Allianz Life confirms data breach affecting majority of 1.4M US customers
Minneapolis-based Allianz Life, a subsidiary of Munich, Germany-based Allianz SE, said the data breach happened on July 16 when a 'malicious threat actor' gained access to a third-party, cloud-based system used by the company.
'The threat actor was able to obtain personally identifiable data related to the majority of Allianz Life's customers, financial professionals, and select Allianz Life employees, using a social engineering technique,' Allianz Life said in a statement. "We took immediate action to contain and mitigate the issue and notified the FBI."
The company said its own systems were not accessed, just the third-party's platform.
Allianz Life said its investigation is ongoing and that the company has begun reaching out to the impacted individuals. It said the incident involves only Allianz Life in the U.S., not other Allianz corporate entities.
In the case of data breaches, a 'social engineering technique' usually involves using trickery to gain access. Spokesman Brett Weinberg said he couldn't provide details because they are still investigating.
Allianz Life also reported the breach to multiple other authorities, including the Maine Attorney General's Office. A filing on the agency's website said the company discovered the breach the day after it happened, and that it will be offering those affected 24 months of identity theft protection and credit monitoring.
Allianz Life was known as North American Life and Casualty until it was acquired by German conglomerate Allianz SE in 1979 and changed its name to Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. It has nearly 2,000 employees in U.S., with the majority working in Minnesota, according to its website.
It is one of five North American subsidiaries of the Munich-based global financial services group Allianz SE, which says it serves more than 125 million customers worldwide.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Chemical maker LyondellBasell misses quarterly profit estimates on lower margins
August 1 - LyondellBasell (LYB.N), opens new tab fell short of Wall Street expectations for second-quarter profit on Friday, as the chemical maker grappled with lower margins and higher energy costs, sending its shares down 2.5% in the premarket trading. Chemical companies in North America are seeing their profit margins squeezed due to rising energy costs, driven by surging power demand from energy-hungry data centers. In April, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said U.S. power consumption will hit new record highs in 2025 and 2026, on the back of data centers dedicated to AI and cryptocurrency. Chemical companies have also been struggling due to slumping demand and rising raw material costs, especially in Europe, where a rigorous regulatory landscape is compelling businesses to reassess their approach in the region. The company was in exclusive talks with Munich-based investment firm AEQUITA for the sale of certain olefin and polyolefin assets in Europe as a part of its strategic review of the European assets in two business units. LyondellBasell's olefins and polyolefins-Americas unit, its largest segment by sales volume, reported adjusted core earnings of $318 million, down from $670 million last year. The unit produces materials for packaging and construction, among others. However, in the third quarter, the company expects improved North American integrated polyethylene margins due to competition of planned maintenance in April and higher prices supported by solid domestic demand and stronger export volumes. The company posted an adjusted profit of 62 cents per share in the April-June quarter, compared with analysts' estimate of 80 cents per share, according to data compiled by LSEG.
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
T. Rowe Price quarterly profit beats estimates on boost from market rally
Aug 1 (Reuters) - Asset manager T. Rowe Price (TROW.O), opens new tab beat second-quarter profit expectations on Friday as a rebound in equities boosted its assets under management and softened the hit from outflows. Stock markets bounced back sharply in the second half of the quarter after tariff-driven turmoil in April as progress on trade negotiations eased recession fears. Assets under management mainly depend on two factors - the performance of investments and money flowing in and out of the funds. "We have developed a broad and ongoing plan to reduce our expense growth over time while continuing to invest in capabilities and client reach. We believe that our plan will drive efficiency to fund investment in the future of the business," CEO Rob Sharps said in a statement. Active asset managers like T. Rowe usually buy and sell investments more frequently than passive fund managers. Such firms have ceded market share and grappled with consistent outflows in recent years due to the growing popularity of low-cost passive funds, which centers around investing in index-tracking funds. T. Rowe's assets under management jumped 6.9% to $1.68 trillion in the quarter despite net client outflows of $14.9 billion. Investment advisory fees, typically a percentage of the AUM, came in flat at $1.57 billion. On an adjusted basis, T. Rowe earned $2.24 per share in the quarter, beating Wall Street expectations of $2.13, according to estimates compiled by LSEG.
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dissenting Fed officials tie votes to labor market concerns
Aug 1 (Reuters) - The two Federal Reserve governors who favored an interest rate cut at the U.S. central bank's policy meeting this week said on Friday they did so largely due to rising concerns about the job market, amid expectations that any price increases related to trade tariffs will not lead to lasting price pressures. "With economic growth slowing this year and signs of a less dynamic labor market, I saw it as appropriate to begin gradually moving our moderately restrictive policy stance toward a neutral setting," Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said in a statement. "In my view, this action would have proactively hedged against a further weakening in the economy and the risk of damage to the labor market," she said. Governor Christopher Waller said in a separate statement that "with underlying inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate." Waller said the job market is nearing stall speed and the Fed's rate target should be closer to its neutral level. Waller said of the Fed's broader approach to monetary policy right now that "I believe that the wait and see approach is overly cautious, and, in my opinion, does not properly balance the risks to the outlook and could lead to policy falling behind the curve." The policymakers weighed in after casting dissenting votes against the Federal Open Market Committee's decision on Wednesday to hold its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range. The dissents marked the first time that many governors had opposed the Fed's consensus view since late 1993. Comments made by Waller and Bowman going into the meeting had led many observers to expect their dissents. Waller has been most explicit in arguing for lower rates, saying the risks are rising for the job market while tariff-related inflation increases are likely to be a one-time shift the Fed could ignore. Bowman also expressed skepticism that tariffs would cause sustained inflation problems. The dissents also garnered interest because of the broader political currents buffeting the Fed. President Donald Trump has been pushing aggressively for rate cuts, excoriating Fed Chair Jerome Powell for failing to heed the White House's demands. Waller, who noted last month that his view was not "political" is widely considered to be in the running to succeed Powell when his term expires next May. Bowman, who was recently elevated to the Fed's bank overseer role by Trump, had previously been on the more hawkish end of the monetary policy spectrum, having dissented last fall in favor of a smaller rate cut than what the Fed delivered. Nodding toward the potential ambitions of the dissenters, Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JP Morgan, described their votes on Wednesday as "two job applications attached" to the FOMC statement, even as he noted, "we don't read too much into these dissents for the future direction of policy." As for the rest of the Fed's policymakers, they voted in favor of holding rates steady because even as some risks to the outlook are emerging, they are still wary of what Trump's tariffs will do to price pressures. "The economy is in a solid position" and "for the time being, we're well positioned to learn more about the likely course of the economy and the evolving balance of risks before adjusting our policy stance," Powell said at a press conference on Wednesday after the end of the Fed's two-day policy meeting. Powell appeared to see no downsides to the dissents. He described the FOMC gathering as a "good meeting" and added, "what you want from everybody, and also from a dissenter, is a clear explanation of what your thinking is and what are the arguments you're making ... We had that today." Powell did not indicate whether the dissenters had moved the consensus. "We haven't made any decisions about September. We'll be monitoring all the incoming data and asking ourselves whether the federal funds rate is in the right place." The Fed's next policy meeting is scheduled for September 16-17.
