Jeremy Renner Breaks Silence On Explosive Abuse Claims: ‘Clickbait That Dehumanises'
Read More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
When irony loses its superpower
'Welcome to the MCU. You're joining at a bit of a low point,' Ryan Reynolds' quipaholic mercenary greets Hugh Jackman's rageaholic mutant in Deadpool & Wolverine, a corporate alliance bulletin in the guise of a superhero team-up romp. Fox's Marvel properties are welcomed into Disney's fold not with the red carpet rolled out, but with a snarky dig. If you thought the franchise had hit rock bottom already, there are phases yet to come in its business cycle, by the end of which you may forget if there ever were any peaks to begin with. Self referential comedy when it's done right: Buster Keaton's Sherlock Jr (1924) (Courtesy iMDB) A corporate alliance bulletin in the guise of a superhero team-up romp. (Publicity material) For a movie about IP integration amid company-wide restructuring, the villain is a fitting one: a corporate bureaucrat by the name of Mr Paradox (Matthew MacFadyen) who has been tasked with cleaning up loose timelines across the multiverse. When Deadpool finds out his timeline is going to be 'pruned' from existence, he seeks out Wolverine for help. Their battle for survival stands in for Fox's battle against erasure upon being gobbled up by the Mouse House. From the very opening moments of Shawn Levy's movie, Deadpool goofs on the business acquisition that greased the wheels for the franchise crossover, a building block for grander crossovers in the future. The movie even pokes fun at the Disney-owned Marvel for persisting with the multiverse despite diminishing returns, while being a glaring example of why the returns keep diminishing. If the MCU has grown into a monster devouring itself into a void of nothingness, the Deadpool movies have become the ouroboros in reverse: a franchise with its head up its own ass. Not that there's anything wrong with self-referential comedy. Many a filmmaker has directed our attention to the artifice of their creation for laughs. In Buster Keaton's Sherlock Jr. (1924), a projectionist dreams of entering the very film he's projecting; once inside the film, he is subject to the whimsical rules of continuity editing; each cut leaves him stumbling and unmoored in one of the most enterprising sight gags. Mel Brooks took aim at the whitewashed myths of the Old West and the absurdity of racism in Blazing Saddles (1974), a satirical Western that has a brawl break out of the set, spread through the Warner Bros studios, pour into the streets and end at a theatre premiering Blazing Saddles. Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994) finds the monster Freddy Krueger has grown beyond folklore; out of his creator's control, he trespasses into the real world to haunt the actor who defeated him on screen. Two years later, with Scream, Craven established the rules of a slasher only to break them. Charlie Kaufman re-energised the modern book-to-film adaptation with a decidedly post-modern approach in Adaptation (2002); on being assigned to adapt Susan Orlean's nonfiction book The Orchid Thief, Kaufman wrote himself into the film; as he dramatized his own struggles to adapt said book, he confronted the self-doubts, the anxieties, the chaos that can paralyse the creative process. Ocean's Twelve (2004) had less serious intentions when it had Julia Roberts play a character who must pretend to be Julia Roberts. Cleavon Little and Gene Wilder in Blazing Saddles (1974). (Film still) It is no surprise that some of the funniest shows on TV in the 21st century similarly took the self-referential route. The metamoments in Arrested Development were like annotated jokes in the margins of its episodes. But the show was also loaded with all sorts of running gags, callbacks and double entendres. Being a situational comedy, it had a good nose for inventing the most absurd situations without the need for a laughter track to punctuate its punchlines. What made the comedy of Community so refreshing was its pop culture references were intertwined with its identity as a sitcom. The nods to movies and shows never once felt out of place. In 20-odd-minute episodes, Dan Harmon's series encapsulated how it feels to live and nerd out in a world saturated by mass media. Community laid the groundwork for another Harmon creation with a flair for the meta: the animated series Rick & Morty. The meta-layers provide Rick, an alcoholic jerk of a superscientist, the necessary distance to confront his cynicism, his failures as a parent and a grandparent, and the consequences of his selfish actions. Its most meta episodes evoke the feeling of living inside an MC Escher lithograph. In Fleabag, creator-writer-star Phoebe Waller-Bridge's quizzical side-eyes to the camera gave the audience an intimate glimpse into her character's inner life. We as the audience became her confidante, her coping mechanism, her emergency escape to dissociate when she felt overwhelmed, nervous, embarrassed, guilty or witty. What was for her a way of taking a breather shaped not only how we saw her but how we engaged with her story. In Season 2, Waller-Bridge broke the very device of breaking the fourth wall. As Fleabag's emotional bond with Andrew Scott's Hot Priest deepens, he begins to clock her asides — a sign of just how much he truly sees her. There is nothing quite as clever or thoughtful about Deadpool writers Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick's approach to metacomedy. Their execution is tantamount to a gag being slapped in the face again and again instead of organically kneaded in. Sure, it might grab your attention by sheer force. But you are left feeling bruised. And not from spasms of laughter. Listening to Reynolds' endless asides is like watching a movie with its built-in commentary track on — and an exhausting one at that. The fourth wall has been flattened to dust. Irony loses its inherent superpower once writers begin to resort to flippant asides as a rhetorical device by default. Deadpool's fourth-wall-breaking antics is a device carried over from the comics (Amazon) Bear in mind Deadpool's fourth-wall-breaking antics aren't a character quirk created exclusively for the movies. It is a device that carries over from the comics. Deadpool, alter ego of one Wade Wilson, was a comic book character aware he was in a comic book. When he is being tortured in a Joe Kelly issue, he reasons, 'None of this is really happening. There is a man. With a typewriter. This is all part of his crazy imagination.' Gail Simone's run saw Deadpool refer to his not-so-inner monologue as his 'little yellow boxes.' Sometimes, the references were about things outside the confines of the comic book medium. In one issue, he cues an action movie montage, instructing the reader to play Pantera's Five Minutes Alone, as he gets ready to kill 10 zombie presidents and their henchmen in about six pages. In another, he shoots a guy in the head for even suggesting he preferred the Star Wars prequels to the original trilogy — years before Lucasfilm and Fox became Disney properties. When the first Deadpool movie came out, Reese and Wernick didn't dial down the references. In one scene, a handcuffed Deadpool pulls out a knife, winks to the camera, says 'Ever see 127 Hours? Spoiler alert' before severing his hand. David Leitch, the director who replaced Miller for the sequel, billed himself in the playful opening credits as 'one of the guys who killed the dog in John Wick' (a piece of trivia that feels a lot less amusing when the end credits dedicate the movie to the memory of Sequana Harris, the stuntwoman who was killed while filming the movie). Deadpool & Wolverine repackages a lot of the same tired routines in a slightly different context. In its crosshairs are more or less the same targets. Ever so often, there might be a dick joke just to say 'Yeah, we went there if you can believe it.' Dress it up in postmodern regalia or undress it with a wink, a dick joke is still a dick joke. 'In Fleabag, creator-writer-star Phoebe Waller-Bridge's quizzical side-eyes to the camera gave the audience an intimate glimpse into her character's inner life.' (IMDB) On page, Deadpool and Wolverine have enough in common (two violent men capable of healing themselves from any wound, haunted by the past and seeking redemption) and enough differences (a glib merc who won't shut up vs a grumpy loner who sulks in silence) to make for a watchable pair with testy dynamics. But their collisions barely draw a laugh. When Deadpool quips, 'That is a shit ton of exposition for a three-quel' or 'Big CG fight coming up!', don't mistake it for satire. Acknowledgement isn't commentary. It is a cynical ploy to vindicate a movie for perpetuating the very tropes it is mocking. It is the writers getting ahead of the punch line of any joke the audiences might make at its expense. The writers are essentially saying 'Hey, we know everyone's grown tired of these same old conventions. But look, we are pointing them out for you this time. Please laugh so as to grant us an automatic free pass.' This kind of self-referential comedy is facile. There are no set-ups to the punchline. Sometimes no punchlines even. Just throwaway lines. Why bother earning our laughter with a fresh well-written joke when you can simply piggyback on the coattails of old material? 'It's a superhero movie that doesn't take itself too seriously' has become an excuse for not putting in the work. This consolidation project and all the Disney properties by themselves provide Deadpool & Wolverine a broad cultural ground to cover. While the movie takes a wild swing at the stakes, the milestones and the characters, it never really has anything interesting to say for itself. About the erasure of a past legacy to create a future one. About bureaucratic meddling. About the superhero monoculture. About our consumption patterns. About fan service. About the state of the entertainment industry. About the annoyingly snarky characters Reynolds always seems to play. The movie wants to have it both ways: to mock MCU while ultimately conforming to its vision. Deadpool is after all a Disney-sanctioned disruptor. A scene from She-Hulk: Attorney at Law (IMDb) In the season finale of the Marvel series She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, Jennifer Walters (Tatiana Maslany) finds herself in the middle of a chaotic conclusion. 'What is even happening here? This is a mess. None of these storylines make any sense,' she complains, looking straight at the camera. Jennifer then literally breaks out of the She-Hulk thumbnail on the Disney+ page to scold the writers, who blame it all on their boss Kevin. Not Marvel Studios boss Kevin Feige, but an AI bot named K.E.V.I.N. (Knowledge Enhanced Visual Interconnectivity Nexus) wearing a similar kind of baseball cap. Calling itself 'the most advanced entertainment algorithm in the world,' K.E.V.I.N. claims to 'produce near-perfect products.' It takes some persuasion on Jennifer's part before K.E.V.I.N. tweaks the ending as she wants it. This turn of events could be seen as a Marvel-approved self-critique for churning out algorithmic trash as well as a warning about a future where AI could replace writers. But it also gets at the core of the problem when self-referential comedy is used as a get-out-of-jail-free card. There is a similar moment in Deadpool 2 where a plot complication is branded as 'lazy writing' — an apt epigraph indeed for formulaic meta-comedy. Prahlad Srihari is a film and pop culture writer. He lives in Bangalore.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
This Bizarre Phone Case Feels Like Human Skin And Can Get Sunburned
A UK-based company has unveiled a bizarre, flesh-looking mobile phone case that looks, feels and even reacts to sunlight like human skin. According to the New York Post, French researcher Marc Teyssier partnered with Virgin Media O2 to create the Skincase. The mobile cover is a synthetic accessory designed to change colour when exposed to ultraviolet light, mimicking the effects of sunburn. The project was inspired by research showing staggering gaps between how frequently people check their phones during peak UV hours and how rarely they reapply sunscreen with similar consistency. "My work often seeks to bridge the gap between our digital lives and our physical well-being. The Skincase is a prime example of how technology can be harnessed to promote health awareness and encourage positive behavioural change," Mr Teyssier said in a press release. Although the skin case looks creepy and lifelike, Mr Teyssier insisted that it is synthetic. According to the Post, it was engineered using silicone combined with UV-reactive compounds to realistically replicate the texture and behaviour of human skin. ☀️ Say hello to the Skincase – the phone case that burns (yes, really) when exposed to UV rays 🔥📱 Crafted with @marcteyssier & backed by @britishskinfndn, it mimics human skin to remind you to reapply sunscreen 👀 Stay safe. Stay connected. Stay sun smart. 📍 Roam freely up… — Virgin Media O2 News (@VMO2News) July 8, 2025 The French researcher also used 3D printing and hand-sculpting techniques, and individually carved wrinkles into the engineered epidermis. The Skincase has been created in three different skin tones, and each reacts to UV rays by changing colours, just like the real thing, per the outlet. "With mobiles being such an essential part of everyday life, especially on holiday according to our new research, we've created the Skincase to demonstrate in real time just how severe the effects of sunburn can be while also promoting sun safety among holidaymakers," Chris Hindennach, Chief Commercial Officer at Virgin Media O2, said. Skincase is still a prototype and isn't for sale quite yet. Notably, Mr Teyssier is not new to working with synthetic skin technologies. Previously, he created an artificial skin that adheres to cell phones. In 2019, he introduced the tech to the world, saying that he simply wanted to "pinch (his) phone, so he created a mobile accessory that could feel human touch and even reciprocate the sensation as a means of comfort.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey releases in 2026: Here's why fans are booking 70mm IMAX tickets a year in advance
Christopher Nolan's next film The Odyssey is a full year away from release, but fans have already begun securing their seats. The 70mm IMAX tickets went on sale this week, and theatres in cities like New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco have already listed showtimes. This is despite the fact that the movie is still being filmed. It is rare to see tickets go up this early, but the excitement surrounding this project feels unprecedented, even for a director like Nolan. Why are fans so eager to buy tickets for The Odyssey? Nolan's name alone is enough to draw massive crowds, but The Odyssey is a different beast altogether. Based on Homer's epic poem, it is one of the most famous stories ever told, packed with gods, monsters, and legendary trials. IMAX 70mm tickets for Christopher Nolan's 'THE ODYSSEY' are already being prepared for film releases on July 17, 2026. It is not just about watching a film. For many, it is about witnessing a story of myth and adventure, brought to life on the biggest canvas available, through the lens of a director who has never failed to make cinema feel larger than life. A stunning cast of fan favourites Part of the hype comes from the star-studded cast Nolan has assembled. Matt Damon leads the lineup as Odysseus, while Tom Holland plays his son Telemachus. Zendaya, Anne Hathaway, Robert Pattinson, and Lupita Nyong'o also feature, giving the movie an extra layer of appeal. Greek media has reportedly discovered some of the roles of the actors in Christopher Nolan's 'THE ODYSSEY'• Matt Damon as Odysseus• Tom Holland as Telemachus• Zendaya as Athena• Charlize Theron as Circe• Anne Hathaway as Penelope• Benny Safdie as Agamemnon• Lupita… Every casting announcement made headlines. Fans of Marvel, DC, and Nolan's own filmography are seeing their favourite actors come together in one of the most ambitious films of the decade. Christopher Nolan's first time with an epic adaptation Nolan is known for original storytelling, but The Odyssey is his take on an existing myth. Yet, no one expects a straightforward adaptation. The director's ability to blend complex narratives with stunning visuals ensures that this will not just be a retelling, it will be a reimagining. His last epic, Oppenheimer, won Best Picture and Best Director at the Oscars. The expectation is that The Odyssey will raise the bar even higher, both technically and artistically. Shot in IMAX 70mm: A rare experience Another major reason for the early ticket sales is the IMAX 70mm experience. Nolan is one of the few filmmakers who still shoots on this format, giving audiences visuals that feel immersive and grand. A film by Christopher Nolan. Shot entirely with IMAX film cameras. In theaters 7 17 26. #TheOdysseyMovie Watching The Odyssey in this format will be like entering another world. From ancient Greek landscapes to intense sea voyages and mythical creatures, the scale of the story matches the format perfectly. Fans are buying tickets on faith No trailer is out yet. The film is still shooting. The listed runtime of 2 hours and 40 minutes is likely just a placeholder. Yet fans are committing now, a full year ahead, purely based on Nolan's reputation and the film's potential. It is a cinematic pilgrimage. A decision to trust that whatever Nolan is creating, it will be worth the wait and the ticket price. A must-watch in 2026 With so many factors, a visionary director, a legendary story, a stunning cast, and an unmatched visual format, The Odyssey is shaping up to be one of the biggest films of 2026. If tickets are already flying off the shelves, imagine the rush.
