DWP making tweak to both new and old basic state pension this week
The Department for Work and Pensions is tweaking both the New and Basic State Pension this week. Under the triple-lock guarantee, from April the DWP single state pension will increase from £221.20 per week (£11,502 per year) to £230.30 per week (£11,975 per year).
The 'old' state pension will increase from £169.50 per week (£8,814 per year) to £176.45 per week (£9,175 per year). Last year, the ONS revealed that the average earnings growth in the three months to July is 4.1%, up from its previous estimate of 4%.
The single state pension is set to exceed the personal allowance of £12,570 by 2027/28, even if the benefit increases by only 2.5% a year (the lowest possible element of the triple-lock guarantee).
READ MORE: Millions warned to 'brace' for HMRC rule change which kicks in Sunday morning
READ MORE: UK households urged to come forward for free £632 water bill discount
READ MORE HMRC urges any parent earning under £200,000 to claim free £2,000 perk
At some point during this Parliament, the new government will need to address the thorny question of what the state pension should be worth and when Brits should receive.
Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, comments: 'UK pensioners should from next April see a sizeable increase to their state pension of almost £500 a year, to bring it to just under £12,000.
'The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, may choose to shout out about this inflation-beating boost in her first Budget in two weeks' time. Criticism of the decision to scrap the Winter Fuel Payment for all pensioners except those that claim Pension Credit still lingers, and the government will hope this rise in Brits' state pensions will publicly reinforce its commitment to the triple-lock, as well as overshadowing the £200 most pensioners will lose this winter.
'But how long they can keep these promises remains to be seen. The state pension is now at a level perilously close to the frozen personal allowance and should overtake it in two years' time. At that point something must surely give. But slowing the increase in state pension growth or unfreezing the personal allowance both seem unlikely.
'It could be that this fast-approaching crunch time means the government will finally be forced to address the question of how much the state pension should really offer, at what age, and how it can increase payments sustainably each year.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed. The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves only has herself to blame for this recession
Companies were hammered by a steep rise in employment taxes. Business rates went up sharply as reliefs were wound down. The living wage was pushed up, and stamp duty breaks were slashed. Against that dismal backdrop, it is probably a miracle that the GDP figures for April published today recorded only a 0.3 per cent month-on-month decline in output. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves will shamelessly try to blame that on the tariff war started by president Trump. But the blunt truth is this. The unfolding recession was entirely predictable – and she has only herself to blame. April was always going to be a tough month for anyone struggling to run a business in the UK. Employer National Insurance went up, and we saw the initial impact of that in the annual loss of 274,000 jobs in the employment data reported earlier this week. Likewise, one of the biggest rises in the living wage was imposed, and we saw the effect of that in declining hours worked in sectors such as shops and restaurants, which need lots of modestly paid staff. Business rates went up sharply, as reliefs were wound down, with many pubs facing an extra £12,000 or more in the amount that they have to pay to the local council, and closures are now running at 100 a month. Stamp duty went up as reliefs were phased out, and we have already seen the consequences of that in the 0.4 per cent decline in home prices reported by Halifax last week. In the background, industrial electricity prices have remained by far the highest in the world, forcing factories to close their doors. One by one Reeves has taken the major sectors of the British economy – property, hospitality, retailing and manufacturing – and whacked them with huge extra charges. Sure, it didn't help that the US imposed tariffs on the UK along with its other major trading partners. And yet, in reality, the sharp fall in output witnessed in April was entirely self-imposed. It took an extraordinary level of incompetence, and a breath-taking level of arrogance, to sequence such a punishing round of tax increases so that they all kicked in at the same time. It is not as if Reeves was not warned of the devastating impact of her tax rises on businesses. The M&S boss Stuart Machin called for the NI rise to be phased in back in February but was ignored. The British Beer and Pub Association called for help with business rates, but no one at the Treasury paid any attention. Rightmove called for stamp duty relief to be extended, and so did many other estate agents, but the Government didn't listen. The list goes on and on. Time and time again, businesses have told the Chancellor that her policies are killing their trade, only to be ignored. As it has turned out, however, they were completely right, and today's GDP figures have proved that. It is going to get much worse over the next few months. We have only seen the start of the fall in employment after the NI rise. After all, if your wage bill is out of control, it takes time to slim staff numbers. There are procedures to follow before you dismiss someone, and most small companies will rely on natural wastage, and simply not replace people, instead of risking the cost of an employment tribunal. Stamp duty has only just gone up, and it will take buyers a while to figure out they can no longer afford to move. Meanwhile, retail sales are falling again, and the inevitability of more tax rises on business in the autumn is deterring investment. Reeves chose to ignore the warnings that her tax raids would crash the economy. She will now have to reap the consequences of those decisions – and unfortunately so will the rest of us. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed. The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.' Sign in to access your portfolio
