
After the fatal Concorde crash, could supersonic flight return?
The closest I've ever been to being on a supersonic flight was looking at the Concorde on static display at the Intrepid Museum in New York. But, for an entire generation of travelers and aviators, flying at twice the speed of sound was a daily reality, at least for the wealthy.
July marks 25 years since an Air France Concorde suffered a catastrophic incident just after departing Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport, and a few years later, the entire commercial supersonic flight program ended.
As private entrepreneurs and the Trump administration renew a push for supersonic flights, I had a chance to speak to a student filmmaker who brought the history of the Concorde to light for a new generation of aviation professionals.
Jillian Preite produced a short film about the Concorde for a class at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and shared why the plane is so inspiring, even to those who never got to see it fly.
'I honestly didn't know much about it before starting this project,' she said. 'It had such an impact way back in the 1960s that's still being put into place now.'
What made the Concorde special?
"What they did was absolutely mind-blowing,' John Tye, a former British Airways Concorde pilot, said in the documentary. 'They didn't have mobile phones or computers, we'd only just got color television when Concorde first flew, so this was one of the greatest technical achievements of mankind.'
The Concorde, developed in the 1960s under a partnership between British and French manufacturers, was the first (and so far, only) commercial supersonic aircraft. It entered service in 1976 with British Airways and Air France.
The commercial supersonic aircraft made the trip from New York to London or Paris in about three and a half hours, less than half the time it takes a traditional jet, but passengers paid a premium for the speed. Tickets on the Concorde were virtually unattainable for the average traveler, and its passengers were often business executives on an expense account or celebrities.
'This is insane that we're able to get a commercial plane to go this far in that amount of time,' Preite, who studied communication and broadcast meteorology and graduated from Embry-Riddle in May, told me. She now works as a meteorologist in Tallahassee.
Passengers also enjoyed high-end cabin service, though the short flight time meant there wasn't a tremendous amount of luxuriating to be done over lunch.
The Concorde crash
Throughout its service history, Concorde suffered only one catastrophic hull loss. On July 25, 2000, an Air France plane that had been chartered by a tour group struck a piece of debris on the runway at Charles de Gaulle Airport. It damaged the tire, a fragment of which ruptured the fuel tank and ultimately, the plane crashed shortly after takeoff, killing everyone onboard.
'The Concorde is so associated with business travel and the fact that the crash was not a business trip, it was a charter carrying mostly German citizens that were flying to the United States to get on a cruise ship, so there were families that were part of the crash, that was one of the things (that people often forget),' Steve Master associate professor of communication at Embry-Riddle and advisor on Preite's project, told me.
In the weeks after the crash, both Air France and British Airways grounded their Concorde fleets, with the planes only returning to service in November 2001.
The Concorde's end of service
Although the Concorde did fly again for about two years after the crash, the program never fully recovered, and Concorde operations at both airlines ended in the fall of 2003.
'They just weren't making any profit from it, so I think the crash was the straw that broke the camel's back. It was already tumbling, and the crash was an excuse, 'it's now dangerous, let's get rid of it,'' Preite said. 'It was a very controversial plane, and the crash really put it in for it.'
Concorde used a tremendous amount of fuel to reach and maintain supersonic speeds, and there were significant concerns about its environmental impact. In addition, the sonic boom it generated when breaking the sound barrier limited the routes it could fly, and its takeoff configuration required full power, leading to significant noise on the ground around airports during its operations.
What's next for supersonic flight?
Since 2003, there haven't been any commercial supersonic flights, but that doesn't mean no one is trying to return to the speedy glory days.
Boom is probably the most well-known company working toward the goal of restoring supersonic passenger aviation, and it already has speculative orders from carriers including American Airlines, United Airlines and Japan Airlines. Still, the American company has major hurdles to overcome before its aircraft enter service, including getting its custom-built engines approved and significant slate of flight testing after that.
There is not yet any realistic entry into service date for the next generation of supersonic aircraft, and engineers still have to prove that efforts to mitigate the sonic boom will work at scale, among other things.
Last week's Cruising Altitude: Want to fly in a fancy seat for less? Try this hack.
Still, it is likely that there will, eventually, be supersonic passenger jets again. It's all but unheard of for an advanced technology to just be shelved after decades of successful service.
President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order aimed at reducing regulatory hurdles to supersonic flight testing in an effort to jumpstart the next phase of research.
Neverthless, the economics remain a question, even if the aircraft are technically capable.
'It's definitely going to happen, it's just the fact of: is it going to be successful in making profit, or go downhill like the Concorde did?' Preite said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sporting goods retailer Decathlon to close its Toronto-area stores this summer
TORONTO — French sporting goods retailer Decathlon says it is closing its five Greater Toronto Area stores this summer. The locations slated for shutdown are in Brampton, Burlington, Markham, Scarborough and Vaughan. The retailer did not offer a reason for the move or say how many staff will lose their jobs, when stores close on a yet-to-be-announced date. In place of running its large-scale GTA stores, the company says it is considering opening smaller locations or using a wholesale distribution model. The GTA closures will leave just one Ontario store located in Ottawa. There are 14 others across Alberta, B.C., Nova Scotia and Quebec. Decathlon entered the Canadian market in 2018 with a Brossard, Que., store. The company expanded steadily ever since, going head-to-head with established domestic players like Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. and its Sport Chek banner. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fed's Powell repeats warning about tariffs as some GOP senators accuse him of bias
WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Wednesday that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs will likely push up inflation in the coming months, even as some Republican senators suggested the chair was biased against the duties. On the second day of his twice-yearly testimony before the House and Senate, Powell said that consumers will likely have to shoulder some of the cost of the import taxes. Most Fed officials support cutting rates this year, Powell added, but the central bank wants to take time to see how inflation changes in the months ahead. 'There will be some inflation from tariffs coming,' Powell said under questioning from members of the Senate Banking Committee. 'Not yet, but over the course of the coming months.' Powell noted that the duties would likely cost hundreds of billions of dollars annually, and 'some of that is going to fall on the consumer. We're just kind of waiting to see more data on that.' Some GOP senators criticized Powell, however, for characterizing tariffs as a potential driver of inflation. Sen. Pete Ricketts, a Republican from Nebraska, argued that the duties could simply act as a one-time increase in prices that wouldn't fuel inflation. And Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican from Ohio, echoed some of Trump's complaints about Powell's reluctance to cut rates and accused Powell of political bias. 'You should consider whether you are looking at this through a fiscal lens or a political lens because you just don't like tariffs,' Moreno said. Powell didn't respond. But the Fed chair reiterated that most central bank officials do support cutting the Fed's key rate this year. And Powell added that it is possible that tariffs won't increase inflation by very much. Trump has sharply criticized Powell for not reducing borrowing costs, calling him a 'numbskull' and a 'fool.' Trump has pushed for rate cuts in order to reduce the interest costs the federal government pays on its debt. Yet some Fed officials have pushed back against that view, saying that it's not their job to lower the government's borrowing costs. So far, inflation has steadily cooled this year despite widespread concerns among economists about the impact of tariffs. The consumer price index ticked up just 0.1% from April to May, the government said last week, a sign that price pressures are muted. Compared with a year ago, consumer prices rose 2.4% in May, up from a yearly increase of 2.3% in April. Yet most economists on Wall Street expect that Trump's tariffs will lift inflation this year, to about 3% to 3.5% by the end of this year.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact-checking Trump's NATO news conference
President Donald Trump made false claims about the war in Ukraine, US inflation, and the past fight against the ISIS terror group during his Wednesday news conference at the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Trump also repeated his unproven assertion that the US' weekend military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites had left them 'obliterated.' As CNN reported Tuesday, an early US intelligence assessment found the core components of the program had not been completely destroyed and that the strikes had likely set back Iran's nuclear program only by months. (The US continues to collect intelligence on the impact of the strikes and later assessments could come to different conclusions.) Here is a fact check of some of Trump's assertions on Wednesday. When a reporter reminded Trump that he had previously promised to end Russia's war on Ukraine in '24 hours' but had later said he had been speaking sarcastically, Trump said, 'Of course it was sarcastic.' It was not sarcastic. When Trump claimed in April that he had made the promise 'in jest,' CNN looked into this assertion – and found 53 examples in which Trump pledged on the campaign trail, in an entirely serious tone, manner and context, that he would end the war either within 24 hours of his return to the White House or even sooner than that, as president-elect. Here is the list of examples. Trump again criticized Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for not immediately lowering interest rates. Trump said, as he has before, that 'we have no inflation.' That's not true. The US had an annual inflation rate of 2.4% in May, an uptick from a 2.3% annual rate in April. That April rate was the lowest since early 2021, and lower than some economists expected for April after Trump imposed significant new tariffs, but it's not 'no inflation' whatsoever. On a month-to-month basis, US consumer prices increased 0.1% in May and 0.2% in April. Trump repeated his regular assertion that, during his first presidency, 'We beat ISIS in a matter of weeks.' He added, 'I was told it would take four to five years, we did it in a few weeks.' In fact, the so-called ISIS 'caliphate' was declared fully liberated more than two years into Trump's first presidency, in 2019, not in 'weeks.'