Tribe to host convocation for tribal college students from
Shondiin SilversmithArizona Mirror
Indigenous students graduating from a Maricopa County Community College will have a special convocation this year, just not one hosted by the district.
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community President Martin Harvier announced Wednesday that the tribal council will host a Native American Convocation for all Indigenous students graduating from a Maricopa County Community College this spring.
The tribe is hosting the event in response to how the district canceled all convocations for specific student groups due to President Donald Trump's threat to defund colleges and universities that engage in DEI efforts.
Harvier said the district's actions came quickly and without consultation with local tribes or other minority organizations.
The cancellation of the convocation concerned the tribe because Scottsdale Community College is located within the boundaries of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, and many tribal members have received their education from SCC.
'We knew we had to do something to address this issue,' Harvier said.
The tribe met with the MCCD Governing Board, Harvier said, and the tribal council agreed to host the convocation for all 2025 Native American MCCD graduates in the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.
'Why? Because honoring all Native American students for their accomplishments is the right thing to do,' Harvier said.
The tribal council will cover all costs for the event that is being planned for early May. Details on the exact date and how students can participate were not shared.
Mona Scott Figueroa, a faculty member at Mesa Community College, said she is 'elated' that the native American convocation will continue this year, even without it being hosted by the district.
'I love that Salt River made this generous offer,' Figueroa said. 'They are coming through for all 10 colleges.'
When Figueroa heard of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community stepping up to host the convocation, she said it's a move that is 'consistent with who we are as Indigenous people.'
'We do what is right for the community,' she added. 'What matters is the students and our community members.'
Figueroa said she was the name reader during the Native American convocations held at Mesa Community College, and she knows how beautiful the event is for the students and their families.
'For many, this is their first official graduation,' Figueroa said, adding that it's an authentic experience for the students and their families because it is full of Indigenous representation.
'I'm glad that it is going to happen,' she added. 'It's a beautiful event that I knew was going to happen in some form or fashion.'
With the convocation being hosted within the Salt River community, Figueroa said she hopes that Scottsdale Community College will take it as a sign to invest and support Indigenous students.
'It does send a message,' she said, and she hopes that it will strengthen connections between tribes and MCCD.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republican urges Trump to reconsider proposed broadcasting cuts
Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.) on Monday urged the Trump administration to reconsider a request to Congress for public broadcasting cuts, warning of the potential impact some local communities face if funding is yanked back. In a joint statement, Amodei and Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), co-chairs of the Public Broadcasting Caucus, defended public broadcasting funding, saying local stations' ability to 'continue offering free, high-quality programming would be eliminated if the federal funding is rescinded.' 'Rescinding this funding would also isolate rural communities, jeopardizing their access to vital resources they depend on,' they said, while noting public broadcasting 'represents less than 0.01 percent of the federal budget, yet its impact reaches every congressional district.' 'Cutting this funding will not meaningfully reduce the deficit, but it will dismantle a trusted source of information for millions of Americans,' the statement continued. President Trump last week sent Congress a request for $8.3 billion in cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and foreign aid, and more than $1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR and PBS. The move kickstarts a special process that would allow Republicans to begin codifying some of the cuts pursued by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) despite widespread Democratic opposition. Some Republicans see the first batch of proposed cuts as potentially the easiest one to deal with, as many in the party have been critical of foreign aid and funds going to outlets like PBS and NPR, which they've accused of political bias. But there are Republicans in both chambers who have expressed concerns about the scope of the proposed package of cuts, including how clawing back funds for public broadcasting programs would impact folks back home. 'You go to rural America, public television is how you get emergency broadcasting and all that kind of stuff,' Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. 'I look at Idaho Public Television, they're a great organization, and we don't see the politics that some states do in them, or at least they believe they see that and stuff,' Simpson said, although he added that he still intended to support the package if it comes to the floor. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) also told reporters earlier last week that, before he agrees to the funding clawback, he wanted to know what the cuts 'would do to my Native American populations who use the AM radio, I think FM in some areas, to actually communicate throughout those rural areas.' 'I tell folks we've got some stuff in public radio that for Native Americans who don't have anything else to communicate with out there for emergencies and so forth,' he said. Amodei and Goldman said in the new statement that 'of the 544 radio and television stations that receive federal funding, 245 serve rural communities and collectively support more than 5,950 local jobs.' 'Rural broadcasters face significant challenges in raising private funds, making them particularly vulnerable if government funding is cut,' they also said. 'Public media has demonstrated a willingness to listen to the American public and adapt. While we reaffirm that public media must be objective and legitimate concerns about content should be addressed, funding decisions should be objective as well.' The plan being considered in Congress calls for rescinding $535 million in funding for the CPB in both fiscal 2026 and 2027. 'These funds would be used to subsidize a public media system that is politically biased and an unnecessary expense to the taxpayer. Enacting the rescission would eliminate Federal funding for CPB,' the administration's rescissions request said of the proposed cuts last week. The CPB also reacted to the recent request in a statement at the time, as well as the president's budget request for fiscal 2026. It said the request would cut 'all funding for public media except $30 million in closeout costs for CPB.' 'Federal funding for the public broadcasting system is irreplaceable. Public media serves all – families and individuals, in rural and urban communities – free of charge and commercial free,' CPB said. 'American taxpayers rely upon and trust public media for high quality educational content, information, and life-saving alerts.' 'The path to better public media is achievable only if funding is maintained. Otherwise, a vital lifeline that operates reliable emergency communications, supports early learning, and keeps local communities connected and informed will be cut off with regrettable and lasting consequences.' At the same time, hardline conservatives are dialing up pressure on Congress to further cut spending and lock in Trump's DOGE cuts. 'Raise money,' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told The Hill last week when asked about concerns over the proposed public broadcasting cuts. 'I mean, look, my bottom line is, we're $36 trillion in debt. You tell me where we're gonna find the cuts. Here's $9 billion. Let's go.' 'We got, I don't know, about $4 trillion more to go if you want to get the balance. So, I know we're not gonna get all that done in one fell swoop, but there's just no more room in the end.' 'And I've got my concerns about the merits on both PBS and NPR and by the way, I say that like I'm an Austin City Limits guy,' he added. 'I love it, but you don't think there's some rich people in Austin that can fund Austin City Limits?'
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge blocks administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders in grant funding requirements that LGBTQ+ organizations say are unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding. The order will remain in effect while the legal case continues, although government lawyers will likely appeal. The funding provisions 'reflect an effort to censor constitutionally protected speech and services promoting DEI and recognizing the existence of transgender individuals,' Tigar wrote. He went on to say that the executive branch must still be bound by the Constitution in shaping its agenda and that even in the context of federal subsidies, 'it cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities for disfavored treatment or suppress ideas that it does not like or has deemed dangerous.' The plaintiffs include health centers, LGBTQ+ services groups and the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society. All receive federal funding and say they cannot complete their missions by following the president's executive orders. The San Francisco AIDS Foundation, one of the plaintiffs, said in 2023 it received a five-year grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand and enhance sexual health services, including the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The $1.3 million project specifically targets communities disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities. But in April, the CDC informed the nonprofit that it must 'immediately terminate all programs, personnel, activities, or contracts' that promote DEI or gender ideology. President Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders since taking office in January, including ones to roll back transgender protections and stop DEI programs. Lawyers for the government say that the president is permitted to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies' with his policies. Plaintiffs say that Congress — and not the president — has the power to condition how federal funds are used, and that the executive orders restrict free speech rights. Har writes for the Associated Press.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge blocks administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing anti-diversity and anti-transgender executive orders in grant funding requirements that LGBTQ+ organizations say are unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar said Monday that the federal government cannot force recipients to halt programs that promote diversity, equity and inclusion or acknowledge the existence of transgender people in order to receive grant funding. The order will remain in effect while the legal case continues, although government lawyers will likely appeal. The funding provisions 'reflect an effort to censor constitutionally protected speech and services promoting DEI and recognizing the existence of transgender individuals,' Tigar wrote. He went on to say that the executive branch must still be bound by the Constitution in shaping its agenda and that even in the context of federal subsidies, 'it cannot weaponize Congressionally appropriated funds to single out protected communities for disfavored treatment or suppress ideas that it does not like or has deemed dangerous.' The plaintiffs include health centers, LGBTQ+ services groups and the Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society. All receive federal funding and say they cannot complete their missions by following the president's executive orders. The San Francisco AIDS Foundation, one of the plaintiffs, said in 2023 it received a five-year grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand and enhance sexual health services, including the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The $1.3 million project specifically targets communities disproportionately affected by sexual health disparities. But in April, the CDC informed the nonprofit that it must 'immediately terminate all programs, personnel, activities, or contracts' that promote DEI or gender ideology. President Donald Trump has signed a flurry of executive orders since taking office in January, including ones to roll back transgender protections and stop DEI programs. Lawyers for the government say that the president is permitted to 'align government funding and enforcement strategies' with his policies. Plaintiffs say that Congress — and not the president — has the power to condition how federal funds are used, and that the executive orders restrict free speech rights. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
