China can't decide whether we are a country, Taiwan foreign minister says
TAIPEI, May 21 (Reuters) - China has no right to decide whether or not Taiwan is a country given it chooses its own government, Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung said on Wednesday, adding that he would be happy to shake the hand of his Chinese opposite number in friendship.
China views democratically-governed Taiwan as its own territory and has stepped up military and political pressure to assert those claims, including increasing the intensity of war games, saying the island is one of its provinces with no right to be called a state.
Taiwan President Lai Ching-te and his government strongly reject that view, and have offered talks with China multiple times but have been rejected. China calls Lai a "separatist".
Asked by Reuters what he would say to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi should they ever meet, Lin said that given the opportunity he would definitely shake hands with him.
"What the nature is of cross-Taiwan Strait relations can be discussed, but we are all human. First, extend the hand of friendship. If he shook my hand, that would be a good start," he said at a press briefing to mark the first anniversary of Lai taking office. "If he takes his hand back, that's his problem."
Taiwan's formal name is the Republic of China, the name of the government which in 1949 fled to the island after losing a bloody civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, who established the People's Republic of China.
"Whether or not Taiwan is a country is not up to Wang Yi, nor the People's Republic of China, to say. The whole world sees us as a country. We choose our governments democratically. It is our business what our name is."
China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The chances Lin and Wang could meet are low. Neither government recognises the other, officials do not visit each other, and Taiwan is not a member of most international bodies due to China's objections.
Lai on Tuesday reiterated an offer to talk to China, saying he sought peace but that the island must also boost its defences.
China responded by saying his comments were a "two-faced tactic" that were a "waste of effort and doomed to fail".
Taiwan's government has warned that Beijing could mark the anniversary with more military drills.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Xi Jinping to skip Brics summit in Brazil after India's Modi offered state dinner
Xi Jinping will not attend the Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro next week, Chinese officials have said, marking his first absence at the high table of the world's leading emerging economies. Beijing has informed host Brazil of Mr Xi's absence, citing a scheduling conflict, the South China Morning Post reported on Tuesday. The 17th annual Brics summit is scheduled for 6-7 July. China will likely send premier Li Qiang to the summit instead. He similarly attended the G20 summit in India in 2023 in Mr Xi's stead. Brics was founded as Bric by Brazil, Russia, India and China in 2009 and South Africa joined the following year. The bloc has since admitted Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Indonesia, and the UAE as full members and invited Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan as 'partner countries'. Chinese officials noted that Mr Xi had already met with Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva twice in less than a year, seemingly suggesting this made his presence at the upcoming summit less urgent. They met at the G20 summit in the South American country last November and then at the China-Celac forum in Beijing this past May, the SCMP reported. The report speculated that the Brazilian president's invitation for a state dinner to Indian prime minister Narendra Modi could have sparked Mr Xi's withdrawal as it could have made the Chinese leader appear as a 'supporting actor'. The Chinese president has never missed a Brics summit since taking office and has participated in every edition since 2013. For two years during the Covid pandemic, he participated in the summit virtually. In response to reports about Mr Xi skipping the summit, the Brazilian foreign ministry said it 'will not comment on internal deliberations of foreign delegations'. The last-minute pull out, however, has reportedly left Brazil upset. The Brazilian president had travelled to Beijing last month in 'a gesture of goodwill' and in 'expectation that the Chinese president would reciprocate' by attending the Rio summit, an anonymous source told the SCMP. While refusing to officially confirm its leader's absence, Beijing pledged its diplomatic support to Brazil's presidency of the talks. 'Information about participation in the summit will be shared at the appropriate time,' foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told Brazilian newspaper Folha. He added that China sought to 'promote deeper cooperation' among Brics members. 'In a volatile and turbulent world, Brics nations maintain their strategic resolve and work together for global peace, stability and development,' Mr Guo said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Chinese exports to UK rise as firms seek to avoid US tariffs
Chinese exports to the UK jumped in May, according to data from Beijing, raising the prospect of a flood of cut-price goods as firms look for alternative markets to avoid Donald Trump's tariffs. Data published by the Chinese government showed a 16.1% increase in exports to the UK in May compared with the same month last year – hitting the highest level since February 2022. That could be an early signal of an acceleration from the 10% annual rate of increase in April in the UK data published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS). UK policymakers are watching closely for evidence that cheap Chinese imports that might once have been bound for the US are arriving in UK markets. The Bank of England's rate-setting monetary policy committee has suggested it could be a welcome factor bearing down on inflation in the coming months. Sanjay Raja, a senior economist at Deutsche Bank, said: 'Given lags in shipping it's possible that we may be seeing the start of a trend in higher imports from Asia … This could have important consequences for inflation.' However, firms in some industries have expressed concerns about the prospect of Chinese products being 'dumped' in the UK. The business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has backed measures recommended by the UK's Trade Remedies Authority, including keeping tight control over import quotas, to prevent cheap Chinese steel flooding on to the UK market. Gareth Stace, the director general of the industry body UK Steel, called it 'a tremendous outcome' that would 'prevent countries that flood international markets with unsustainably cheap steel from swamping the UK and driving our steel manufacturers out of business'. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, also recently promised retailers she would review the low tax regime that allows parcels worth less than £135, often bought from websites such as Shein and Temu, to be imported free of customs duties. Neil Shearing, a chief economist at the consultancy Capital Economics, said Chinese exports to the US had dropped 34% year on year in May as tariffs on Beijing peaked – creating inevitable pressure both to divert goods ultimately bound for the US via other countries, such as Vietman or Cambodia, or to find new markets elsewhere. 'It's the proverbial double-edged sword – and this is the essence of the challenges of globalisation,' he said. 'On the one hand, you have disinflation coming through imported goods, so that's good for consumers. On the other hand, there's extreme price competition for your exporters and your domestic industries.' The US and China recently agreed a temporary trade truce, but tariffs on most Chinese goods entering the US market remain at a prohibitive 30%. Most countries are subject to a 10% tariff, with the much higher 'reciprocal' levies announced on Trump's 'liberation day' paused for 90 days until 9 July while trade negotiations continue.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Only feeble, woke Britain could think Trump is a threat to world peace
The People's Republic of China threatens the independence of Taiwan, has increased its Middle East arms sales by 80 per cent in the past decade, and is strategically gobbling up Africa through its Belt and Road Initiative. The United States is a largely reliable ally, and even though its mercurial president has shredded diplomatic protocols and speaks belligerently about neighbouring countries, America remains a checking force on tyrants and terrorists within its sphere of influence. An arrogant empire, perhaps, but a more benign one the world has never seen. So which of the two do you suppose more Britons consider a threat to world peace? According to the latest British Social Attitudes Survey, it's America, which 72 per cent of us think is a source of conflict and chaos across the globe, compared to 69 per cent who say the same of China. As might be expected, this attitude is more common on the Left, with 81 per cent of Labour and 96 per cent of Green voters expressing that view. But even among backers of the Conservative Party, it's a ludicrous 68 per cent. Any sense of proportion is restricted to supporters of Reform, with only 41 per cent of their number going in for this hyperventilating nonsense. Well done, people of Britain. You've made Reform voters the sensible ones. There are a number of factors at work here. The quiet but constant anti-Americanism of the British middle classes, the superstition that all cruelty and misfortune in the world can (and must) be traced to Western transgressions, but above all it's a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Orange man bad, orange man blow up world. If president Kamala Harris had just bombed Iran's nuclear programme, imposed a ceasefire on Tehran and Jerusalem, then ordered Israel not to retaliate to material breaches, many of those currently hallucinating the brink of World War III would be filling Bluesky with paeans to girlboss peacekeeping. Progressives cannot countenance the thought that Trump might bring hostilities to a close, and so they seethe rather than grudgingly acknowledge his achievement. Cursed be the peacemakers, for they shall inherit the wrath of The Guardian letters page. Trump has shown markedly less enthusiasm for military entanglements than his recent predecessors in office, Republican and Democrat. He evinces little interest in being the world's policeman and many in his administration are fiercely hostile to this concept. If there is anything the Left should be able to agree with Maga on, it's scepticism about US involvement in the world. This has been unfortunate for Ukraine, because Trump truly could not care whether a Russian or Ukrainian flag flies over Kyiv, but he shows no eagerness to expand existing conflicts or spark fresh ones. It is possible to regard Trump as a political abomination, wholly unfit for high office, a walking repudiation of the political philosophy of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. But if you must also imbue him with every wickedness known to man, there's a chance you've allowed him to break your grip on reason. He's not only living rent-free in your head, you've barricaded him in there.
