logo
No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts

No sign of cost of living crisis end amid big consequential geopolitical shifts

Sky News5 hours ago

Is the cost of living crisis over?
If you're looking purely at the annual inflation data, the numbers us journalists, not to mention politicians and economists, tend to focus on, the answer might seem like: probably, yes.
Sure, the rate is, at 3.4% in May, higher than the Bank of England's 2% target. But it's far below the double-digit peaks experienced in 2022. Plus, the Bank itself thinks prices are likely to drop back down towards 2% in the coming year or two, even assuming a few more interest rate cuts. End of story, right?
Well, not quite. Because look a bit deeper into the numbers and you notice a couple of important things.
The first is that whether the cost of living squeeze is over really depends on how you slice up the numbers. Look in a slightly different way and actually this is still an ongoing crisis for millions of families around the country.
To see what I mean, recall that when economists talk about inflation, they are really referring to something quite specific. The rate at which the average level of prices across the economy (actually, it's a shopping basket of representative goods) has changed over the past year.
And the change in that level over the past year is indeed 3.4%. But look back a bit further, say the past four years, and the rate of change is 25%.
Why looking back makes sense
Both of these numbers are accurate. They are both expressions of inflation, except that one is for a single year and the other is for a four-year period. But when you're going to the supermarket, or buying a big ticket item like a computer or a car, are you really thinking back over a 12-month horizon or, perhaps, thinking back further?
For a lot of people, that four-year horizon feels much more representative of their everyday lives and retail decisions than the one-year horizon. True: the fact that it's up 25% is largely because of the enormous rise in prices in 2022 amid the energy price shock and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
3:05
But (and one can't emphasise this enough), it's not like prices went up and then went down. The prices went up and stayed up (in fact, they carried on getting more expensive).
And when you look at the four-year, "recent memory" rate of inflation, it's higher in recent months than any period going back to the early 1990s.
Now, economists have very good reasons for focusing on the annual rate of inflation. But by the same token, you can see why so many people scoff when they see the latest inflation data, finding it bears little resemblance to their lived experience. The problem isn't so much the data itself but the way we focus on an annual rate.
Expect yo-yoing in the coming months
However, even that annual rate might be in for more of a roller coaster than most economists assume. Because the second important underlying issue to remember is that we're living through big, consequential geopolitical shifts that could well be very inflationary but are really hard to model.
Consider the events in the Middle East. Military conflict between Israel and Iran has already pushed the oil price up by 18% in June alone. If that price stays elevated, that will feed into higher petrol and other prices in the UK and further afield. And since no one has a clue what will happen next, you can expect that price to yo-yo around quite violently in the coming months.
More broadly, it's very hard to know for sure what the impact of tariffs will be on UK inflation. The Bank of England's estimates in its latest set of forecasts suggested a reassuringly small impact on both economic growth and inflation. But no one really knows whether manufacturers will lift prices just for American consumers or for the rest of the world too.
Finally, it's worth noting that in much the same way as the past few decades of globalisation were, all else equal, quite deflationary - with prices dropping as manufacturers shifted production to cheaper parts of the world, primarily Asia - the reversal of those forces could be very inflationary.
Again, all this stuff is very hard to model and forecast. But we are living through a period of volatility, with significant historical shifts. It would be remarkable if that weren't reflected in the economic data, at some point.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says
UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK benefits system could collapse if payments are not cut, Liz Kendall says

Britain's benefits system faces collapse without cuts to disability payments, Liz Kendall has said, as the government published plans that put it on a collision course with dozens of angry Labour MPs. Kendall published her welfare reform bill on Wednesday, confirming it would lead to benefit cuts for 950,000 people by 2030. She said the country's £326bn social security net might cease to exist if costs continued to escalate. The bill includes several concessions designed to win over fractious Labour MPs as ministers look to ward off the biggest rebellion of Keir Starmer's premiership. But the efforts were met with hostility by many in the party, who said they still intended to vote against the bill next month. Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot – putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth.' The bill will cut personal independence payments (Pips) for more than 800,000 people with disabilities, as well as carers' support for 150,000 people who care for them. Claimants only able to wash half of their body or who are unable to cook a meal for themselves will no longer be able to claim Pips unless they have another limiting condition. The cuts are at the heart of an overall package of nearly £5bn in welfare savings which ministers argue are necessary to protect the financial sustainability of the benefits system. Kendall has tried to dispel widespread anger in the Labour party over the plans by introducing new concessions. Under the terms of the bill, people losing their disability benefits will get additional financial support for 13 weeks, while those with severe conditions such as heart disease or spinal injuries will not have to face reassessments. The work and pensions secretary has set out a separate £1bn plan to help unemployed people get back to work, but this is not related to Pips, which are unconnected to employment status. Whips are also issuing threats, and the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, refused on Wednesday to rule out the possibility of suspending any Labour rebels when the bill is put to a vote next month. The mixture of concessions and threats did not appear to have won over wavering Labour MPs, however, and many went public with their criticism after the bill was published. Rachael Maskell, the MP for York Central, said: 'Having read the bill, it is clear that disabled people will lose significant support. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'The explanatory notes set out that 800,000 will not receive the daily living component of Pip by 2029/2030 and 150,000 will also lose their carers allowance. Poverty will be the legacy of this bill.' Andy McDonald, the MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said the bill was 'a huge attack on the incomes of disabled people'. 'MPs are being expected to vote these through whilst the green paper consultation continues, before the Pip assessment review is conducted, and without any evidence the separate employment support package – which is not in this bill – will work. 'This bill will be a yes or no on impoverishing disabled people. It's a no from me.' Those feelings were echoed by disability campaign groups and charities. James Taylor, the director of strategy at the disability equality charity Scope said: 'This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people. Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from Pip. 'It will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.'

HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians
HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians

The Guardian

time43 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

HS2: a complete failure by the British state and its politicians

When was it obvious that HS2 was an economic turkey at risk of becoming 'an appalling mess', as transport secretary Heidi Alexander described today's position? A fair case can be made for 2013, a year of two neon-lit warnings of trouble ahead. One was a scathing report on HS2 from the National Audit Office (NAO), the first of many, when the project was still at the planning stage. The NAO concluded it was impossible to say whether the programme was likely to deliver value for money; the cost and benefit estimates were 'uncertain'; there had been 'past errors in the underlying model'; the Department for Transport had 'poorly articulated' the strategic need for a transformation in rail capacity and how HS2 was supposed to rebalance economic growth. In short, there was 'a weak foundation for securing and demonstrating success in the future'. Then there was Peter Mandelson's remarkable insider confession in the pages of the FT of how Gordon Brown and his cabinet came to approve HS2 in the first place in 2010. It was a tale of collective short-termism; in the grim post-banking crash era, the Labour government didn't want to be outdone by the Tories in their enthusiasm for a shiny new big project. The cost estimates were 'almost entirely speculative', wrote Mandelson, but 'the vision was exciting' and 'we were focusing on the coming electoral battle'. Laughably, ministers had imagined HS2 would attract private sector backers. By 2013, Mandelson had changed his mind on HS2 and feared 'an expensive mistake'. If only others had rethought. It would have been a painless option for David Cameron's coalition government to ditch the whole adventure. There was an excuse to do so because an earlier report in 2006 by former British Airways chief Sir Rod Eddington, which was being reread with fresh eyes at the time, had rejected the idea of new high-speed rail links. For a country the size of the UK, the best value will usually lie in improving existing rail and road networks, it argued. Instead, the HS2 show rolled on, fuelled by more political puff and short-termism. Some of the passages in the review by ex-KPMG infrastructure adviser James Stewart, published by Alexander on Wednesday, are excruciating. Key decisions, such as the passing of the first parliamentary bill in 2017 and the letting of works contracts, prioritised the schedule over costs. 'I have heard a range of reasons for this but pressure from politicians to maintain momentum, fear of HS2 being cancelled, and the belief that costs will increase as a result of delay have featured strongly,' says Stewart. Meanwhile, 'the top-down vision of building a railway that would be the best and fastest has been a major factor in undermining attempts to introduce a culture of cost control'. This is tear-your-hair-out stuff because it breaks the golden rule about getting plans hammered down in detail before you start building large-scale infrastructure projects. Even now half of Euston sits as a wasteland before a plan has been agreed for a design for a HS2 terminus. The main source of cost overruns, as Stewart and Mark Wild (the ex-Crossrail chief executive now charged with salvaging the shambles) agree, were the works contracts. The contracting model, combined with unrealistic targets, turned the contracts into 'cost-plus' arrangements whereby contractors had little to no incentive to hit cost targets. Companies rang rings around the department and its arm's-length body, HS2 Ltd. The Institution of Civil Engineers concluded roughly the same in its report last year: huge contracts created 'an imbalance of power', especially in the context of a political demand to hurry up. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Later Tory leaders, especially Boris Johnson, deserve their own mention in the catalogue of infamy. It was Johnson who pushed the formal 'notice to proceed' button in 2020, in full knowledge that the review he commissioned from Douglas Oakervee said HS2 only made sense if built in full. Within 18 months, and with costs hurtling out of control, ministers amputated most of HS2's eastern arm to Leeds in 2021; the section to Manchester followed. In shrunken circumstances, it makes sense, as Alexander and Wild say, to slow down and complete the rump Birmingham-London link to a slower timetable in the interests of minimising yet more cost overruns. It will involve running the high-speed trains at slower speeds initially, a suitably farcical postscript to a project that has wasted tens of billions of pounds and consumed the lion's share of spending on rail for years. The tragedy is this ending has been predictable for about a decade.

Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most
Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Santander cuts mortgage rates with first-time buyer deals slashed most

By Santander has cut mortgage rates for those buying homes with smaller deposits, despite the expectation that the Bank of England will hold interest rates at 4.25 per cent tomorrow. The changes are aimed at first-time buyers and home movers with a 5 per cent or 10 per cent deposit. The mortgage rate cuts will be up to 0.22 percentage points. The new products are available to all customers, whether they are applying via a broker or directly. Santander's lowest five-year fix for first-time buyers will now charge 4.85 per cent with no fee and £250 cashback. On a £200,000 mortgage being repaid over 25 years that would cost £1,152 a month. Home movers can do slightly better, with Santander offering a 4.78 per cent rate - again with no fee and £250 cashback. There are slightly lower rates on the market, but these tend to come with higher fees. For example, Monmouthshire Building Society is offering a 4.75 per cent rate with £1,379 of fees. Nationwide is also offering a 4.79 per cent five year fix at 4.79 per cent with £999 of fees. Buyers can compare rates and fees using This is Money's mortgage calculator. First time buyers with a 10 per cent deposit can secure a five-year fix at 4.47 per cent with Santander with a £999 fee and £250 cashback. Home movers with a 10 per cent deposit get a market-leading 4.4 per cent rate with Santander, albeit with the same fees. The next best deal after that is Virgin Money charging 4.44 per cent for its five-year fix, with a £995 fee. Alongside the 90 per cent and 95 per cent mortgage products, Santander is also cutting deals for home movers buying with 15 per cent deposits. It is also cutting the rate on its lowest five-year fixed rate remortgage deal for those refinancing with at least 40 per cent equity in their home. Peter Stimson, director of mortgages at the lender MPowered suggests that mortgage rates are unlikely to fall any further for the time being. 'When it comes to interest rates, inflation has morphed from a blip into a block,' said Stimson. 'That's why the prospects of the Bank of England cutting its base rate again tomorrow - already very slim - have evaporated. 'The swaps market - which mortgage lenders use to set the interest rates they offer on new loans - is already implying that there will be just one further cut to the base rate this year. He added: 'For anyone planning to buy their first home or remortgage this summer, who'd been assuming that the only way is down for mortgage interest rates, this week's inflation data will have been an uncomfortable reality check. 'Mortgage rates may well have fallen as far as they can for now, and in the coming weeks rates may even creep up back as lenders recalibrate in response to rising swap rates.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store