logo
Is judicial decay behind immolation of societal ethos and civil chaos?

Is judicial decay behind immolation of societal ethos and civil chaos?

Express Tribune10-03-2025

Mohamed Bouazizi was, at least, lucky enough to stir a revolution as he set himself ablaze in Tunisia. It led to the Arab Spring in 2010, and the Middle East stands changed for all times to come. But Pakistan's Asif Javed was quite unfortunate as he self-immolated inside the premises of Lahore High Court. No one came to heed to the purpose of putting an end to his life, nor was the court of law bothered to dig deep into the malaise our society is infected with. Surprisingly enough, a probe was ordered to merely find out how gasoline made its way inside the premises of the court. The apathy is that Asif had been knocking at the doors of the court for years, seeking his eligible reinstatement, and his last words were: "Mujhe insaaf chahiye (I want justice)."
Asif, sadly, is unlikely to be the last one to have taken this bizarre route of extinction. Pakistan's traumatised social mosaic is full of many such horrible episodes where men and women opt for self-murder in desperation, as they have lost faith in the system in vogue. Denial of justice is one of the fundamental causes behind this reprehensible route. The tendency to commit suicide has risen in Pakistan owing to declining social mobility, incapacity of the poor to get two square meals, institutional discrimination and harassment at workplaces, and last but not least a jaundiced legal system that keeps a litigant in a zigzag of uncertainty.
According to WHO, there are around 10 suicides per 100,000 people in Pakistan. PIMS Islamabad claims that 40% of cases of suicide are burn victims who go over the brink in an aura of despair and disheartenment. Most of these children of a lesser god, who decide to take their lives, are sufferers of denial of justice. Even small cases pertaining to robbery, false allegations and mob arrests remain pending for months and years.
The Law and Justice Commission says that more than 2.26 million cases are pending in courts to this day. This is in addition to high-profile cases involving judicial review and constitutional interpretations that are more than 57,000. Official figures reveal that 82% of pending cases (i.e. 1.86 million) are at the district judiciary level. Lack of proper staff, corruption, mismanagement, political interference and waywardness of judicial officers, including police meddling, are factors behind low dispensation of justice.
There is also an emerging nexus between denial of justice and rise of parochialism, coupled with the tendency to opt for violence. From a societal perspective, it is leading to intolerance; and communities are refusing to see from the same prism of nationalism, as they have genuine grievances that are not being addressed by the state, per se. A lame duck and executive-subservient judiciary is an enigma, which has throttled public sentiments for realising an egalitarian society. Thus, lawful governance and constitutional supremacy take a backseat as justice is denied or delayed.
That is what is happening in Pakistan today as the judiciary for reasons of exigency, and undue influence from the executive, is not taking a stance. This is tantamount to negation of rule of law. The impugned 26th constitutional amendment is a case in point that has literally undermined the independence of judiciary, opening floodgates of political revulsion and social chaos.
With the Constitution and fundamental rights being ignored, there is hardly anything left with the common man to see a future for himself and his wards. Thus, self-immolation, civil disobedience, public dissent and law and order problems are a last resort. Perhaps that is why Winston Churchill was determined to see an independent judiciary functioning even in times of war so that public litigation is squarely taken care of.
The crumbling of judicial supremacy in Pakistan is taking a toll in the form of political instability and economic meltdown. Confidence of masses and businesses, local and foreign, originate from a rules-based society where law is supreme and duly accessible. If we can erect a law-abiding order, the decay can be stemmed and many more Asifs can live a cheering life of their own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No decision yet to annul treaties with India: FO
No decision yet to annul treaties with India: FO

Express Tribune

time19 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

No decision yet to annul treaties with India: FO

Pakistan has not made any formal decision to abrogate any bilateral agreement with India as the two countries compete on diplomatic front post April 22 Pahalgam incident. "No formal decision on abrogation of any bilateral agreement with India has so far been made," a Foreign Office official said on Thursday The statement came a day after Defense Minister Khawaja Asif told a private TV channel that the Simla Agreement signed between Pakistan and India in 1972 has lost its "sanctity" due to New Delhi's unilateral actions, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). "The [Simla] Agreement was bilateral [...] as no third party or the World Bank was involved," Asif said, maintaining that the Line of Control (LoC) would convert into a ceasefire line in the absence of the bilateral treaty. "If this is the case and India has begun this [attitude] then the Simla Agreement is between two parties and has no interference or patronage from the World Bank or anyone else, so the LoC will revert to a ceasefire line, which was its original status as per the [UN] resolution passed at the time of the 1948 plebiscite. "The sanctity of the Simla Agreement has been eliminated due to India's actions," the defence minister added, further saying that its conditions, such as for India and Pakistan to resolve issues bilaterally, were no longer applicable. "The agreement as a whole after this episode of war has now no value," he added. The agreement was signed between Pakistan and India in the aftermath of the 1971 war; the signatories were Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Indira Gandhi.

Pakistan says no decision yet to scrap bilateral agreements with India
Pakistan says no decision yet to scrap bilateral agreements with India

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

Pakistan says no decision yet to scrap bilateral agreements with India

Listen to article No decision has yet been taken to scrap bilateral agreements with India, Pakistan's foreign ministry said on Thursday – a day after Defence Minister Khawaja Asif claimed that the 1972 Simla Agreement between the two hostile neighbours was a 'dead' document. Responding to media queries, a senior Foreign Office official said that while India's recent actions and statements prompted internal discussions, Pakistan had made no formal or conclusive move to annul any of its bilateral accords with New Delhi. 'At present, there is no formal decision to terminate any bilateral accord,' the official stated, indicating that the existing bilateral agreements, including the Simla Agreement, remain in effect. Read more: Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document' The clarification came a day after Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, during an interview with a private television channel, said the Simla Agreement had lost its relevance and validity due to India's recent unilateral actions. 'The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the Line of Control a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions,' Asif said. He argued that the bilateral framework agreed upon in 1972 had collapsed, and future disputes would have to be addressed through multilateral or international channels. Referring to the first Indo-Pak war and the resulting UN-mediated ceasefire, the minister asserted that India's steps — particularly the revocation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir in 2019 — had undermined the foundations of bilateral engagement. He also questioned the current status of other key agreements, saying: 'Whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over.' In a pointed warning, the defence minister commented on the broader security situation, saying the threat of conflict with India was still there. 'Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, our response will be even stronger than before,' he warned. Read more: Simla Agreement 1972: Key points and exit implications The Simla Agreement, signed in 1972 in the aftermath of the 1971 Indo-Pak war, committed both countries to resolving their disputes through peaceful and bilateral means. The accord converted the ceasefire line in Jammu and Kashmir into the Line of Control (LoC) and obligated both sides to refrain from the threat or use of force, while respecting each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity. Khawaja Asif's remarks came against the backdrop of New Delhi's recent announcement to unilaterally suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), followed by unprovoked strikes inside Pakistani territory last month—developments that triggered heightened military tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. In the wake of India's move, Pakistani authorities reported a sharp decline of 91,000 cusecs in water flows from India into the Chenab River as the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, has continued to issue hawkish statements, suggesting the use of water as a strategic weapon against Pakistan. Days after announcing the suspension of the treaty, PM Modi declared that water previously flowing to Pakistan would now be retained for domestic use, asserting that Pakistan would no longer receive water from rivers over which India claims rights.

Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'
Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Asif declares Simla agreement a 'dead document'

Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement "dead" in the current geopolitical context, stating that Pakistan has effectively returned to the 1948 position regarding Kashmir, and the Line of Control (LoC) should now be viewed as a ceasefire line. In an interview with a private television channel on Wednesday, the minister said that while the Simla Agreement had initially committed both India and Pakistan to resolving disputes bilaterally, that framework had collapsed due to unilateral Indian actions in recent years. "The Simla Agreement is now a dead document. We are back to the 1948 position, when the United Nations declared the LoC a ceasefire line following the ceasefire and resolutions," he said, referring to the UN-mediated cessation of hostilities in the first India-Pakistan war. "Going forward, these disputes will be dealt with multilaterally or internationally." He also cast doubt over the status of other bilateral arrangements, stating that "whether the Indus Waters Treaty is suspended or not, Simla is already over." Commenting on regional tensions, Asif said the threat of war with India remains present. "Pakistan does not desire war, but if it is imposed on us, the response will be even stronger than before," he warned. The minister touched upon post-conflict developments, stating that Pakistan had emerged as a strengthened defensive power after its past wars with India. "We have become a defensive force. Orders for our JF-17 Thunder fighter jets are coming in," he said, highlighting Pakistan's growing defence capabilities. On the issue of Afghan refugees, Asif reiterated that Afghans should now return to their homeland. "Afghans must settle in their own country. They have no loyalty to our soil," he remarked, adding that the time had come to address this issue firmly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store