Alabama Senate committee rejects bail reform bill that members approved last year
Rep. Chris England, D-Tuscaloosa, speaks to Rep. Steve Clouse, R-Ozark, on the floor of the Alabama House of Representatives on April 1, 2025 at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. A bill sponsored by England that would have given judges the power to impose percentage bond payments for pretrial release died in a Senate committee on Wednesday. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
A bill that would have allowed people to win release from pretrial detention by paying a partial amount of a bond died in an Alabama Senate committee on Wednesday.
The Senate Judiciary Committee deadlocked on HB 42, sponsored by Rep. Chris England, D-Tuscaloosa, in a tie vote of 5-5. All the Democrats on the committee and committee chair Sen. Will Barfoot, R-Pike Road, voted for the bill. The remaining Republicans on the committee abstained or voted against the measure.
No member offered a reason for their vote except for Sen. Josh Carnley, R-Enterprise, who said he was voting the way he was after speaking with judges and court officials before he cast his vote.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The legislation would have restored three words to the current bail bond statute — 'a part of' — to allow judges to order defendants to pay percentage bonds to secure their release from pretrial detention, which was removed when the Legislature enacted the Bail Reform Act of 1993.
'All the bill does is add back three words to the code that were taken out a few years ago when we passed a bail reform bill,' England said to the committee during the meeting Wednesday.
The legislation passed the House with bipartisan support on April 15.
It is one of two bills aimed at changing the state's bail system, and the only one that the Alabama Bail Bond Association publicly opposed as it made its way through the Legislature.
Chris McNeil, president of the Alabama Bail Bond Association and who owns a bail bond company, suggested that the bill, if enacted, would increase the rates at which defendants failed to appear in court for their cases.
England said that those figures are not a fair comparison.
England filed the same bill during the 2024 legislative session. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the legislation last year but it stalled in the Senate chamber.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
16 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Mike Johnson said Elon Musk is 'terribly wrong' about Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was disappointed to hear Elon Musk's critique of President Donald Trump's " big beautiful bill." "Let me say this. It's very disappointing. I have come to consider Elon a good friend. He's obviously a very intelligent person, and he's done a lot of great work," Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. "But with all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the one big beautiful bill," Johnson added. Johnson said he had a "friendly conversation" with Musk on Monday, where he pitched the bill's merits to the Tesla and SpaceX CEO. "He and I spoke for, I think, more than 20 minutes on the telephone, and I extolled all the virtues of the bill and he seemed to understand that," Johnson said on Tuesday. Johnson was speaking at a doorstop interview when he was asked about Musk's X post on Tuesday afternoon. In his post, Musk called Trump's signature tax bill a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill" and a " disgusting abomination." "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk wrote. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he added. On May 22, House Republicans passed Trump's "big beautiful bill" and sent it to the Senate. GOP lawmakers hope the bill will be sent to Trump's desk on July 4. Trump's bill, in its current form, will raise the US deficit by $2.5 trillion over the next 10 years, per the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. This isn't the first time Musk has criticized Trump's signature tax bill. Musk told "CBS Sunday Morning" in an interview that aired on June 1 that he was disappointed with the bill. "I was like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," Musk said. "I think a bill can be big, or it could be beautiful. I don't know if it could be both," he added. Musk's pointed criticism of the GOP comes just days after he announced his departure from the Trump administration. Musk said on May 28 that he was wrapping up his 130-day tenure as a special government employee leading the White House DOGE office. In his interview with CBS, Musk said he did have " differences of opinion" with the Trump administration but but did not specify what they were. "But it's difficult for me to bring that up in an interview because then it creates a bone of contention," Musk told CBS. "So then, I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't wanna, you know, speak up against the administration. But I also don't wanna take responsibility for everything the administration's doing," he added.
New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
Who should Sarina Wiegman name in England's Euro 2025 squad?
It's almost exactly a month until England's first game against France at the European Championship this summer and we are finally a little more than 24 hours away from knowing who will make up the Lionesses' title-defence squad. Despite the surprising shake-up after Mary Earps retired from international football following the news that Hannah Hampton would get the No 1 role this summer, head coach Sarina Wiegman is still steadying the ship. Consistency is a crucial pillar for the Dutch coach, who isn't afraid of making tough decisions in tournaments, especially as another notable name, Fran Kirby, calls time on her international career after being told she'd be left off the squad as well. With the final UEFA Nations League match before Euro 2025 behind them, it's time for our writers to pick their squads before Thursday's announcement. While some clear themes are emerging, there are a few must-haves that spark debate around the edges… The biggest question mark is whether Millie Bright will return to the squad after withdrawing last week, citing mental and physical fatigue. Wiegman said on Tuesday evening that the situation remains the same and they will have to have 'that conversation' before Thursday's squad announcement. If Bright is available, Lotte Wubben-Moy and Maya Le Tissier drop out of the squad. However, the latter's substitute appearance for Lucy Bronze against Portugal suggests Wiegman sees her as a reliable backup option. Advertisement I would take Michelle Agyemang because the teenager is an unknown quantity who could disrupt opponents' backline. However, I doubt Wiegman will do that, as she already has two centre forwards in Alessia Russo and Aggie Beever-Jones, as well as Lauren Hemp, who can adapt when necessary. Laura Blindkilde Brown gets the nod following Kirby's abrupt retirement Tuesday night after Wiegman told her she was unlikely to make the squad. I would take Lauren James even if she has not played since April, and Wiegman seemed positive about her fitness after the 2-1 defeat to Spain. She brings a sense of unpredictability like no-one else and can make something happen out of nothing. James' presence alone is a concern to the opposition as she makes them think. Her two-footedness makes her a versatile option for Wiegman as she can pop up in pockets across the front line. England has depth in the No 10 role with Toone, Clinton or Park, but no one can replicate James' talent. Keira Walsh, the metronomic midfielder who makes things tick for England, is the other must-pick. Recently, we have seen teams mark her out of the game, nullifying her ball-playing skills. The problem for England is that there is no obvious replacement for her. Georgia Stanway could drop into the single pivot, likewise Leah Williamson could push up, but it is neither player's natural position. England without Walsh causes a reshuffling of the pack, which significantly depreciates their quality. Goalkeepers (3): Hannah Hampton (Chelsea), Khiara Keating (Manchester City), Anna Moorhouse (Orlando Pride) Defenders (7): Millie Bright (Chelsea), Lucy Bronze (Chelsea), Jess Carter (Gotham FC), Niamh Charles (Chelsea), Alex Greenwood (Manchester City), Esme Morgan (Washington Spirit), Leah Williamson (Arsenal) Midfielders (6): Grace Clinton (Manchester United), Jess Park (Manchester City), Georgia Stanway (Bayern Munich), Laura Blindkilde Brown (Manchester City), Ella Toone (Manchester United), Keira Walsh (Chelsea) Forwards (7): Michelle Agyemang (Arsenal), Aggie Beever-Jones (Chelsea), Lauren James (Chelsea), Lauren Hemp (Manchester City), Chloe Kelly (Arsenal), Beth Mead (Arsenal), Alessia Russo (Arsenal) If UEFA expanded the squad capacity from 23 to 26, as they did with the men's tournament last summer, this conversation would become a lot less controversial. But I'll go for just 23 players (and maybe a bonus). At this point, the core of the squad picks itself. Thankfully, one of Wiegman's biggest nagging questions has already been resolved after goalkeeper Earps opted to hang up her gloves. Advertisement My biggest quandary is over Wubben-Moy. I feel the Arsenal defender has been unlucky not to feature more under Wiegman. She's one of England's best centre-backs, but injuries coupled with the versatility of Jess Carter, Esme Morgan and Le Tissier (who Wiegman sees more as a full-back) drop Wubben-Moy down the pecking order. She was drafted in to replace Bright after the Chelsea captain refrained from joining the most recent England camp, citing a need to 'value herself'. If Wubben-Moy is included, the list of defenders (including full-backs) stretches to nine and potentially means the exclusion of an extra attacker. That attacker for me is Agyemang. This isn't just because she scored 41 seconds into her international debut against Belgium (what a goal, by the way), but because of the context. The 19-year-old Arsenal striker was called in as an injury replacement for Alessia Russo. A post shared by Lionesses (@lionesses) England are very short of options behind Russo at No 9 and Agyemang clearly has something special. What better place for a young English talent to flaunt it than a major tournament? I've dithered over this decision for weeks, but I think Agyemang comes in before Wubben-Moy. Goalkeepers (3): Hannah Hampton, Khiara Keating, Anna Moorhouse Defenders (8): Millie Bright, Leah Williamson, Jess Carter, Maya Le Tissier, Esme Morgan, Alex Greenwood, Lucy Bronze, Niamh Charles Midfielders (4): Georgia Stanway, Keira Walsh, Grace Clinton, Ella Toone Forwards (8): Alessia Russo, Chloe Kelly, Lauren Hemp, Jess Park, Beth Mead, Lauren James, Aggie Beever-Jones, Michelle Agyemang Waiting in the wings (1): Lotte Wubben-Moy Realistically, there aren't many debates to be had about England's optimal squad. Wiegman always makes her intentions clear about the first XI (as Earps has found out) and she's determined for her backups to be 'good travellers' who are good for squad harmony rather than necessarily the best players (as Steph Houghton found out three years ago). Advertisement The real question is about the allocation of players in each position. Do you want eight defenders and two strikers, meaning two players for each position, or seven and three? Wiegman's willingness to play Lauren Hemp up top means you could consider her England's third striker and elect for eight defenders. However, I think Agyemang's instant impact on her debut against Belgium means she deserves inclusion, particularly as that goal came from a hopeful cross into the box, indicating she could be a useful Plan B (or C). I would have had Kirby in my squad, but since she has announced her international retirement, I'll take Missy Bo Kearns. England probably need another deep midfield option, even if she struggled in a tough debut appearance from the bench against Spain on Tuesday. I'd also go for Morgan over Le Tissier and Wubben-Moy, although there's really not much in it; these players probably won't play and I agree with Wiegman's stance of just selecting the best for the group dynamic. Morgan seems like the epitome of what you want in that respect. This assumes that Bright will be available. If not, it would make sense to go for Le Tissier, bearing in mind Wiegman's (slightly curious) history of using her as a stand-in right-back. Goalkeepers (3): Hannah Hampton, Khiara Keating, Anna Moorhouse Defenders (7): Lucy Bronze, Leah Williamson, Alex Greenwood, Niamh Charles, Millie Bright, Jess Carter, Esme Morgan Midfielders (6): Keira Walsh, Georgia Stanway, Grace Clinton, Ella Toone, Jess Park, Missy Bo Kearns Forwards (7): Beth Mead, Lauren Hemp, Lauren James, Chloe Kelly, Alessia Russo, Aggie Beever-Jones, Michelle Agyemang Just to drive the point home, most of the squad picks itself considering the consistency of Wiegman's selections over the past year. One of the biggest debates is whether to gamble and take Lauren James given she is still recovering from a hamstring injury and may not be able to feature at the beginning of the tournament. There are few players I would make this concession for, but James is a game-changer and offers something unique. In a 23-player squad, I'm willing to risk it for the potential match-winning ability she could bring for the latter stages of the tournament. England are light in midfield, particularly in the No 4 and 8 roles. What happens if Walsh is unavailable is the conundrum no one wants to look directly in the eye. With the reliance on Walsh and with Georgia Stanway returning from a lengthy injury layoff, I've gone with bulking out the defensive options and potentially enabling Leah Williamson to step into midfield if needed — the England captain was initially listed as a midfielder at Euro 2022 and wore the No 8 shirt, having been deployed alongside Walsh in the build up to the tournament. Wiegman still seems to be figuring out her strongest back four and the majority of the players selected can play in multiple positions across the defence. Advertisement Aggie Beever-Jones and Michelle Agyemang get the nod ahead of Nikita Parris as the second and third-choice strikers behind Alessia Russo after impressive showings in recent Nations League outings. I've risked it and just named three out-and-out strikers, but that's four with Hemp (and five with Bright). Goalkeepers (3): Hannah Hampton, Khiara Keating, Anna Moorhouse Defenders (8): Millie Bright, Lucy Bronze, Jess Carter, Niamh Charles, Alex Greenwood, Esme Morgan, Maya Le Tissier, Leah Williamson Midfielders (5): Keira Walsh, Georgia Stanway, Grace Clinton, Ella Toone, Jess Park Forwards (7): Beth Mead, Lauren Hemp, Lauren James, Chloe Kelly, Alessia Russo, Aggie Beever-Jones, Michelle Agyemang
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk bashes Trump's megabill. Will it give cover to fiscal conservatives on the Hill?
One of Trump's closest allies called his 'big, beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination' and called out House Republicans for voting for it. And in the Senate, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said that at least three of his colleagues are also against the proposal in it's current form. Jeff Mason, Sam Stein and Leigh Ann Caldwell join.
