logo
Gene editing cures child of rare disease in world first

Gene editing cures child of rare disease in world first

Yahoo15-05-2025
A child with an extremely rare genetic disorder has become the first to be genetically edited for his disease in a breakthrough for people suffering from uncommon conditions.
KJ Muldoon was born with a rare metabolic disease known as severe carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1) deficiency, which causes a build-up of ammonia and can result in brain damage and organ failure.
It affects fewer than one in a million people, so there is little incentive for pharmaceutical companies to find a treatment.
But in a medical first, doctors at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Penn Medicine, used the genetic editing tool Crispr to correct the defect in his DNA which causes the condition.
Crispr, which acts like genetic scissors to alter genetic code, is already being used for diseases such as sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia which affect hundreds of thousands of people.
It is hoped the technique could be adapted to treat individuals with rare diseases for whom no medical treatments are available.
'Years and years of progress in gene editing and collaboration between researchers and clinicians made this moment possible, and while KJ is just one patient, we hope he is the first of many to benefit from a methodology that can be scaled to fit an individual patient's needs,' said Dr Rebecca Ahrens-Nicklas, director of the Gene Therapy for Inherited Metabolic Disorders Frontier Programme (GTIMD) at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
'While KJ will need to be monitored carefully for the rest of his life, our initial findings are quite promising.'
The personal treatment was developed in just six months and delivered via fatty nanoparticles injected into the liver to correct a faulty enzyme which causes the overproduction of ammonia.
KJ spent the first months of his life in hospital, living a very restricted diet before receiving the first round of his bespoke therapy in February, when he was around seven months old.
He has since had two more injections and doctors say he is now growing well and thriving and has been able to go home.
Kyle Muldoon, KJ's father, said: 'We've been in the thick of this since KJ was born, and our whole world's been revolving around this little guy and his stay in the hospital.
'We're so excited to be able to finally be together at home so that KJ can be with his siblings, and we can finally take a deep breath.'
Typically, patients with CPS1 deficiency are treated with a liver transplant, but they need to be old enough to handle such a major procedure.
During that time, episodes of increased ammonia can put patients at risk for ongoing, lifelong brain damage or even prove fatal.
Dr Kiran Musunuru, professor for translational research in Penn's Perelman School of Medicine, said: 'We want each and every patient to have the potential to experience the same results we saw in this first patient, and we hope that other academic investigators will replicate this method for many rare diseases and give many patients a fair shot at living a healthy life.
'The promise of gene therapy that we've heard about for decades is coming to fruition, and it's going to utterly transform the way we approach medicine.'
Commenting on the research, Dr Alena Pance, senior lecturer in genetics at the University of Hertfordshire, said: 'Crispr-based therapy has been used to correct genetic diseases before. The approach in the paper is applicable to this specific form of the disease.
'The approach is applicable to any disease caused by a single nucleotide change, however more often than not, diseases are caused by a variety of variants so perhaps more general strategies could be more effective than very precise ones.'
The research was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Which Gene Therapy Technology Wins? New Data from Spherix Global Insights Reveals Emerging Hematologist Preferences in Beta Thalassemia Care
Which Gene Therapy Technology Wins? New Data from Spherix Global Insights Reveals Emerging Hematologist Preferences in Beta Thalassemia Care

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Which Gene Therapy Technology Wins? New Data from Spherix Global Insights Reveals Emerging Hematologist Preferences in Beta Thalassemia Care

New research from Spherix Global Insights reveal Vertex/CRISPR Therapeutics' Casgevy holding a competitive edge over bluebird bio's Zynteglo as preferred beta thalassemia gene therapies. EXTON, PA, Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As the first wave of gene therapies for transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT) continues to roll out in the U.S., a new conversation is emerging within the hematology community: whether the future belongs to gene editing or gene addition. Recent physician survey data from Market DynamixTM: Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia reveal a clear shift in preference toward the CRISPR/Cas9-based therapy Casgevy with half of hematologists now favoring it, compared to just one-fifth for Zynteglo, a lentiviral vector-based therapy. The remaining respondents express no strong preference, citing similar efficacy and safety profiles in clinical trials. Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel, Vertex/CRISPR Therapeutics) uses CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to disable the BCL11A enhancer, reactivating the body's natural production of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) – an oxygen-carrying molecule that can compensate for defective β-globin. 'Potential for more efficient editing and promising efficacy data,' one physician noted, adding that Casgevy's 'novel CRISPR platform' and accumulating real-world experience were compelling advantages. Zynteglo (betibeglogene autotemcel, bluebird bio) takes a different approach: inserting a functional HBB (β-globin) gene into a patient's hematopoietic stem cells via a lentiviral vector, restoring normal hemoglobin production. Physicians highlight its 'higher rate of transfusion independence (90–95% in long-term studies),' 'well-established safety profile,' and 'durable results' as support for their preference. While some clinicians see Casgevy as a leap forward in precision and efficiency, others value Zynteglo's longer track record and direct β-globin restoration. For many, the choice remains personalized, depending on patient genotype, treatment center expertise, insurance coverage, and patient or family comfort with each technology. Despite the promise of both therapies, physicians in suburban and rural areas report that demand for gene therapy exceeds available capacity. In addition, hematologists in the south and west are more likely to cite physical distance to certified gene therapy centers as a barrier. Even when centers are accessible, high upfront costs, lengthy insurance approvals, and constrained treatment slots can delay care. TDT is a severe inherited blood disorder requiring lifelong blood transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Gene therapy offers the potential for transfusion independence, but equitable access remains a critical challenge. Spherix will continue to monitor the hemoglobinopathy market, including thalassemia, through annual Market DynamixTM and Patient Chart DynamixTM services. Market Dynamix™ is an independent, data-driven service focused on understanding the evolving dynamics of specialty markets poised for disruption. Leveraging quantitative and qualitative research, the service evaluates current treatment approaches, unmet needs, and likely impact of pipeline agents over a three-to-five-year horizon. Patient Chart Dynamix™ is an independent service that includes robust patient chart audits and integrated specialist surveys fielded biannually. This research provides an in-depth, real-world view of treatment practices by combining verified patient data with attitudinal insights from physicians. The series highlights clinical decision-making, treatment sequencing, and outcomes for targeted patient populations across key therapeutic areas. About Spherix Global Insights Spherix is a leading independent market intelligence and advisory firm that delivers commercial value to the global life sciences industry, across the brand lifecycle. The seasoned team of Spherix experts provides an unbiased and holistic view of the landscape within rapidly evolving specialty markets, including dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, and hematology. Spherix clients stay ahead of the curve with the perspective of the extensive Spherix Physician Community. As a trusted advisor and industry thought leader, Spherix's unparalleled market insights and advisory services empower clients to make better decisions and unlock opportunities for growth. To learn more about Spherix Global Insights, visit or connect through LinkedIn. For more details on Spherix's primary market research reports and interactive dashboard offerings, visit or register here: Spherix Global Insights Contacts Sarah Hendry, Hematology Franchise Head NOTICE: All company, brand or product names in this press release are trademarks of their respective holders. The findings and opinions expressed within are based on Spherix Global Insight's analysis and do not imply a relationship with or endorsement of the companies or brands mentioned in this press release. CONTACT: Sarah Hendry, Hematology Franchise Head Spherix Global Insights 4848794284

Diabetic Man With Gene-Edited Cells Produces His Own Insulin—No Transplant Drugs Required
Diabetic Man With Gene-Edited Cells Produces His Own Insulin—No Transplant Drugs Required

Gizmodo

time6 days ago

  • Gizmodo

Diabetic Man With Gene-Edited Cells Produces His Own Insulin—No Transplant Drugs Required

A new case study offers a tantalizing glimpse into the potential future of transplantation medicine. A man with type 1 diabetes is now able to make his own insulin thanks to a transplant of gene-edited pancreatic cells—a transplant that hasn't required the typical drugs used to avoid rejection. Scientists in Sweden and the U.S. conducted the research, published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine. The 42-year-old man with long-standing diabetes was given donated islet cells that were genetically modified via CRISPR to prevent immune rejection. Roughly four months after the procedure, his fully gene-edited cells have continued to produce insulin without provoking an immune response. 'Our study, although preliminary, suggests that immune evasion is an alternative concept for the circumvention of allorejection,' the authors wrote in the paper. A New Diabetes Treatment Is on the Horizon—But It Involves Poop People with type 1 diabetes have immune systems that destroy the pancreatic cells responsible for making insulin. The condition can be managed with regular doses of synthetic insulin, but people's health still tends to worsen over time. Recently, scientists have been studying whether donated islet cell transplants can provide a self-sustained replacement supply of insulin for type 1 diabetics—an effective cure, in other words, provided the cells can survive long-term. Early clinical trials of the technology have looked promising so far, but these transplants still require lifelong immunosuppressive therapy to ensure the host's body doesn't go after the donated cells. Effective as these drugs are, they have their well-known drawbacks, such as weakening people's immunity to actual threats like infections. The study researchers have been experimenting with a unique approach to sidestep the need for these drugs. They first tested it on mice and monkeys, with this new case being the first test in humans. They created three specific edits in the donated cells, all intended to quiet the most likely responses from the immune system. Two of the edits deplete the cells' supply of HLA class I and II antigens, proteins that tell our T cells whether another cell is foreign or not. A third edit causes the donated cells to make more of another protein called CD47 that inhibits the activity of other immune cells that would normally target them. The researchers injected the modified cells into the man's forearm. The edits weren't completely successful in some of the cells, and the man's immune system quickly killed off these cells. But as hoped, his body left the fully edited cells alone, even without immunosuppressants. The surviving cells produced insulin as normal, and the man appeared to be doing well 12 weeks later. He did experience several adverse events, but none were serious or linked to the transplanted cells themselves (he had mildly inflamed veins where a catheter was placed, for instance). This study is only a proof of concept, geared more at showing the procedure can be done safely than at proving it actually works. The man was given a relatively low dose of the donated cells, likely too low for his body to produce enough insulin on its own to no longer need treatment. Follow-up is also needed to know whether these cells can survive long-term. In Medical First, Woman's Type 1 Diabetes Seemingly Cured by Stem Cells But there's much to be encouraged about. And it's the latest sign that scientists are truly on the verge of making type 1 diabetes curable. Other research teams have shown early success in using similar transplants to cure the condition, including some that have also avoided needing immunosuppressant therapy.

What to know about mRNA vaccines as Trump admin pulls funding
What to know about mRNA vaccines as Trump admin pulls funding

Axios

time06-08-2025

  • Axios

What to know about mRNA vaccines as Trump admin pulls funding

The Trump administration is decreasing funding for the development of mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines, which were crucial in the response to COVID-19. Why it matters: mRNA vaccines are a public health tool to mitigating future pandemic-like situations, as researchers can move fast at a lower cost than other vaccine systems. "mRNA vaccines use a genetic code to tell the body's cells to produce proteins that train the immune system," a Penn Medicine report said. "The result: 'plug-and-play' vaccines with rapid development times and lower costs." Driving the news: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Tuesday that the government would pull $500 million in mRNA vaccine development funding in order to focus on "safer, broader vaccine platforms." No new mRNA based projects will be initiated, HHS said. Some final-stage contracts for targets like pandemic bird flu will run their course. What they're saying: " I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions — but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives," Jerome Adams, who served as surgeon general during President Trump's first administration, said on X. "It's rhetoric of wellness ideologues who deny the benefits of mRNA vaccine technology in saving 3.2 million American lives in the pandemic," Peter Hotez, Baylor College of Medicine vaccine researcher, said on X. "Also in my view it's [a] slap in the face for President Trump, given this is one of his best achievements." What are mRNA vaccines? How do they work? The big picture: mRNA vaccines use a molecule necessary for protein production, called messenger RNA, rather than part of an actual bacteria or virus, according to the National Library of Medicine. mRNA vaccines introduce a piece of mRNA that corresponds to a viral protein, prompting cells to produce the viral protein. People who get an mRNA vaccine are not exposed to the virus, nor can they become infected with a virus by the vaccine. Flashback: mRNA was discovered in the early 1960s, and research into how it could be delivered into cells was developed in the 1970s, per Johns Hopkins ' Bloomberg School of Public Health. The intrigue: The biggest challenge with mRNA was that it was taken up by the body and quickly degraded before it could "deliver" the RNA transcript and be read into proteins in the cells. Advances in nanotechnology allowed for fatty droplets, or lipid nanoparticles, to wrap the mRNA like a bubble and allowed entry into the cells. Didn't the COVID vaccine use mRNA? State of play: The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID vaccines use mRNA. "Thanks to decades of research and innovation, mRNA vaccine technology was ready," the Johns Hopkins report said. "With COVID, this technology got its moment and has proven to be extremely safe and effective." Context: The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine gives cells instructions for how to make the S protein found on the surface of the virus, according to Mayo Clinic. The body creates antibodies that help clear the virus, if caught. What else could mRNA vaccines help protect against? Zoom out: Researchers at Penn Medicine are developing mRNA vaccines for infections including avian bird flu, all coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS, C. difficile, genital herpes, hepatitis C, HIV, influenza, leptospirosis, malaria, norovirus and tuberculosis. Moderna has mRNA vaccines in various levels of development to fend against RSV, HIV, Lyme disease, Mpox, several cancers and cystic fibrosis. What we're watching: As of January, more than 120 clinical trials were testing the potential for mRNA vaccines in cancer treatment across various malignancies, according to research published in the National Library of Medicine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store