
After the fatal Concorde crash, could supersonic flight return?
July marks 25 years since an Air France Concorde suffered a catastrophic incident just after departing Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport, and a few years later, the entire commercial supersonic flight program ended.
As private entrepreneurs and the Trump administration renew a push for supersonic flights, I had a chance to speak to a student filmmaker who brought the history of the Concorde to light for a new generation of aviation professionals.
Jillian Preite produced a short film about the Concorde for a class at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and shared why the plane is so inspiring, even to those who never got to see it fly.
'I honestly didn't know much about it before starting this project,' she said. 'It had such an impact way back in the 1960s that's still being put into place now.'
What made the Concorde special?
"What they did was absolutely mind-blowing,' John Tye, a former British Airways Concorde pilot, said in the documentary. 'They didn't have mobile phones or computers, we'd only just got color television when Concorde first flew, so this was one of the greatest technical achievements of mankind.'
The Concorde, developed in the 1960s under a partnership between British and French manufacturers, was the first (and so far, only) commercial supersonic aircraft. It entered service in 1976 with British Airways and Air France.
The commercial supersonic aircraft made the trip from New York to London or Paris in about three and a half hours, less than half the time it takes a traditional jet, but passengers paid a premium for the speed. Tickets on the Concorde were virtually unattainable for the average traveler, and its passengers were often business executives on an expense account or celebrities.
'This is insane that we're able to get a commercial plane to go this far in that amount of time,' Preite, who studied communication and broadcast meteorology and graduated from Embry-Riddle in May, told me. She now works as a meteorologist in Tallahassee.
Passengers also enjoyed high-end cabin service, though the short flight time meant there wasn't a tremendous amount of luxuriating to be done over lunch.
The Concorde crash
Throughout its service history, Concorde suffered only one catastrophic hull loss. On July 25, 2000, an Air France plane that had been chartered by a tour group struck a piece of debris on the runway at Charles de Gaulle Airport. It damaged the tire, a fragment of which ruptured the fuel tank and ultimately, the plane crashed shortly after takeoff, killing everyone onboard.
'The Concorde is so associated with business travel and the fact that the crash was not a business trip, it was a charter carrying mostly German citizens that were flying to the United States to get on a cruise ship, so there were families that were part of the crash, that was one of the things (that people often forget),' Steve Master associate professor of communication at Embry-Riddle and advisor on Preite's project, told me.
In the weeks after the crash, both Air France and British Airways grounded their Concorde fleets, with the planes only returning to service in November 2001.
The Concorde's end of service
Although the Concorde did fly again for about two years after the crash, the program never fully recovered, and Concorde operations at both airlines ended in the fall of 2003.
'They just weren't making any profit from it, so I think the crash was the straw that broke the camel's back. It was already tumbling, and the crash was an excuse, 'it's now dangerous, let's get rid of it,'' Preite said. 'It was a very controversial plane, and the crash really put it in for it.'
Concorde used a tremendous amount of fuel to reach and maintain supersonic speeds, and there were significant concerns about its environmental impact. In addition, the sonic boom it generated when breaking the sound barrier limited the routes it could fly, and its takeoff configuration required full power, leading to significant noise on the ground around airports during its operations.
What's next for supersonic flight?
Since 2003, there haven't been any commercial supersonic flights, but that doesn't mean no one is trying to return to the speedy glory days.
Boom is probably the most well-known company working toward the goal of restoring supersonic passenger aviation, and it already has speculative orders from carriers including American Airlines, United Airlines and Japan Airlines. Still, the American company has major hurdles to overcome before its aircraft enter service, including getting its custom-built engines approved and significant slate of flight testing after that.
There is not yet any realistic entry into service date for the next generation of supersonic aircraft, and engineers still have to prove that efforts to mitigate the sonic boom will work at scale, among other things.
Last week's Cruising Altitude: Want to fly in a fancy seat for less? Try this hack.
Still, it is likely that there will, eventually, be supersonic passenger jets again. It's all but unheard of for an advanced technology to just be shelved after decades of successful service.
President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order aimed at reducing regulatory hurdles to supersonic flight testing in an effort to jumpstart the next phase of research.
Neverthless, the economics remain a question, even if the aircraft are technically capable.
'It's definitely going to happen, it's just the fact of: is it going to be successful in making profit, or go downhill like the Concorde did?' Preite said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Pay-For-Play Chips Deal Generates Alarm and Optimism
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's controversial plan to take a cut of revenue from chip sales to China is leading to concerns that the US government will find new ways to start charging companies for a range of business activities with other countries. Experts and people familiar with the matter said the surprise deal, in which Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from Chinese AI chip sales to the US, potentially provides a path to enter the Chinese market despite severe export controls, tariffs and other trade barriers. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The question that companies must now confront is whether the risk is worth taking. People familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations, said companies are struggling to figure out what the president's order means for their future, especially given the unpredictable nature of Trump's decision-making. 'This is truly bizarre and unusual, and the troubling thing — beyond the individual instances of AMD and Nvidia — is the possibility that this will be expanded,' said Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'Everything is now 'national security,' according to the new definition, which means it's all subject to export licenses and then they give you a license based on your contribution.' There are concerns that US trade agencies could begin charging fees to companies every time there's a meeting to discuss tariffs, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security, which issues export licenses, wasn't consulted about the revenue deal, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private conversations. Trump administration officials defend the idea as a smart way to generate revenue for the US government and suggest it will extend well beyond the chips sector. 'I think we could see it in other industries over time,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television on Wednesday. 'I think right now this is unique, but now that we have the model and the beta tests, why not expand it?' Bessent defended the deal and rejected any national-security concerns around the decision to sell Nvidia's H20 chip to China — something that had been earlier barred for fear of giving China a boost in the artificial-intelligence race. 'There are no national security concerns here,' Bessent said. 'We would not sell any of the advanced chips. So, the H20, I don't know whether you'd say they're four, five, six levels down the chips stack.' Either way, the deal highlights how Trump has pushed to open a wave of new revenue streams including by taking ownership shares of companies or extracting higher fees to live or work in the US. The US is weighing sales of a so-called 'gold card' residency permit, it won a 'golden share' to have direct say over corporate actions by United States Steel Corp., and it's secured investment pledges and potential revenue-sharing in country-level tariff talks. That's aside from the barrage of product tariffs that have at times left massive dislocations in globally traded markets. The matter further surprised China hawks in Congress, who have been unimpressed by the administration's reassurances. Rep. John Moolenaar, the Michigan Republican who chairs the US House Select Committee on China, questioned the legal basis for the move and suggested it does an end-run around controls put in place to limit the sale of sensitive technology to US adversaries. 'Export controls are a front-line defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' he said. It also raises questions about where the administration will steer the revenue. Trump has mused about issuing tariff rebate checks — though he has yet to seriously pursue the idea — while at other times he's said it would go toward narrowing the large budget deficit. The administration had debated launching a sovereign wealth fund before shelving those plans for now. It's too soon to say whether the administration will seek to revive the fund and steer revenue there, one official familiar with deliberations said. 'Trump's aides argue that these measures will strengthen America's AI leadership by maximizing its global influence and market share,' Hal Brands, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and a former Pentagon official, wrote in Bloomberg Opinion. 'Yet it is also possible that they will simply eat into America's innovation advantage.' --With assistance from Mackenzie Hawkins and Derek Wallbank. (Updates with details of consultation process in fifth paragraph.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


UPI
9 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump revokes Biden antitrust EO targeting monopolies
President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order revoking a Biden-era antitrust initiative. Photo by Will Oliver/UPI | License Photo Aug. 14 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump on Wednesday rescinded a signature Joe Biden-era initiative aimed at promoting competition in the U.S. economy and curbing monopolies, especially in the technology industry. Trump revoked Biden's Executive Order 14036 with an executive order of his own. The far-ranging EO 14036 was signed by Biden in July 2021 to bolster antitrust enforcement to "promote the interests of American workers, businesses and consumers" and protect them from economic consolidation. Trump offered no reason for the revocation, though the Justice Department celebrated the move, saying it will use this as an opportunity to "recalibrate and modernize" its approach to competition policy. "America First Antitrust focuses on empowering the American people in the free markets, not enabling regulators and bureaucrats to prescribe outcomes," Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater of the Justice Department's Antitrust Division said in a statement. "We are unleashing the new American Golden Age through antitrust enforcement that removes barriers to innovation and opportunity and limits regulatory burdens on free competition." The Justice Department also criticized the Biden initiative as "overly prescriptive and burdensome," and said that the Trump administration is focused on crafting executive orders that are "tailored" and call for lowering drug prices and reducing regulatory barriers.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Chinese Imports Fell During Trump's First Term. It's Happening Again.
President Trump recently delayed for 90 days raising tariffs on China to give the two sides more time to negotiate a trade deal. Where the sides ultimately end up is an open question: The president hasn't said how much more he will impose on China beyond the 30% currently in place if a deal isn't reached. But this much is clear: The U.S.'s reliance on Chinese goods has fallen off since Trump first put tariffs on China in 2018.