Locals who live near overgrown & derelict theme park inspired by King Arthur say it's better than the council's new plan
Residents living near Camelot theme park in Chorley have expressed their frustration with the proposed plans.
8
8
8
8
Having closed down over a decade ago, the derelict site has become overgrown and littered with graffiti.
It has turned the once-popular theme park into a hot spot for urban explorers and rebellious locals.
Despite the 140-acre land laying unused since 2012, locals have protested against new planning proposals that could see the site repurposed.
The plan centres on an £80 development that would see 350 homes built on the site.
Plans were put forward by Developers Story Homes to Chorley Borough Council on June 20.
However, similar plans have twice been rejected - once in 2014, and again in 2017 - since the developers bought the site in 2009.
In planning documents they claim it is "well positioned" to support wider regional growth and a "prime location" for a residential development like this.
They plan to keep half of the new homes as "affordable" housing after the estimated seven-year project.
The developers also hope it will lead to more wide-ranging benefits for the area, bringing in jobs and higher household expenditure.
Despite the optimistic proposals, residents in nearby Heskin have argued against the project, with 25 objections to the proposals and just one supporting.
They are primarily concerned about the destruction of wildlife on greenbelt land.
Others were worried about increased noise and traffic, with the village's population of 1,000 people having "insufficient infrastructure" to cope with new residents.
One resident commenting on the proposals said: "There are not enough amenities to cope. How will the schools, GPs, roads cope?
They added: "Please leave our greenery and woodland and nature alone."
Other residents expressed similar concerns, with one writing: "The development lacks clear provision for new schools, healthcare or transport links - failing to meet the needs of the existing population, let alone new residents."
Another resident raised concerns about existing drainage problems in the area.
While the report does consider flood risks to the site, they feel it has not adequately considered risk to the existing properties.
They wrote: "We have issues with drainage already and with the aforementioned sites we have no idea how this is going to impact the communities with flooding and future issues."
Residents generally would rather the site be used to enhance the existing community, for example with a leisure centre, or dedicated woodland trails.
Out of the 27 comments on the planning proposal, only one local expressed support for the development.
They wrote: "There are some who say there isn't the infrastructure to make this development viable. I would say, there are numerous engineers whose job it is to ensure that there will be enough electricity/drainage etc to ensure the development will be ok.
"As long as the development is sympathetic to the local nature, I think it is an ideal use of a brown field site."
The planning application does contain reference to a 186.9 square metre community hub "with associated habitat creation, landscaping, open space, parking, footpaths / cycleways, drainage and other infrastructure."
8
8
8
8
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Royal Mail deliveries AXED in seaside village after terrified posties are forced to take drastic action
POSTIES are dodging deliveries in a street where aggressive seagulls keep dive-bombing them. There have been so many attacks that villagers have been asked to collect their letters from the depot or get them delivered elsewhere. 2 2 The birds are said to have been nesting in Wright Close in Caister, Norfolk, for a decade. But experts say they are particularly aggressive at this time of year as they are protecting their chicks. It has led Royal Mail to tell staff not to feel under pressure to make deliveries in the street. Villager Marion Gibbs, 75, said: 'I was out walking and a gull hit me on the head.' Chairman of Caister Parish Council Kevin Wood said: 'I get dive-bombed when I'm walking my dogs. I put an umbrella up. People sometimes put spikes on their roofs, but that doesn't work. 'It happens all over Caister. There's nothing we can do.' A Royal Mail spokesman said: 'The activities of seagulls in the area is, at times, making it difficult for our postmen and women to safely deliver to some addresses. 'We are still attempting deliveries. Customers can nominate a different delivery address or collect their mail from the delivery office.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Siblings united after woman guessed long-lost brother would be called James
A woman has found her long-lost brother after guessing what her late mother Ann would have called him. Jess Basey-Fisher, 53, was told in 2019 that Ann had given birth years before meeting her father Nicholas. She gave the baby boy up for adoption, but Ms Fisher was 'determined' to find her brother. The only information Ms Fisher, a nurse who lives in Carleton St Peter, Norfolk, had was that her mother had met the father of her older brother at a ball at a US airbase in Sculthorpe. She was then sent away to London to give birth. 'I was determined to find my older brother,' she told the BBC. Ms Fisher tracked down her brother's birth record from 1962 on the Ancestry website by guessing what his first name would have been. 'I knew the surname, and I just had a hunch that she would have called him something like James, and it turned out to be correct,' she said. After finding his birth record, she reached out to a social worker who then tracked James down on Facebook in 2021. He had been renamed Alistair Dalgliesh and was now 62. The social worker contacted Mr Dalgliesh but heard nothing back. Ms Fisher assumed her brother did not want any contact from his biological family. Ms Fisher tried to contact Mr Dalgliesh herself in October through social workers, and a conversation started. 'That was an incredible moment for me. And I found out my brother lives in Australia,' she said. 'I was really happy to be found' Over a two-hour chat on FaceTime, the siblings laughed at how similar they looked and how Mr Dalgliesh's mannerisms resembled those of Ann. Ms Fisher said they also shared the same interest in history and music. 'I was really happy to be found,' he said from his home in Queensland. 'I had such a great upbringing with amazing parents, and I feel very lucky. Ms Fisher told her brother that Ann had died, but he wished he had met her. 'My only regret is that I didn't get to tell her I had a great life,' Mr Dalgliesh said. He called his sister a month after they first spoke to tell her he had been diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer. Ms Fisher then stayed in Australia for five weeks to help her brother through chemotherapy. Mr Dalgliesh is set to stay with Ms Fisher in Norfolk this October. She said she wished her mother could have shared her secret before she passed away, adding: 'I feel devastated for her and I feel cheated out of knowing Alistair for longer. But we are going to make the most of the time we have left.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
I don't plan to have children. That doesn't mean I want them banished from my life
It struck me recently that, as a woman in my 30s, I am almost never asked about my plans to have children. Even in the few instances I have been, the question arose naturally in a related conversation and each time, when I said 'Oh I don't think I want children', the other person responded politely and didn't push any agenda. We could draw conclusions on what this says about other people's impressions of my lifestyle or my mothering instincts. But let's choose to see this anecdote in a positive light. I imagine that, even as recently as 10 years ago, I would have had to endure endless hectoring and intrusive comments about the so-called 'biological clock'. Or about ending up lonely in my old age or having a life which feels somehow empty or unfulfilled, as if that never happens to people with children. I think I don't really get asked this because now fewer of us are having children. Last year, the fertility rate in England and Wales (which measures how many children are born per woman during her childbearing years) was the lowest on record, at 1.44 children. The number of babies born was also the lowest it has been since the 1970s. Figures like this are usually bandied about as a source of doom and gloom regarding the state of the world. People are not having children only because they can't afford to, we are told, or because they fear impending environmental collapse. No doubt this is true for some people. But this focus may eclipse another, more straightforward reason: more of us are realising that if we don't want children we simply don't have to have them. In the space of a few generations many (although not all) of the restrictions placed on women's lives, in particular, have been dropped. It is commonplace for women to go to university and pursue the career of their choosing. The pressure to have a family has lessened. And I think the relief of that pressure is worth celebrating. (After all, in our time of environmental and social collapse we must take our silver linings where we can find them!) Still, I have wondered recently if one negative corollary to these changing norms is a pervasive and growing anti-child sentiment. I notice it everywhere. There is constant social media discourse about the annoyance of having to interact with children in pubs or cafes or parks. Now we're into school holidays I can detect the grumbling ramping up. There are noticeably more children in my local pub as some of the regular patrons have started families. It often feels as if a war is brewing, with locals of all ages hissing and whispering, their eyes narrowed if families leave 15 minutes later than the child curfew. Occasionally there is bad behaviour from the parents too. Recently a few dads brought a group of eight or so children of various ages to spend a sunny day inside watching a football match they were clearly not interested in. Naturally they all charged around the pub like horses in a western, barging into people and knocking over glasses. But I think we can accept there will be bad examples of every demographic and that this group would have had a great time at the park. It isn't just that one pub. There was a story recently about more pub landlords, facing a tough climate in the midst of the cost of living crisis, choosing to ban young children from pubs to manage this tension. I empathise with the difficult position they feel they have been put in. But to me it feels like a choice they shouldn't have to make. Quite often now, too, when I'm in restaurants or cafes, if a parent enters with a child or a pram, people start tutting and muttering, or rolling their eyes. God forbid if the baby starts to cry, as babies do. It strikes me as very rude and also counterproductive. If you greet an adult in a hostile way you won't get the best out of them. Why would it be different for a child? Even as someone not primarily affected by all this tutting and muttering I find it tiresome. It feels melodramatic, joyless and, dare I say, also quite childish. Consider too that, in general, women still do the bulk of childcare. What do we expect them to do? Sit in the house all day wearing black, pushing their babies back and forth in one of those metal Victorian prams with the big spokes, so the rest of us needn't be troubled by their existence? Is it really such a big deal to hear a baby briefly cry in the afternoon in a pub? If that is the price to pay for their mum being out and about in the world I think it's a more than fair one. It feels strange, to me, to draw us all into two camps of 'has children' or 'doesn't have children'. Those labels cover such a vast array of different lifestyles and choices, as well as circumstances which are sadly forced, rather than chosen. But whether or not we end up having children, it serves us well to consider how we welcome families of young children into our public spaces. After all, few of us end up living a life completely 'free' of children. My own isn't. As I come into my 30s the women around me are having children. I already have two godchildren. I have a feeling I might end up with 10 or so. And if I'm ever rich, maybe I will hire them all a holiday villa when they turn 18 and they can bond over the honour of having me for a godparent. I imagine I'll end up with nieces and nephews too. Or stepchildren. Who knows? Time brings all kinds of different, unexpected relationships into our lives. The children I see about in the cafes or pubs in my neighbourhood are a part of the community like anyone else. The idea of public spaces cleanly absent of children seems to speak to a fantasy of a world where the lives we live are totally detached from the lives of the people around us. But of course they aren't. And if this fantasy were reality, our lives would be very small and boring. Rachel Connolly is the author of the novel Lazy City
