logo
The two major news channels that completely IGNORED domestic terror attack on ICE detention facility

The two major news channels that completely IGNORED domestic terror attack on ICE detention facility

Daily Mail​10-07-2025
MSNBC and CNN did not devote any on-air coverage to a domestic terror attack on an ICE detention facility in Alvarado, Texas, on the Fourth of July, according to a report from Mediate.
The lack of coverage was revealed in a scathing opinion piece that took the networks to task for the lack of coverage.
'This glaring omission is particularly notable given the two news organizations' relentlessly critical coverage of ICE and persistent warnings about right-wing extremism and violence,' the piece read.
The attack saw 11 suspects dressed in all-black military fatigues shoot fireworks at the facility 'as part of an organized attack,' the US Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas said on Tuesday.
When an Alvarado police officer responded to the scene, one alleged defendant in nearby woods shot the officer in the neck area, officials added.
Another alleged assailant across the street fired 20 to 30 rounds at unarmed correctional officers who stepped outside.
The suspects left behind pointed graffiti that read 'ICE pig' and 'F*** you pigs' on vehicles and a guard structure in the parking lot at the facility.
The injured officer was treated and released following the shooting.
The FBI has since arrested 10 of the 11 suspects, with a final suspect still at large.
In the Alvarado ambush, suspects left behind pointed graffiti that read 'ICE pig' and 'F*** you pigs' on vehicles and a guard structure in the parking lot at the facility
Meanwhile, MSNBC's Catherine Rampell ranted about its employees 'potentially like beating people, and committing violence,' and a CNN interview of a Latino man lamenting that his 'own people' were being 'arrested and harassed by the ICE agents'
MSNBC did not cover the ambush at all, while CNN only devoted a single sentence to the attack, Mediaite said, highlighting the networks' anti-ICE coverage.
'Searches for mentions of ICE on air may not turn up any coverage at all of the attempted murder of innocent law enforcement officers,' the piece said, 'but they do yield plenty of segments about other protests of the organization, MSNBC's Catherine Rampell ranting about its employees 'potentially like beating people, and committing violence,' and a CNN interview of a Latino man lamenting that his 'own people' were being 'arrested and harassed by the ICE agents.'
'Nothing about bullets flying by heads, though.'
Both networks extensively covered news of the deadly floods in central Texas, which began the same day as the Alvarado attack.
Three days later, a gunman was shot and killed by federal agents at a US border patrol facility in McAllen, Texas in an incident covered by both CNN and MSNBC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man ‘speechless' after personal gift from Putin
Man ‘speechless' after personal gift from Putin

The Independent

time8 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Man ‘speechless' after personal gift from Putin

An Anchorage resident, Mark Warren, reportedly received a new Ural motorcycle as a personal gift from Russian President Vladimir Putin. The gift was presented by Andrei Ledenev, an employee of the Russian embassy, during a summit between Putin and Donald Trump in Anchorage, Alaska. Warren, a biker, immediately took the new motorbike for a spin and expressed his amazement and gratitude to Russian state media, saying: 'I'm speechless, it's amazing. Thank you very much.' The gesture followed Warren's earlier conversation with Russian state television reporters, where he mentioned difficulties obtaining spare parts for his old Ural bike due to its manufacturing plant being in Ukraine. Ural, the motorcycle company, now assembles its bikes in Kazakhstan, having ceased production in Russia after the full-scale war in Ukraine.

Ravens' Lamar Jackson sparks liberal meltdown after resharing post from controversial Charlie Kirk
Ravens' Lamar Jackson sparks liberal meltdown after resharing post from controversial Charlie Kirk

Daily Mail​

time9 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ravens' Lamar Jackson sparks liberal meltdown after resharing post from controversial Charlie Kirk

Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson ignited some anger on the left by re-posting a pro-Christian message from a conservative provocateur. 'It's all about Jesus,' read the X post from Charlie Kirk, the Turning Point USA co-founder In itself, the post isn't altogether different from what Jackson typically puts on social media. A devout Christian, Jackson's X page is dominated by bible verses, baptisms and some occasional football content. But Kirk has faced accusations of racism for his attacks on diversity initiatives and the idea of white privilege, making Jackson's re-post a bit more divisive than his others. 'Kirk is outright racist and would easily throw Lamar to the cotton fields,' wrote one critic about the white podcaster and black NFL star. 'It's so tone deaf.' 'Lamar Jackson out here retweeting Charlie Kirk,' another wrote. 'Hope he continues to choke in the playoffs.' Charlie Kirk (center) has described civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. as 'awful' One respondent put it more succinctly: 'Lamar retweeting a very known racist…' Several critics acknowledged that Jackson may not know much about Kirk, a frequent target of liberal anger who was recently lampooned on South Park. Regardless, at least one criticized the Ravens star anyway. '[Guys I'm] very aware that lamar jackson probably has zero idea who charlie kirk is and is solely [retweeting because it] talks about his faith,' one person wrote on X, adding: 'it still wild to see your favorite players name right above the second spawn of satan himself.' The much larger online reaction belonged to conservatives, many of whom responded to a post from @_MLFootball by accusing Democrats of religious intolerance. Many suggested that Jackson was focused on the pro-Christ message and not its author Jackson's decision to repost a message from Charlie Kirk rankled some football fans 'Is this the point we've come to?' former ESPN host and current Donald Trump supporter Sage Steele wrote on X. 'Criticizing someone bc of their religious beliefs? Just stop. Stay strong @Lj_era8 and keep being an example for so many in Baltimore & beyond! @Ravens #lamarjackson.' But posts of anyone criticizing Jackson's specific religious beliefs have been difficult to track down. Instead, much of the anger has centered on Kirk, who has described civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. as 'awful' and once questioned the capabilities of black pilots. What's more, Kirk has been outspoken against the 1964 Civil Rights Act that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 'It's not because Jesus bro,' one person wrote on X. 'It's because it's Kirk and he's a known racist. Stop trying to conflate it.' Jackson has sat for the Ravens' first two preseason games and may not play in the third. He has not appeared in a preseason game since 2021.

Democratic-led states sue over Trump restrictions on crime victim grants
Democratic-led states sue over Trump restrictions on crime victim grants

Reuters

time9 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Democratic-led states sue over Trump restrictions on crime victim grants

Aug 18 (Reuters) - A group of Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to prevent the Trump administration from forcing them to cooperate with immigration enforcement activities in order to receive grant funding to support crime victims. The lawsuit, opens new tab filed in federal court in Rhode Island is the latest case to challenge efforts by Republican President Donald Trump's administration to impose immigration-related conditions on states' ability to receive federal funding. Monday's lawsuit by state attorneys general in 20 states and the District of Columbia takes aim at a condition the U.S. Department of Justice recently imposed on the ability of states to receive grants pursuant to the Victims of Crime Act, which Congress enacted in 1984 to bolster support for crime victims. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment. The department administers programs funded by fines and penalties assessed in federal criminal cases that allow states to receive grant funding to provide services for victims including medical care, counseling, shelter and compensation for lost wages. Attorneys general from states including California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island say those funds help about 10 million people annually. In 2025, nearly $1.4 billion in such funding is available, the lawsuit said. But under a new Trump administration policy, states can lose out on such funding if they decline to provide U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement access to facilities or honor all civil immigration enforcement requests, the lawsuit said. The conditions were imposed in keeping with a policy Attorney General Pam Bondi unveiled in February requiring the Justice Department to ensure that federal funds do not flow to so-called "sanctuary jurisdictions" that do not cooperate with ICE. The states' lawsuit argues that such conditions are unlawful and violate the U.S. Constitution by undermining Congress' power over appropriations. They are asking a judge to block the Justice Department from enforcing the conditions. Judges in Rhode Island have issued a series of rulings preventing the administration from imposing conditions on grant funding that align with Trump's broader agenda. Most recently, a judge in the state this month barred the Justice Department from enforcing new restrictions on grant funding used to support victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store