UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'.
The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return.
Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders.
They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.'
The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.'
Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'.
She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people.
'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same.
'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way.
'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.'
The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius.
As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms.
The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities.
The agreement has also been backed by the United States.
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
JD Vance previews candidates' defense of Trump's bill for midterms in Georgia
The US vice-president JD Vance previewed in Georgia on Thursday the lines of attack candidates will use to defend the president's signature One Big Beautiful Bill Act in the midterms next year, calling it 'the biggest tax cut for families that this country has ever seen'. Vance touted an increase in the child tax credit, the elimination of taxes on overtime and on tips in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act while speaking in a warehouse for ATLA Refrigeration in Peachtree City, Georgia. Vance didn't mention that only the first $25,000 of tips will be tax free and will require itemization to claim, something few service workers do because the standard deduction usually provides a larger benefit. Eliminating overtime taxes also applies to the first $12,500 of a filer's overtime income, phasing out at $150,000 of income. The increase in the child tax credit is $200 a child under 17 to $2,200, which will now be indexed to inflation. The event also served as a preview of the attacks Jon Osoff, the Georgia Democratic senator, will face in the bruising swing state battle to come next year. The White House paired Vance's appearance with an information blitz on the 'working families' tax cut. Ossoff would come to regret voting against the bill, Vance said. 'In about a year, you are not going to be able to turn on the television without Senator John Ossoff pretending that he supported the working families tax cut, when in reality he voted against them,' Vance said. Vance extolled the virtues of the federalization of policing in Washington DC, and spoke at length about making places like Atlanta 'safe' for out-of-town visitors to its downtown attractions. 'The compassionate thing is to have people who are having mental health crises to get them in treatment, not to let them sit on the streets and yell at our people while they're walking,' Vance said, when asked where federal agents are taking people swept up from encampments in the nation's capitol. 'The president actually signed an executive order to make it easier for some of these people to get access to mental health treatment. And I don't know for the life of me what happened in this country where we decided that the compassionate thing was to let somebody fester on the streets instead of getting them treatment. And I don't know why we accept it as parents and grandparents, as people who just want to walk down the street in comfort, why we accepted that it was reasonable to have crazy people yelling at our kids.' Vance also rejected observations that the bill would throw people out of their healthcare plans. 'The President of the United States made a promise, a sacred promise, that the only people who are going to lose access to healthcare are illegal aliens who shouldn't be in this country in the first place,' he said. 'I happen to believe that when you are struggling in this country, we're a generous people. We want to help you, or we want to help the people who have the legal right to be in the United States of America. So it's not about kicking people off of health care. It's about kicking illegal aliens the hell out of this country to preserve healthcare in America.' Comprehensive Medicaid benefits have never been available to undocumented immigrants. The budget bill cuts $1tn from Medicaid spending, beginning in 2027. About 17 million people are expected to lose health insurance by 2034 across the country if the provisions remain as enacted, according to estimates from the non-partisan congressional budget office. Nearly 12 million people will lose insurance because of attacks on Medicaid. Nonetheless, a roster of speakers addressed the party faithful from the stage, three of whom – the representative Buddy Carter, the representative Mike Collins and Derek Dooley, the former Tennessee football coach, – are candidates for the US Senate, vying for a face-off with Ossoff. Dooley is a political newcomer with the endorsement of both Trump and Georgia's Republican governor Brian Kemp. He likened his political outsider status to that of Trump, who 'didn't accept business as usual up there. And look at the results we got.'
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Beep if you think Starmer's a w***er' sign removed by police after constant honking
POLICE removed a banner saying 'beep if you think Keir Starmer is a w**ker' after constant honking from motorists created a noise nuisance for neighbours. Locals said the sign created the 'loudest dual carriageway in Britain' before a patrolling officer was alerted to it. 2 2 It was put up on the A4 Portway in Bristol on Wednesday, while a second banner read: 'Stop the boats.' Local resident Mike Turner commented: 'It's louder than The Rolling Stones at the moment. "I think it's a sign!' Another wrote: 'Loudest dual carriageway in Britain'. It is understood there were no official noise complaints to the police. There was one call pointing out that the signs were put up. An Avon and Somerset Police spokesman said: 'A patrolling officer was alerted to two signs on overbridges on the busy A4 Portway on Wednesday 20 August. 'Due to the potential they could result in a distraction to drivers, as well as a nuisance to nearby residents, they were removed.'
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hotels braced for a wave of protests: Up to 30 targeted as residents turn up heat to follow Epping precedent
A wave of protests are set to sweep the country this weekend targeting migrant hotels. Anti-immigration campaigners are looking to ride on the back of this week's landmark judgment that saw the High Court order the removal of migrants from a hotel in Epping, Essex. Protests at up to 30 hotels are believed to be planned as communities seek to replicate the ruling for The Bell Hotel, which, pending an appeal, must be closed within weeks. The hotel had been at the centre of protests after an asylum seeker living there was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl, which he denies. Hotels in Cannock, Chichester and Tamworth are among those expected to be targeted by demonstrations, with anti-racism groups already organising counter-protests in 15 locations across the three-day Bank Holiday weekend. They are prepared to turn up tonight in the likes of Bournemouth, Portsmouth, Leicester, Leeds, Orpington, Perth, Aberdeen and Altrincham. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has used Epping as a rallying cry, saying: 'Let's hold peaceful protests outside hotels and put pressure on councils to go to court to try to get illegal immigrants out.' On Tuesday, a judge granted a temporary injunction against migrants being housed at The Bell Hotel after Epping Forest council argued that it was necessary for 'the safety of nearby residents' and to reduce the threat of 'violent protests'. As it tried, unsuccessfully, to intervene in the case at the eleventh hour, the Home Office argued that granting Epping's application 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. The ruling threatens to collapse Labour's asylum system as protesters take to the streets and councils across the country prepare to hit the Home Office with copycat litigation over the use of hotels in their areas. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has written to all Conservative councils pledging support for any legal action, while Reform UK's leaders have encouraged people to protest at their local asylum hotels. But anti-racism groups have warned the ruling sets a 'dangerous precedent', with Stand Up To Racism saying that it will 'embolden the far-Right to call more protests outside hotels housing refugees'. Labour grandee Lord Falconer urged the Home Office to appeal against the Epping judgment on Thursday as he admitted the ruling 'causes great problems' for the Government. The peer, who served as justice secretary under Sir Tony Blair and as Sir Keir Starmer's shadow attorney general, said it 'gives rise to the expectation that some asylum hotels can be closed'. Lord Falconer said the ruling presents Labour with a 'very troublesome issue, namely does demonstrations outside these hotels lead to it being more likely that they will be closed'. Urging the Government 'very strongly' to appeal, he told Radio 4's Today programme: 'It puts the courts and the politicians in a difficult position. 'There should be clarity on that and the authority in relation to that can only come from the Court of Appeal.' The Home Office still could not say whether or not it plans to appeal on Thursday. But pressure was mounting on the Government as all Tory councillors were sent a draft motion, produced by the Conservative Research Department and the Conservative Councillors' Association, 'strongly urging' them to follow Epping's example. It included instructions on how to influence their local authorities. Stevenage became the latest Labour-run council to say it would consider taking legal action over an asylum hotel in the Hertfordshire borough as the internal revolt grew. The council had already warned a Novotel hotel it must stop housing asylum seekers or face planning enforcement action, and on Thursday said it was 'actively investigating alleged breaches' as it considered legal action similar to Epping's. Ministers were scrambling to find contingency plans to house migrants, with officials looking at houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), empty tower blocks, disused teacher training colleges and old student accommodation as alternatives. The asylum minister, Dame Angela Eagle, told the Commons home affairs committee in June that the Government had shifted its focus from old military barracks to smaller locations such as tower blocks. However, the Guardian reported officials are still considering placing people removed from hotels in the RAF Wethersfield base in Essex and Napier Barracks in Kent. Meanwhile, it was also reported that asylum accommodation contractors working for the Home Office have contacted property specialists, seeking 5,000 residential units in towns and cities to house migrants. But a Government minister could not answer when quizzed on where asylum seekers should go instead of hotels on Thursday. Asked 'where will they go?', schools minister Catherine McKinnell said: 'Well, I mean, that's a big question.'
