Boeing, Justice Department reach deal to avoid prosecution over deadly 737 Max crashes
The U.S. Justice Department said Friday that it has reached a deal with Boeing t hat will allow the aircraft maker to avoid prosecution over two crashes of its 737 Max planes that killed 346 people.
The non-prosecution agreement would allow Boeing, a major military contractor and top U.S. exporter, to avoid being labeled a felon. The decision means Boeing won't face trial as scheduled next month, as crash victims' family members have urged for years.
The Department of Justice met with crash victims' family members last week to discuss the potential deal.
In a court filing Friday the DOJ said it 'is the Government's judgment that the Agreement is a fair and just resolution that serves the public interest.'
The agreement 'guarantees further accountability and substantial benefits from Boeing immediately, while avoiding the uncertainty and litigation risk presented by proceeding to trial.'
The DOJ said it intends to file a motion to dismiss the case once the 'agreement in principle' is finalized, by no later than the end of next week.
Under the agreement, Boeing will have to 'pay or invest' more than $1.1 billion, the DOJ said in its filing in federal court in Texas on Friday. That amount includes a $487.2 million criminal fine, though $243.6 million it already paid in an earlier agreement would be credited. It also includes $444.5 million for a new fund for crash victims, and $445 million more on compliance, safety and quality programs.
Boeing declined to comment.
The company has been trying for years to put the two crashes of its best-selling Max planes — a Lion Air flight in October 2018 and an Ethiopian Airlines flight less than five months later — behind it. The Maxes were grounded worldwide for nearly two years after the second crash, a pause that gave rival Airbus a head start in recovering from the Covid pandemic.
But families of the crash victims have criticized previous agreements as sweetheart deals for Boeing, called for more accountability from the company and said its executives should stand trial. In 2022, a former chief technical pilot for Boeing was acquitted on fraud charges tied to the Max's development.
Several of the victims' family members issued a statement through their lawyer shortly after the court filing was released criticizing the deal and saying it set a troubling precedent for other large companies.
'This kind of non-prosecution deal is unprecedented and obviously wrong for the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history. My families will object and hope to convince the court to reject it,' said the families' lawyer, Paul Cassell.
The Justice Department said relatives of more than 110 crash victims told the government they support the non-prosecution agreement or 'support the Department's efforts to resolve the case pre-trial more generally,' but added that others said they want the U.S. to take Boeing to trial and that they would litigate to dismiss the deal.
The aerospace giant reached a settlement in 2021 in the final days of the first Trump administration that shielded it from prosecution for three years.
Under that deal, Boeing agreed to pay a $2.51 billion fine to avoid prosecution. That included a $243.6 million criminal penalty, a $500 million fund for crash victims' family members and $1.77 billion for its airline customers. The new fund will be on top of the $500 million that was already established.
That 2021 settlement was set to expire two days after a door panel blew out of a nearly new 737 Max 9 operated by Alaska Airlines on Jan. 5, 2024, after the aircraft left Boeing's factory without key bolts installed.
But last year, U.S. prosecutors said Boeing violated the 2021 settlement, accusing the company of failing to set up and enforce a compliance and ethics program to detect violations of U.S. fraud laws.
Last July, toward the end of the Biden administration, Boeing agreed to plead guilty to the criminal fraud charge in a new settlement. A federal judge later rejected the plea deal, citing concerns with diversity, equity and inclusion requirements for choosing a corporate monitor.
Under that 2024 deal, Boeing would have faced a fine of up to $487.2 million, though the Justice Department recommended that the court credit Boeing with half that amount it paid under the previous agreement.
The U.S. had accused Boeing of conspiracy to defraud the government by misleading regulators about its inclusion of a flight-control system on the Max that was later implicated in the two crashes.
'Boeing's employees chose the path of profit over candor by concealing material information from the FAA concerning the operation of its 737 Max airplane and engaging in an effort to cover up their deception,' then-acting Assistant Attorney General David Burns of the Justice Department's Criminal Division said at the time of the 2021 deferred prosecution agreement.
Messages revealed in an investigation into the Max's development showed the former top Boeing pilot who was found not guilty of fraud in 2022, Mark Forkner, told the FAA to delete the flight-control system known as MCAS from manuals and, in a separate email, he boasted about 'jedi-mind tricking' regulators into approving the training material.
Lawyers for victims' family members railed against last year's preliminary plea deal, equating it to a slap on the wrist for the corporate giant, which recently won a contract worth billions to build the next-generation fighter jet and works on other military programs including outfitting two new presidential jets.
Rescuers work at the scene of an Ethiopian Airlines flight crash near Bishoftu, or Debre Zeit, south of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Monday, March 11, 2019.Mulugeta Ayene | ReutersFamily members hold photographs of crash victims lost in two deadly Boeing 737 Max crashes that killed 346 people as Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg testifies before a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing on aviation safety and the grounded 737 Max, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Oct. 29, 2019.Sarah Silbiger | Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Pentagon should shave defense procurement regulation: industry group
WASHINGTON, June 9 (Reuters) - As the Pentagon overhauls procurement regulations, an industry group that represents defense and aerospace companies says it identified over 50 regulatory requirements that discourage companies from doing business with the government. The Pentagon has embarked on a renewed attempt to change how the Pentagon acquires weapons and support systems. One example was a March memo signed by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth changing how the Pentagon buys software. In a June 3 letter to Hegseth, the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), which represents a wide swath of defense companies including Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N), opens new tab, Boeing Co (BA.N), opens new tab General Dynamics Corp (GD.N), opens new tab and others, said its members want to eliminate burdensome regulations that have frustrated them for years. "The cumulative growth of these requirements over time has created a regulatory framework that itself poses an endemic risk: stifling innovation, diminishing the supplier base, driving up costs, and delaying delivery," said Eric Fanning, the head of the AIA said in the letter. Key areas AIA targeted for reform include cybersecurity compliance, cost accounting standards, intellectual property rules, and commercial acquisition requirements. Industry leaders have argued these regulations create unnecessary obstacles to an expedited acquisition process. Particularly problematic were the Cybersecurity Maturation Model Certification requirements, which industry representatives say place substantial risk and liability on prime contractors who must verify compliance throughout their entire supply chain. Other targeted regulations include Cost Accounting Standards that force companies to maintain separate accounting systems from standard commercial practices, and intellectual property rules that industry claims discourage companies from offering their best technologies to the Pentagon.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Families urged to apply for cost of living cash worth up to £600
The Household Support Fund is a cost of living scheme that is run by local councils - it is a pot of cash awarded to local authorities, which they then distribute to residents Families are being urged to check if they can claim up to £600 in cost of living payments through the Household Support Fund. The Household Support Fund is a cost of living scheme that is run by local councils. It is a pot of cash awarded to local authorities, which they then distribute to residents. The help provided normally comes in the form of one-off payments that don't need to be paid back, or vouchers for food or energy. London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Council is issuing cash grants, which vary depending on the size of your household. Here is the help available: Up to £300 for households with one or more adults Up to £500 for households with one child Up to £600 for households and two children or more Get cost of living tips straight to your WhatsApp! As the cost of living crisis continues to burn a hole in people's pockets, the Mirror has launched its very own Money WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest cost of living advice and money-saving tips straight to your phone. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. To be eligible for the grant, you must be over 18, living in Richmond and be struggling from the impact of rising costs of food and energy or continue to be impacted by COVID-19. This can include: Reduced pay or lost job Benefits issues Struggling to afford food, energy costs and other essentials, including white goods Extra costs as a result of COVID-19 Richmond Council is also encouraging individuals to apply if: There are community care needs They have serious health problems There is a risk to a child's wellbeing Get the best deals and tips from Mirror Money You can apply by contacting Citizens Advice Richmond by freephone on 08082 787873. If you're not a Doncaster resident, it is worth checking what support your local council can offer you through the Household Support Fund. For example, City of Doncaster Council is providing help to households that are in receipt of one of benefits including Housing Benefit, Council Tax Reduction, Universal Credit which includes the housing element and means-tested free school meals. If you're in a household with one dependent child, you will get a £100 payment for food, while £200 will be paid for two dependent children, and £300 for three dependent children. The council described a dependant child as one you are receiving Child Benefit for. A single payment will be made for energy bills to households that meet the eligibility criteria. Hull City Council is giving £200 to pensioner households. Meanwhile, low income families will get a £40 school uniform grant, as well as food vouchers in school holidays for those eligible for school meals. Hartlepool Borough Council is awarding £100 food vouchers to all households where a child is aged between two and 19 and is eligible for free school meals. Meanwhile, households with pensioners who are in receipt of council tax support will get £100 in bank payments or food vouchers this year.
NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
Senior U.S. and China envoys to meet for showdown trade talks in London
HONG KONG — Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China 's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. The U.K. is providing a venue for the discussions but will not be involved in them directly and the exact time and location of the meeting remains unknown. 'We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks,' a U.K. government spokesperson said. The effects of the U.S.-China trade rift are already apparent, with China on Monday reporting a 34.5% decrease in exports to the U.S. in May — the biggest drop since February 2020, at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, CNBC reported. Investors were relieved last month when U.S. and Chinese representatives meeting in Geneva said they had reached a preliminary agreement to suspend most of the tit-for-tat tariffs they had imposed on each other's goods, which had reached as high as 145%. But in recent weeks both countries have accused each other of violating the agreement. The new round of talks comes four days after President Donald Trump and Chinese Xi Jinping held a lengthy phone call that Trump said focused mostly on trade. The call, which Trump said lasted about 90 minutes, was the first between the two leaders since Trump returned to office, though they spoke a few days before his Jan. 20 inauguration. Trump, who had complained a day earlier that Xi was 'extremely hard to make a deal with,' said in a Truth Social post that the call 'resulted in a very positive conclusion' for both countries. He told reporters Friday that Xi had agreed to resume the flow of rare earth minerals and magnets to the U.S. after imposing export controls on the products, which are crucial components for electronics, automobiles and other industries. Trump said his administration was 'very far advanced on the China deal' and that the meeting on Monday was about 'clarification.' The U.S. side will be represented in London by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, while the Chinese delegation will be led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. Bessent, Greer and He were all in Geneva last month.
