RTIs filed over samosas & grooms, Bombay HC irked by misuse
MUMBAI: What's eating the State Information Commission (SIC)? Frivolous RTI pleas over samosas in public offices, it appears. SIC told Bombay high court on Wednesday it had received an RTI application to know how many samosas are served in a day in a govt office.
The misuse of RTI Act also drew flak from HC. It said laws are made with a beneficial purpose, but "people use them to look for sons-in-law... to find govt employees". "It's a paradox," said a bench of CJ Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne.
It was hearing a PIL by former chief information commissioner (CIC) Shailesh Gandhi and five RTI activists to direct SIC to give a roadmap for disposal of second appeals and complaints within 45 days of filing.
SIC said the delays were due to vacancies. State's advocate Jyoti Chavan said there are seven sanctioned posts of state information commissioners and one CIC. Four vacancies, including CIC, were filled in April.
The petitioners sought three additional posts of state information commissioners, citing nearly 1 lakh pending second appeals and complaints. Chavan said the state would decide on it.
When HC asked petitioners' advocate Sunil Ahya whether "their grievances stand redressed", he said no, adding that the CIC was directed by HC in Dec 2023 to file a report on disposal of second appeals.
The CJ generally commented about PIL petitioners "consistently finding fault with action of the govt". "They always come with a negative attitude and are never satisfied," he said. The judges said they cannot expand the PIL's scope and added that RTI was misused.
The judges said RTI Act does not contain any time limit for second appeals. They disposed of the PIL saying they "hope and trust" SIC "shall make an endeavour to decide second appeals/complaints as expeditiously as possible".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi HC refuses bail to separatist Shabir Shah in terror funding case
Representative image NEW DELHI: Delhi HC Thursday refused to grant bail to Kashmiri separatist Shabir Ahmad Shah in a terror funding case, citing the possibility of him carrying out similar unlawful activities and influencing witnesses. The court also rejected Shah's alternative prayer seeking "house arrest." Shah, arrested by NIA in 2019, had moved HC against trial court's July 7, 2023 order refusing him bail. "This right (to freedom of speech) cannot be misused under the guise of carrying out rallies wherein a person uses inflammatory speeches or instigates public to commit unlawful activities, detrimental to the interest and integrity of the country," Justices Navin Chawla and Shalinder Kaur observed. NIA booked Shah among 12 people in 2017 for allegedly conspiring to collect funds to cause disruption through stone pelting, and conspiring to wage war against India.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Allow FYJC aspirants to edit college choices: Principals after court stay
Mumbai: The school education department may have to allow students from socially and economically backward classes to change their preferences on the FYJC admission portal following Bombay high court's stay on the controversial clause in the May 6 govt resolution (GR) that introduced social reservations in the 50% non-minority seats in minority institutions, said principals of city colleges. This, they added, may delay the admission process further. While department officials said that necessary steps will be taken for the welfare of students, no decision was made on providing the editing option on the portal until Thursday night. Many students belonging to the socially and economically backward classes would have chosen minority institutions on the admission portal, said a principal. "There is a possibility that all their 10 choices are for minority institutions or even if they selected two or three, their order of preferences will be affected. Now, with the HC decision, these students will have to be given a fair chance to edit their options and to apply to the same colleges under the open category too, based on their merit. Or maybe to choose other colleges too. If they are not allowed to change now, there could be confusion after the allotment," added the principal. The allotment list for the first round is set to be released on June 26. Another principal pointed out that govt did not issue clear guidelines prior to the commencement of admissions. "The May 6 GR talks only about admissions to vacant minority seats. There was no application of mind behind bringing such a regulation. If govt was clear about its intention, institutions would have moved court before. Now, we just hope the change does not impact the admission schedule much," said the principal, pointing out that SSC results were out over a month ago. A govt official confirmed that no decision has been made yet. "We will study the HC order copy and then take appropriate action for the larger benefit of students. We will make necessary changes, if needed," said the official, adding that this is the first time that students have access to thousands of colleges across the state by just filling one form for Rs 100. Meanwhile, admissions to in-house, minority, and management quotas commenced Thursday. Of the over 1.1 lakh students who applied under these quotas, 9,087 have secured admissions. Mumbai: The school education department may have to allow students from socially and economically backward classes to change their preferences on the FYJC admission portal following Bombay high court's stay on the controversial clause in the May 6 govt resolution (GR) that introduced social reservations in the 50% non-minority seats in minority institutions, said principals of city colleges. This, they added, may delay the admission process further. While department officials said that necessary steps will be taken for the welfare of students, no decision was made on providing the editing option on the portal until Thursday night. Many students belonging to the socially and economically backward classes would have chosen minority institutions on the admission portal, said a principal. "There is a possibility that all their 10 choices are for minority institutions or even if they selected two or three, their order of preferences will be affected. Now, with the HC decision, these students will have to be given a fair chance to edit their options and to apply to the same colleges under the open category too, based on their merit. Or maybe to choose other colleges too. If they are not allowed to change now, there could be confusion after the allotment," added the principal. The allotment list for the first round is set to be released on June 26. Another principal pointed out that govt did not issue clear guidelines prior to the commencement of admissions. "The May 6 GR talks only about admissions to vacant minority seats. There was no application of mind behind bringing such a regulation. If govt was clear about its intention, institutions would have moved court before. Now, we just hope the change does not impact the admission schedule much," said the principal, pointing out that SSC results were out over a month ago. A govt official confirmed that no decision has been made yet. "We will study the HC order copy and then take appropriate action for the larger benefit of students. We will make necessary changes, if needed," said the official, adding that this is the first time that students have access to thousands of colleges across the state by just filling one form for Rs 100. Meanwhile, admissions to in-house, minority, and management quotas commenced Thursday. Of the over 1.1 lakh students who applied under these quotas, 9,087 have secured admissions. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
HC stays new rule for FYJC quotas in minority colleges
Mumbai: Bombay HC Thursday stayed a clause in the May 6 GR that introduced reservations for SC/ST/OBC/SEBC for FYJC admissions in minority institutions in the state. "Till further orders, we direct that insofar as minority institutions are concerned for admissions to FYJC, the mandate of social reservation shall not be made applicable… Consequent steps may be taken by state govt," said Justices Makarand Karnik & Nitin Borkar. They directed the govt to file its reply in 4 weeks and posted the hearing for Aug 6. On Wednesday, the judges had asked state to consider withdrawing the clause and issue a corrigendum. Clause 11 of the GR mentions that social and parallel reservations will apply to vacancies after filling minority seats in minority institutions. However, as govt pleader Neha Bhide said Thursday there are no instructions to withdraw the clause, the HC heard the matter on merits for grant of interim reliefs. The judges heard two petitions challenging the contentious clause of the GR by which govt brought minority institutions under the purview of social reservations. The first petition was filed by Solapur's Shri APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce. The second was a joint petition by south Mumbai colleges, including St Xavier's, KC, HR, Jai Hind and Maharashtra College, along with Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions. Senior advocate Milind Sathe, for the Mumbai colleges, and advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, relied on Articles 15 (5) and 30 of the Constitution emphasising on the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutes. They also brought to HC's notice clause 18.9 of the GR that makes social reservations generally applicable to FYJC admissions in all colleges. They cited decisions — including HC's 2017 verdict in the St Xavier's College case — that minority educational institutions, both aided and unaided, are exempt from backward class reservations. In July 2018, Supreme Court upheld the HC verdict. "We are saying, insofar as minority institutions in all seats, there is no cannot be imposed by govt," argued Sathe. Govt pleader Neha Bhide countered that the May 6 GR does not interfere with the rights of minority institutions; they have the right to fill 50% of their seats. It is only when seats remain unfilled and have been surrendered, that the policy is being made applicable to these seats, she said, adding: "Social reservation is an obligation put on state for filling up seats. " The judges "prima facie" found substance in the submissions of the petitioners' advocates' and granted interim relief. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
