logo
Is judicial decay behind immolation of societal ethos and civil chaos?

Is judicial decay behind immolation of societal ethos and civil chaos?

Express Tribune10-03-2025
Mohamed Bouazizi was, at least, lucky enough to stir a revolution as he set himself ablaze in Tunisia. It led to the Arab Spring in 2010, and the Middle East stands changed for all times to come. But Pakistan's Asif Javed was quite unfortunate as he self-immolated inside the premises of Lahore High Court. No one came to heed to the purpose of putting an end to his life, nor was the court of law bothered to dig deep into the malaise our society is infected with. Surprisingly enough, a probe was ordered to merely find out how gasoline made its way inside the premises of the court. The apathy is that Asif had been knocking at the doors of the court for years, seeking his eligible reinstatement, and his last words were: "Mujhe insaaf chahiye (I want justice)."
Asif, sadly, is unlikely to be the last one to have taken this bizarre route of extinction. Pakistan's traumatised social mosaic is full of many such horrible episodes where men and women opt for self-murder in desperation, as they have lost faith in the system in vogue. Denial of justice is one of the fundamental causes behind this reprehensible route. The tendency to commit suicide has risen in Pakistan owing to declining social mobility, incapacity of the poor to get two square meals, institutional discrimination and harassment at workplaces, and last but not least a jaundiced legal system that keeps a litigant in a zigzag of uncertainty.
According to WHO, there are around 10 suicides per 100,000 people in Pakistan. PIMS Islamabad claims that 40% of cases of suicide are burn victims who go over the brink in an aura of despair and disheartenment. Most of these children of a lesser god, who decide to take their lives, are sufferers of denial of justice. Even small cases pertaining to robbery, false allegations and mob arrests remain pending for months and years.
The Law and Justice Commission says that more than 2.26 million cases are pending in courts to this day. This is in addition to high-profile cases involving judicial review and constitutional interpretations that are more than 57,000. Official figures reveal that 82% of pending cases (i.e. 1.86 million) are at the district judiciary level. Lack of proper staff, corruption, mismanagement, political interference and waywardness of judicial officers, including police meddling, are factors behind low dispensation of justice.
There is also an emerging nexus between denial of justice and rise of parochialism, coupled with the tendency to opt for violence. From a societal perspective, it is leading to intolerance; and communities are refusing to see from the same prism of nationalism, as they have genuine grievances that are not being addressed by the state, per se. A lame duck and executive-subservient judiciary is an enigma, which has throttled public sentiments for realising an egalitarian society. Thus, lawful governance and constitutional supremacy take a backseat as justice is denied or delayed.
That is what is happening in Pakistan today as the judiciary for reasons of exigency, and undue influence from the executive, is not taking a stance. This is tantamount to negation of rule of law. The impugned 26th constitutional amendment is a case in point that has literally undermined the independence of judiciary, opening floodgates of political revulsion and social chaos.
With the Constitution and fundamental rights being ignored, there is hardly anything left with the common man to see a future for himself and his wards. Thus, self-immolation, civil disobedience, public dissent and law and order problems are a last resort. Perhaps that is why Winston Churchill was determined to see an independent judiciary functioning even in times of war so that public litigation is squarely taken care of.
The crumbling of judicial supremacy in Pakistan is taking a toll in the form of political instability and economic meltdown. Confidence of masses and businesses, local and foreign, originate from a rules-based society where law is supreme and duly accessible. If we can erect a law-abiding order, the decay can be stemmed and many more Asifs can live a cheering life of their own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LHC frees 5 persons from custody of landlord
LHC frees 5 persons from custody of landlord

Business Recorder

time3 days ago

  • Business Recorder

LHC frees 5 persons from custody of landlord

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday freed five persons after getting them recovered from the illegal custody of a landlord Saeed Anwar in Faisalabad. Earlier, the court heard a petition filed by Rehmat Ali who approached the court for recovery of his brother Jafar along with other family members, including children. The court appointed a bailiff who recovered all the detainees from the landlord's residence. According to the bailiff's report, Jafar stated that the landlord had not only confined him and his family members but had also taken possession of his two buffaloes unlawfully. Following their recovery, all the detainees were produced before the court and set at liberty. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Court questions summer break extension
Court questions summer break extension

Express Tribune

time3 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Court questions summer break extension

Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench Senior Judge Justice Jawad Hasan expressed strong disapproval over the Punjab government's decision to extend summer vacations for classes from nursery to eight until August 31. Questioning the logic behind the move, Justice Hasan remarked, "Do parents pay Rs70,000 in school fees just for schools to remain closed? Shouldn't the Chief Minister of Punjab be summoned to court over this?" The remarks came during the hearing of a petition filed by student Daniyal, challenging the extension. The petition was admitted for regular hearing, and Justice Hasan dismissed the Assistant Advocate General's argument, stating that students, being the affected party, have a constitutional right to file such petitions. The court also issued notices to the Punjab Government, the Education Department, and the Deputy Commissioner of Rawalpindi, asking them to respond next week. Petitioner's counsel, Advocate Hafiz Waqar Awan, argued that the decision was made without justification and violated Section 12D of the Punjab Private Educational Institutions Act 1984, which delegates such powers to the District Education Authority in cases of emergency. He said that halting educational activities for three months is akin to jeopardising students' futures. Justice Hasan further questioned the Assistant Advocate General on what policy had guided the extension. He pointed out that even during wartime, courts remained operational and that children should not be deprived of their fundamental right to education under the pretence of extreme weather. Notices have been issued to the Secretary of Education and other respondents to submit their replies. box our correspondent RAWALPINDI. After a prolonged 78-day summer vacation, schools across the six districts of Rawalpindi Division partially reopened on Monday, August 18. However, attendance on the first day remained disappointingly low due to morning showers followed by heavy rain. Only classes 9 and 10 resumed, while students from nursery to grade 8 will return on September 1. Most schools dismissed students as early as 10 or 11am due to the poor turnout. In many institutions, schools opened late—around 8:00am instead of the scheduled 7:30am—with some teachers arriving to find the buildings still locked. Security measures were also lax, with guards often without uniforms and main entrances left unsecured. Cleanliness arrangements were notably absent on the first day. Several prominent higher secondary schools in Rawalpindi city, which had been converted into flood relief camps, also saw low attendance. Some camps remained closed due to rain. In girls' schools, turnout was particularly poor. Despite the conditions, many students expressed joy at returning. Students from Islamia High School, Liaquat Bagh, said the summer homework was excessive, and they were relieved to be back in school. Faizan Ali of Danish Higher Secondary School commented that the break was unusually long but welcomed the return to academic routine.

High court's jurisdiction must not be exercised on a whim: LHC
High court's jurisdiction must not be exercised on a whim: LHC

Business Recorder

time6 days ago

  • Business Recorder

High court's jurisdiction must not be exercised on a whim: LHC

LAHORE: Justice Mirza Viqas Rauf of the Lahore High Court advised a petitioner Muskan Zahra to approach ex-officio justice of peace for remedy and held that the constitutional jurisdiction of the high court should not be exercised at the whims of the parties. Justice Viqas noted that now a day a trend has developed to bypass the alternate remedies and instead to approach the high court in constitutional jurisdiction. He observed that the high court shall not exercise its writ jurisdiction in the cases where the petitioner has access to an equally efficacious and adequate alternative remedy under the law. The petitioner has approached the court against his parent and police officials harassing her and her husband for contracting the marriage against the will of her parents. The court dismissed the petition in liming and advised the petitioner to approach ex-officio justice of peace as alternate remedy, which is neither illusory nor ineffective, the court added. The court observed that nobody can be allowed to bypass or circumvent the natural course of law by avoiding to avail remedy provided there under and to invoke constitutional jurisdiction of this court. The court ruled that it is an extraordinary jurisdiction which is only to be exercised in rare and exceptional cases but not as per convenience of the parties. This on the one hand absolves the relevant forum from performing its functions and duties and on the other, unnecessarily burdened the docket of the high court and deprives the litigants, who have their genuine causes to lay before the high court, the court added. The court also observed that the Police Order, 2002, regulates the police and the police officials have been made answerable with regard to performance of their official duties. In case of any negligence or omission, they not only have to face disciplinary proceedings but also to be confronted with conviction in the shape of imprisonment and fine as well, the court added. The court observed that grievance of the petitioner, as agitated in the instant petition, can easily be remedied through a petition before the ex-officio justice of peace or even she can approach against the respondent police officials, the concerned authorities under the Police Order, 2002. Even otherwise in presence of alternate remedy, a person desirous to invoke the constitutional jurisdiction of high court is obliged to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court that such remedy is only illusory and not adequate at all, the court concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store