Manager of Chief Albert Luthuli Museum assisted with gathering evidence for inquest
An inquest is currently underway at the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) High Court in Pietermaritzburg, where the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is seeking to overturn the initial findings on Luthuli's cause of death.
Thulani Thusi works at Luthuli Museum in Groutville, KwaZulu-Natal and is tasked with preserving historical records of the Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Thusi's evidence has focused on some of the monuments that still exist from 1967, when Luthuli died.
ALSO READ: Wilhemina Luthuli says her father-in-law, Albert Luthuli, was not frail when he died
They include the Luthuli home and farm, as well as the railway track where Luthuli was allegedly hit by a train.
Thusi said that on 6 February 2023, he took a tour with Hawks detectives who were re-investigating Luthuli's death.
'This tour was done to assist with the gathering of evidence for the reopening of the inquest into the death of Luthuli. The tour included the following sites: Luthuli Museum, the bus stop on R102, the route to Nonhlevu General Dealer in Glad area.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
RAF payout murder lands MP man behind bars for 25 years
Sibuyi was found guilty of five charges, including murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances. He might not have imagined a future behind bars, but Present Sibuyi will have to face that reality after he was sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment for murder. The High Court in Mbombela, Mpumalanga, recently found the 31-year-old guilty of five offences in connection with the brutal killing of Nonewell Nkuna, 33, over allegations relating to a Road Accident Fund (RAF) payout. The charges include murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, kidnapping, possession of a prohibited firearm, and possession of ammunition by the High Court in Mbombela, Mpumalanga. Sibuyi ambushes deceased The conviction follows an incident that occurred on 6 January, when Sibuyi and an unknown accomplice followed Nkuna and other victims from Mbumber Taven in Buyisonto, Bushbuckridge. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Monica Nyuswa said the pair ambushed Nkuna and company at gunpoint when they stopped their vehicle on the side of the road. Sibuyi and his accomplice forced them into the car; they followed them in and drove to a secluded location. Nkuna declared dead at scene 'During the ordeal, Sibuyi accused one of the victims of having received an RAF payout, robbed them of a cellphone and R1 800 in cash, and fired multiple shots at them,' Nyuswa said in a statement on Friday. ALSO READ: Three men found guilty for murder of would-be state witness Nkuna died at the scene from gunshot wounds to the head and hands, as confirmed by the post-mortem report. Guilty plea In court, Sibuyi admitted his actions were unlawful and entered into a Section 105A plea and sentence agreement with the state. The agreement allows the accused to negotiate a resolution with the state without having to go to trial. State Advocate Fedile Tsotetsi argued that the murder was premeditated and committed violently without any provocation. 'The court accepted the plea and imposed the sentence,' Nyuswa said. 'The NPA remains committed to ensuring that perpetrators of violent crimes face the full might of the law and that justice is served for victims and their families,' she added. In addition to the 25-year term, the court declared Sibuyi unfit to possess a firearm in terms of Section 103 of the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000. NOW READ: Mozambican traditional healers arrested in for kidnapping, muthi murder
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
Man who raped and murdered Amantle Samane to be sentenced after admitting guilt
Amantle Samane's family faces an emotional court day as Simiao is set to be sentenced on Tuesday. The man who raped and murdered six-year-old Amantle Samane will be sentenced on 19 August after pleading guilty to all four charges against him in the High Court in Johannesburg on Friday. Pethe Sara Simiao, a 25-year-old Mozambican national, faced charges of kidnapping, rape, murder and Contravention of the Immigration Act. Amantle Samane goes missing In October last year, the community of Orlando East in Soweto joined a mother's search for her little girl after she went missing. She had last been seen playing with other children before Simiao called her to his rented shack at one of the houses in the neighbourhood. He allegedly raped and killed the girl inside the shack and then went into hiding. 'A witness, who had earlier seen the child walking with Simiao, who he knew was not a relative, became suspicious and led the community members to a shack where the child's lifeless, half-naked body was found,' National Prosecuting Authority Gauteng spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane said in a statement. Simiao's arrest and guilty plea After an extensive search and investigation, the suspect was located and arrested by police in Zola, Soweto, on 23 October 2024. In his plea, through his counsel, Simiao admitted to all charges. ALSO READ: Four-year-old from Eldorado Park dies after alleged abuse by father He provided a detailed account of the heinous acts he committed and confessed that he was under the influence of alcohol and had strangled Samane to conceal the rape. 'The court reviewed all aspects of the plea, found him guilty as charged and adjourned the case to 19 August 2025 for sentencing,' Mjonondwane said. 'We all broke down in tears' Samane's family members were present in court for the verdict. Speaking to TimesLive after the proceedings, the family's spokesperson Brenda Mjiyako said listening to Simiao's account of the murder was heartbreaking. 'It brought back the memories: of her last day, the pictures of where we found Amantle deceased, and the mortuary,' Mjiyako said. 'The mother broke down, we all broke down in tears. We knew this day would come but we didn't think it would be so difficult. When they were reading, step by step what had happened, you could reflect back. It was painful.' She said what Simiao did was inhuman, and that no normal human being could do what he did to Samane. Mjiyako added that it will be Samane's birthday on Tuesday when sentencing begins, which will not be an easy day for her mother. NOW READ: Man gets life sentence for raping minor with Down syndrome, claims victim is his girlfriend
The Citizen
13 hours ago
- The Citizen
Homeowner vindicated after CoJ's ‘illegal use' property rates declared unlawful
High Court orders the City of Joburg to reverse all charges levied against a Randburg property since July 2019. The City of Johannesburg's (CoJ's) conduct in levying property rates on a Randburg woman's home, based on the tariff applicable to properties put to an illegal use, has been declared unlawful by the High Court in Johannesburg. Sylvia Maria Lampe has operated a home exercise studio for 42 years and was granted permission by the Randburg Town Council on 19 January 1984 to run her studio from the property. Some 25 years later in 2017, the CoJ, which had succeeded the Randburg Town Council's rights and obligations, determined that Lampe did not have its consent to operate her business on the premises. ALSO READ: Charged R1 083.63 on your City of Johannesburg bill this month? Here's why Court orders reversal of charges Judge Stuart Wilson on Thursday ordered the CoJ to reverse all charges levied on Lampe's municipal account since 1 July 2019, which were based on the claim that the property was being put to illegal use. Judge Wilson also interdicted and restrained the CoJ from continuing to levy property rates against Lampe's municipal account on this illegal property use basis. The CoJ must, within 30 days of the date of Judge Wilson's order, also furnish Lampe with a municipal account recalculated on the basis of his orders. The CoJ was further interdicted and restrained from terminating any services to Lampe's property on the basis of non-payment of municipal charges levied in contravention of Judge Wilson's order. The order granted against the CoJ reflects what Lampe applied for in her application. Judge Wilson criticised the CoJ, stating it had conducted itself throughout the litigation 'in an unresponsive and high-handed manner'. 'It failed seriously to oppose the bulk of Ms Lampe's claim. In the end, it pursued a far-fetched justification of one portion of the penalties it has imposed. 'Had the city engaged reasonably and sensibly with Ms Lampe from the outset, this application would never have been necessary,' he said. ALSO READ: Johannesburg homeowners uproar over soaring property rates Attempts to resolve consent issue Lampe sent two letters to the CoJ after it determined that she did not have its consent to operate her business from the property. She explained that her business was being operated in accordance with the licence she obtained from the Randburg Town Council in 1984 and that, accordingly, she did have the necessary consent to operate her business. Therefore, the property was not being put to an illegal use, and the notice should be withdrawn. Judge Wilson said those letters were ignored, and the CoJ in July 2019 increased the property rates levied against the property. Lampe told the court that from that month her municipal account included an additional R9 400 per month in rates and taxes. This was levied on the basis that the property was being put to an illegal use because the CoJ had not consented to its use as a home exercise studio. Lampe could not afford these charges and did not pay them, but she lodged a new application with the CoJ for consent to run her business from the property. ALSO READ: Bad news for business and property owners as municipal rates spike Electricity disconnected, later reversed by court The CoJ responded to Lampe's refusal to pay the additional rates by terminating her electricity supply and suing for the outstanding amounts. However, the electricity disconnection was reversed by order of Judge Bashier Vally on 5 March 2020. Judge Vally also ordered the parties to 'hold a debatement regarding the penalties charged' to Lampe within 30 days of his order. Judge Wilson said that this debatement never took place, with the CoJ taking the view it would simply proceed with its action to collect the rates it claimed were owed. Lampe's new consent use application from the CoJ was granted in October 2020. Judge Wilson said this seems to have triggered the withdrawal of the CoJ's action to collect the outstanding rates. But, Judge Wilson said the CoJ continued to levy enhanced rates and taxes against Lampe's property on the basis that it was being put to an illegal use, despite the CoJ itself having consented to the use of the property in October 2020. ALSO READ: City of Joburg, please get your house in order! Ongoing attempts to disconnect Lampe, in the meantime, had to fend off further attempts to disconnect her water and electricity supplies. Judge Wilson said the CoJ did not seriously oppose the relief sought by Lampe in respect of the illegal use charges levied on or after 20 October 2020, the date on which it gave its consent for the use of the property to run her business. He said the CoJ in its answering affidavit says that it is 'attending to reverse the penalty costs charged on and after 20 October 2020,' but highlighted that the answering affidavit was deposed on 6 September 2021. 'I have nothing before me that indicates that Ms Lampe's account has since actually been corrected to the extent the city concedes it should be. 'However, the city can suffer no prejudice from an order that it implements such a correction. If it has already done so, then so much the better,' he said. Judge Wilson said the only real dispute before him was whether Lampe is entitled to the reversal of the penalty charges levied between 1 July 2019 and 20 October 2020. ALSO READ: Huge rates shock could force Joburg schools to close down A 'far-fetched' proposition He said the CoJ maintained the property was being put to an illegal use during that time because its consent was not obtained until 20 October 2020, and that the penalty charges it levied against the property during that time were perfectly lawful. Judge Wilson disagreed, stressing the CoJ accepts that the consent the Randburg Town Council gave for the use of the property in 1984 binds it as the Randburg Town Council's successor in law. He said the CoJ also accepts that the Randburg Town Council granted Lampe a licence to use the property for the purposes to which she put it, and also that the licence was renewed annually for 10 years before being renewed indefinitely. Judge Wilson said the CoJ stakes its opposition to Lampe's application solely on the contention that she never applied for consent in terms of the Randburg Town Planning Scheme of 1976. The CoJ's point, as far as he understands it, seems to be that Lampe might have had a business licence from the Randburg Town Council but that did not mean the Randburg Town Council had consented to the use of the property in terms of its Town Planning Scheme of 1976. 'I find that proposition far-fetched. 'It beggars belief that the Randburg Town Council would have issued a business licence that authorised the illegal operation of Ms Lampe's business from the property nominated in the licence,' he said. Costs were awarded against the CoJ. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
