logo
How Much Salt Is Too Much Salt When It Comes To Your Health?

How Much Salt Is Too Much Salt When It Comes To Your Health?

Buzz Feed11 hours ago

Low-sodium soy sauce, soup and snacks dominate supermarket shelves, so it seems pretty obvious that a lot of Americans are aware that they need to lower their sodium intake. But to what extent is it really a problem?
Most people have no idea how much salt they're eating every day, or how much is recommended (particularly for those with certain health conditions). And did you know that some people are actually encouraged to eat more salt?
We spoke with doctors to answer all of our saltiest questions.
First of all, we do need to eat a certain amount of sodium.
According to Dr. Columbus Batiste, the regional chief of cardiology with Kaiser Permanente in Southern California, 'We need the right amount of salt to provide our bodies with important electrolytes that can regulate things like muscle contractions, fluid balance and nerve transmission.'
Dr. Rohan Khera, an assistant professor of cardiovascular medicine at the Yale School of Medicine, told HuffPost that salt is 'needed for every single body cell, especially the more active heart and muscle tissues.'
Moreover, salt plays a role in 'sweating, normal cell function, metabolism, maintenance of body fluids, and keeping muscles and nerves working properly,' said Dr. John Higgins, a cardiologist with UTHealth Houston.
Healthy adults only need 500 milligrams of salt per day (about a quarter-teaspoon of salt) to maintain healthy body function, according to cardiologist Dr. Nieca Goldberg, the medical director of Atria New York and a clinical associate professor of medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
Limiting salt intake to such a paltry amount isn't realistic for many people, and that's OK for most healthy adults, as long as they don't overdo it. The American Heart Association recommends that healthy adults consume no more than 2,300 milligrams of salt per day and ideally no more than 1,500 milligrams, or about three-quarters of a teaspoon of salt per day.
However, most Americans eat far more than the recommended amount of salt, according to Goldberg. 'The average American eats about 3,500 milligrams of sodium a day,' she said. 'Seventy percent of that salt that consumed is from processed foods.'
Although the recommended maximum of salt may seem low for such an important nutrient, there is a good reason for these guidelines. Khera explained that 'our body is built to preserve sodium, so we only have to supplement a little in our diet to ensure we are in good balance' — and too much salt is risky for some people.
What are the risks of eating too much salt?
Too much salt can be dangerous. This is true whether you add salt to your food or purchase processed foods made with salt.
According to Higgins, 'A high-salt diet can contribute to high blood pressure, stroke, heart disease, osteoporosis, stomach cancer, kidney disease, renal stones and obesity.' Since too much salt can increase blood pressure, this has the ability to cause a heart attack or stroke, he added.
Other risks of high salt intake include blood vessel damage and negative impacts on hormonal and inflammatory pathways, immune response, the gut microbiome and body fat metabolism, Batiste said. He added that the effects of consuming too much salt can lead to premature death.
Are we all at equal risk?
Not everyone needs to worry. Too much salt 'may not be bad for everyone. It depends on the person's health status,' Goldberg explained. 'If you are healthy and have low blood pressure, salt may not be harmful,' she said.
If you aren't sure whether you need to watch your salt intake, Goldberg recommended discussing your diet with your doctor.
High amounts of salt are dangerous for many people, however.
For those with high blood pressure 'in the pre-hypertensive range or higher,' or with 'heart failure or kidney disease,' Goldberg cautioned that 'high salt intake may worsen your condition.'
Higgins said that patients with moderate to severe heart failure should limit their salt intake to under 2,000 milligrams, or about one teaspoon, a day. Those who have had a heart attack or stroke should consume under 1,000 milligrams, or about a half-teaspoon, per day.
Here are the best ways to lower salt intake.
Higgins recommended switching out table salt for an alternative like Morton Salt Substitute, which does not contain any sodium. Goldberg also recommended looking for lower-salt versions of foods that you already eat and becoming skilled at reading labels.
For those with high blood pressure, Higgins recommended eating fruits and vegetables high in potassium, which can lower blood pressure naturally. These include potatoes, tomatoes, spinach, raisins, lima beans, lentils, bananas, oranges, watermelon and cantaloupe.
Some people may actually need to eat more salt.
MirageC / Getty Images
Although most people consume too much salt, some conditions require more salt. However, before increasing your salt intake, Khera emphasized that 'these are specialized conditions that require specific expertise,' and that no one should increase their salt intake before having 'explicit discussions with their doctor.' The following conditions may require adding salt to one's diet:
Orthostatic hypotension. Khera explained that if people have low blood pressure when standing up, or orthostatic hypotension, they may need more salt. When a patient is diagnosed with this condition — one variation of which is postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome — doctors 'sometimes recommend salt to retain more fluid in the body and have fewer dizzy or loss-of-consciousness spells,' Khera said.
High-performance athletes. Khera explained that high-performance athletes may lose a lot of salt via sweat, especially if they are training or competing in hot climates. However, he noted that 'this is rarely needed,' and that when it is, 'modest increases are sufficient.'
Cystic fibrosis. Individuals with cystic fibrosis lose salt through their sweat more than those without the condition, Khera said. That means they 'often require an increase in intake in salt,' although the amount of additional salt each person needs varies and is determined by their doctor.
Addison's disease. According to Batiste, 'People with Addison's disease, a condition affecting the adrenal glands, may experience low levels of sodium.' Health care providers may recommend increased salt intake to maintain electrolyte balance.
Electrolyte abnormalities. Some electrolyte abnormalities, such as low blood sodium or hyponatremia, are treated with increased sodium intake. However, these conditions are sometimes treated with reduced fluid intake.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A member of RFK Jr.'s MAHA movement and a public health expert met on Zoom. Here's what happened next.
A member of RFK Jr.'s MAHA movement and a public health expert met on Zoom. Here's what happened next.

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

A member of RFK Jr.'s MAHA movement and a public health expert met on Zoom. Here's what happened next.

The conversations are the brainchild of Brinda Adhikari, a journalist and former television producer who grew increasingly concerned about Americans' mistrust of institutions after Donald Trump's reelection. 'These are two groups that talk a lot about each other,' said Adhikari, who has worked for ABC News and the podcast 'The Problem with Jon Stewart.' 'I just don't see a lot of spaces where they talk to each other or with each other.' The conversations are captured on Adhikari's weekly podcast, ' Advertisement Despite the high stakes, the goal wasn't to change anyone's mind, said Adhikari, who lives in Brooklyn. She hoped both sides would discover shared concerns and better understand their opponents' perspectives. Those common worries included the risks of corporate influence in science and medicine, the possible harms Medicaid cuts could cause, and the safety of Americans' food. 'I didn't expect the areas of agreement would be so obvious that we would actually find spaces to work together almost immediately,' said Megan Ranney, dean of the Yale School of Public Health, who participated in the conversations. Advertisement Though 'We really came into this feeling ostracized,' said Elizabeth Frost, a panelist who led Kennedy's Ohio presidential campaign operation. 'What really surprised me is a lot of people in public health feel the same way.' The two groups, five MAHA representatives and the same number of public health experts, met twice in May. A third conversation involved a few of the same panelists, plus MAHA representatives from Georgia. Some meetings took on the tenor of estranged family members working to heal rifts. MAHA is grounded in a deep skepticism of establishment medicine. Many gravitated toward the movement after feeling let down by doctors they had trusted. Public health experts derive their knowledge from establishment medicine: They rely on hard-won data and the scientific method for their conclusions. One side feels ignored or dismissed. The other is frustrated and dismayed by how little sway scientific evidence and expertise hold with some MAHA adherents. Advertisement 'Scientists try their best to be open-minded, and ... we push and test each other to make sure that we're coming up with new ideas and using the best methods possible and getting as close to truth as we can,' Ranney said during the podcast. She then asked Frost, 'What would help folks to feel like science was being done with and for them?' 'There was a lot of outrage for having any questions about the way that the COVID pandemic was handled,' Frost responded. 'People on the MAHA side of it felt very demonized and very othered, that they weren't allowed to be a part of the conversation.' The MAHA movement coalesced around Kennedy's presidential campaign last year, though it adopted its name only after he suspended his campaign for president and endorsedTrump and his Make American Great Again movement. MAHA emphasizes personal choice in health, with a focus on addressing chronic illness, food quality, and distrust of the pharmaceutical industry. It also is associated with opposing longstanding, and well-proven, public health cornerstones, including the importance of widespread vaccination and water fluoridation to improve dental health. It's proven to have surprising appeal to members of both political parties, drawing liberals, MAGA Republicans, and independents, said Frost. As a result, members' beliefs are highly heterodox. Antivax sentiments are far from uniform, and dissatisfaction with overall policies in the Trump administration isn't unusual. Mark Harris, another Ohio MAHA leader, described himself as an independent thinker. He disapproves of proposed deep cuts to Medicaid and was among the first in his friend group to recognize how serious COVID would be. He did take the COVID-19 vaccine, he said. Advertisement 'I do believe in herd immunity,' he said in an interview. 'I believe in vaccines being very helpful in achieving that.' He emphasized during one of the podcasts, though, that the word vaccine implies permanent protection against an illness, and seems like a misnomer when applied to the COVID shots. COVID shots reliably offer long-term protection against serious illness and death but don't keep the virus entirely at bay over more than a few months. 'I completely agree with you,' said Paul Offit, one of the nation's most prominent vaccine experts and a member of the Food and Drug Administration's Vaccine Advisory Committee. 'Very early we should have made that very clear what the vaccine can and can't do.' The two sides also generally agree on why so many Americans have lost faith in the medical establishment. Access is expensive and difficult. Insurance coverage can appear arbitrary and confusing. Interactions with physicians are often through overcrowded emergency departments or with harried primary care physicians with barely the time to spend 10 minutes with a patient. Public health officials are not often visible, trusted figures in a community until an emergency arrives, leaving them with limited credibility, noted Craig Spencer, associate professor of the practice of health services, policy and practice at Brown University. Many public health officials wish scientific evidence spoke for itself, particularly when it comes to the power of vaccines. Polio is virtually unheard of in the United States. Measles was eliminated in this country before lower vaccination rates allowed it to resurface. The absence of these illnesses makes it hard for people who didn't live before widespread inoculation to fully believe in the value of vaccines, Spencer said, and data alone can't compete with a powerful messenger. Advertisement People like Kennedy have stepped in to fill that communication gap. Many of his ideas aren't supported by science, Spencer said, but his ability to command an audience is enviable. 'They've done such an incredible job just being out there,' he said of MAHA leaders and influencers. 'Even if they're saying some things, a lot of things that I wouldn't agree with, they're out there and that is instilling trust." During the podcast, Frost described how angry she was that people with COVID had been denied ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Offit responded with a layman's explanation of the evidence that the drugs aren't effective against the virus and, in the case of hydroxychloroquine, may do harm. Yet in the interview Frost didn't sound especially convinced, saying she gives the most weight to what her physician recommends. That wasn't evidence of the podcast's failure, Adhikari said. 'That you're going to sit down with someone whom you've never met and act as though you could say something to them within a two hour conversation that will completely change something that is a deep-rooted value for them, it's just not reasonable,' she said. 'What I am trying to do is to build the bridge, to trust each other enough to even be at the same table.' Jason Laughlin can be reached at

NIH chief sidesteps controversy while other officials court it
NIH chief sidesteps controversy while other officials court it

Axios

time36 minutes ago

  • Axios

NIH chief sidesteps controversy while other officials court it

National Institutes of Health director Jay Bhattacharya didn't aggressively push back and defend Trump administration budget cuts and grant freezes when senators grilled him last week about plans for his agency. An $18 billion cut in the 2026 NIH budget request was just a starting point for negotiations, he said. Why it matters: The hearing showed how the former Stanford professor is trying to deflect controversy over the administration's health agenda while others on President Trump's health team under Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have leaned into their roles as disruptors. That's raising questions about who has the final say over the government's biomedical research hub. Bhattacharya is "in a difficult position with limited influence," Capital Alpha Partners analyst Rob Smith wrote in a note on Friday. "RFK appears to be running the show at the subagencies he oversees as HHS Secretary. It's our understanding that very little happens without his input." What they're saying: An HHS spokesperson told Axios that NIH and Bhattacharya are fully committed to advancing research, improving health outcomes and supporting scientific discovery. Constructive criticism pushes this innovation forward, they said. The big picture: NIH is the largest public payer of biomedical research in the world. It funds academic research and develops and funds much of the science behind products that drug companies eventually commercialize. The Trump budget's plan to cut its funding 40% next year could kneecap pharma and the biotech industry. State of play: Bhattacharya tried to find a middle ground during the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, taking credit for fighting what he called "politicized science" while telling lawmakers he didn't accept the job to terminate grants. "This is my first time through this budget fight, and so I'm still learning, but I'll tell you what I understand is that this — the budget — is a collaborative effort between Congress and the administration," Bhattacharya said. "We have tremendous health needs that we have to address. It's only excellent research that's going to solve those problems," he said. His written testimony didn't mention the cuts, instead laying out the administration's policy priorities for NIH and the funding they are requesting. Zoom in: It's true that the budget proposal is just the first step in a negotiation process, and Congress gets the final say on funding levels. But Bhattacharya's decision not to explicitly defend the budget cuts shows that his role remains cryptic on a health team that's eagerly pushing boundaries. Kennedy defended the cuts strongly when he appeared in front of the same panel last month. "All the money that we've been pouring into these programs for years has not resulted in better health for Americans. ... We won't solve this problem by throwing more money at it. We must spend smarter," Kennedy said. The intrigue: Bhattacharya was sworn in as NIH director in April — just as mass layoffs at the agency ordered by Kennedy and DOGE went into effect. He quickly sent an all-hands letter to staff expressing gratitude for their work and pledging to implement changes "humanely." Bhattacharya has set up an appeals process to review grants that were terminated through keyword searches and other aggressive efforts to root out DEI initiatives. NIH was one of the first agencies to tell employees they didn't have to answer Elon Musk's "five things" weekly emails, and Bhattacharya reportedly called the task silly in an address to NIH staff. But the frozen grants and budget request haven't earned him much of a grace period with Congress. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said last week the proposed budget cuts would "delay or stop effective treatments and cures from being developed for diseases like cancer, Alzheimer's, Type 1 diabetes — I could go on and on." "A President's budget is not a 'negotiation with Congress,' it's a statement of priorities and values," Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), the ranking member of the committee's subpanel on health, told Axios in a statement. Reality check: Bhattacharya is no stranger to controversy. During the pandemic, he was disparaged by the medical establishment for co-authoring the Great Barrington Declaration, a petition arguing for COVID to spread among young, healthy people to reach herd immunity faster. He's been receptive to the idea that NIH-funded research in China led directly to the spread of COVID, and he's cast doubt on the merits of gender-affirming medical care for kids. "I think Dr. Bhattacharya wants NIH to continue to set the pace for medical progress, but what matters is whether he acts on intention and stops the dismantling of American-led research," Ellie Dehoney, senior vice president of policy and advocacy at Research!America, told Axios in an email. What we're watching: Bhattacharya is demurring, and there's bipartisan interest in keeping NIH well-funded. Congress in the near term is likely to maintain the status quo through stopgap spending measures.

Trump turned 79 this weekend and will be 82 at the end of his term. How old is too old?
Trump turned 79 this weekend and will be 82 at the end of his term. How old is too old?

Boston Globe

time43 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump turned 79 this weekend and will be 82 at the end of his term. How old is too old?

Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT The president is an old man. He sometimes mixes up names or garbles his words. Some voters worry that age is affecting his performance in arguably the world's most demanding job. Those sentences are true today: Donald Trump, who turned 79 on Saturday, is the oldest president ever at this point in his term. But they've also been true for the past eight years, both during Trump's first term and during Joe Biden's. At the end of Trump's second, he will be the oldest president ever — and among the oldest leaders Advertisement Many politicians, like many people, remain sharp and spry into old age. And older leaders can bring strengths: More experience and longtime ties with the voters they represent. But age also brings health vulnerabilities. Since the first members of Congress convened in 1789, Today's newsletter explains what we know about Trump's health and the ongoing debate around older elected officials. Advertisement The age of Trump Aging increases the risk of getting cancer, having heart attacks and strokes, and developing Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and other neurodegenerative diseases. By the time Americans reach 65, about 90 percent suffer from at least one chronic condition, said Dr. Eric Topol, a cardiologist who studies aging. Topol published a book last month, ' On the other hand, Trump doesn't drink, and his wealth and office give him access to top-tier medical care. Trump's doctor calls his health ' Trump has for years given rambling speeches and misstated facts, which could make it hard to tell if his faculties are changing. Still, he often appears more tired today than he did in his first term. During the 2024 campaign, Trump warned that Biden would 'plunge the world into World War II' and mixed up Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley. Since starting his second term, Trump has Advertisement Right now, Americans don't seem too concerned about Trump's age and health: less than a third say those factors ' Age-old debate Being old, of course, is no guarantee of infirmity. And casually dismissing aging lawmakers also risks stoking stigma against older Americans in general. But Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election after a Some argue that younger politicians offer a clear break with the past and are more attuned to younger voters' concerns. Over the weekend, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, 35, Most voters, though, may have other ideas. Many Advertisement Potential guardrails Francis Shen, a University of Minnesota law professor who studies aging and the law, thinks strict age limits would bar older politicians who remain capable — and that the public debate should be about cognitive ability, not the year on a politician's birth certificate. Instead, he argues, Congress should require candidates for federal office to take and disclose cognitive assessments, much as it requires financial disclosures. Topol predicts that medical advances will soon enable routine testing to determine how vulnerable someone is to age-related disease, allowing political candidates to release more detailed metrics about their current and future health. Still, there's a long history of presidents of both parties That means if Trump experiences cognitive decline in office, it might be hard to know for sure. 🧩 6 Across: 69° POINTS OF INTEREST A person golfs at Puttshack in Seaport, which has seen higher traffic than usual on rainy weekends. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff Boston and New England A broken housing market: The price of the typical Massachusetts home is now Measles: A traveler sick with the highly contagious virus visited a Boston hotel, the Museum of Fine Arts, and Logan Airport earlier this month, Pièce de résistance: A 12-year-old who recreated the Boston Tea Party using more than 1,000 LEGO bricks will represent the city Rain check: A string of washout weekend days has Massachusetts residents [Redacted for a family paper]: Maine's newly redesigned license plate features a pine tree. Some drivers Trump administration Israel vs. Iran: Israel had a chance to assassinate Iran's supreme leader over the weekend, but US officials told their Israeli counterparts that Trump opposed doing so. Israel and Iran continued to exchange missiles. ( Pick and choose: After telling ICE to stop targeting undocumented workers at farms, restaurants, and hotels, Trump directed the agency to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities. ( G7 summit: Trump will meet with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney today. They may discuss trade negotiations ahead of talks with five other world leaders near Calgary, Alberta. ( 'No Kings': Anti-Trump protests in Boston and hundreds of other cities across the country drew millions of attendees, organizers said. Trump vs. Harvard: A judge will hear arguments today over Trump's effort to BESIDE THE POINT 🗓️ For your calendar: A Juneteenth whiskey tasting, the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, an audiobook walking club, and more 🏈 Sportswashing: The NFL is selling flag football to bougie parents ( Advertisement 🎥 Happy 50th: Read our film critic's memories of seeing 'Jaws' 👨‍🦲 Misters Worldwide: Pitbull's fans dress like him at his concerts. It's hysterical to see that many people in bald caps. ( ❤️ Love Letters: She's on all the dating apps, but Get outside: The Coolidge is hitting the road this summer. Here's where you can watch films curated by the nonprofit Brookline cinema on the Greenway and elsewhere al fresco. ( 🪦 RIP: Graham Gund, an architect and philanthropist who shaped Boston's skyline and art museums, Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store