
To understand what immigrants mean to California, eat at any restaurant
Taquerias, dim sum parlors, sushi counters, noodle shops, kebab stands, strip malls filled with businesses serving 12 different Vietnamese specialties: Immigrant excellence powers every single restaurant on the L.A. Times' first ever 101 best restaurants in California guide. Without exception.
Even in the white-owned places serving Euro-centric dishes, who is doing the cooking or delivering the plates to the table? I see the greatness of immigrant contributions to our dining culture everywhere.
Given the past week in Los Angeles, amid the accelerated immigration raids and anti-ICE protests, and the many obfuscations across social media and national coverage in their portrayals of L.A. and Angelenos, it feels important to say plainly: The top-to-bottom glory of culinary California feeds and influences the nation and the world, and it would not exist without our immigrants.
That's reflected in our new statewide 101 essential restaurants project, which went live this morning.
This list isn't full of super-secret, 'undiscovered' amazements hidden in the furthest regions of the state. No. It's built from fantastic restaurants of all kinds — the standouts, telling a collective story about who we are and what we eat.
Did I rank them? No, though of course I'm aware plenty of people crave stars and status to argue over.
The No. 1 reason to take the time to read over the guide is to see that, in the spirit of usefulness, the 101 restaurants are jumping-off points. There is too much brilliance to highlight at every level in California. So along with many of the write-ups, you'll find 'extra helpings' of restaurants similar in style or cuisine or geography.
For instance, you might glance down the list of places in San Francisco — the U.S. capital of fine dining, full-stop — and say, 'These are out of my budget!' Keep reading, and you'll see I've also included more affordable dining recommendations in the city.
Eating well in California has outgrown simplistic notions of perfect fruit on a plate.
For almost 50 years, the architects of the modern California-wide dining culture drove the ethos of 'seasonal' and 'local' into eye-glazing cliches, and we know who farms all our beautiful produce.
But over the last decade, the foods of the state's longest-standing immigrant communities — Mexican, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Filipino and Middle Eastern, among others — have become engines of creativity for a new generation of chefs cooking from their heritage.
At the stove, each person could choose to hue close to tradition or veer wildly into innovation. Someone could re-create their grandmother's pozole, another could infuse the dish's broth with Asian herbs and garnish it with edible flowers.
If it was delicious, it found an audience. It was a big element when, in the early 2010s, media and food lovers finally began acknowledging Los Angeles on the world map as a dining destination.
That approach — it can go by 'third culture cuisine' or 'identity-based cooking' — is no less thrilling these days, but it's become a welcome part of our culinary consciousness.
The reaction isn't so much, 'Whoa, this take on mapo tofu is wild' as it is, 'Ah, this is what you bring.' It's the closest I have to a modern, working definition of the overly broad term 'California cuisine.'
Staying in
John says, 'I was thinking about leaving a promising career in the corporate world working 50-60 hours a week to become a teacher. My dad asked me why. One reason was that I would be able to spend more time with my kids. He was retired from a job where he worked 50-60 hours a week and said that he wished he had worked less because he missed out on so much of my and my siblings' lives. He told me to never put work before family like he had done.'
Katie says, 'I grew up in Washington, DC, and was lucky to have a father who loved to take me out to eat at all kinds of restaurants. My father taught me from a very young age to always read the dessert menu first, so you could plan your meal accordingly.'
Email us at essentialcalifornia@latimes.com, and your response might appear in the newsletter this week.
On June 12, 1967, the Loving vs. Virginia decision deemed bans on interracial marriage unconstitutional. In recent years, the anniversary of that decision has been informally celebrated by multiracial families across the country.
In 2016, The Times invited readers to share their Loving Day stories and how interracial relationships have affected them.
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editorAndrew Campa, Sunday writerKarim Doumar, head of newsletters
How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Meta Bets on Scale + Apple's A.I. Struggles + Listeners on Job Automation
Hosted by Kevin Roose and Casey Newton Produced by Rachel Cohn and Whitney Jones Edited by Jen Poyant Engineered by Alyssa Moxley Original music by Dan PowellMarion Lozano and Alyssa Moxley This week, Meta hits the reset button on A.I. But will a new research lab and a multibillion-dollar investment in Scale AI bring the company any closer to its stated goal of 'superintelligence'? Then we break down Apple's big developer conference, WWDC: What was announced, what was noticeably absent, and why Apple seems a little stuck in the past. Finally, a couple of weeks ago we asked if your job is being automated away — it's time to open up the listener mail bag and hear what you said. Additional Reading: Meta looks for an A.I. reset Apple Executives Defend Apple Intelligence, Siri and A.I. Strategy This A.I. Company Wants to Take Your Job 'Hard Fork' is hosted by Kevin Roose and Casey Newton and produced by Rachel Cohn and Whitney Jones. This episode was edited by Jen Poyant. Engineering by Alyssa Moxley and original music by Dan Powell, Marion Lozano, and Alyssa Moxley. Fact-checking by Ena Alvarado. Special thanks to Paula Szuchman, Pui-Wing Tam, Dahlia Haddad and Jeffrey Miranda.


CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
OpenAI Image Generator Review: ChatGPT Is Creative but Lacks Essential Tools
6.0 / 10 SCORE ChatGPT AI Image Generator Buy at OpenAI Pros Available with free and paid ChatGPT plans Decent prompt adherence Versatile styles Cons Long generation times Typo-ridden text No advanced editing tools ChatGPT AI Image Generator 6/10 CNET Score Buy at OpenAI ChatGPT is practically synonymous with generative AI, so it wasn't too surprising when its parent company, OpenAI, announced earlier this year that it's getting into the AI image business. With GPT-4o's new text-to-image capabilities, the internet exploded with ChatGPT's Studio Ghibli-esque images. As CNET's resident AI image and video reviewer, I was particularly excited by the company's promise that ChatGPT could generate images with a lot of text, something that other AI services typically can't do. But my wild ride testing ChatGPT's image generation prowess proved one thing: ChatGPT might be a power player as an AI chatbot, but it's an amateur image generator. I spent many hours with ChatGPT, generating close to 100 images using several of OpenAI's models, including 4o, o3 and o4-mini. There were some recognizable similarities between ChatGPT and OpenAI's other image generation program, Dall-E. They both have the same conversational editing flow, which is one reason why Dall-E 3 was a CNET Editor's Choice award recipient last year. But there are a lot of differences, and they aren't all for the best. ChatGPT is slower than any other program I've tested, much slower than Dall-E. Unlike Canva, Midjourney and ChatGPT only generates one image per prompt, which doesn't give you a lot of variety or choices. Most distressingly, it doesn't have advanced editing capabilities. And as you'll see in the images I created, that's going to be annoying when you want to make text-heavy images. The most comparable program is Meta AI, which is also primarily a chatbot. Between the two, I would give the edge to ChatGPT for more creative and versatile results. If you're used to using ChatGPT, it will feel familiar. But if you've used a lot of other graphic design and editing programs, or even just other AIs, you're going to be disappointed. OpenAI's image generation is best for users looking for a quick image tool or those who are less creatively inclined but still want to bring their ideas to life without much heavy lifting. It is certainly not for professional creators looking to expand their digital toolkits. Here's how ChatGPT fared against my testing, including how good the images were, how well they matched my prompts, how you can fine-tune results and how quickly they arrive. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) How CNET tests AI image generators CNET takes a practical approach to reviewing AI image generators. Our goal is to determine how good it is relative to the competition and which purposes it serves best. To do that, we write AI prompts based on real-world cases, such as rendering in a particular style, combining elements into a single image and handling lengthier descriptions. We score the image generators on a 10-point scale that considers factors such as how well images match prompts, creativity of results and response speed. See how we test AI for more. You can create images using ChatGPT with any plan. You'll have limited access with the free plan. Upgrading to the Plus ($20 per month) and Pro ($200 per month) plans gets you higher rate limits, along with other ChatGPT features. Even on the paid plans, you may run into wait times, where OpenAI's servers are overloaded and your requests are delayed. OpenAI's general privacy policy, which the company said includes image generation, says it can train on your personal information and content to improve its services, including using your prompts and any images or files you upload. To opt out, go to Settings > Data control and turn off Improve the model for everyone. Abusive, illegal and other malicious uses of ChatGPT's AI image generator are not allowed and should be prevented, according to GPT-4o's system card. You can read more in OpenAI's safety policies. How good are the images, and how well do they match prompts? ChatGPT is pretty versatile when it comes to style. It handles photorealistic stock imagery, as well as more whimsical, cartoonish looks. The images had a fun, engaging style. ChatGPT images do not have a visible watermark denoting they're AI-generated, so always be sure to disclose that when you share them. Images do have C2PA metadata that indicate they were AI-generated. The main differentiator between ChatGPT and other AI image services is that ChatGPT can generate text-heavy images. Most AI image generators can't generate more than a few letters; ChatGPT is definitely the most impressive AI image generator I've seen when it comes to creating legible, English-language text. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT Of course, being able to create letters is one thing, but putting them in a meaningful construction is another. This is where ChatGPT struggles. I tried to generate a lot of education posters -- topics that require some descriptions but also allow the generator to show off its creativity. Some turned out okay. Others were a complete disaster. This took me more than 20 prompts and 2 hours to create, and there's still a typo. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT ChatGPT does best when you give the chatbot a website or text passage to reference when creating text-heavy images. Even then, it's not always great. I'm a big Wishbone Kitchen fan, but ChatGPT seriously misread Meredith Hayden's French hot cocoa recipe. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT And I really have no idea what happened here. My apologies to Jane Austen and the cast of the 2005 movie adaption of Pride and Prejudice. This was the best iteration of the bunch, if you ignore Mr. Darcy's eyes. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT Despite OpenAI saying its models should not be able to reproduce copyrighted or protected imagery, I was able to sometimes. ChatGPT created a fake product stock photo of a Hydroflask water bottle with the real logo, even though the chatbot itself told me it shouldn't be able to do that. I also tried to get it to recreate the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in a few photos, and while prompts where I asked for them by name were blocked, other prompts describing them as "human-like turtles with colorful masks" produced very similar results. This is likely a result of OpenAI's broad training data. (Side note: OpenAI is being sued by a number of companies and artists alleging copyright infringement and misuse of their protected content.) Other image generators I've tried haven't been able to replicate brand logos like ChatGPT. I strongly advise against creating AI images that could infringe on protected content, especially with name brands or a person's likeness. Realistic-looking protected content I generated with ChatGPT. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT I primarily tested ChatGPT on my laptop through the website, but I did create a few images using the iPhone app. The experiences were comparable, and it is nice to have the option to create on your phone if that's your preference. A cartoonish version of my beach photo created using the ChatGPT iPhone app. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT ChatGPT has pretty good prompt adherence for your initial prompt, which means that it can follow directions. Like with any image generator, practicing good prompt writing will help you achieve your artistic vision more easily. That means including a lot of detail -- the aesthetic, style and general vibe you want, in addition to the characters and setting. ChatGPT has a harder time when you're editing photos after, so I recommend really taking some time to craft your perfect first prompt. That will help you get usable final results without too much fuss. How engaging are the images? The images I created with ChatGPT were pretty engaging, very colorful and bold. I enjoyed how creative the model was, and although it's not a scientific or quantitative measurement, I felt like ChatGPT could create an interesting image with nearly any kind of prompt. They weren't the most intricate or detailed images -- I would give that title to Midjourney or -- but they were decent. If you put in your prompt that you want a lot of fine details, you're likely to get better results. I gave ChatGPT specific instructions in this prompt to be as detailed as possible. It's pretty good, but normal images without that instruction are more plain. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT Can you fine-tune results? Yes, you can edit images after you've generated them. The main way you do this is by sending a follow-up prompt asking for changes. You can highlight the specific area you want adjusted for more accurate adjustment. Click on the image to enlarge it and tap the paint brush icon in the upper right corner to highlight the specific region where you want changes to occur. You can then tell ChatGPT what you want fixed via a text prompt. I recommend making these region selections every time because you're more likely, though not guaranteed, to get your desired changes where you want them. If you're generating a text-heavy image, you may be able to get the service to fix typos. I tried a bunch of different methods, including highlighting the region where the typo is, rerunning the prompt and just straight up telling ChatGPT it messed up. Sometimes it will fix them, but you are absolutely going to need to be patient and work through those errors one by one. In my experience, the process was like fighting a hydra of errors -- fixing one error often spawned three new ones. It was a frustrating, usually unsuccessful process. I also ran into an issue where ChatGPT would repeatedly cut off the far left side of the image, meaning I had to go back in and ask for it to extend the left side so the whole image would be visible. While it was an easy fix, a simple aspect ratio issue is something that I expected a company like OpenAI would be better at addressing. Regenerating to get the whole image visible also opened the door for the program to change other, nonselected areas, which inevitably led to more errors. It's easy but annoying edits like these that make me wish OpenAI would integrate advanced editing tools like it has in Sora, its AI video generator. I liked the conversational flow for brainstorming and making big changes, but there were many times I was frustrated with the minimalist approach to editing features. It's super disappointing, and I hope OpenAI brings in better options in a future update. This birthday invitation is a good example of ChatGPT's abilities. It took some editing, as you can see through the progression. But the final result is super cute and usable. Created by Katelyn Chedraoui using ChatGPT How fast do images arrive? ChatGPT has the longest generation time of any AI image service I've tested. It takes anywhere between 1 to 2 minutes for an image to arrive, even using its most recent and supposedly fastest model, GPT-o4 mini. Most AI image generators take 20 to 40 seconds for a batch of four images. ChatGPT takes more than twice as long to create a single image. Watching the image load on my screen, from the top down, is reminiscent of watching my parents' old printer try to eke out a single paper -- agonizingly slow and frustrating. For people like me who are so used to near-instant responses, the speed is exasperating. I have to believe that generating images with a lot of text -- forcing the program to use a lot of energy -- is part of the reason for the delay. ChatGPT is a chatbot first, an image tool second After all my testing, I was left feeling disappointed. When a big tech company like OpenAI invests its resources and talent into a new feature like image generation, I expect something that can either match or surpass its competition. But ChatGPT is first and foremost a chatbot, and it showed throughout my testing. The primary purpose of a text-extruding machine like ChatGPT is to generate text. But like how ChatGPT's regular text results can be filled with made-up information, its AI images with text were wonky and typo-riddled. The lack of advanced editing tools is a real bummer, because any way to remediate the typos and errors would've made this program a lot more usable. Instead, it was a frustrating experience to have to fix individual things via prompting. More often than not, fixing one error would inadvertently create new ones in the subsequent generation. The conversational flow is nice, but it's not a viable substitute for specific post-generation editing tools. I wouldn't mind it's slow pace and ability to only generate one image per prompt if that image were good and easily editable. It's difficult for me to believe that this is the same company behind Sora, OpenAI's video generator, which has a much smoother, professional experience. I'm hopeful that the company might eventually bring these tools over to ChatGPT. Otherwise, I'll stick with using ChatGPT only for the occasional search query. For more, check out our guide to writing AI image prompts and best AI chatbots.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Disney's Doctor Odyssey In Distress Over Sexual Harassment Lawsuit
Season 1 of The Walt Disney Company's 'Doctor Odyssey' has been highly received by fans, but recent ... More allegations of on-set misconduct may taint the fate of the show. Contributing Author: Nicole Page The Walt Disney Company's Doctor Odyssey premiered on ABC in the fall of 2024, with a star-studded cast featuring Dawson's Creek's Joshua Jackson, Hamilton's Phillipa Anne Soo, and Skins' Sean Teale. While the series started off as one of the channel's top-rated shows, recent allegations of sexual harassment, wrongful termination, and retaliation from cast members may pose a threat to a second season. On May 30, 2025, three members of the production's prop department, Caroline Mack, Alicia Haverland, and Ava Steinbrenner filed a lawsuit against Disney and 20th Century Studios. The suit alleges sexual harassment, failure to prevent harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and negligent hiring, supervision, and retention. According to the complaint, Tyler Patton, hired as a prop assistant and married to Prop Master Tammie Patton, was brought on despite prior knowledge of sexual harassment allegations against him on the set of Fox's House. While employed at Doctor Odyssey, Mr. Patton allegedly subjected the Plaintiffs to repeated instances of 'sexual jokes, innuendos, comments, sexual gestures and images, and unwanted touching,' from both Mr. Patton and his friends. When Mr. Patton was asked to stop, the victims were met with laughter and escalation of the sexual commentary. Mr. Patton was aware of his misconduct and position of power over his subordinates, verbally exclaiming, 'If I wasn't fucking the boss, I'd be fired' after one instance in which he showed Ms. Haverland a sexually explicit image. Ms. Patton witnessed some of these events firsthand, yet no action was taken until over two weeks after formal complaints were filed against Mr. Patton. Following her husband's termination, Ms. Patton allegedly retaliated against the Plaintiffs by screaming, assigning demeaning tasks, and threatening termination of employment, among other things. Instead of providing assistance, the plaintiffs allege that HR repeatedly undermined their concerns. In one cited instance, despite their requests for confidentiality and over the plaintiffs' objections, Ms. Patton was invited to a meeting to address her own conduct. When they complained, the plaintiffs were purportedly told '[T] In a written statement to Forbes' Legal Entertainment channel, legal representatives of the Plaintiffs have noted, 'As detailed in their complaint, our clients suffered severe and troubling sex-based harassment while working in the Doctor Odyssey props department. The companies that made and profited from Doctor Odyssey failed to prevent this egregious conduct and instead fostered a culture and workplace that allowed it to happen.' While the show left fans in awe, three members of the production's prop department alleged ... More disturbing details of what occurred behind the scenes, after being subjected to sexual harassment for weeks on end. On August 31, 2024, the entire prop department was notified their jobs were terminated with the exception of Don Bracken, Mr. Patton's friend and replacement. Directly after the so-called 'lay-offs' the production 'hired a whole new set of employees to replace the Plaintiffs and other Props Department employees for the Doctor Odyssey Season 1 project.' The lawsuit alleges that the layoffs are believed to have been orchestrated in retaliation for the complaints. Legal representatives of the Plaintiffs continued to write, 'When our clients took the difficult step of raising these issues with Defendants' human resources personnel, Defendants decided the 'show must go on' at all costs and with conscious disregard for our clients' well-being and careers. Instead of remedying the issues, Defendants took the easy route by summarily 'laying off' our clients and others in the props department and then replacing them shortly thereafter.' 'We look forward to presenting Defendants' misconduct to a jury and obtaining justice for Ms. Mack, Ms. Haverland, and Ms. Steinbrenner,' said the aforementioned legal representatives. At this time, the Defendants have not filed a counterclaim. Forbes has reached out to both parties for comments. Disney's response and what happens next in this litigation raises major stakes for a post #MeToo ... More society. The Plaintiffs' accounts outline a consistent pattern of misconduct, indifference of management, and institutional retaliation which was apparently implemented against multiple employees after they complained about sexual harassment. Movie sets, although perhaps more glamorous than offices, factories, or any other run-of-the-mill workplaces, are governed by the same employment laws and must provide the same employee protections as any other workplace. If instead of addressing employee complaints about sexual harassment, Disney's response was to fire the employees voicing the complaints, that would certainly constitute retaliation. According to the facts alleged, Disney went even further and also fired everyone else in the prop department who may have been subjected to or at least witnessed the complaints about behavior. That is an unusual and seemingly extreme move for an employer to make. It is not clear what motivated that action, although the Plaintiffs posit it was done in an effort to avoid additional complaints about the workplace environment. Above all, what seems especially egregious to me is that Disney may have known that Patton had prior harassment complaints made against him on other productions but hired him anyway. We are no longer in a peak #MeToo world, which makes it even harder for people who suffer harassment at work to speak up. Disney's response and what happens next in this litigation will be telling, not only about this case, but about whether we can expect to see a backslide to the time when men routinely got away with sexually harassing female employees and studios looked the other way. Let's hope that's not the case. Nicole Page is the Head of the Media and Entertainment practice and Partner at Reavis Page Jump LLP, where she represents film, television and podcast clients in connection with issues ranging from financing, rights acquisition, production, talent and distribution agreements, exploitation of ancillary rights, content licensing, fair use and clearance issues and an array of related matters. She also represents creative talent, athletes, and authors in their various endeavors and negotiates executive compensation deals for top talent at leading entertainment companies.