Vitality rows back on loyalty changes after members threaten to leave
The health insurer revamped its membership programme in April and introduced a weekly game where customers had to find a cartoon dachshund to earn rewards.
However, The Telegraph spoke to dozens of members who threatened to cancel their insurance policies over claims the game was a cover for watering down the rewards available – a suggestion which Vitality strongly denied.
Vitality's loyalty scheme rewards members for their healthy lifestyle choices. Walking a certain number of steps a day, going to the gym or completing a Parkrun can all accumulate points that can be converted into monthly rewards.
However, anger arose after an upgrade in April meant members that made healthy lifestyle changes would be offered the chance to play a game within the app each week to claim monthly rewards. Members would have to find a number of hidden dogs named Stanley to earn points.
Less than three months after rolling out the changes to its 1.9 million members, Nick Read, managing director, admitted in a letter to members that some aspects were not 'resonating as we had hoped'.
Although the game has not been removed, members will no longer need to play to earn up to two monthly rewards each month which include cinema tickets, restaurant meals and food delivery discounts.
Weekly rewards have also been improved to give customers more choice. Members can now choose any two rewards between a drink at Caffè Nero, 25pc off a meal at Itsu and 50pc off a cinema ticket at Vue or Odeon.
The Stanley game will remain, giving members a chance to earn additional rewards.
Martyn James, a consumer champion, said: 'While it's disappointing when businesses make decisions that appear to reduce the benefits of their products to their consumers, it's heartening to see that they listen when people make it clear they are unhappy.
'So it's gratifying that Vitality has made a consumer focused decision so quickly after The Telegraph's recent article.'
Alex McCann, who has been a member since 2015, also welcomed the news and praised Vitality for listening to its customers.
The small business owner said: 'This goes to show the power that consumers have. The outrage on social media was visible as soon as the initial changes in the reward system were announced.
'I'm surprised it took them so long to do a U-turn. Although the full details haven't been announced yet, I feel it's a positive step. Business is all about listening to customers.'
Another member told The Telegraph: 'I'm pleased that Vitality has listened to user feedback, and I think the changes could become a positive example of listening to customer feedback. Removing the need to play the Stanley game for weekly and monthly rewards is what we wanted to see so that's great.'
Nick Read, of Vitality, said: 'We always look to ensure everything we do gives each of our members the best outcomes, both through their insurance with us, and the support we offer them to live a longer healthier life.
'Our members' views always matter to us, and the recently announced changes build on our members' feedback, and our launch earlier this year. It will provide even more value, going further to support our members to be active and get more rewards when they do so.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
12 minutes ago
- Metro
My flatmate pays rent and bills but never buys shared household essentials
Everyone who's lived in houseshares has a few flatmate horror stories, from the ridiculously noisy to the chronically cleaning-averse. But sometimes it's a bit more nuanced, and one small habit can turn an otherwise great situation into a resentment-fuelled nightmare. That's the case for Jen, 28, from Manchester, who got in touch about bringing up an awkward issue — as well as being the only one in her flat who replaces household essentials, she's also footing the bill for them all. In this week's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion, Sarah Davidson, shares her perspective. If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this online form or email providing as much detail about your situation as possible. No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence. I've lived with Becky* for the last five months, after my old flatmate moved out and the landlord brought her in as a replacement. For the most part, it's a good situation – we're not friends as such, but we occasionally hang out, and are both the same level of clean and quiet. You can access completely fee-free mortgage advice with London & Country (L&C) Mortgages, a partner of Metro. Customers benefit from: – Award winning service from the UK's leading mortgage broker – Expert advisors on hand 7 days a week – Access to 1000s of mortgage deals from across the market Unlike many mortgage brokers, L&C won't charge you a fee for their advice. Find out how much you could borrow online Mortgage service provided by London & Country Mortgages (L&C), which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (registered number: 143002). The FCA does not regulate most Buy to Let mortgages. Your home or property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. The issue is that although she pays her share of rent and bills on time, stuff like milk, toothpaste, and kitchen and toilet roll are left to me – and it really adds up. When she first moved in, we discussed shared essentials and agreed that we'd each get what was needed as and when, then split the cost. Ever since though, I'm the only one who's actually replaced anything, and my texts asking her to transfer half the cash go ignored. I've tried to mention it in conversation too, but she brushes it off saying she'll sort then never does. While I know I could just stop buying things or get them for myself, I can't handle having to go without or spend my life hiding washing up liquid in my room. I also don't want to start a full-blown argument about it, as we have to live together for at least until her lease (12 months) ends. Is there any way I can bring this up without it ending badly? How. Annoying. I think your problem will resonate with most people who have lived with roommates at some point in their lives. There's always one who eats your bread and never buys milk. But I agree with you, life's too short to keep loo roll under your bed instead of in the bathroom where it belongs. So, how to fix this 'without it ending badly'. First question – what does ending badly look like to you? It sounds like you're uncomfortable with confrontation and the 'full blown argument' is what you're worried about. Second question – what would a good ending look like? Ideally, you want Becky to contribute 50/50 to the household essentials without having to nag her. The answer (and I think you know this) is to talk to her about it. Not in passing and not by text. You also need to be clear, up front, about what outcome you are seeking at the end of the conversation. Before you get to this stage, though, I'd arm yourself with some facts. Make a list of the household essentials you share. Be specific about exactly how much is used collectively each month and write it down – two rolls of kitchen paper, half a bottle of washing up liquid, two pints of milk a week. Whatever it is, if you're both using it, it goes onto the list. Go back through receipts or check a supermarket online and put a price on each of those items. Again, write it down so you've got your monthly total. Is it a reasonable number? What could come off that list? Next time you find yourself having a chat in the kitchen and neither of you is in a rush to go anywhere, ask her if she's got half an hour in the next couple of days to sit down and go through your household expenses. Suggest she make a list of what she's got for the house over the past six months (approximately) and cost it up. Book a time, make a cup of tea and sit down with your lists. Tot it up, agree what you're both using and are happy to split and put a number on it. You both need to agree that this is what needs to be kept aside at start of the month, every month. Be accountable – the best way to do this is to keep track of spending and make sure you're both aware of the running total at all times. When I was a student, we had a jar in the kitchen and stuck cash in it once a week. When it ran out we all stuck a bit more in, and if there was any left over we got a takeaway together. Things have moved on a bit since then. but there are some fantastic apps that make things really easy to track. Splitwise is great, particularly if you're the one who does most of the shopping. It will keep a running total of what you've spent and she'll be able to see exactly what she owes you. You can pay each other back through the app by connecting your bank account securely or using PayPal. App-only banks Monzo and Revolut have a similar function, though you'll both need to have your own accounts. And budgeting app Emma is also a good option, allowing you to pay someone using a QR code you generate on your phone. There are plenty of others too. One word of caution: be mindful of the fact she might be struggling with money and that's why she's relying on you. This isn't fair, but it is something you and she may have to manage. Perhaps it can help to suggest shopping somewhere cheaper or cutting back on certain things. More Trending Ultimately though, you need to come to an agreement that's realistic for you both and make it as easy as possible to stick to. Personally (as long as you can afford to) I'd swallow my frustration up to now, wipe the slate clean and start afresh. It'll clear the air and there's no way she can claim unfairness. Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB . View More » Got a money worry or dilemma? Email Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ MORE: Sending one polite email can get a free hotel upgrade – trust me MORE: What I Own: At 22 and 23, we bought a run-down London four-bed for £910,000 MORE: I pay £480 for my rent and bills in London — I've saved £5,000 in less than a year Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Business news live: FTSE 100 to open near record high and latest bitcoin price after fall
The FTSE 100 rose to new highs once again last week, tipping the scales well above 9,100 points after a particularly strong day on Thursday which saw the likes of BT Group rise ten per cent. The British companies index is up more than 11 per cent this year, outpacing the key US benchmarks. Meanwhile, key upcoming UK economy data this week includes mortgage approvals and the Nationwide House Price Index. Additionally, there is likely to be more news emerging on how the government may tackle pension reform, amid debate over what age the state pension should be and whether the tax relief rate on pension contributions may be altered. In other markets, bitcoin fell towards the end of last week, from the highs above $123,000 down to around $115,000, with gold also retreating as investors took a risk-on approach once more.
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent RSPCA warning over imported dogs
An animal charity has urged the UK government to implement stricter regulations on the import of dogs, citing concerns over disease transmission and behavioural problems. The RSPCA highlighted government statistics that 320,000 pets entered the UK via travel schemes and 44,000 as commercial imports in 2023, warning of 'ticking time bombs' due to inadequate health testing. There is currently no licensing requirement for animal rescue organisations in England, Wales, or Northern Ireland, contributing to the unregulated import of animals. A new Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, proposed by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers, has passed the Commons with cross-party support. The bill aims to reduce non-commercial animal entry, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant animals, and prohibit the import of mutilated dogs and cats, such as those with docked ears.
