Sugar Prices Slump to 4-Year Lows on the Outlook for Abundant Global Supplies
Sugar prices on Wednesday extended their 3-month-long slide and posted 4-year nearest-futures lows. The outlook for improving global sugar supplies is weighing on prices. However, fund short covering on Wednesday lifted London sugar off its lows and into positive territory.
Grains, Unrest, & Gold: What Middle East Tensions Mean for Your Portfolio Now
Coffee Prices Plummet on an Improved Supply Outlook
Can Soybean Prices Keep Trending Higher?
Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else.
Sugar prices have fallen over the past 3-months due to expectations of a global sugar surplus. On May 22, the USDA, in its biannual report, projected that global 2025/26 sugar production would increase by +4.7% year-over-year (y/y) to a record 189.318 million metric tons (MMT), with a global sugar surplus of 41.188 MMT, up 7.5% year-over-year.
The outlook for higher sugar production in India, the world's second-largest producer, is bearish for prices. On June 2, India's National Federation of Cooperative Sugar Factories projected that India's 2025/26 sugar production would climb +19% y/y to 35 MMT, citing larger planted cane acreage. The outlook for abundant rainfall in India could lead to a bumper sugar crop, which is bearish for prices. On April 15, India's Ministry of Earth Sciences projected an above-normal monsoon this year, with total rainfall forecast to be 105% of the long-term average. India's monsoon season runs from June through September.
Signs of larger global sugar output are negative for prices. On May 22, the USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) predicted that Brazil's 2025/26 sugar production would rise +2.3% y/y to a record 44.7 MMT. Also, India's 2025/26 sugar production is projected to rise +25% y/y to 35.3 MMT, citing favorable monsoon rains and increased sugar acreage. In addition, Thailand's 2025/26 sugar production is expected to climb +2% y/y to 10.3 MMT.
In a bearish factor, the Indian government said on January 20 that it would allow its sugar mills to export 1 MMT of sugar this season, easing the restrictions placed on sugar exports in 2023. India has restricted sugar exports since October 2023 to maintain adequate domestic supplies. India allowed mills to export only 6.1 MMT of sugar during the 2022/23 season to September 30 after allowing exports of a record 11.1 MMT in the previous season. However, the ISMA projects that India's 2024/25 sugar production will fall -17.5% y/y to a 5-year low of 26.2 MMT. Also, the ISMA reported last Monday that India's sugar production from Oct 1-May 15 was 25.74 MMT, down -17% from the same period last year. In addition, Indian Food Secretary Chopra said on May 1 that India's 2024/25 sugar exports may only total 800,000 MT, below earlier expectations of 1 MMT.
The outlook for higher sugar production in Thailand is bearish for sugar prices. On May 2, Thailand's Office of the Cane and Sugar Board reported that Thailand's 2024/25 sugar production rose +14% y/y to 10.00 MMT. Thailand is the world's third-largest sugar producer and the second-largest exporter of sugar.
Sugar prices have some support from reduced sugar production in Brazil. Unica reported Monday that cumulative 2025/26 Brazil Center-South sugar output through May is down by -11.6% y/y to 6.954 MMT. Last month, Conab, Brazil's government crop forecasting agency, said 2024/25 Brazil sugar production fell -3.4% y/y to 44.118 MMT, citing lower sugarcane yields due to drought and excessive heat.
The International Sugar Organization (ISO) raised its 2024/25 global sugar deficit forecast to a 9-year high of -5.47 MMT on May 15, up from a February forecast of -4.88 MMT. This indicates a tightening market following the 2023/24 global sugar surplus of 1.31 MMT. ISO also cut its 2024/25 global sugar production forecast to 174.8 MMT from a February forecast of 175.5 MMT.
The USDA, in its bi-annual report released May 22, projected that global 2025/26 sugar production would climb +4.7% y/y to a record 189.318 MMT and that global 2025/26 human sugar consumption would increase +1.4% y/y to a record 177.921 MMT. The USDA also forecasted that 2025/26 global sugar ending stocks would climb +7.5% y/y to 41.188 MMT.
On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
34 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Goldman Sachs keeps buy on USL with Rs 1,575 target, says long-term tailwinds intact
By Markets Desk Published on August 18, 2025, 08:22 IST Goldman Sachs has maintained its buy call on United Spirits Limited (USL) with a target price of ₹1,575 after the company delivered a first-quarter performance ahead of topline estimates. The brokerage noted that volume growth was muted when adjusted for the impact of Andhra Pradesh, but said the overall showing was encouraging given the operating environment. Goldman Sachs expects structural benefits from the UK-India free trade agreement to begin accruing from the first quarter of FY27, potentially providing tailwinds for both growth and margins. It has, however, trimmed FY26–28 earnings per share estimates by 2–4% to reflect near-term pressures. Despite the cut, the brokerage remains constructive on USL's medium-term outlook, citing strong premiumisation trends and the company's ability to expand margins through disciplined cost control. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made in this article are those of Goldman Sachs. This article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should consult their financial advisors before making any investment decisions. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Markets Desk at
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
Don't Let AI Be Your Career Coach
With everyone all tied up in AI-induced knots, worried about their jobs, and concerned about the reliability of AI to begin with, it boggles the mind that so many people have flirted with or worse, committed to AI as a source of career coaching. The come-ons are enticing, creating the impression of infallibility to everything including Kryptonite. There's only one problem, though, That's about as likely to be successful as a robot at a wine tasting. As an independent career and executive coach for the past 28 years, I find the whole thing laughable. Staying up with the times for the sake of progress is one thing; change for change's sake rarely passes muster. Coaching: Linear or Intuitive This conflict between AI algorithms and human wisdom is the crux of the matter. I've coached thousands of people, delivered workshops to tens of thousands, and written articles which have been read by millions. Yet every single person makes a unique impression on me. That's how I learn. To me and countless other coaches, this coaching thing is much more intuitive than you might think. It's a distinctly right-brained process. But is also imprecise. A great coach is an artist Career coaching is more an art than a science; it is more intuitive than it is empirical; it works more on hunches and accumulated experience than on proofs and strictly rational systems of thought. Career coaches who consider themselves scientists are fooling themselves. We are, hopefully, artists – and when we do our jobs well, we produce good work. But it is imprecise. As such, this state of being requires mutual faith – a kind of partnership in belief between the coach and the coached, a shared vision toward which both work. Both must subscribe. Both must be comfortable with the unknown, with ambiguity, with uncertainty. But both must be optimistic, hopeful, and proactive. And while this remains imprecise, it works. Half a century ago, Harold Geneen, CEO and chairman of ITT when it was the largest conglomerate in the world, said, 'Leadership cannot be taught; it can only be learned.' Today, it's the same thing with coaching. Perspective and Experience This thought has given me an uusual perpective. Over the last 28 years, I've coached people from 17 to 82 years old (yes, 82 – really); from the executive suite to the assembly line; from the classroom to the boardroom; from the military and law enforcement to the ex-con looking for a new start; from the private sector to the public and non-profit sectors; from construction and manufacturing to biotech; from science and medicine to sports and leisure; from logistics and transportation to journalism and publishing. I coached people in dozens of industries, with hundreds of job titles and thousands of job descriptions. I've learned from each one, gaining experience and perspective. AI hasn't figured out how to do that. What I've learned as a career coach – more than anything else – is that success almost never comes in one giant leap, but almost always as a result of small steps. It takes perspective and experience – and those traits still belong to us humans alone. Don't let AI be your career coach.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
We still aren't sure what's going on with tariffs and inflation — or what will happen next
Recent economic data continue to give mixed signals on how much tariffs are affecting prices, leaving Wall Street conflicted on who is paying for what. While companies may be absorbing much of the tariff costs for now, it's not clear how much longer they can keep it up and how much consumers will be able to shoulder later. Months after President Donald Trump launched his trade war, economic data continue to give mixed signals on how much tariffs are affecting prices in the U.S. While the consumer price index has ticked higher, it has also consistently come in below forecasts, though the latest reading on producer prices surprised to the upside. Certain sectors heavily exposed to tariffs have seen spikes, but July data showed less upward price pressure on some goods prices and more pressure on some services. 'Despite this firmness, the tariff pass-through effect on consumer prices arguably has been less bad than expected so far,' JPMorgan economists led by Michael Feroli said in a note on Friday. According to the bank, one potential explanation for the muted inflation numbers is that firms are eating the tariff cost at the expense of their profit margins, which are currently wide by historical standards and can accommodate the added costs without harming capital or operating budgets. Other explanations include the delayed effects of duties on prices as companies draw down pre-tariff inventories, the seasonality of prices as inflation during the summer tends to be softer than in the winter, and tariff costs being passed though more via services rather than goods, JPMorgan added. Yet another explanation could be that the tariff rates importers are actually paying are far below the headline numbers. A recent Barclays report found that the weighted-average levy in May was just 9% versus the bank's estimate for 12%. That's because demand shifted away from countries with higher tariffs while more than half of U.S. imports that month were duty-free. Despite higher rates on Canada, for example, they don't apply to goods covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. 'The real surprise in the U.S. economy's resilience lies not in its reaction to tariffs but that the rise in the effective tariff rate has been more modest than commonly thought,' the report said. To be sure, Barclays said the weighted-average rate has edged up to 10% today and predicted it will eventually settle at around 15%, as more products like pharmaceuticals are expected to get hit with levies and as loopholes close. Businesses vs. consumers Citi Research still doesn't see much evidence of broad-based price pressure from tariffs and attributed the recent uptick in services to one-time anomalies, such as the 5.8% jump in portfolio management fees due to the rally in asset prices. Citi also doesn't expect consumers to get hit with big price hikes in the future, even as more levies are expected to roll out. 'Softer demand means firms will have difficulty passing tariff costs on to consumers,' chief US economist Andrew Hollenhorst said in a note. 'While some firms might still attempt to slowly increase prices in coming months, the experience so far suggests these increases will be modest in size. This should reduce concerns about upside risk to inflation and increase concerns that decreased profit margins will cause firms to pullback on hiring.' By contrast, Goldman Sachs predicted consumers will pay most of the tariff costs. As of June, they had absorbed 22%, but that figure should jump to 67% by October if the pattern seen in early rounds of Trump's trade actions continues. For businesses, the burden will shrink from 64% down to 8%, while foreign suppliers will see an uptick from 14% to 25% of the tariff impact. Unraveling the mystery over what tariffs are doing—or not doing—to inflation has major implications for the Federal Reserve, which is trying to balance both sides of its dual mandate. Tariffs have kept inflation stubbornly above the Fed's 2% target, causing policymakers to hold off on rate cuts. But weakness in jobs data have raised alarms on employment, fueling demands for easing. 'The evidence so far is that almost all of the costs of tariffs are being born by domestic firms,' Citi's Hollenhorst wrote. 'The lack of pass-through should reduce lingering Fed official inflation concerns and allow for a series of rate cuts beginning in September. If anything markets are underpricing the potential for faster and/or deeper cuts.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
