic ties, a month after India and the UK finalised the FTA. Lammy had visited Pakistan shortly after New Delhi and Islamabad reached an understanding on halting military actions on May 10. In his opening remarks at the meeting with Lammy, Jaishankar thanked the UK government for the strong condemnation of the 'barbaric terrorist attack' in Pahalgam and its support to India in the fight against terror. 'We practice a policy of zero tolerance against terrorism and expect our partners to understand it, and we will never countenance perpetrators of evil being put at par with its victims,' he said. Lammy responded by referring to the 'horrific terrorist attack' and said Prime Minister Starmer had asked him to convey the 'deep condolences of the UK and a hand of friendship with India and support as we deal with the terrorism threat in a comprehensive manner'. Jaishankar described the finalisation of the FTA and double contribution convention as a milestone that will boost two-way trade and investment and have a 'positive effect on other strategic aspects' of bilateral relations, besides strengthening supply and value chains. ALSO READ | 'New normal': Shashi Tharoor on India's approach towards terrorism with Operation Sindoor He also referred to other significant initiatives that have seen progress, such as the TSI for deeper collaboration in strategic sectors such as AI, semiconductors, telecom, quantum computing, health technology, critical minerals and advanced materials. The TSI, coordinated by the national security advisers of India and the UK, was launched during Lammy's last visit to New Delhi in July 2024. 'We have also launched the Strategic Exports and Technology Cooperation Dialogue, the first meeting of which was held…this week. This will enhance, among others, the TSI's effectiveness in promoting trade in critical and emerging technologies, including the resolution of relevant licencing or regulatory issues,' Jaishankar said. The India-UK infrastructure financial bridge can unlock quality long-term capital flows from Britain to India and contribute to infrastructure development, and there is also good collaboration in the education sector with many UK universities planning to establish campuses in India, he said. Lammy described the finalisation of the FTA as Britain winning a 'trophy' and the beginning of a new era in bilateral ties since it is expected to increase will trade by £25.5 billion. He also conveyed the UK's interest in enhancing cooperation in key sectors such as trade, investment, defence and security, technology, innovation and clean energy. Lammy also met commerce minister Piyush Goyal and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval. A readout from Britain's foreign office said bolstering economic and migration ties and delivering growth opportunities for British businesses topped the agenda for Lammy's visit. Lammy also focused on the migration partnership, including 'work on safeguarding citizens and securing borders in both countries'. The readout added, 'Addressing migration remains a top priority for the government - the Foreign Secretary is focused on working internationally with global partners to secure the UK's borders at home.' Lammy's visit would also prepare the grounds for a visit by Starmer to India for the formal signing of the FTA. Both countries are currently involved in the legal scrubbing of the FTA, a process expected to be completed in three months. During 2023-24, India was the UK's second largest source of investments in terms of number of projects for the fifth consecutive year. India was the UK's 11th largest trading partner in 2024, accounting for 2.4% of total British trade, and two-way trade in goods and services was worth nearly $57 billion in 2024. The FTA is expected to increase bilateral trade by $34 billion a year from 2040. Within a decade of the deal being implemented, 85% of British products will become tariff-free in India. Indian tariffs on alcohol will be cut from 150% to 75%, falling to 40% by the 10th year of the deal. India will also cut automotive tariffs from more than 100% to 10%. The UK too has agreed to cut its tariffs and 99% of India's exports to Britain will face no duties.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
LOP's desperation over Congress losses on display: BJP
NEW DELHI: Top BJP functionaries including party president J P Nadda and Dharmendra Pradhan on Saturday reacted vehemently to Congress member Rahul Gandhi's latest claim questioning the Maharashtra assembly polls, saying that the leader of opposition in Lok Sabha was reflecting his desperation after his party's losses and the looming one in Bihar assembly polls. "Rahul Gandhi's latest article is a blueprint for manufacturing fake narratives, owing to his sadness and desperation of losing election after election," said Nadda in response to Gandhi's article which appeared in a national daily on Saturday. Citing factors that "doomed" Congress in recent polls, Nadda said Congress gets defeated election after election due to his (Rahul Gandhi's) antics. "Instead of introspecting, he cooks up bizarre conspiracies and cries rigging. Ignores all facts and data. Defames institutions with zero proof and hopes for headlines over facts," the BJP president said in a post on X. Nadda said despite being exposed time and again, Rahul shamelessly keeps peddling lies. "And, he is doing this because a defeat in Bihar is certain," he said adding that democracy doesn't need drama but truth. Pradhan said Rahul Gandhi's post on Maharashtra elections is nothing more than a predictable script-lose elections, discredit institutions, fabricate conspiracies, and portray himself as a victim of an imaginary system. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 신차장기렌트 첫달 렌트료 전액지원해드립니다. 신차장기렌트센터 더 알아보기 Undo "But India's democracy is far stronger than the insecurities of a dynast who refuses to accept repeated electoral verdicts," Pradhan, a prominent OBC face of BJP, said. He said it there's any rigging Rahul should be worried about, it's the kind his own party mastered for decades-from Emergency to misusing Article 356 over 90 times to dismiss opposition govts. "Let's not forget, this is the same Rahul Gandhi who falsely claimed in Cambridge that Indian democracy is 'dead', yet participates in elections, campaigns freely, and blames EVMs only when he loses," the senior BJP functionary said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi's attack on EC doesn't match poll data, officials say bid to ‘defame'
LEADER of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's attack on the Election Commission, in a piece in The Indian Express Saturday, reiterates allegations he has made in the past and contradicts Maharashtra Assembly election data the poll panel has released. A scrutiny by The Indian Express of his allegations and data around each shows that Gandhi's criticism selectively cites records, ignores crucial context and, in one case, even draws a connection where none exists. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was unavailable for comment. However, a senior EC official said: 'After losing the match, blaming the referee has become standard practice. These allegations are absurd and a bid to defame the poll body. ECI has responded to INC on 24 December 2024 on the same issues. It seems like the party has not shared the reply with him (Gandhi).' Consider: 🔴 Appointment of Election Commissioners: Gandhi questioned the government's decision to replace the Chief Justice of India (CJI) with a Cabinet Minister on the panel responsible for appointing Election Commissioners—over-riding a 2023 Supreme Court ruling and raising concerns about the neutrality of the selection process. The fact is that successive governments across party lines—including the UPA—had opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism but failed to do so. For instance, in 2007, the Administrative Reforms Commission, chaired by Congress leader M. Veerappa Moily, recommended a collegium system for appointing Election Commissioners, citing the 'far-reaching importance' of the EC. The ARC proposed a selection panel comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Leader of the Opposition, Law Minister, and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman. However, this recommendation was never implemented. Nor was a similar proposal made by the 20th Law Commission, headed by Justice A.P. Shah, which submitted its report to the NDA government in 2015. 'Now for the first time, a law made by Parliament under Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is better—the earlier system or the new one? Now, there is consultation, there is transparency and there is a concept of majority,' a senior EC official said. 🔴 Increase in new voters: Gandhi flagged what he called an 'incredible leap' of 41 lakh new voters added in Maharashtra within five months between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections—almost equal to the number added over the previous five years—suggesting possible manipulation of the voter rolls. However, under election laws, political parties are involved at every stage of preparing the final electoral roll. Election authorities regularly hold meetings with political parties, provide them free copies of draft and final rolls, and publish these on official websites. During the summary revision period, weekly lists of additions and deletions are shared to allow objections. Ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election, 1,03,727 booth-level agents (BLAs) were appointed by political parties, including 27,099 from the Congress. These agents are responsible for interacting with election officials to flag any discrepancies at the polling station level. Yet, during this revision, fewer than 100 appeals pertaining to additions or deletions were filed by party agents across all parties. 🔴 Voter turnout: Gandhi questioned the reported voter turnout jump from 58.22% at 5 pm on November 20, 2024, to 66.05% the following morning—an increase of 7.83 percentage points, or about 76 lakh voters. He called the rise unprecedented, noting that in the 2019 Maharashtra polls, the difference between provisional and final turnout was only 0.64 percentage points. The fact is that the poll watchdog has always treated turnout figures released on polling day as provisional—and for good reason. Polling officers prioritise the integrity of the voting process over real-time reporting, and delays in updates are common. Before the Voter Turnout app, the EC would brief media around 6 pm on polling day, with officials consistently stating that the 5 pm figures were tentative, as voting often extended beyond the official deadline. In this context, the gap between the provisional turnout reported at 5 pm and the final figure released the next morning is not unusual—especially when compared to previous elections. On Saturday, the Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer's office clarified that the difference between provisional and final voter turnout figures in 2024 was not unusual when compared to 2019. In 2019, turnout rose from approximately 54.43% at 5 pm to 61.10% final; in 2024, it rose from 58.22% to 66.05%. The CEO's office said final figures are based on official records (Form 17C), provided to polling agents for verification. It also pointed out that Gandhi's data comparison was flawed: for 2019, he used provisional turnout figures recorded at the actual end of polling—which may have extended beyond 6 pm—alongside the final figures. But for 2024, he compared the 5 pm provisional turnout (before polling had ended) with the final numbers. Further, EC officials said that in 2024, an average of 58 lakh voters cast their votes every hour in Maharashtra. Based on this, 116 lakh voters could have voted in the last two hours alone—making the increase of 76 lakh voters completely plausible. 🔴 'Bogus' Voting: Gandhi further alleged that the surge in voter turnout was concentrated in 12,000 booths across 85 constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and connected this to gains made by the BJP in the Assembly polls. He cited Kamthi Assembly seat as an example, claiming BJP's votes rose from 1.19 lakh in the Lok Sabha election to 1.75 lakh in the Assembly poll, while Congress figures remained mostly stable. However, the EC allows candidates and their polling agents full access to all polling booths to raise objections in real time. Even after results are declared, candidates may challenge the outcome by filing election petitions in High Court. Congress candidate Suresh Yadavrao Bhoyar, who contested from Kamthi Assembly seat, has not filed such a petition. Of the 112 election petitions filed across Maharashtra, only 28 are from Congress—and Kamthi is not among them. When asked about Gandhi's claim, a Maharashtra CEO official said it was factually incorrect. Kamthi falls under the Ramtek Lok Sabha seat, which was contested by Shiv Sena in the general election—not the BJP. 'Therefore, the question of the BJP receiving 1.19 lakh votes in Kamthi during the Lok Sabha polls does not arise,' the official said. The officer also pointed out that Bhoyar received 1,07,064 votes in 2019 and 1,34,033 in 2024, an increase in support. 🔴 'Concealing' evidence: Accusing the Election Commission of responding with 'silence and even aggression,' Rahul Gandhi said requests to access voter rolls from the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were denied, and that the poll watchdog has also refused to provide videography and CCTV footage of the polling process in Maharashtra. Electoral rolls—lists of registered voters—are already available to political parties. What cannot be shared is the list of those who actually voted, as this would violate the 'secrecy of voting,' a foundational principle in ensuring free and fair elections, a top official said. It's for this reason the EC provides private voting compartments for each voter. Disclosing post-poll attendance could expose voters to intimidation or pressure. On CCTV footage, it is a fact that in December 2024, the EC—after consultations with the Centre—amended the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to restrict access to electronic records. This followed a Punjab and Haryana High Court directive ordering the EC to share footage with advocate Mehmood Pracha. The Commission has argued that providing CCTV footage would amount to violation of secrecy of vote and open it up to potential misuse using artificial intelligence. Asked about this, an official in the State CEO office said, 'In case of any grievance or objection related to the election process, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, under Section 80, provides a legal option in the form of an Election Petition, which may be filed before the Hon'ble High Court. If the Court deems it necessary during the proceedings of such a petition, the relevant electronic or documentary evidence related to the election process is produced before the Court as per its directives.'
