logo
The JCB Prize for Literature has shut down. What else has ended with it?

The JCB Prize for Literature has shut down. What else has ended with it?

Scroll.in21-06-2025
One full month after the announcement of the 2025 International Booker Prize winner, it is difficult to enter a London bookshop without seeing the winning book, Kannada writer Banu Mushtaq's short story collection Heart Lamp, translated by Deepa Bhasthi, displayed in full glory. From the Foyle's shop window in Charing Cross to special tables in Waterstones and Hatchard's, not to mention dozens of independent bookshops, Heart Lamp is, quite literally, everywhere.
While sales figures in the UK are yet to be disclosed publicly, publishers And Other Stories, whose decision to publish the book in the UK made it eligible for the prize, have been working hard to meet the demand from online and in-store buyers. In India, sales are believed to be closing in on the 100,000-mark, an incredible achievement by any standards for a work of serious contemporary fiction, and a translation, and a volume of short stories, at that.
These figures are in the same orbit as the sales of Geetanjali Shree's Tomb of Sand, the English translation of Ret Samadhi by Daisy Rockwell, which won the International Booker Prize in 2022, and of the Hindi original. Clearly, when an Indian book wins the International Booker Prize for its English translation, readers – some regular, many more sporadic – in the country snap up copies. Earlier, we saw the same success for Indian or India-linked winners of the Booker Prize – Salman Rushdie, Arundhati Roy, Kiran Desai, and Aravind Adiga – for their books.
The end of the story
This is exactly what the JCB Prize for Literature had wanted, hoped and expected to achieve with its winning titles in India. Launched in 2018, the prize picked seven winners in seven successive years, awarding the writer Rs 25 lakh, and the translator, when there was one, Rs 10 lakh, before quietly disappearing.
The prize that had positioned itself as the Indian Booker, and had definitive plans to make the same impact on the world of books in India, had the unlikeliest of endings – at least, in the form in which it had begun life – by simply ghosting the entire literary world. No announcement, no farewell, no summing up.
Of course, the modest ceremony for the 2024 award, held not at a swank venue but at the sponsor's corporate headquarters in Faridabad, Haryana, held a clue. So did the near-total lack of marketing for the shortlisted books. Everyone in the literary establishment, especially in Delhi, had an inkling that this might be a swansong. There is still no formal acknowledgement, but with no announcements having been made for the 2025 awards, it is obviously the end of the prize as we knew it.
The only official document in this context is a document that has been uploaded to the website of the JCB Prize for Literature, stating, among other things, that the 'Notice is hereby given that in pursuance of sub-section (4)(ii) of section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, an application has been made by JCB Literature Foundation to the Registrar of companies, Delhi & Haryana at Delhi for revocation of the licence issued to it under section 8(5) of the companies Act, 2013. After the cancellation of license, the company will be required to add the word 'Private Limited' to its name in place of 'Foundation'.
The same document, however, lists activities that are more or less the same as those involved in running the prize.
The same mills that churned with the rumours of closure have also been suggesting that the JCB Prize might be back, in a different form. The organisers have commissioned a survey to assess the impact of the prize over seven years, and many people in the world of books have been interviewed for it. But whether the findings will form the basis of a newer version of the prize, or will feed into a closure report, is a closely guarded secret at the moment.
Play
Why, then, did the JCB Prize fold? Why, for that matter, did its big-ticket predecessor, the DSC Prize for South Asian Literature go the same way after its 2019 awards, the ninth in the series that gave $25,000 to the winning title (shared equally between the writer and translator in case of a translated book). The onset of the pandemic may have forced the hands of the sponsors, although there, too, no formal announcement was made.
Still, the JCB Prize for Literature came on the scene with a grand flourish and with seemingly powerful intent, as exemplified by the extravagant marketing, advertising, and event-management that went into the first two years of the prize with Rana Dasgupta as the director. Dasgupta, for reasons never made clear to the literary community, was let go of immediately after the second year of the prize, and a few months later, Mita Kapur, founder of the literary agency Siyahi, took over, leading the prize over the next five years, including the difficult ones during the pandemic.
To its credit, despite having to go online for everything, the prize did not falter in its commitment during this period, returning to something like the grandeur of its pre-pandemic version from 2022 onwards.
What changed, then, forcing the decision to close down? Maybe it is important to accept and acknowledge here that the corporate entity behind the prize, JCB, has had its own inadvertent image problem in India with its bulldozers being pressed into service for demolition of private property as a means of punitive administrative steps undertaken by several state governments. This even led to an open letter criticising the prize, signed by over 120 writers, translators, and publishers in 2024. But the company, of course, has not gone public with its reasons for stopping – or, at the very least, pausing – the prize.
Did the prize make an impact?
Perhaps the more important question, however, is what sort of JCB-Prize-shaped hole there will be in India's literary world now. To make even informed guesses, it is, of course, necessary to consider the achievements of the prize over its seven years. And the very first question here is, are seven years long enough for a literary prize to have made significant effect?
The JCB Prize for Literature was by no means the first high-profile literary prize in India. The Crossword Book Award was instituted by the bookshop chain back in 1998 and continues to be run despite a brief break. The Hindu Literary Prize began life in 2010, continuing the till the outbreak of the pandemic in 2019. The Sahitya Akademi awards were established as far back as in 1954, and continue to be given out. And there was, of course, the DSC Prize for South Asian Literature.
Stepping as it did into a space already primed for literary awards, the JCB Prize had the luxury of being able to hit the ground running. Given this backdrop, seven years was long enough to build on an impactful beginning. For comparison, remember that Tomb of Sand won the International Booker in its seventh year.
The greatest opportunity for the prize was to create interest – and, by extension, a return to a reading culture – in not just the winning book but the entire list of shortlisted and even longlisted titles. Over seven years, these numbered 71 (in 2019, two of Perumal Murugan's novels were considered as a combined work) and 35, respectively, amounting to a fine showcase of fiction from India. And yet, despite efforts ranging from special films, appearances at literary festivals, and bookshop partnerships, none of the novels could be said to have gained a boost because of their appearance on the longlist or shortlist.
Why, even the winning books have not reported anything remotely close to the kind of sales that India's two International Booker Prize winners did. Consider the seven fine novels that have won the JCB Prize between 2018 and 2024.
2018: Jasmine Days, Benyamin, translated from the Malayalam by Shahnaz Habib.
2019: The Far Field, Madhuri Vijay.
2020: Moustache, S Hareesh, translated from the Malayalam by Jayasree Kalathil.
2021: Delhi, A Soliloquy, M Mukundan, translated from the Malayalam by Fathima EV and Nandakumar K.
2022: The Paradise of Food, Khalid Jawed, translated from the Urdu by Baran Farooqi.
2023: Fire Bird, Perumal Murugan, translated from the Tamil by Janaki Kannan.
2024: Lorenzo Searches for the Meaning of Life, Upamanyu Chatterjee.
While official sales figures are not available, the informal response from publishers was that none of these books became break-out successes among book-buyers.
Play
Arguably the most important actual achievement of the prize, therefore, was to create expectations of winning, among writers and publishers. For the first time, both of these groups thought actively about the possibility of winning the prize when they put out a title. Perhaps the great change in publishing programmes came because of the decision of the prize to consider translated books as well as those written in English. As many as 19 of the 36 shortlisted titles over seven years have been translations from various Indian languages.
While it might be an exaggeration to state that publishers looked at translations with greater intent because of the chances of one of them winning the prize, there was undoubtedly a renewed focus on translated because of the prize.
The impact of the end of the prize, then, will be felt mostly by the publishing community. Most of all, probably, by the writers and translators who will not win the Rs 25-lakh and Rs 10-lakh purses. With serious writing being a monetarily dismal practice in India, awards like these can go a long way towards supporting future work by prize-winning authors.
For readers, unfortunately, the closure of the prize may have very little impact. Still, the JCB Prize for Literature has create a model. The literary community will certainly be hoping for a second version of the prize – or a new one to replace it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Goat Life 'lacked naturality', performances weren't 'authentic': National Awards jury on Prithviraj film's snub
The Goat Life 'lacked naturality', performances weren't 'authentic': National Awards jury on Prithviraj film's snub

Hindustan Times

time12 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

The Goat Life 'lacked naturality', performances weren't 'authentic': National Awards jury on Prithviraj film's snub

No National Awards for The Goat Life However, many on social media have wondered why Prithviraj Sukumaran and his film Aadujeevitham: The Goat Life failed to garner a single award. Now, National Awards jury member Pradeep Nair has revealed in an interview with Onmanorama that the Blessy directorial was indeed in contention for the awards but missed out during the final discussions. During the interaction, Pradeep Nair said that the decision came down to Jury Chairperson Ashutosh Gowariker's opinions on the film. He said, 'Jury Chairperson Ashutosh Gowariker had seen the movie at a previous film festival in Goa and had serious concerns about the film's adaptation and execution. Gowariker and others also felt the adaptation lacked naturality and the performances didn't feel authentic.' K R Gokul was in contention to win? Pradeep also said that the film was in contention in categories of Best Male Playback Singer and Best Lyrics (for Rafeeq Ahammed's Periyone Rahmane), but did not proceed further because there was no proper English translation of the lyrics, which were submitted by the producers. Rohit won the award for Best Playback singer (male) for Premisthunna in Baby, while Kasarla Shyam's work in Ooru Palleturu for the film Balagam won the award for Best Lyrics. Meanwhile, Pradeep also added, 'K R Gokul's character was widely appreciated by the jury for its freshness and impact. Still, he was not awarded as categories also considered the overall quality of the film.' KR Gokul played the role of Hakim in the film. About The Goat Life Directed by Blessy, Aadujeevitham: The Goat Life is a biographical survival drama based on the life of Najeeb, a Malayali immigrant labourer in Saudi Arabia. It received critical acclaim and went on to do well at the box office after its release in 2024. The film earned ₹158 crore, becoming one of the highest-grossing Malayalam films of all time.

Kingdom Box Office Collection Day 3: Vijay Deverakonda's Film Is "Blazing Fire"
Kingdom Box Office Collection Day 3: Vijay Deverakonda's Film Is "Blazing Fire"

NDTV

time12 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Kingdom Box Office Collection Day 3: Vijay Deverakonda's Film Is "Blazing Fire"

New Delhi: Vijay Deverakonda's Kingdom opened its doors to the public on July 31. The film features Vijay Deverakonda in a never-seen-before avatar. As per Sacnilk, the Gowtam Tinnanuri directorial has minted Rs 2.62 crore on its first Saturday at the domestic box office across languages. With this, the total collection of Kingdom now stands at Rs 28.12 crore. The report added that the Kingdom 'had an overall 38.78% Telugu Occupancy on Saturday.' On its first day, the film minted Rs 18 crore across languages at the Indian box office. Kingdom has been produced by Sithara Entertainments, Srikara Studios, and Fortune Four Cinemas. Bhagyashri Borse, Satya Dev, and Ayyappa P Sharma are also part of the film. Sithara Entertainments shared a post of X to announce that Kingdom has minted Rs 53 crore worldwide in 2 days. Sharing a poster of Vijay Deverakonda's character from the film, the makers wrote, 'That's how KINGDOM gets hailed big with the audience's love. Box Office Blockbuster Kingdom hits 53Cr+ worldwide gross in 2 days.' In a follow-up post, the production house added that Kingdom is 'blazing fire at the box office on Saturday.' It added, 'The king continues to dominate. Kingdom storms ahead with monstrous bookings 7K+ tickets every hour on BookMyShow and fans turning theatres into a festival of celebrations.' Ahead of the film's release, Vijay Deverakonda at a press meet said that this was the first time he was feeling 'calm' ahead of a release. 'Usually before a film releases, things are a little chaotic. Everyone is a little nervous, and the phone doesn't stop ringing. However, this is the first time I am feeling calm and content before the release day. In the last 2-3 years, I have had many sleepless nights. But last night, I had a good night's sleep and came here to meet you all. If I am feeling this satisfied, it's all because of the love Telugu film-goers are showering upon us, which reflects in the advance collections for Kingdom,' he said.

Shah Rukh Khan's 20-year-old National Award regret resurfaces after his big win. Check viral video
Shah Rukh Khan's 20-year-old National Award regret resurfaces after his big win. Check viral video

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Shah Rukh Khan's 20-year-old National Award regret resurfaces after his big win. Check viral video

An Old Video Brings Back a Popular Argument The 'Swades vs Hum Tum' Debate Reignited Khan's Gratitude and Reflections on Recognition A Moment Long Awaited Shah Rukh Khan, often regarded as one of the most influential figures in Indian cinema, was recently awarded the National Film Award for Best Actor for his role in Jawan, marking a significant milestone in his 33-year-long film career. He shared the prestigious award with Vikrant Massey, who was recognised for 12th Fail. While the honour was widely celebrated, it reignited a long-standing debate among fans and critics — whether Shah Rukh deserved the award much earlier, particularly for his acclaimed performance in Swades (2004).Shortly after the 71st National Film Awards were announced, an old video resurfaced on social media platforms, including Reddit and X, where Shah Rukh candidly spoke about the time he missed out on the National Award for Swades. The clip is from a late-2000s Tag Heuer event where Shah Rukh was seen on stage alongside director Kunal Kohli and anchor Mandira the conversation, Khan praised Kohli's work, especially Fanaa and Hum Tum. He playfully noted that Kohli's actor had won the National Award for Hum Tum — referring to Saif Ali Khan — and then added, in a tongue-in-cheek manner, that he believed he should have received the award instead for Swades. The moment, delivered with his usual charm, drew smiles and laughter from the audience, including Kohli video triggered renewed discussions online, with fans expressing continued disappointment over the 2005 decision. Many argued that Swades, although not a commercial success, had immense critical acclaim and cultural significance. Shah Rukh's portrayal of Mohan Bhargava, a NASA engineer reconnecting with rural India, is still seen as one of his most powerful Reddit users offered context, pointing out that filmmaker TS Nagabharana, who was part of the jury that year, had reportedly questioned the originality of Swades, suggesting it bore similarities to one of his own works. This may have played a role in the final decision, fans the announcement of his Jawan win, Shah Rukh posted a heartfelt video on Instagram thanking his director Atlee, his family, fans, and his entire team. He reflected on the significance of the award, describing it as more than a personal achievement — a reminder of the value and impact of shared that the National Award serves as encouragement to continue evolving and contributing meaningfully to storytelling. It represented, in his words, a responsibility to portray truth on screen, especially in a world full of Shah Rukh's fans have long championed his performance in Swades as award-worthy, his win for Jawan has brought a sense of closure and celebration. For many, it's not just about a trophy — it's recognition of a body of work that has shaped modern Indian 71st National Film Awards also honoured Rani Mukerji as Best Actress for Mrs Chatterjee vs Norway, while 12th Fail was named Best Film. However, Shah Rukh's moment stood out as a long overdue acknowledgment for a star who has dominated screens, hearts, and headlines for decades.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store