Citizens Advice says it helps someone with a disability aid complaint every hour
The charity said it helped someone with a complaint about a disability aid 'every hour', with 48% of all complaints relating specifically to mobility vehicles.
Faulty goods made up more than two-thirds (69%) of disability aid issues reported to the charity's consumer service, including products that were unsafe, of poor quality, broken shortly after purchase, or never worked to begin with.
The advisory service said it had dealt with cases where people were stranded over their bath, stuck on the top floor of their house waiting for delayed repairs to a stairlift, or left in pain from using products which did not meet their needs.
In total, 70% of all complaints were specifically about aids designed to help people with mobility, including – as well as mobility scooters – stairlifts (12%) and mobility and bath aids (10%).
A UK-wide survey by the charity found that around one in seven people (7.4 million) bought an aid for themselves or someone else in the last year.
It warned that people buying disability aids experienced problems at every point of the process, from confusing and technical product information and poor customer service to poor quality items and a lack of warranty support.
Citizens Advice chief executive Dame Clare Moriarty said: 'Too often, disabled people are being failed by a disability aids market that isn't meeting their needs – and instead of offering support, it's creating new barriers.
'Problems like faulty products and poor service don't just leave people out of pocket, they can leave them literally stranded or unable to carry out even the most basic tasks. Having to battle to resolve problems only makes this worse.
'In this growing market, it's vital consumers are armed with the correct information before making a purchase. We urge people to do their research, know their rights and stay safe when buying – and remember we're here to help.'
John Herriman, chief executive at the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI), said: 'These findings are deeply concerning and highlight just how vital effective consumer education is for disabled people to help ensure accessibility and inclusion.
'Alongside enforcement, we need to ensure disabled consumers are empowered with the right information to make informed choices, recognise poor practice, and know where to turn for help.
'CTSI is committed to working with partners and the Approved Code Scheme provider – the British Healthcare Trades Association (BHTA) – to raise awareness, and support education efforts to protect all consumers, and ensure businesses are held to the standards they should be meeting.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
28 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Hackers, spies and saboteurs: How Leonardo will help to fortify UK Defence against cyber attacks
New service will support the delivery of a range of simulated attacks against Armed Forces target systems, replicating 'real world' adversaries to protect against security vulnerabilities. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Under a new three-year contract, defence company Leonardo has been chosen by the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) to manage 'red team and cyber adversary simulation' operations across UK Armed Forces bases and networks. As hostile states step up attempts to sow disruption and chaos, the new service will ensure that UK Armed Forces are as well defended and resilient as possible. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A red team plays the role of an adversary, by simulating a cyber-attack against an organisation based on real world tactics, techniques and procedures, to test resilience and identify ways of improving cyber security. This can involve a combination of live activities to test on-site security, as well as simulated cyber attacks against critical networks. Under a new three-year contract, defence company Leonardo has been chosen by the UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) to manage 'red team and cyber adversary simulation' operations across UK Armed Forces bases and networks. Leonardo already provides red team services to a range of customers, however under this new contract the company will be working closely with the MOD to manage the smooth delivery of the red team simulations. Leonardo will provide technical and delivery support to the MOD, to hire best-of-British red teams and cyber security experts from large consultancies to specialist SMEs, to carry out simulated attacks against a range of military targets. The three-year contract has been placed by the Ministry of Defence's Strategic Command and will see Leonardo work closely with UKStratCom security leads to establish a 'Red Team Delivery Cell'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Leonardo already supports cyber security efforts the length and breadth of the Ministry of Defence estate, under the Defence Digital Cyber Resilience Programme. Wherever there's a digital system, Leonardo might either audit it or check if it's a cyber risk. This 'investigations as a service' provision covers a range of Armed Forces networks. Leonardo will draw on its own 'red team' and cyber security expertise to support delivery by MOD of best-of-British suppliers, including SMEs. The red team and cyber adversary simulation contract is part of the growth of Leonardo's UK-based cyber security business. The Cyber & Security Division doubled their revenue between 2020 and 2023, achieving £100m revenue in 2024. This is in line with the company's broader European and global strategy in the cyber security sector, to strengthen services, technologies and collaborative efforts to accelerate the demand for Cyber Resilience Services. Leonardo has more recently achieved significant results with major contracts, partnering with prime technology leaders and pursuing further opportunities in cyber security, secure digital solutions and mission critical communication. T his reinforces the Company's position in Europe, responding with advanced proprietary products and innovative solutions to meet evolving digital transformation requirements at both a national and international level.
Times
32 minutes ago
- Times
Leapmotor T03 review — a cheaper electric that delivers value
Chinese cars don't always hit the spot for European buyers. You know roughly what you're getting from, say, a Ford, BMW, Audi or Mercedes. But with a BYD, GWM, XPeng or Jaecoo, you're taking a big financial step based on little backstory. So what's the story behind the latest entrant to the UK market, the Leapmotor T03, a diminutive city car that looks like a render straight from a computer game? Leapmotor vehicles sold outside China are distributed and sold by Leapmotor International, a joint venture that's owned 51:49 by Stellantis and Leapmotor of China. Stellantis is the European megacorporation responsible for Citroën, Peugeot, Jeep, Fiat and Vauxhall. Thus, you can buy and service a T03 at an established web of Stellantis dealers which, for prospective buyers, is one reassurance. The T03 is built on the old Fiat 500 production line in Poland, allowing Leapmotor to sidestep the 20 per cent tariff that Europe puts on Chinese imports. The UK imposes no tariffs on Chinese cars, by the way, which is one explanation for the arrival of so many Chinese car brands in the UK. So what do we get from this Sino-European electro-hatch? Well, the T03 is one of the cheapest electric cars in the UK, if you discount rule-evading quadricycles like the Citroën Ami, and pitches in at just under £16,000. As ever when it comes to electric cars, though, 'cheaper' doesn't necessarily mean cheap. A petrol Dacia Sandero costs £14,715. The T03 seats four in a cabin that feels remarkably spacious thanks in part to a big glass panoramic roof. The 37.3kWh battery is good for 165 miles — officially — of range, which makes the T03 fine for urbanauting but not for longer hauls. From standstill to 62mph, it takes a relaxed 12.7 seconds. Leisurely rather than rapid but enough to keep up with traffic on normal roads. A top speed of 81mph is probably best left to theory. It has a small 210-litre boot and disconcertingly light steering, although that's fine as long as you're pootling around in the city. It's excellent at slipping through traffic and a joy to park. Where most cars feel enormous these days, the T03 is narrower than a tiny Kia Picanto and capable of greasing itself into the tightest parking spaces. However, there are a few issues. If you were generous you'd say they result from delivering value for money. If you were unkind you'd say they were skimping. For a start, there's its appearance. The T03 is not bad looking but it should be more appealing than it is, given its compact proportions. It nibbles at the edges of cute without ever being something that you bond with, a bit like those pictures of other people's newborns. There are other things. The headlights should be LEDs, given that the taillights and daytime running lights are, but for some reason they're not. The lack of physical buttons make the T03 a bit of a nightmare to operate. The climate controls are buried in the too-small 10in touchscreen menus and verge on the positively distracting when trying to operate them while on the go. To turn off the annoying advanced driver-assistance systems — standard on all cars these days thanks to the EU's General Safety Regulations 2 (GSR2) — you have to stop and put the car in park. Failure to do so means enduring a drowsiness monitor that seems more paranoid than helpful. Look away from the road for a microsecond or blink slowly and it yelps and chimes for what feels like several minutes (it's actually 15 seconds). All of which makes it sound like the T03 is a bad car, which it isn't. Once you've got used to twiddling the right buttons before you depart, or accidentally slip and cover the driver-monitor camera with a piece of tape, the T03 is fine and functional. But is it good enough? Without doubt it's cheaper than the Citroën ë-C3, Hyundai Inster or Fiat 500 Electric but you'd probably just want to save up a little more for any of those to have a nicer city car. Not to mention the excellent Fiat Grande Panda, which starts as a hybrid at £18,975 or at just under £21,000 for the fully electric model. The other consideration is bragging rights, which I'm afraid you just don't get from Chinese brands. No one is going to look admiringly as you lay your key fob on the table and say: 'Ah, so you've treated yourself to the Leapmotor T03.' The same for Jaecoo, Omoda, BYD or XPeng. Rightly or wrongly, many people regard Chinese cars as things you lease when you have precisely no interest in what you drive as long as it's reliable, handily equipped and meets the budget for monthly payments. In other words, white goods with wheels. • James May reviews BYD Dolphin, the cheap Chinese electric car Yet the thing about Chinese manufacturers is their astonishing rate of change and improvement. Where European manufacturers might take years to update models and correct faults, the Chinese manufacturing ecology evolves at a ferocious speed. It wasn't that long ago that we were suspiciously eyeing the South Korean models from Kia and Hyundai. Even further back, in the 1970s, Japanese cars were derided as cheap rip-offs of British designs. Now brands from those countries are class leaders. Perhaps it won't be long before 'Made in China' means something very different indeed.
Sky News
38 minutes ago
- Sky News
No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts
Is the cost of living crisis over? If you're looking purely at the annual inflation data, the numbers us journalists, not to mention politicians and economists, tend to focus on, the answer might seem like: probably, yes. Sure, the rate is, at 3.4% in May, higher than the Bank of England's 2% target. But it's far below the double-digit peaks experienced in 2022. Plus, the Bank itself thinks prices are likely to drop back down towards 2% in the coming year or two, even assuming a few more interest rate cuts. End of story, right? Well, not quite. Because look a bit deeper into the numbers and you notice a couple of important things. The first is that whether the cost of living squeeze is over really depends on how you slice up the numbers. Look in a slightly different way and actually this is still an ongoing crisis for millions of families around the country. To see what I mean, recall that when economists talk about inflation, they are really referring to something quite specific. The rate at which the average level of prices across the economy (actually, it's a shopping basket of representative goods) has changed over the past year. And the change in that level over the past year is indeed 3.4%. But look back a bit further, say the past four years, and the rate of change is 25%. Why looking back makes sense Both of these numbers are accurate. They are both expressions of inflation, except that one is for a single year and the other is for a four-year period. But when you're going to the supermarket, or buying a big ticket item like a computer or a car, are you really thinking back over a 12-month horizon or, perhaps, thinking back further? For a lot of people, that four-year horizon feels much more representative of their everyday lives and retail decisions than the one-year horizon. True: the fact that it's up 25% is largely because of the enormous rise in prices in 2022 amid the energy price shock and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 3:05 But (and one can't emphasise this enough), it's not like prices went up and then went down. The prices went up and stayed up (in fact, they carried on getting more expensive). And when you look at the four-year, "recent memory" rate of inflation, it's higher in recent months than any period going back to the early 1990s. Now, economists have very good reasons for focusing on the annual rate of inflation. But by the same token, you can see why so many people scoff when they see the latest inflation data, finding it bears little resemblance to their lived experience. The problem isn't so much the data itself but the way we focus on an annual rate. Expect yo-yoing in the coming months However, even that annual rate might be in for more of a roller coaster than most economists assume. Because the second important underlying issue to remember is that we're living through big, consequential geopolitical shifts that could well be very inflationary but are really hard to model. Consider the events in the Middle East. Military conflict between Israel and Iran has already pushed the oil price up by 18% in June alone. If that price stays elevated, that will feed into higher petrol and other prices in the UK and further afield. And since no one has a clue what will happen next, you can expect that price to yo-yo around quite violently in the coming months. More broadly, it's very hard to know for sure what the impact of tariffs will be on UK inflation. The Bank of England's estimates in its latest set of forecasts suggested a reassuringly small impact on both economic growth and inflation. But no one really knows whether manufacturers will lift prices just for American consumers or for the rest of the world too. Finally, it's worth noting that in much the same way as the past few decades of globalisation were, all else equal, quite deflationary - with prices dropping as manufacturers shifted production to cheaper parts of the world, primarily Asia - the reversal of those forces could be very inflationary. Again, all this stuff is very hard to model and forecast. But we are living through a period of volatility, with significant historical shifts. It would be remarkable if that weren't reflected in the economic data, at some point.
