Footage shows Kim Jong Un's remarks on military readiness, not corruption in Indonesia
"We, as a friendly nation to Indonesia, share deep concern over the horrifying acts of corruption taking place," Kim appears to say, according to the Indonesian-language subtitles added to a SnackVideo post shared on March 18, 2025.
"The government officials who have been given the full trust by their people instead recklessly enrich themselves," the subtitles go on.
The false video circulated after Indonesia's Attorney General's Office announced on February 25 that it had arrested executives from subsidiaries of state-owned energy firm PT Pertamina for alleged corruption over oil imports that cost the country nearly $12 billion (archived link).
Authorities alleged that between 2018 and 2023, the suspects colluded to import crude oil from foreign suppliers at inflated prices, instead of sourcing it domestically as required by Indonesian law.
The case also involves a fuel blending process that the office said is "not permitted" (archived link).
The same video was also shared on TikTok, Facebook, and SnackVideo, with some users appearing to believe the Indonesian-language subtitles in the clip were accurate.
"What an embarrassment -- our corruption is now famous in North Korea," said one user.
"Even the leader of another country understands that Indonesia is the centre of corruption," wrote another.
However, the clip -- viewed hundreds of thousands of times across various platforms -- contains fabricated subtitles of Kim's speech.
A reverse image search on Google led to a video published by news outlet North Korea Now on YouTube on February 13, 2024 (archived link).
The video is titled "Kim orders military to prepare for the occupation of S. Korean territory".
The same speech in the false posts can be heard beginning at the 25:37 mark in the clip, during which Kim discusses the importance of the military's role in maintaining global peace.
"Our military must possess even stronger power, prevent war and unconditionally safeguard peace with its irresistible force. Peace is not something to beg for or negotiate," says Kim.
"Let us remember once again that war is not advertised in advance. We must always maintain a state of readiness."
Rodong Sinmun, the newspaper of North Korea's ruling Workers' Party, published a transcript of Kim's speech on February 9, 2024. It does not show Kim mentioning corruption in Indonesia (archived link).
AFP has debunked other misinformation related to the PT Pertamina case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Victory for Gardens officer who held unarmed man at gunpoint in viral 'unhinged cop' video
WEST PALM BEACH — A federal appeals court has dismissed a civil-rights lawsuit against a Palm Beach Gardens police officer whose viral arrest of an unarmed man drew national scrutiny, upholding a lower court's ruling and marking the latest in a series of victories for officer Bethany Guerriero. In a 13-page opinion, the panel of judges said Guerriero was not in the wrong during her May 2023 encounter with Ryan Gould, a then-resident of Palm Beach Gardens' Sabal Ridge apartment complex. Gould called 911 to report a neighbor who threatened him with a gun, only to be arrested at gunpoint himself when Guerriero mistook him for the suspect. Surveillance-camera footage in the apartment complex's parking lot showed Guerriero ordering Gould to the ground with her weapon drawn, ignoring his insistence that he was the victim. The video, posted to YouTube under the title 'Innocent Man Arrested by Unhinged Cop,' went viral. The city fired Guerriero in January 2024. Gould sued Guerriero soon afterward, accusing her of excessive force and false imprisonment. Guerriero, a 20-year veteran with the department, invoked qualified immunity, which, under Florida law, shields officers from personal liability unless they act with 'malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard.' U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks dismissed the lawsuit in August, ruling that Guerriero did have probable cause to arrest Gould, and that her actions did not violate clearly established law. He found that the body-camera footage supported her version of events, including Gould's failure to follow commands. 'Any reasonable officer who was called to a scene due to a man brandishing a concealed weapon would have been aware of the danger of a man reaching into his pocket after being instructed not to,' Middlebrooks wrote. The appellate court agreed, concluding that Guerriero's decision to draw her firearm and arrest Gould was constitutional, given the conflicting 911 calls and uncertainty about who was armed. 'It is not clearly established law that drawing a gun on an unidentified individual thrice disobeying the reasonable commands of an officer … constitutes excessive force,' the court wrote. The judges noted that Guerriero repeatedly told Gould to keep his hands out of his pockets and to drop his phone, and only escalated when he failed to comply. The court's decision, finalized with a mandate on June 3, effectively ends Gould's federal lawsuit, barring an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Though Guerriero was initially fired for violating department policy — including policies on conduct, courtesy and response to resistance — she was reinstated months later through arbitration. The arbitrator ruled that her conduct warranted serious discipline, but not termination, and she returned to duty without back pay. In his ruling, arbitrator Richard J. Miller found that Guerriero's behavior — including escalating the encounter with verbal taunts, drawing her weapon and violating several department policies — was serious enough to warrant discipline but not dismissal. He noted Guerriero admitted to violating policies on response to resistance, conduct unbecoming and professional courtesy. Still, the arbitrator rejected the city's argument that her actions and past record— three prior disciplinary incidents over her two-decade career — justified ending her employment. He emphasized the principles of progressive discipline and determined that a suspension without pay was more appropriate. 'Termination is too severe a punishment in this case,' Miller wrote. 'This award gives Officer Guerriero another chance and, at the same time, does not become a financial liability to the city.' City officials had maintained that Guerriero's conduct undermined public trust and departmental credibility. The incident drew more than 60,000 views online and sparked hundreds of calls and emails to the police department, many of them critical. Gould's attorney, Eric Rice, did not return a request for comment. Hannah Phillips is a journalist covering public safety and criminal justice at The Palm Beach Post. You can reach her at hphillips@ This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Lawsuit dismissed against Florida officer in "unhinged cop' video
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York Judge Censured After Erupting During School Board Meeting, Demanding His Son Be Named Valedictorian
Long Beach City Court Judge Corey E. Klein was formally censured by the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct The judge, who will maintain office through 2034, was accused of using his title amid a heated exchange during a school board meeting where he complained that his son was not named valedictorian Klein now has 30 days to appeal the decisionA New York judge was censured after erupting during a school board meeting. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct confirmed via press release on Monday, June 9 that Long Beach City Court Judge Corey E. Klein had been censured for "invoking his judicial office in a personal matter involving his son." During a local school board meeting that streamed live on YouTube on April 11, 2024, Klein took the microphone after the session was opened up to the public for questions. He announced that he wanted "to discuss the implications of this board's policies as it relates to COVID and the selection of the valedictorian." The judge proceeded to say that his son was "not selected as a valedictorian because of this board's policies," adding that they "impact[ed] one person and one person only this year, my son." Klein said that his son was a straight-A student before he was cut off. "Don't try to out-lawyer me with the law," the judge said when the superintendent asked the school district attorney if this was the right place to have Klein's conversation, per a formal written complaint reviewed by the Commission on Judicial Conduct on Feb. 20, 2025. The judge's microphone was seemingly turned off as a member of the school board spoke. However, Klein could still be heard shouting in the background. 'If you are going to try to be a lawyer, then refer to me by my title as well, okay. Thank you," Klein said. 'You can refer to me, counsel, as judge,' he also said, according to the complaint, which also noted that Klein frequently used the terms "counsel" and "counselor" to address the attorney. At one point, Klein accused the board of "[trying] to sick your pit bull attorney on me." He also said, "I'm sorry that your attorney needed to go at me when all I wanted to do was come up here and politely address one simple question." He had the floor for nearly 20 minutes. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Amid his outburst, he was told that he "had the right to appeal" the decision about his son. However, this was not the place to do so. "Don't try to shut me down," Klein said, threatening to continue speaking "all night." At one point, the attorney noted that he was "respecting" Klein and asked for the same respect in return. He also addressed Klein's repeated use of legal terminology, saying, "Your Honor, we are not in court at this point." In the commission's press release, it was noted that Klein "agreed to the censure." The release also noted that all 11 members "concurred" with the determination that was made on May 29, 2025. He was also censured for using his office to help an "acquaintance" get out of a "traffic matter." Now that the determination has been filed, Klein has 30 days to make a formal appeal. According to the New York State Commission, the judge has held office at the Long Beach City Court since 2015. He will remain a judge until the end of 2034. 'It corrodes public confidence in the judiciary when a judge lends the prestige of judicial office to advance a private benefit," Commission Administrator Robert H. Tembeckjian said, per the release. Tembeckjian continued, by adding, "Doing so impulsively, in an unseemly public argument over who should be a high school's honoree, or as a favor to a parking ticket scofflaw, is especially irresponsible." According to the Center for Judicial Ethics of the National Center for State Courts, a censure "is a formal sanction for violating the Code of Judicial Conduct." While a judge who is censured "does not require suspension or removal," the formal matter is a "stern rebuke." PEOPLE reached out to the New York State Unified Court System for comment but did not hear back at the time of publication. Read the original article on People
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Chinese Bank Scandal Victims Attacked by Security While Petitioning Over Frozen Accounts, Source Says
Victims of a years-long banking scandal in central China were violently attacked by security personnel last week while petitioning authorities over their frozen savings, according to a protester who shared what he witnessed at the scene with the Chinese-language edition of The Epoch Times. The crisis began in April 2022, when several rural banks in Henan Province collapsed, affecting approximately 400,000 depositors. Protester Xiao Mei, who used a pseudonym out of fear of retaliation by authorities, recently told The Epoch Times that on May 28, a group of account holders—including Ba Zhongjun and his wife, whose family was among the most affected—traveled to Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan Province, hoping to appeal directly to a central government inspection team. According to Xiao, they were intercepted in the Jinshui district by black-clad security personnel, who beat several of them in broad daylight. Xiao said Ba's wife and another woman were surrounded and assaulted by more than a dozen men, who also seized their phones. Ba's wife sustained an arm injury. 'The entire scene was chaotic,' Xiao said. Two days later, plainclothes police and security agents forcibly entered the hotel room where Ba was staying with his wife, their 6-year-old son, and his mother-in-law. According to a source familiar with the incident, Ba was restrained, and his phone was confiscated. Ba, his wife, child, and mother-in-law were then forced into a vehicle and taken back to Shanghai, where the couple work as migrant laborers. Related Stories 7/12/2022 6/23/2022 'The police weren't dressed in uniform—they were trying to avoid recognition,' the source, who used the pseudonym Yu Ming, told The Epoch Times. 'The child was so terrified he didn't dare to say a word.' Despite multiple rounds of promised repayments and ongoing investigations since 2022, many victims have seen little resolution. Protests in Zhengzhou and other cities have been met with Yu described the Ba family's situation as 'tragic.' Their 2 million yuan in savings—earned over decades by four elderly parents working as farmers—was suddenly frozen by the bank. Ba's mother is seriously ill and requires medical treatment, while both Ba and his wife are unemployed and struggling to support their son, who has just started primary school, Yu said. Recently, Ba's wife had an abortion because the family could not afford to raise a second child. 'Their family is on the brink of ruin,' Yu said. Authorities have repeatedly pressured depositors to sign settlement agreements, but according to Yu, some legal experts warn that these documents could waive the depositors' rights to further legal action. 'These so-called settlements are traps,' Yu said. 'Once you sign, it's considered an admission of guilt. It's extremely risky even if you later try to sue the bank.' As a result, most depositors have refused to sign, he said. The agreements contain clauses barring petitioners from invoking China's Contract Law or any legal grounds for defending their rights, according to legal experts Yu consulted. 'Ordinary people can't understand these legal tricks,' Yu said. 'They're full of provisions that hurt depositors.' Authorities have also employed harsh tactics—including detention, criminal charges, and extended prison sentences—to pressure victims and their families into backing down, according to Yu. 'They show wives and mothers videos of their loved ones suffering in detention,' Yu said. 'Of course, they break down and beg them to sign. It's ruthless.' Despite the ongoing repression, Yu said the victims are 'resilient and determined.' 'For over three years, they've fought for the return of their life savings—money they need to feed their families,' he said. 'If they don't get their money back, they'll keep fighting to the end.'
