
Steve Bannon back on Spotify after 5 years — but pledges to fight big tech to the end: ‘Most dangerous thing in the country'
Nearly five years after Steven Bannon's suspension from Spotify, his podcast 'WarRoom' has returned — a move which may cement his role as the most influential MAGA voice for a global audience, given the platform's massive reach of 268 million subscribers.
Bannon, like now-president Donald Trump, managed to grow his audience during the years Joe Biden was in office despite his removal from YouTube, Facebook, and X.
His team says his following is well into the millions and was fortified by his unwavering support of Trump through his mass media shadowbanning and even being sent to jail, which helped solidy his MAGA bona fides.
Advertisement
4 Bannon said War Room, which churns out four hours of programming six days a week from a basement studio in Washington, D.C
Bannonâs War Room
While he has been welcomed back to Spotify, Bannon said 'WarRoom' — which produces four hours of programming six days a week from a studio in Washington, D.C. — hasn't changed its tone or style at all since it was banned in 2020.
'I think our content's the same, probably more hard hitting than ever,' Bannon, 71, told The Post.
Advertisement
'WarRoom' was removed from most platforms, but not Apple Podcasts, in November 2020 after Bannon said, 'I'd actually like to go back to the old times of Tudor England, I'd put the heads on pikes, right, I'd put them [then-NIAID chief Anthony Fauci and FBI director Christopher Wray] at the two corners of the White House as a warning to federal bureaucrats.
'You either get with the program or you're gone – time to stop playing games.'
In a statement, a Spotify spokeswoman said, 'Following its temporary suspension and a constructive dialogue with the show's team, new 'Bannon's WarRoom' episodes are available on Spotify.'
4 Spotify has a global presence — the company is in more than 180 countries.
Emmy Park for NY Post
Advertisement
Bannon told The Post his comments were metaphorical rather than literal, 'I made a comment two days before about Thomas More in 'A Man for All Seasons', where they put his head on a pike, and we said it metaphorically about Christopher Wray and Dr. Fauci.'
As well as making a comeback on streaming, Bannon is also making a resurcence in mainstream media, with appearances on the Democrat California Governor's 'This is Gavin Newsom' podcast and Bill Maher's 'Real Time'.
'I can give a punch and I can take a punch — the MAGA movement prides itself in being resilient,' Bannon said of how he has adapted from being ban to now being welcomed on even left-wing programs.
Advertisement
He's glad for the opportunity to reach Americans on the left who have never heard him. He's also focused on content that has a global reach (Although MGGA — Make the Globe Great Again doesn't have the same ring to it). Spotify's presence in more than 180 countries can help that.
'At least an hour we try to give over to just the international populist nationalist sovereignty movement,' Bannon said. 'We have a lot of coverage of Hungary, Poland, Romania…'
4 Bannon is 'adamant' about breaking up tech companies and believes free speech is not safe until companies like Amazon and Facebook are broken up.
Getty Images
During his career, Bannon has worked as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, a Hollywood producer on nearly two dozen films, co-founder of Breitbart News, CEO of Trump's 2016 campaign, and a chief strategist at the White House until 2018, when a report broke that he had made damaging comments about Trump's children.
But Bannon has moved away from jockeying for power in the White House and is now wholly focused on learning his audience and building War Room.
Part of 'War Room's' appeal, Bannon says, is that the show respects its listeners, 'Our audience is into the receipts [the evidence and data], it's a working class and middle class audience.'
He says media snobs are clueless about his audience, citing a recent example of a reporter who dscribed his show as him discussing a lot of 'boring stuff' before going on a 'rant.'
4 Steve Bannon is very critical of Elon Musk, who he calls an 'apostate of the left.'
Getty Images for Semafor
Advertisement
'Well, in that show, what he would call the boring stuff is what the audience wanted most,' Bannon explains.
'We do a lot capital markets, detailed politics, the precinct strategy, geopolitics, a lot of economy, a lot of the bond market, you know, things like the [Trump's] Big, Beautiful Bill, we will drill down on the math.'
While Bannon is admittedly glad to be reinstated, he isn't taking it for granted. He is also aware of how any company with the power to ban and then reinstate someone can change its policies on a whim, which is part of the reason he tells me he is 'adamant' about breaking up giant tech companies.
'The oligarchs go beyond big tech, but I think Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Google all need to be broken up,' he said.
Advertisement
'Big tech, I think, is the most dangerous thing in the country. It has potential great upside, but right now it's oligarchy power and we have to go after them.'
'And I remember at the inauguration [this January], they were all sitting there thinking they own President Trump… It turned out President Trump started crushing them, whether in federal court or with other anti-trust efforts. They can't be trusted as far as you can throw them… that's why I think they have got to be broken up.'
But Bannon is also very critical of Elon Musk, who he tells me is an 'apostate of the left' but who he has also slammed as a 'parasitic illegal immigrant.'
Advertisement
Bannon and Musk are pitted against each other in an idealogical war over MAGA. When asked whether X offers a sufficient antidote to other tech behemoths, Bannon replied, 'If you mention getting rid of H-1B work visas, you'll see how suppressed you become.'
'Although Twitter's been a sea change with the political right… Elon Musk could flip in a second… that's where the danger [is].'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Self-proclaimed Democratic 'super mayor' ordered to court as scandal-plagued tenure unravels
The self-described Chicago suburb "super mayor" is facing mounting legal woes after being ousted in a landslide election following a scandal-plagued time in office. Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard, a Democrat, has been ordered to appear for a contempt hearing after she did not turn over public records from her time in office, according to WGN 9. The Edgar County Watchdogs Inc. sued the Village of Dolton and the former mayor for failing to produce financial records after the administration allegedly disregarded Freedom of Information Act requests earlier this year. "The former mayor is about to find out if losing an election is enough to escape contempt of court," Edward "Coach" Weinhaus, attorney for Edgar County Watchdogs, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. Henyard was previously held in contempt of court after she failed to turn over records from her time in office, directly dismissing state transparency laws for elected officials, WGN 9 reported. "The massive public exposure given to the defendant that has brought Illinois corruption into the national public spotlight needs to be addressed immediately to save further harm to the state's reputation," the complaint reportedly read. In a hearing last week, Henyard reportedly told the judge she was the "face" of the village but was not tasked with recordkeeping, according to WGN 9. Henyard and the attorneys representing the Village of Dolton did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Last month, Jason House was sworn in as the newly elected mayor of Dolton, ending Henyard's tumultuous time in office. Henyard was also defeated by Illinois state Sen. Napoleon Harris in her bid for re-election as Thornton Township supervisor. Henyard made national headlines in April 2024 after the FBI served subpoenas at Dolton Village Hall following corruption allegations against local officials, according to FOX 32 Chicago. While Henyard was not charged, village trustees voted to hire former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot to lead an investigation into her administration, with the town meeting descending into chaos as supporters of Henyard clashed with her opponents following the decision. Lightfoot reportedly discovered the village's general fund fell from its initial $5.6 million balance to a $3.6 million deficit, with the local government's credit card charges adding up to over $779,000 in 2023. In February, a federal subpoena was issued, coinciding with the day Henyard was defeated in the mayoral primary, FOX 32 reported. The filing relates to a development project involving land reportedly owned by Henyard's boyfriend. Henyard is reportedly scheduled to appear in court on Friday.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bill would cover ‘Forever Chemical' exposure at bases under VA benefits
A bipartisan bill would allow veterans with health issues caused by exposure to 'forever chemicals' at U.S. military bases to be treated as service-connected disabilities, which would further open the door to health care and benefits compensation for those impacted. Forever chemicals, more technically known as polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are long-lasting chemicals that break down slowly. They are found in many everyday objects, food, and in air, water, and soil around the world, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The bill, titled 'Veterans Exposed to Toxic PFAS Act,'' or the ''VET PFAS Act,' would designate exposure to PFAS as a service-connected condition for veterans, making them eligible for disability compensation through the Department of Veterans Affairs. It would also allow military dependents, including those 'in utero while the mother' resided at a base with PFAS exposures, to be eligible for hospital care and medical services for certain diseases and conditions, according to the text of the bill. If passed, the legislation would be a major expansion of health conditions and illnesses for which veterans could receive VA care and disability benefits. The bill was introduced in the House on May 29 by New York Rep. Josh Riley, a Democrat, and Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican, and builds upon measures from the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act. The PACT Act, passed in 2022, was the largest expansion of service-connected health conditions eligible for VA care, including service members exposed to burn pits during Iraq and Afghanistan deployments, for Vietnam War veterans exposed to Agent Orange-related chemicals, and very specific instances of base exposures. The Department of Defense has identified 718 bases with known or suspected PFAS release. The military estimates that PFAS investigation and cleanup costs could come to more than $9.3 billion in fiscal year 2025, which was more than triple the estimate in 2022. Since 2017, the Defense Department has spent around $2.6 billion to address PFAS, according to a Government Accountability report from February. The bill states that covered health conditions would be identified by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the agency administrator of the Department of Health and Human Services' registry for toxic substances and diseases. Their suggestions would come from studies directed by Congress in the annual defense bill for fiscal year 2018, which are ongoing from the Centers for Disease Control. The CDC's website on health investigations states that existing research suggests that high levels of PFAS could lead to increased cholesterol, changes in liver enzymes, pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, decreases in birth weight, and increased risks of kidney and testicular cancers. The bill specifically calls for health care coverage of perfluorooctanoic acid exposures for veterans diagnosed with high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Other iterations of the legislation have been previously introduced. Some Democratic senators have expressed interest in crafting their own PFAS bill, but nothing formal has been introduced yet, a spokesperson for the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee told Task & Purpose. The issue of forever chemicals on military bases and their health impacts on military families has been gaining support in Congress. In April, Senate Democrats held an event on the Hill with former service members and their families who called for a broadening of the PACT Act. At the April event, military families described cancers and other illnesses they believe are the result of PFAS exposures, including former bases like George Air Force Base, California, which later became superfund sites, a designation by the EPA as one of the most polluted sites in the U.S. Despite the designation, the families based there were never notified of their potential exposure. The PACT Act also established a framework for the VA to establish presumptive conditions without an act of Congress through the federal rule-making process. The VA began the process for defining PFAS exposure as a presumptive health condition for VA care with a federal register notice in September. However, an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in January paused all federal rule-making. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Stephen Miller: GOP policy package ‘most MAGA bill ever'
President Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller defended the House-approved GOP spending bill in a series of posts online Tuesday. The affectionately labeled 'big, beautiful bill' has faced a chorus of criticism from Democrats and even some Republican lawmakers and Trump allies, including former White House adviser Elon Musk. 'BBB was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close,' Miller wrote in a post on the social media platform X. 'Certain libertarians in Congress, who are not MAGA, have their own agenda…and it's not yours,' he added. Earlier on Tuesday, Musk slammed the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) doubled down on his criticism of the proposed national debt hike. In a Tuesday evening post, Miller said lawmakers should champion the bill, referencing it as 'the most important legislation for the conservative project.' He said the legislation would be, 'The most significant border security and deportation effort in history, including the entire wall — up front, now, with no possibility of Democrat obstruction.' The Trump administration has rattled national immigration policy as it cracks down on the foreign student visa process and seeks to execute massive deportations, both of which have provoked a variety of legal challenges. The budget bill, which would increase the number of agents at the border and funding for more removals, can only afford three defects to pass in the upper chamber. Still, Miller says Republicans and the country couldn't have ever dreamed of having the chance to pass a bill featuring such a wide array of reforms. 'The BBB is not an appropriations bill. It does not fund 99% + of government. Zero dollars for Dept of Ed, zero dollars for HUD, zero dollars for EPA. Not a cent,' Miller wrote. 'BBB cuts taxes, deports the illegals and reforms welfare. We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017.'