China is building a ‘mega-sized' consumer economy, Premier says
Chinese Premier Li Qiang delivers a speech during opening ceremony of the World Economic Forum's meeting in Tianjin on June 25. PHOTO: AFP
- Premier Li Qiang has projected confidence that China can turn consumption into a driver for the economy, while also portraying his nation as a stabilising force in a rapidly shifting global trade landscape.
Policymakers were growing the nation 'into a mega-sized consumer powerhouse on top of its solid foundation as a manufacturing power', Mr Li said in a speech at the World Economic Forum's meeting in Tianjin on June 25.
'This will bring vast markets to enterprises from all countries.'
He added that while the world was seeing a host of global trade frictions, China was positioned 'to cross cycles, move forward steadily, and continue to inject more stability and certainty into the world economy'.
Mr Li did not directly mention the Trump administration's tariffs or Washington's tech curbs, but called for 'all parties to avoid the politicisation of economic and trade issues', saying Beijing's approach offered win-win outcomes.
Chinese officials often express confidence that they can build the consumer sector into a key engine of the economy, but the task is becoming more urgent as governments around the world push back on China's huge amount of exports.
Those tensions have been highlighted by a trade war with the US that is now amid a fragile truce.
The world's second-largest economy continues to struggle with weak consumer sentiment and deflationary pressures, although strong retail sales in May gave it some relief from US tariffs.
Consumer enthusiasm for a government-subsidised home goods trade-in programme has been so great that provinces are quickly running out of funds the national government has distributed.
State media has said China will allocate the remaining 138 billion yuan (S$24.6 billion) in planned funds to provinces to ensure consumer access to subsidies throughout 2025.
Underscoring China's push to revamp its economy, Vice-Premier He Lifeng said while on a trip to the northern province of Hebei earlier this week that the nation would 'actively expand domestic demand to boost consumption', the official Xinhua News Agency reported.
He added that promotion of the trade-in programme needed further implementing.
In his address at the World Economic Forum event, Mr Li also touted China's advances in areas such as electric vehicles (EVs) and artificial intelligence (AI).
He added that the nation would 'share indigenous technologies and innovative scenarios with countries around the world'.
That remark may have been intended to contrast with the US, which is trying to deprive China of advanced semiconductors and other high-tech equipment on national security grounds.
Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek has released an open-source model that it says rivals software from the top American AI developers, a move that could allow others to see, freely use and build on top of the code.
Critics of the open-source software say it is less secure.
Bloomberg News reported in 2024 that China strongly advised its carmakers to make sure advanced EV technology stays in the country.
Beijing apparently encouraged the automakers to export so-called knock-down kits to their foreign plants, meaning key parts of a vehicle would be produced domestically and then sent for final assembly in their destination markets.
Global business executives and world leaders, including Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh, are attending the meeting also known as Summer Davos in the northern Chinese city of Tianjin. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
41 minutes ago
- International Business Times
Burqa-Clad Statue of Liberty Image Sparks Islamophobic Uproar After Zohran Mamdani's NYC Win
The victory of Zohran Mamdani—a democratic socialist of Indian Muslim heritage—in a key Democratic primary in New York City has become a lightning rod for controversy. As celebrations broke out among supporters, a very different reaction was brewing online. A digitally altered image of the Statue of Liberty wearing a black burqa began circulating across social media, igniting a storm of Islamophobic outrage. Mamdani, who secured 43.5% of first-choice votes through the city's ranked-choice voting system, is no stranger to backlash. But the reaction this time—driven largely by right-wing voices—has escalated into a symbolic attack on American identity itself. A digitally manipulated image of the Statue of Liberty draped in a black burqa has ignited a firestorm online after Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani won a closely watched primary election in New York City. The viral image surfaced as far-right commentators lashed out at Mamdani, a state assemblymember of Indian Muslim descent, who garnered 43.5% of first-choice votes under the city's ranked-choice system. Mamdani, the son of renowned filmmaker Mira Nair, has long been the target of Islamophobic rhetoric. Following his primary victory, the online backlash grew sharper, with conservative voices portraying his win as a symbol of declining American values. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene shared the image of the burqa-wearing statue, suggesting that it signified a cultural collapse. Donald Trump Jr. escalated tensions further, declaring on social media, "New York City has fallen," while invoking the 9/11 attacks to criticize Mamdani's success. Other far-right figures followed suit, branding New Yorkers as complicit in their own downfall and warning of an impending imposition of Islamic law. Yet the symbolism behind the viral image carries historical irony. The original design for the Statue of Liberty by French sculptor Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi was inspired by a veiled Egyptian woman titled Egypt Carrying the Light to Asia. Though the Egyptian project was rejected, Bartholdi repurposed the design into the Roman-robed figure that now stands in New York Harbor. Statue historian Barry Moreno emphasized that Bartholdi's early concept envisioned a Muslim woman as a beacon of enlightenment. "What was intended as mockery now unintentionally mirrors the statue's original form," he noted. On social media, however, hostility continued. Alarmist posts forecasted a dystopian future for New York, suggesting Mamdani's win heralded an era of Sharia law. "NYC in 2040: Obey or leave," read one viral post. Despite the vitriol, Mamdani remains focused on advancing progressive policies. Official results of the primary are expected in early July. In the meantime, the controversy has opened deeper questions around America's cultural symbols, historical memory, and ongoing struggles with religious pluralism.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US Supreme Court may rule on allowing enforcement of Trump birthright citizenship limits
FILE PHOTO: A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., November 26, 2021. Picture taken November 26, 2021. REUTERS/Will Dunham/File photo WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court may rule on Friday on Donald Trump's attempt to broadly enforce his executive order to limit birthright citizenship, a move that would affect thousands of babies born each year as the Republican president seeks a major shift in how the U.S. Constitution has long been understood. The administration has made an emergency request for the justices to scale back injunctions issued by federal judges in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts blocking Trump's directive nationwide. The judges found that Trump's order likely violates citizenship language in the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment. On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the United States who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident, also called a "green card" holder. More than 150,000 newborns would be denied citizenship annually under Trump's directive, according to the plaintiffs who challenged it, including the Democratic attorneys general of 22 states as well as immigrant rights advocates and pregnant immigrants. The case before the Supreme Court was unusual in that the administration used it to argue that federal judges lack the authority to issue nationwide, or "universal," injunctions, and asked the justices to rule that way and enforce the president's directive even without weighing its legal merits. Federal judges have taken steps including issuing nationwide orders impeding Trump's aggressive use of executive action to advance his agenda. The plaintiffs argued that Trump's directive ran afoul of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 in the aftermath of the Civil War of 1861-1865 that ended slavery in the United States. The 14th Amendment's citizenship clause states that all "persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." The administration contends that the 14th Amendment, long understood to confer citizenship to virtually anyone born in the United States, does not extend to immigrants who are in the country illegally or even to immigrants whose presence is lawful but temporary, such as university students or those on work visas. In a June 11-12 Reuters/Ipsos poll, 24% of all respondents supported ending birthright citizenship and 52% opposed it. Among Democrats, 5% supported ending it, with 84% opposed. Among Republicans, 43% supported ending it, with 24% opposed. The rest said they were unsure or did not respond to the question. The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has handed Trump some important victories on his immigration policies since he returned to office in January. On Monday, it cleared the way for his administration to resume deporting migrants to countries other than their own without offering them a chance to show the harms they could face. In separate decisions on May 30 and May 19, it let the administration end the temporary legal status previously given by the government to hundreds of thousands of migrants on humanitarian grounds. But the court on May 16 kept in place its block on Trump's deportations of Venezuelan migrants under a 1798 law historically used only in wartime, faulting his administration for seeking to remove them without adequate due process. The court heard arguments in the birthright citizenship dispute on May 15. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, representing the administration, told the justices that Trump's order "reflects the original meaning of the 14th Amendment, which guaranteed citizenship to the children of former slaves, not to illegal aliens or temporary visitors." An 1898 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a case called United States v. Wong Kim Ark long has been interpreted as guaranteeing that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents are entitled to American citizenship. Trump's administration has argued that the court's ruling in that case was narrower, applying to children whose parents had a "permanent domicile and residence in the United States." Universal injunctions have been opposed by presidents of both parties - Republican and Democratic - and can prevent the government from enforcing a policy against anyone, instead of just the individual plaintiffs who sued to challenge the policy. Proponents have said they are an efficient check on presidential overreach, and have stymied actions deemed unlawful by presidents of both parties. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran's hackers keep a low profile after Israeli and US strikes
FILE PHOTO: A man holds a laptop computer as cyber code is projected on him in this illustration picture taken on May 13, 2017. REUTERS/Kacper Pempel/Illustration/ File Photo After Israeli and American forces struck Iranian nuclear targets, officials in both countries sounded the alarm over potentially disruptive cyberattacks carried out by the Islamic Republic's hackers. But as a fragile ceasefire holds, cyber defenders in the United States and Israel say they have so far seen little out of the ordinary – a potential sign that the threat from Iran's cyber capabilities, like its battered military, has been overestimated. There has been no indication of the disruptive cyberattacks often invoked during discussions of Iran's digital capabilities, such as its alleged sabotage of tens of thousands of computers at major oil company Saudi Aramco in 2012, or subsequent break-ins at U.S. casinos or water facilities. "The volume of attacks appears to be relatively low," said Nicole Fishbein, a senior security researcher with the Israeli company Intezer. "The techniques used are not particularly sophisticated." Online vigilante groups alleged by security analysts to be acting at Iran's direction boasted of hacking a series of Israeli and Western companies in the wake of the airstrikes. A group calling itself Handala Hack claimed a string of data heists and intrusions, but Reuters was not able to corroborate its most recent hacking claims. Researchers say the group, which emerged in the wake of Palestinian militant group Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, likely operates out of Iran's Ministry of Intelligence. Rafe Pilling, lead threat intelligence researcher at British cybersecurity company Sophos, said the impact from the hacking activity appeared to be modest. 'As far as we can tell, it's the usual mix of ineffectual chaos from the genuine hacktivist groups and targeted attacks from the Iran-linked personas that are likely having some success but also overstating their impact,' he said. Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York did not respond to a request for comment. Iran typically denies carrying out hacking campaigns. Israeli firm Check Point Software said a hacking campaign it ties to Iran's Revolutionary Guards has in recent days sent phishing messages to Israeli journalists, academic officials and others. In one case, the hackers tried to lure a target to a physical meeting in Tel Aviv, according to Sergey Shykevich, Check Point's threat intelligence group manager. He added that the reasoning behind the proposed meeting was not clear. Shykevich said there have been some data destruction attempts at Israeli targets, which he declined to identify, as well as a dramatic increase in attempts to exploit a vulnerability in Chinese-made security cameras – likely to assess bomb damage in Israel. The pro-Iranian cyber operations demonstrate an asymmetry with pro-Israeli cyber operations tied to the aerial war that began on June 13. In the days since the start of the conflict, suspected Israeli hackers have claimed to have destroyed data at one of Iran's major state-owned banks. They also burned roughly $90 million in cryptocurrencies that the hackers allege were tied to government security services. Israel's National Cyber Directorate did not return a message seeking comment. Analysts said the situation is fluid and that more sophisticated cyber espionage activity may be flying under the radar. Both Israeli and U.S. officials have urged industry to be on the lookout. A June 22 Department of Homeland Security bulletin warned that the ongoing conflict was causing a heightened threat environment in the U.S. and that cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks. The FBI declined to comment on any potential Iranian cyber activities in the United States. Yelisey Bohuslavskiy, the cofounder of intelligence company Red Sense, compared Iran's cyber operations to its missile program. The Iranian weapons that rained down on Israel during the conflict killed 28 people and destroyed thousands of homes, but most were intercepted and none significantly damaged the Israeli military. Bohuslavskiy said Iranian hacking operations seemed to work similarly. 'There is a lot of hot air, there is a lot of indiscriminate civilian targeting, and - realistically - there are not that many results,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
