Debt settlement pros and cons: Is it right for you?
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms.
If you're drowning under the weight of your high-rate debt, debt settlement could be worth considering, but you'll want to weigh the pros and cons first.
Getty Images
Picture this: You're staring at a stack of credit card bills but are only able to make the minimum payments on the accounts, which barely touch the balance. As a result, you're watching the interest charges pile up faster than you can pay them down. Sound familiar? It might. Millions of people find themselves trapped in this cycle every year, and the issue is only getting worse now that the average credit card rate is sitting near a record high.
When this happens and the traditional credit card repayment strategies aren't enough, debt settlement often comes up as a possible solution. Unlike debt consolidation or balance transfers, which simply help combine multiple debts into one account and interest rate, debt settlement involves negotiating with creditors to settle for less than what you owe. It's a strategy that can cut your total credit card debt significantly, but it's also one that fundamentally changes your relationship with credit and can reshape your financial future in ways you might not anticipate.
So, the question isn't whether debt settlement works. It does in many cases. The real question is whether the relief it provides outweighs the long-term consequences. Below, we'll examine what you need to know to determine that.
Chat with a debt relief expert about your options now.
Debt settlement pros and cons: Is it right for you?
Here's a look at the pros and cons of debt settlement to help you decide whether this approach makes sense in your situation.
Pro: You could pay significantly less than you owe
The most obvious benefit of debt settlement is the potential to pay substantially less than what you owe currently to get rid of your credit card debt. Successful settlements often reduce debt by 30% to 50%, though results vary. So, if you owe $20,000 across several credit cards, a settlement might reduce that to between $10,000 and $14,000 before fees. For someone facing serious credit card debt issues, this type of debt reduction can be life-changing.
Find out how to start the debt settlement process today.
Pro: It could be a smart alternative to bankruptcy
For those with overwhelming amounts of credit card debt, debt settlement can be a good alternative to bankruptcy. While both options damage your credit, bankruptcy appears on your credit report for up to 10 years, compared to seven years for settled accounts.
Debt settlement also allows you to maintain more control over the process, and if successful, you can resolve your debt issues without going to court, liquidating your assets or dealing with a bankruptcy trustee. For some people, that alone makes settlement worth considering.
Pro: It could be a path to faster debt resolution
When debt settlement works, it can resolve your debt problems much faster than making just the minimum payments on what's owed. Instead of taking decades to pay off high-rate credit card balances, the average debt settlement process is completed within two to four years. This expedited timeline can help free up cash flow for other financial goals and provide psychological relief from the burden of long-term debt.
Con: It could come with credit score damage
Debt settlement typically involves you stopping payments on your accounts as you save up to fund negotiated settlements, which immediately damages your credit score. Delinquent accounts can result in negative marks that drop your score by 100 points or more, and this damage can impact your ability to qualify for mortgages, car loans or even rental apartments.
Settling your accounts for less than what you owe can also have an impact on your credit score, and these types of negative marks remain on your credit report for seven years from the original delinquency date. During that time, any credit you do qualify for will likely come with higher interest rates and less favorable terms.
Con: There is no guarantee of success
While working with an experienced debt relief expert can increase your chances of success, there is no guarantee that creditors will accept the proposed settlement offers. Some creditors, particularly those who believe you have the ability to pay, may refuse to negotiate and instead pursue collection actions or lawsuits. That's why many debt settlement companies offer their customers access to legal service providers who can help navigate these issues. Most companies charge customers an additional fee for this service, though some offer it at no additional cost.
That means you could end up with damaged credit and still owe the full balance. The process can also take years to complete, during which your debt continues to grow due to interest and penalties. And if the settlement ultimately fails, you may owe more than when you started.
Con: There could be tax implications and fees
Forgiven debt above $600 is typically considered taxable income by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). If you settle a $15,000 debt for $7,500, you may owe taxes on the $7,500 difference. This "phantom income" can create an unexpected tax bill, especially problematic when you're already struggling financially.
Settlement companies also charge fees, which typically range from 15% to 25% of your enrolled debt. So, on a $20,000 debt load, you might pay $3,000 to $5,000 in fees, reducing the actual benefit.
The bottom line
Debt settlement can provide relief for those facing overwhelming debt, but it's not a decision to make lightly. The credit damage can be significant and long-lasting, and there's no guarantee the process will succeed. Before pursuing settlement, it's important to exhaust other options and speak with an expert who can help you evaluate both debt settlement and all of your alternatives. That way, you can ensure that the decision you're making is right for your unique circumstances.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
21 minutes ago
- Fast Company
People-first leadership in a performance-driven world
In a world where leadership is often mistakenly understood as a position of control, I've found that true impact comes from service—leading not from above, but alongside your team to achieve success. This point was driven home about 15 years ago, when I made a resolution to read more books. Since starting this journey, one book stood out and shaped my leadership style more than any other: The Way of The Sheperd. It resonated with me so much that I even named my youngest son, Shep, after it. This book takes readers through core principles of servant leadership and outlines a leadership plan that showcases how true influence comes not from authority, but from trust, empathy, and a genuine devotion to the growth and well-being of your team. I reread this book once a year to remind myself that the most effective leaders are ones who lead with compassion, understand what motivates each team member, and empower everyone to hold themselves accountable. It underscores how a leader can't manage what they don't know, and how too many well-intentioned leaders focus solely on performance rather than their people. These lessons have influenced the way I lead, inspiring me to prioritize building trust and authentic connections with our team. At Kendra Scott, I make it a point to ensure everyone has direct access to me—my email is always open—and I encourage team members to reach out or schedule time to discuss anything on their minds. Company connections We've also established a tradition of celebrating the meaningful connections within our company. For the past 9 years, we've passed down the shepherd's staff. The tradition involves the current holder receiving the staff and keeping it for a set period of time before nominating someone else at the next family meeting. They share how this person has impacted them, add a meaningful token to the staff, and pass it on to the new nominee. The cycle continues from there. This simple yet powerful practice has reinforced our culture and the importance of the connections we share with one another. However, this modern leadership philosophy wasn't one that always came naturally to me. Growing up, my life was all about sports, which helped me become the first in my family to go to college. The competitive mindset required for sports can sometimes be too focused on the individual. But the real lesson I took away, doing whatever it takes with your team to win, shaped my early approach to leadership. 3 things I know As I moved into the business world and started working with founders like Ralph Lauren and Kendra Scott, I began to see how personal their connection to their companies was. That shifted my approach to leadership, and I started to focus more on building trust and creating a more supportive, nurturing environment for my team. Here are three things I know now: Fostering a sense of purpose leads to stronger performance Investing in your team and infusing every position with importance helps to instill passion and purpose in your employees. Every employee should be empowered to feel as if they represent a brand's vision. This authentic connection fuels productivity and drives success. Making mistakes can be your biggest asset You learn the most through your mistakes. In those moments, the best lessons come from acknowledgement and accountability. As a leader, being transparent and vulnerable about your own missteps can set a tone that not only enhance company culture, but also make employees feel secure in taking risks. The importance of leading with a learner's heart Great leaders are great learners. No one has all of the answers, regardless of their position in an organization. That's why it's important to maintain a culture of continuous learning and collaboration. The more you learn, the more tools and opportunities you have. In the end, leaders can't be successful without their team, and leadership isn't about control, power, or having all the answers. It's about showing up for your people, creating space for them to grow, and demonstrating humility through it all. Whether it's by reading a book about servant leadership or establishing supportive methods, I've learned that true leaders are those who cultivate intentional connections with their employees. There is still much to learn, and my journey is still unfolding, but one thing I know to be true is that leading with trust and empathy is the type of legacy worth leaving.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Will Really Happen if New York City Goes Socialist
New York mayoral candidate, State Rep. Zohran Mamdani speaks to supporters during an election night gathering on June 24, 2025. Credit - Michael M. Santiago—Getty Images The sweeping victory of the charismatic Zohran Mamdani in the Democratic New York mayoral election has the business community alarmed, if not downright distressed. Immediately after the election, many New York CEOs and financiers predicted an accelerated flight of capital to lower tax states like Texas and Florida. Mamdani's victory fits the emerging pattern of angry and fed-up voters from across the spectrum, as some notable anti-establishment populists have swept to victory in the US and across the globe on both the left and the right. But the prospect of the capital of capitalism going socialist poses a challenge for those who want to see New York City prosper. Mamdani's economic proposals do not match the real challenges of today. He has proposed building a network of city-run, subsidized grocery stores to drive food prices down, bragging that he drew inspiration from none other than Donald Trump. Mamdani, blames grocery stores for running up food costs when in reality, grocery stores are some of the lowest-margin businesses around, with 1-2% profit margins in good times. In fact, our we ran analysis of the 2014-2023 fiscal year revenues and profits for Fortune 100 companies has found little evidence of corporate price gouging or profiteering. On the contrary, the research indicates that large corporations responded to consumer needs by limiting price hikes and launching value products and discount programs. Those actions have become evident in the current inflation rate, which is nearly in line with the Federal Reserve's 2% target. Mamdani has made 'freeze the rent' a rallying cry, even though that would backfire, as rent caps would disincentivize developers to build new housing supply at a time when more housing is desperately needed. He has also proposed nationalizing all utility companies, arguing that private companies are inherently incapable of addressing climate change, which even fellow green environmentalists oppose. The Democratic nominee estimates his agenda will cost taxpayers $10 billion annually. His solution for financing the hefty price tag is to increase taxes on big corporations and the wealthy. Never mind the questionable math used by the campaign to raise the $10 billion in municipal tax revenues, any tax increase – even at the local level – must be approved by the state assembly. While checks and balances may be established for tax policies, Mamdani has other levers that could damage the local economy if misused. Adjustments to land use and zoning laws, licensing and permitting processes, and environmental restrictions could be used by the would-be mayor to disadvantage major business leaders, real estate developers, successful entrepreneurs, and wealthy investors, among others, all of whom significantly contribute to New York City's economic vitality. Mamdani makes no defense of his lack of experience. His peak responsibility has been managing a staff of five as state assemblyman. His inability to build a record of achievement there has been described by many, including the New York Times opinion page which warned earlier this month, 'We do not believe that Mr. Mamdani deserves a spot on New Yorkers' ballots.' Mamdani's socialist taunts of big business are misguided. When big companies leave New York City do to rising costs to operate here, Mamdani's constituents are the true victims. Already, by last year, JP Morgan Chase, which was founded in New York City more than 200 years ago and has 24,000 employees still in New York today, has started moving workers out of New York by the thousands. Texas has now already surpassed New York as the largest base of its workers with 30,000 employees there, and with another 15,000 based in Miami. Other pillars of New York's financial community such as Goldman Sachs and Citigroup have similarly been relocating workers thousands of miles away from Wall Street. In earlier years, such global beacons of American capitalism and major employers of choice, from American Airlines and AT&T to Exxon and International Paper fled their historic New York homes for Texas. The loss of such businesses takes away jobs and the vital tax base needed to support infrastructure, social services, as well as educational and cultural institutions, while eroding economic development. The villainizing of business is regressive, not progressive. History has repeatedly shown that socialism doesn't work, as ideas that seem good in theory often turn into a mess of government bureaucracy, inefficiency, and inertia, setting society and living standards back instead of moving them forward. Capitalism is truly progressive, as capitalism has been directly responsible for the massive leaps in quality of life and prosperity, feeding the dynamic wellspring of innovation and creative destruction which underlies genuine and societal progress. Our hope is that New Yorkers will continue to keep this dynamic city the capital of capitalism. Contact us at letters@
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Steadies at End of Turbulent Week as Focus Shifts to Tariffs
Oil was steady at the tail-end of a momentous week, with focus shifting from the conflict in the Middle East to US tariff negotiations and the potential easing of Washington's sanctions on Iran. West Texas Intermediate traded near $65 a barrel after gaining 0.5% in the previous session, while Brent settled near $68 on Thursday. The US and China finalized a trade understanding reached last month in Geneva, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. Meanwhile, the Trump administration discussed incentives to restart Iran talks including possibly easing sanctions, according to CNN.
