Dublin boss sacked his fiancée after she found him on gay dating app
A woman who said she was sacked from her fiancé's business after she confronted him over his 'prolific casual homosexual encounters' has been awarded just under €100,000 in compensation.
The woman, who was not named to protect the couple's child, had made three complaints to the Workplace Relations Commission.
Adjudicator Patricia Owens said the woman had told the WRC that she worked in the recycling services business as company secretary, from December 2021 until September 2023. WRC Buildings, Dublin. Pic: Eamonn Farrell/RollingNews.ie
She stated that when her fiancé set up the business, he had actively encouraged her to leave her previous job and work for him.
Ms Owens noted: 'She further submitted that in August 2023, whilst on holiday together, the complainant discovered that her partner had downloaded the dating/casual sex app, Grindr, which is specifically orientated for the LGBTQ+ community.
'She submitted that it was clear to her that her partner was engaged in prolific casual homosexual encounters/liaisons.'
Ms Owens said the woman had found it 'very stressful' to see the messages on her fiancé's phone while they were on holiday, and told him she wanted to separate when they got back to Dublin.
She told the WRC that her partner had said he planned to undergo treatment for sex and other addictions, and that he wanted her to be involved. Pic: Getty Images
'She advised that she did not want to participate in the programme,' Ms Owens said. The woman said the man then asked her, by letter, to resign her position as company secretary and to return the company car.
'The complainant advised that she did not respond to that letter but that when she got up one morning, she realised that the car had been removed overnight from in front of her home,' Ms Owens said.
'She stated that some of her personal belongings were in the car. She was in a panic about having to get the children to school, and she advised that her mother, who is a pensioner, used some of her savings to purchase a car for the complainant.'
The woman said her salary was due to be paid in mid-November, but nothing went into her account.
'She stated that she had to contact social welfare and had to rely on support from Women's Aid and the St Vincent de Paul to provide for her and her children's basic needs,' Ms Owens said.
Ms Owens said the businessman had not attended the hearing of the case or made any attempt to explain his absence.
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, she said she would uphold the woman's claim that she had been unfairly dismissed. Ms Owens said the women's loss of earnings equated to €63,000, and that the loss of the company car was worth €30,000.
With additional sums of compensation for the lack of contract and rest breaks, the total amount she was awarded came to €99,000
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Baker who alleged he was subjected to racial slur in Polish wins €4,000
A baker has won €4,000 over being subjected to a racial slur in Polish by a colleague nearly six years ago. The award was made in a set of rulings published on Monday regarding a workplace dispute that arose in the spring of 2019. The worker, a black French man, alleged he was being bullied by predominantly Polish colleagues at an unidentified food and drinks company 'because he does not speak Polish'. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) rejected various complaints of his alleging discrimination in breach of the Employment Equality Act 1998 on the grounds of race and disability. However, it found against the employer in respect of the racial slur incident in June 2019. READ MORE The worker gave evidence at a series of adjudication hearings, saying he 'felt threatened and isolated at work' during a period in early 2019 and felt he was suffering discrimination because he was 'black and did not speak Polish'. The worker said 'nothing was done' after he complained to his bosses in February 2019. The company's position was that it facilitated the worker by changing the start time of his shift and later changing his work location. It had also ordered his Polish colleagues to translate all work-related conversations to English, the tribunal was told. The complainant's further evidence was that after his transfer to the new work location he was subject to 'a particularly offensive and derogatory racial slur which was conveyed to him in Polish' on June 23rd, 2019. The worker who made the remark – which was not recorded in the tribunal's published decisions – left the employment the following day. The worker told the tribunal he 'did not know what it meant' until it was explained to him by a third party some months later, after which he filed his second complaint with the WRC. A head chef who gave evidence on behalf of the employer said 'nobody was subject to racial abuse' and that the workplace has 'zero tolerance' for bullying and harassment. The employer's position was that the complainant 'did not react well' when performance issues were raised with him. 'His response was to claim that he was being discriminated against and racially abused,' the company's representative submitted, adding that the firm had 'gone to great lengths' to support him. Adjudicator Andrew Heavey noted the accusation was 'vehemently denied' in the company's investigation process. However, he accepted the sworn evidence of the worker on the balance of probabilities. He wrote that despite the 'bona fides' and 'significant efforts' made by the employer to support the worker and address his complaints, it was still vicariously liable for the actions of its staff. He found the complainant was 'harassed on the race ground' on or about June 23rd, 2019, and directed the company to pay €4,000 in compensation for the discrimination. He rejected all other claims by the worker under the Employment Equality Act. Mr Heavey anonymised his decisions on the basis 'information of a sensitive nature relating to the complainant', which he believes 'deserves privacy'. He noted that when he held his final hearing into the claims last November, the complainant remained an employee of the firm and there had been 'no further issues'.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Keelings worker fired over claims regarding dead co-workers
The Keelings fruit and vegetable group sacked a warehouse worker after deciding he had brought the company into disrepute with 'false' posts on social media claiming excessive night work hours contributed to the deaths of two of his colleagues in 2013, a tribunal has heard. The worker, Rudolf Csikos, lost his job of 16 years with the north Co Dublin produce firm last December, and is pursuing a number of employment rights complaints against Keelings Logistics Solutions. The company maintains it was justified in dismissing him on the grounds of gross misconduct after an investigation which concluded he had 'acted recklessly by publishing false and misleading information' implying that Keelings was 'responsible for the deaths of two colleagues as a result of excessive working hours'. The LinkedIn posts were made amid a long-running legal row between Mr Csikos and his employer over alleged breaches of working time legislation. READ MORE A statutory complaint under the Organisation of Working Time Act originally filed in late 2019 by Mr Csikos remains live over five years later. Having been rejected as 'vexatious' by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), that ruling was quashed by the Labour Court on appeal and referred back to the WRC. In addition to a dispute over the payment of a Sunday premium, which Keelings maintains is covered by a collective agreement, Mr Csikos has alleged the company failed to comply with its legal obligations on the employment of night workers such as himself. 'The night working hours was breached by the company, and that's why it caused the people to die,' Mr Csikos said via a Hungarian-language interpreter at an initial hearing last week. When adjudicator Brian Dalton pointed out that Mr Csikos was not medically qualified and there was no medical evidence before him, Mr Csikos said his assertion was that there was a 'possibility'. The company's representative, Emily Maverley of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), said the Keelings workers referred to by Mr Csikos in his posts 'passed away, unfortunately, in 2013', some 11 years before the posts. Giving evidence last week, company disciplinary officer Alan Morrissey said the posts were 'damaging to the Keelings name, and our customers and other stakeholders'. 'There was no going back. I asked Rudolf did he think he made a mistake. He was quite happy in what he said and did,' he said. Asked whether he was aware of the allegations Mr Csikos had aired about his working hours, Mr Morrissey said he didn't 'get into it', but said he believed Mr Csikos had referred to the posts as a protected disclosure. Lauren O'Brien, head of people for Keelings Logistics, said at an earlier hearing in the case last week that she was 'concerned' after seeing the first post, which the tribunal heard Mr Csikos posted on LinkedIn at the end of October 2024. 'It was seriously defamatory to several ex-colleagues, accusing us of being responsible for the deaths of two colleagues,' Ms O'Brien said. At a hearing on Thursday, the company investigation officer, Damien O'Brien, noted in his report that Mr Csikos continued to allege Keelings had broken the law and maintained his comments 'were not false' when they met on an unspecified date last year. He quoted Mr Csikos as saying: 'How many more people need to die?' and said Mr Csikos was 'consistent that his beliefs are honestly held' and that it was 'not the first time he has raised these concerns'. Mr Csikos, cross-examining Mr O'Brien, asked: 'Why did he not say that Keelings is keeping according to the law and is making progress to keep the law and do things according to the regulations?' Mr O'Brien replied: 'My objective was to investigate the two posts.' Mr Dalton said: '[Mr Csikos] is claiming two workers died. That's not something [the witness] could exercise any role in.' Mr Csikos said: 'In my opinion, it was that if the working hours are breached and the health and safety regulations are breached, we can draw a conclusion.' 'We have no conclusion on that, and that doesn't follow, because [Mr Csikos] is not medically qualified. We have no evidence that there's a correlation between the [alleged] breach and what he says has happened. He may speculate, and he may have an opinion. He cannot use this forum as an opportunity to make outlandish allegations,' Mr Dalton said. Mr Dalton said the matter was at an 'impasse' without further submissions being made to him about the company's working time records. He adjourned the matter and said he would seek a further hearing date in July. In addition to the original Organisation of Working Time Act claim, Mr Csikos's further complaints are under the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 against the company, arising from his dismissal.
Irish Independent
03-06-2025
- Irish Independent
Chef whose colleague thrust into him ‘as if he was riding a horse' and let out a ‘yee-haw' loses discrimination claim against Dublin nightclub
While the tribunal accepted Mr Aksakal was subjected to 'unedifying' behaviour with 'undeniable sexual overtones', it found the Odeon took the incident 'very seriously' A chef has failed to have a Dublin nightclub held liable for the conduct of a colleague who thrust into him with his genital area 'as if he was riding a horse' and let out 'a loud 'yee-haw'' in an incident with 'undeniable sexual overtones' last year. Rejecting the worker's discrimination claim under the Employment Equality Act 1998, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) found the Odeon Bar and Restaurant on Harcourt Street in Dublin 2, operated by Kivaway 2 Ltd, was not a workplace where sexual harassment was tolerated.
