logo
From tribals to labourers, legal help in local lingo through interactive apps; law must speak every language: Justice Surya Kant

From tribals to labourers, legal help in local lingo through interactive apps; law must speak every language: Justice Surya Kant

Time of India03-08-2025
Justice Surya Kant (File photo)
NEW DELHI: 'Ka adhikaar baa hamaar jab malik paisa na de?'This is exactly what a labourer from Bihar will ask a phone download App, which will soon be readied by, to get free legal assistance to lawfully deal with a contractor denying him his just wages.
This pioneering effort to create an App to reach free legal aid to every person, from tribals to labourers to craftsmen in the hinterlands, was revealed on Saturday by Justice Surya Kant, Supreme Court Judge and National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) chairperson.
Delivering a lecture in memory of former CJI R C Lahoti at Manav Rachna University, Justice Kant said given the mobile phone penetration to the nook and corner of the country, said the mobile App under development would offer step-by-step guidance in every schedule language using voice, video and text and answer fundamental legal queries, explain rights and entitlements and connect the needy to lawyers and paralegal volunteers.
'The challenge before us is not simply about bridging a technological divide. It is about combining the best of our technological ingenuity with the enduring values of human empathy, procedural fairness, and social solidarity. Each digital leap must draw us closer to the soul of the law - a law that speaks in every tongue, answers every call, and bends always toward justice,' he said.
Justice Kant said multilingual digital platforms in the legal field could be of immense help if the AI is used ethically and transparently with supervision.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Sambau: New Container Houses – Take A Look At The Prices!
Container homes | Search ads
Learn More
Undo
'Guided conversations, through legal aid chatbots, can help citizens articulate their issues clearly, identify relevant rights, and generate basic petitions in local languages. Accordingly, the systems can quickly determine whether litigants qualify for free legal aid, reducing paperwork, discretion, and possible delays,' he said.
Proposing to involve law students, young advocates and retired legal professionals to provide legal advice to the poor, needy, illiterate and marginalised people free of cost through App-based direct interactions, the SC judge said this would not only exponentially expand the reach of legal guidance, but also foster a sense of shared societal responsibility for justice to all.
He said In remote villages of Assam, paralegals are now using mobile phones to record testimonials of domestic violence and connect survivors to pro bono counsel in real time. In Tamil Nadu, legal aid chatbots in Tamil have been deployed to answer questions on land rights and tenancy, he said.
But the success of this technology driven initiative depends on citizen's familiarity with its basics and the confidentiality and security attached to the interactions between the litigant and the legal professionals. 'As we digitise legal aid, we must design systems with built-in ethics. 'Privacy must be paramount; all platforms handling sensitive legal data must comply with rigorous data protection standards,' Justice Kant said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'If these words reach you ...': Final message of Al Jazeera reporter killed in Israeli strike; his ‘do not forget Gaza' call
'If these words reach you ...': Final message of Al Jazeera reporter killed in Israeli strike; his ‘do not forget Gaza' call

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'If these words reach you ...': Final message of Al Jazeera reporter killed in Israeli strike; his ‘do not forget Gaza' call

Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif was killed along with four of his Al Jazeera colleagues in an airstrike on Gaza City on Sunday. Anas al-Sharif, one of Al Jazeera's correspondents in Gaza, was killed alongside four colleagues in an Israeli airstrike on Sunday. Hours before his death, the 28-year-old posted a video on X showing nearby Israeli strikes and describing 'intense, concentrated Israeli bombardment' of Gaza City. In what he called his 'will and final message,' al-Sharif left a deeply personal statement to be published if he was killed, beginning: 'This is my will and my final message. If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice.' In his post, he reflected on a lifetime in Jabalia refugee camp, saying he had 'never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is' despite living through 'pain in all its details' and witnessing repeated loss. He entrusted readers with 'Palestine—the jewel in the crown of the Muslim world' and urged them not to let 'chains silence you, nor borders restrain you.' He spoke of his longing to return to his family's original town of occupied Asqalan, and left heartfelt words for his mother, wife Bayan, and his young children Sham and Salah, whom he would never see grow up. 'If I die, I die steadfast upon my principles,' he wrote. 'Do not forget Gaza… And do not forget me in your sincere prayers.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo According to Al Jazeera, the strike hit a tent housing journalists outside a hospital gate in Gaza City, killing al-Sharif along with Mohammed Qreiqeh and cameramen Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal, and Moamen Aliwa. The Israeli military admitted targeting him, calling him a 'terrorist' and accusing him of leading a Hamas cell responsible for rocket attacks—claims his colleagues and press freedom groups reject. The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was 'appalled' by the deaths, accusing Israel of a 'pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence.' Al-Sharif had been repeatedly targeted online by Israeli military spokespeople in recent months, with the CPJ previously urging protection for him. His killing comes amid what media watchdogs describe as unprecedented losses for the press in Gaza, with more than 200 journalists reported killed since the war began 22 months ago. As Israel signals an expansion of military operations in the territory, UN officials have warned the Security Council of 'another calamity' that could bring further death, destruction, and displacement for Gaza's two million residents.

How Trump's executive order could reshape college admissions and campus diversity across the US
How Trump's executive order could reshape college admissions and campus diversity across the US

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How Trump's executive order could reshape college admissions and campus diversity across the US

The Trump administration recently issued an executive order requiring universities to publicly disclose detailed information about the race, test scores, and grade point averages of all applicants. This move intensifies an already heated national debate over college admissions, meritocracy, and campus diversity. According to The New York Times , the new data disclosure rules aim to increase transparency but could also shift admissions practices in ways that affect student diversity across the country's most selective institutions. A century-long debate over admissions For more than a century, colleges have grappled with the question of how to admit students fairly. The controversy touches on fundamental issues such as equal opportunity, racial justice, and the definition of merit. Traditionally, many colleges have used holistic admissions processes that consider applicants' life experiences, including race and socio-economic background, to build diverse and inclusive campuses. However, conservative groups argue that such subjective criteria can lead to unfair advantages for certain groups and discrimination against others, particularly white and Asian students. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Secret Lives of the Romanovs — the Last Rulers of Imperial Russia! Learn More Undo Supreme Court ruling and new federal requirements In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled that considering race in admissions decisions was unconstitutional. This ruling forced universities to overhaul their admissions policies to comply with the new legal framework. Building on that decision, the Trump administration's executive order now requires colleges to report applicant data to a federal database called the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Education Secretary Linda McMahon emphasised that this data will help the public see whether colleges admit students based on merit or race, stating, according to The New York Times, it 'will enable the American public to assess whether schools are passing over the most qualified students in favor of others based on their race.' The pressure to prioritise test scores According to The New York Times , experts warn that this focus on quantitative measures like test scores and grade point averages could unintentionally favour wealthier students who often have access to better preparation and resources from an early age. James Murphy, director of postsecondary policy at Education Reform Now, told The New York Times , 'I think the incentives that this creates are a big deal. It is creating pressure on colleges to focus on higher G.P.A.s and higher test scores.' The history and impact of standardised testing The use of standardised test scores in admissions has a complex history. In the early 20th century, colleges prioritised intangible qualities such as character, leadership, and athletic ability. These factors sometimes served as barriers for certain groups, including Jewish students. After World War II, as the United States faced global competition, universities shifted focus towards academic metrics like the SAT. However, this shift has been challenged by civil rights advocates seeking more inclusive admissions policies. Income and racial disparities in test scores Research highlighted by The New York Times shows significant disparities in test scores tied to family income. For example, students from affluent households are seven times more likely to score at least 1300 on the SAT compared to those from low-income families. Among the high school class of 2024, just 1% of Black students and 2% of Hispanic students scored between 1400 and 1600, the highest SAT range. By contrast, 7% of white students and 27% of Asian students reached that score bracket. Admissions beyond test scores Given these disparities, very few elite colleges admit students solely based on test scores today. They also consider legacy status, special talents, and economic adversity to create a more balanced student body. Boston University professor Anthony Abraham Jack told The New York Times that the new order could push admissions towards a 'quota system for wealthy and white students.' He cautioned, 'If your class is too brown, too poor, then somehow you rigged the system.' Jack stressed the importance of context in evaluating applicants, telling The New York Times , 'If you have a student who gets a 5 in A.P. calculus, that doesn't give you a relative understanding of how good they are. What if they're the only young woman in the entire state to get a 5 in A.P. calc? That tells you how amazing that person is.' What this means for students As the admissions landscape shifts, students and families may find it harder or easier to understand what it takes to gain entry into selective colleges. The Trump administration's push for more standardised, data-driven admissions decisions may narrow the path for many, especially students from diverse and disadvantaged backgrounds. The debate continues as universities strive to balance fairness, diversity, and academic excellence in an evolving legal and political environment. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

Netanyahu doubles down: Israel plans final push to crush Hamas strongholds in Gaza city
Netanyahu doubles down: Israel plans final push to crush Hamas strongholds in Gaza city

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Netanyahu doubles down: Israel plans final push to crush Hamas strongholds in Gaza city

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly defended his government's plan to seize control of Gaza City and eliminate the last remaining Hamas strongholds, calling it 'the best way to end the war' swiftly. Speaking on Sunday in Jerusalem, Netanyahu outlined a 'fairly short timetable' for the operation, which aims to dismantle Hamas's hold on Gaza City and the central camps, while creating safe passages for civilians to escape the fighting. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program With roughly 70 to 75 percent of Gaza already under Israeli military control , Netanyahu insisted that completing the defeat of Hamas was unavoidable. 'We have two remaining strongholds: Gaza City and the central camps in Al Mawasi,' he said, emphasizing that Israel 'has no choice but to finish the job.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Undo Despite his resolve, Netanyahu's statements drew immediate condemnation from Hamas, whose spokesperson dismissed the remarks as a 'series of lies.' Rising pomestic protests Netanyahu's announcement has intensified a deep divide within Israel, with growing protests against the expanded military campaign. Thousands marched in Tel Aviv over the weekend, warning that the new plan would likely fail and risk the lives of both hostages and soldiers. Live Events 'It could very well be the end of our hostages,' protester Joel Obodov told AFP, expressing fears that the escalation would only prolong the conflict. The prime minister faces criticism from multiple quarters: while many Israelis demand a ceasefire and hostage release, Netanyahu is also pressured by far-right coalition members to take an even harsher stance. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called the plan 'half-hearted,' accusing the government of repeating an ineffective approach. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir pushed for total victory, advocating for the transfer and colonization of Gaza. Their influence remains crucial to maintaining the government's parliamentary majority. Netanyahu's Resolve Internationally, the expansion of hostilities has sparked alarm. UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenca warned that the plans could trigger 'another calamity in Gaza,' worsening displacement, deaths, and destruction across the region. Many foreign allies of Israel have urged a truce to secure hostage releases and address the mounting humanitarian crisis, with famine looming. Despite this pressure and reports of dissent among Israeli military leaders, Netanyahu reiterated his determination: 'We will win the war, with or without the support of others.' He clarified that Israel's objective is not to occupy Gaza indefinitely but to establish a civilian administration free from Hamas or the Palestinian Authority's influence. The prime minister also reportedly discussed the military plans in a phone call with US President Donald Trump. Since Hamas's attack in 2023 triggered the conflict, 49 hostages remain in Gaza, with 27 confirmed dead by Israeli military sources. The ongoing Israeli offensive has resulted in at least 61,430 Palestinian deaths, according to Gaza's health ministry and UN figures. Meanwhile, recent Israeli fire killed at least 27 people across Gaza, including aid seekers near distribution centers. The war, now more than 22 months old, continues to deeply divide opinion both within Israel and internationally, as the cycle of violence and demands for resolution intensifies. (With AFP inputs)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store