Senior member of Anas Sarwar's shadow cabinet 'opposed' to Labour welfare cuts bill
EXCLUSIVE: A senior party figure said Duncan-Glancy is angry about the cuts being proposed.
A member of Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar 's shadow cabinet is opposed to Keir Starmer's welfare cuts for disabled people.
A senior party figure said Pam Duncan-Glancy is against a Labour Government bill campaigners warn will cost the vulnerable hundreds of pounds a year.
The insider said the education spokeswoman, a permanent wheelchair user, is angry about the plans.
They said: 'Pam has brought her lived experience to bear in leading the internal campaign against disability cuts. She has consistently made the strongest case against the cuts and has the ear of senior government figures.'
The Prime Ministe r is under mounting pressure over a welfare bill that would cut around £5bn from disability and sickness benefits.
A number of the benefit changes are UK-wide and the cuts are forecast to plunge 50,0000 children into poverty.
But the bill could be dumped after over 100 Labour MPs, twelve from Scotland, backed an amendment that would torpedo the whole package.
A party insider said Duncan-Glancy's opposition showed the Labour shadow cabinet at Holyrood is split over the plans.
When approached, Scottish Labour released a statement in Duncan-Glancy's name. She said: 'Everybody agrees reform is needed to address the structural challenges in the system, but those reforms need to be fair.
'Labour's plans include positives, for example increasing the Universal Credit standard allowance, scrapping the Work Capability Assessment, introducing a 'right to try', and investing £1 billion in employability support.'Disabled people are raising their concerns and it's right that people work to ensure these reforms deliver on Labour's ambitions to fix a broken system and support disabled people.'
Sarwar has so far walked a careful line between backing the principles of welfare reform while encouraging Starmer to listen to concerns.
In a Holyrood Sources podcast, Sarwar said of the bill: 'I support the principle of reform.'
'We do have to look at the structural challenges that exist in our welfare system.'
He also said there are ' many positives ' in the bill, such as £1bn for back to work schemes.
Asked if he agreed with the rebels, Sarwar said: 'Conversations are ongoing, as you would expect. People are legitimately raising their concerns, having those conversations.'
He added: 'We have to support the principle of reform. What those reforms look like have to be balanced and have to be fair.'
His comments are milder than the criticisms of mayors Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham.
Meanwhile, Starmer is in talks with Labour rebels over concessions to save the welfare reform package.
Sir Keir told MPs there was 'consensus" across the House on the "urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system.
'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said.
'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.'
SNP MSP George Adam said: "The UK Labour government is slashing vital support for disabled people and under Anas Sarwar's leadership, Scottish Labour is rowing in behind them.
"So far, Anas Sarwar has faithfully backed his Westminster bosses - but a growing number of his own colleagues have finally seen the irreparable damage these cuts will do.
"While Scottish Labour won't stand up for Scotland, the SNP has called for the cuts to be scrapped.
"The people of Scotland deserve far better than continued Westminster austerity. Only with the full powers of independence can Scotland escape Westminster's austerity obsession."
A key element of the welfare package is freezing the rate of the health element of Universal Credit and Employment and Support Allowance payments until 2030.
In a briefing to parliamentarians, the Trussell charity estimated that there are nearly 300,000 people receiving these payments in Scotland: "All would stand to be affected by the freeze which by 2029/30 amounts to [a] real terms cut of £500 per year.'
The Scottish Labour MP sceptics are Richard Baker, Scott Arthur, Euan Stainbank, Brian Leishman, Lilian Jones, Tracy Gilbert and Elaine Stewart.
Kirsteen Sullivan, Patricia Ferguson, Martin Rhodes, Maureen Burke and Irene Campbell are also opposed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer offers major concessions on benefit cuts after crisis talks with Labour rebels
Sir Keir Starmer has caved to a Labour rebellion and offered major concessions to his backbenchers on his planned benefit cuts. In a screeching £1.5bn U-turn, people currently receiving personal independence payment (Pip) will be protected in a move the prime minister hopes will spare him a humiliating defeat on Tuesday. Adjustments to universal credit will also see existing claimants' incomes protected, work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall confirmed in a letter overnight. The U-turn followed crisis talks with backbenchers, with some 126 Labour MPs within the party having signed an amendment that would hve killed the flagship welfare bill. It cuts £1.5bn from the £5bn the government had hoped to save through the changes, and blows a hole in Labour's spending plans that economists warn will need to be filled with either tax hikes or spending cuts elsewhere. Speaking after the U-turn was announced, care minister Stephen Kinnock refused to say how the £1.5bn shortfall would be made up, pointing to the chancellor's Budget this autumn. He said he was 'really pleased with the way that the dialogue happened' and that the changes were a 'step in the right direction'. And he went as far as accusing critics of the original welfare proposals of spreading 'misinformation', claiming that Labour had always planned to 'protect the most vulnerable in society'. Sir Keir's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. The major concessions announced overnight should be enough to win back the support of tens of rebels and get the measures over the line. A Downing Street spokesman said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the work and pensions secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement. Speaking before the U-turn, Rachel Maskell said: 'As the government is seeking to reform the system, they should protect all disabled people until they have completed their co-produced consultation and co-produced implementation. 'I cannot vote for something that will have such a significant impact … as disabled people are not involved, it is just a backroom deal.' One MP said that ministers would need to 'go back to the drawing board' to make the Bill acceptable. Another said they expected the legislation would get through second reading if the government conceded the key sticking points relating to existing Pip claimants, the health element of universal credit and a policy consultation. 'It would need to be in the Bill, not just a commitment,' they said. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to reflect 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He insisted there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP minister admits PIP system causes 'huge anxiety'
The qualifying rules for PIP are changing from next year Labour has addressed concerns that PIP claimants feel "extremely anxious" when they have to go through an assessment to decide how much they get. PIP (Personal Independence Payment) supports people who live with a long-term health condition or disability, providing varying levels of financial support depending on how you are affected in your daily life and in your ability to get around. The DWP benefit includes a daily living part and a mobility part with an lower and upper payment depending on your level of need, and you can get nothing for one part if you do are not affected enough by your condition. New applicants often go through an assessment with a health professional to decide their level of payment, and you may have to go through a fresh assessment when your award is due to end, to determine again how much you should get. Liberal Democrat MP Edward Morello spoke about how in his constituency of West Dorset, some 40% of PIP claimants get the highest rate, meaning they get £110.40 a week for the daily living part and £77.05 a week for the mobility element. The lower daily living part is £73.90 a week while the lower mobility payment is £29.20 a week. Mr Morello asked the Government in the House of Commons: "Many are extremely anxious about PIP assessments being carried out over the phone rather than in person, particularly those with complex or fluctuating conditions. Will the minister guarantee that anyone who wants an in-person assessment will receive one?" In response, DWP minister Liz Kendall said that the Government "absolutely want" for claimants to have the option of an in-person assessment. She added: "Indeed, we want to record the assessments as standard to ensure that claimants have confidence in what is being done." Yet she also acknowledged the stress that waiting for an assessment result can cause: "This is an issue that causes huge anxiety among my constituents. Too many decisions take too long and are overturned, and we want to deal with these problems head-on." READ MORE: NatWest gives some customers £125 - and you could get extra £50 As part of wider efforts to reform the benefits system, the Government is looking to change PIP assessments. Ministers will be consulting with disabled people as well as with disability advocacy groups, in working to improve the system. Some other major changes to PIP are coming up, as from next year the eligibility criteria for the daily living part will become stricter. An additional rule will mean you have to get at least one score of 4 on one of the daily living activities to get the payment. At present, you only need a total of 8 points across the 10 activities to get the lower rate and a total of 12 points to get the higher rate. A person who went from the higher rate to no longer qualifying would lose out on over £5,700 a year.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
A hat-trick of U turns – and this is the most awkward of the lot
Three U-turns in a there was the slow motion change of mind on the winter fuel payment for millions of there was the decision to hold a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs, having previously said one wasn't now this on benefits. Ministers argue their decision on setting up an investigation into the scale of child sexual abuse by men often of Pakistani heritage came about after they had commissioned a considered piece of work by Dame Louise Casey - and that was a pragmatic sequencing of decision making, albeit under considerable political the other two are more straight forward U-turns: decisions of the government's own making they later concluded were deeply latest one, on the welfare state, comes after Sir Keir Starmer has endured his bumpiest days yet in Downing was publicly humiliated by coach-loads of his own MPs in a well-executed campaign while he was out of the country at the Nato Summit in the scale of it, and its remorseless growth over the last 48 to 72 hours, nigh on guaranteed his eventual alternative was this shouldn't have come as a surprise. Labour MPs have been telling me and others for months they didn't like these plans - and more and more of them were making their views known both publicly and privately within the government was determined not to budge, perhaps hopeful much of it was noise and their mountainous majority would inoculate them from a minority of prime minister is determined to leverage that majority to take on what he sees as the difficult changes the country desperately benefits bill is rising fast and he, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves and others believe the only way to protect the welfare state and ensure it is sustainable into the long term is to at least limit the scale of its the grumblers got louder, more numerous and more Downing Street found out the hard way their plans were Thursday evening, multiple sources were telling me the concessions were agreed and were big and the outline of the about turn was spelt it was only formally confirmed at half past midnight on Friday addition to the anger and uncertainty that this saga has caused for so many benefits recipients, there are two potentially long lasting political consequences: for the Treasury's spreadsheets and the prime minister's economic competence and a firm grip of the public finances runs to the core of the image Rachel Reeves wants to project as chancellor. These cuts were, in part at least, about doing just that. But now all the numbers are as for Sir Keir Starmer's authority, moments like this can leave a lasting impression, on a prime minister's own MPs and the country at 10 had rapidly concluded this about turn was their least worst this isn't meant to happen to a government with a landslide majority and certainly not one less than a year into its time in office.
