‘All rise, if able': Centuries-old court tradition makes way for ‘woke' alternative
The centuries-old tradition where judges enter courts with the request 'All rise' is to be replaced with an 'inclusive' modern alternative of 'All rise, if able'.
Officials in charge of courts in England and Wales have decreed that the change will be introduced across all courtrooms in the coming weeks to help to create 'a more welcoming environment' for defendants, witnesses and members of the public who may be disabled.
The move, to make hearings 'more inclusive', is believed to be the first change to a tradition dating back to mediaeval times. The statement will be made by court staff, irrespective of whether any disabled people are present in the courtroom.
'It will now become standard whenever such an announcement is made at the start of a hearing, regardless of whether it is known that a person who finds it difficult to stand due to a disability or health condition is present,' according to the internal message sent out to courts last month.
It comes after The Telegraph revealed last month that courts had been urged to draw up new rules for 'emotional support animals' in court after warnings that defendants' barking dogs were disrupting proceedings.
The new move has, however, upset traditionalists, who described it as 'unnecessary virtue-signalling' when there had never been any anticipation previously that a disabled person would have to stand up.
Jack Rankin, a Tory MP, said: 'Changing a legal convention which dates back to mediaeval times to be supposedly more inclusive is totally unnecessary virtue-signalling.
'For centuries, people who are unable to literally rise have been present and partaken fully in the business of Britain's courts. I don't remember this ever being an issue. I worry how much time has been consumed in both proposing and implementing this change, and can't help thinking this would be put to better use in cutting the judicial backlog.'
Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said: 'Another tradition trashed to the god of wokery. What a ludicrous waste of time and energy reviewing this sort of nonsense.'
'Reasonable adjustments'
The tradition of saying 'All rise' originated in the royal courts of England some 1,000 years ago, when judges, often carrying a Bible, were seen as representatives of the King's or Queen's justice.
Standing showed respect for the judge, the Bible, which represented the law, and the monarch. This tradition has continued until today as a sign of deference to the authority of the court and the judicial system.
The change was proposed by HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) to 'demonstrate a willingness to make reasonable adjustments for physical disability', according to the internal memo sent to the courts.
The memo added: 'It will help to create a welcoming environment for all those who attend hearings in courts and tribunals, particularly those who may face challenges on grounds of disability.'
However, the executive note admitted there were cases where those attending were not required to stand. 'In some types of hearing, there is no requirement to stand when the judicial office holder enters, but still on occasions people present in the court or hearing room do stand,' it said.
'In these circumstances, HMCTS staff and judicial office holders are encouraged to use an appropriate version of the above announcement to inform those present that they are not required to stand.'
The change to 'All rise' has now been included in the Equal Treatment Bench Book for court staff, judges and magistrates, which aims to 'increase awareness and understanding of the different circumstances of people appearing in courts and tribunals.'
The 340-page book includes guidance for courts on physical and mental disability including options for remote hearings or even sittings at a person's home should a disabled person not be able to attend.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
UK agrees to check-free land border for Gibraltar but EU controls for flights
The UK has reached a deal with the EU over Gibraltar's border with Spain that will allow travellers to cross by land without checks. The agreement on a 'fluid border' clears the way to finalise a post-Brexit deal on the territory with the EU. But those flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU. An agreement for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in relation to Gibraltar is now a reality. It is a historic agreement. — Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025 This is because the land border will allow those arriving by air access to the European Schengen free travel area unchecked once they are in Gibraltar. The UK and Gibraltar insisted the changes would not affect the British overseas territory's sovereignty. The airport will operate under a model similar to London's St Pancras station, where passengers pass through both UK and French passport checks to board international trains. Goods and customs checks will also eventually be removed in both directions under the agreement. The move could also see airlines start to add flights to Gibraltar from countries other than the UK in a boost to tourism. Officials say a hard border would have been introduced under the EU's incoming exit and entry control system if no deal was reached, causing delays for some 15,000 people who cross the border every day as every individual passport was checked. Talks on rules governing the border have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the previous Tory government left behind a situation that 'put Gibraltar's economy and way of life under threat'. He said the agreement was a 'breakthrough' after years of uncertainty. He said: 'Alongside the government of Gibraltar, we have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again. 'I thank the chief minister and his government for their tireless dedication throughout the negotiations. The UK's commitment to Gibraltar remains as solid as The Rock itself.' Spanish foreign minister Jose Albares said the deal marked 'a new beginning' in the relationship between the UK and Spain. He said that Spain 'will guarantee free movement of people and goods', adding that Gibraltar would now be linked to the Schengen Area with Spanish authorities controlling entry and exit. I have always said nothing about Gibraltar, without Gibraltar. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 11, 2025 President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the deal. In a post on X, she said: 'It safeguards the integrity of Schengen and the single market, while ensuring stability, legal certainty and prosperity for the region.' Gibraltar's chief minister Fabian Picardo said the deal would 'protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty'. 'Now is the time to look beyond the arguments of the past and towards a time of renewed co-operation and understanding. Now the deal is done, it's time to finalise the treaty,' he said. On Wednesday evening, Sir Keir Starmer spoke with Mr Picardo and thanked him for 'his years of hard work, commitment, and leadership to reach an agreement'. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez also had a phone call with Sir Keir, and congratulated the British PM because 'his Government had succeeded where others had failed'. The Conservatives have said they will carefully review the UK's agreement with the EU on Gibraltar's border to see if it crosses any 'red lines' the party set out during its own negotiations when in government. Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'Gibraltar is British, and given Labour's record of surrendering our territory and paying for the privilege, we will be reviewing carefully all the details of any agreement that is reached.' Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning. Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory. The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move.
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
UK agrees to check-free land border for Gibraltar but EU controls for flyers
The UK has reached a deal with the EU over Gibraltar's border with Spain that will allow travellers to cross by land without checks. The agreement on a 'fluid border' clears the way to finalise a post-Brexit deal on the territory with the EU. But those flying into Gibraltar from the UK will face one check from Gibraltarian officials and another by the Spanish on behalf of the EU. An agreement for the future relationship between the EU and the UK in relation to Gibraltar is now a reality. It is a historic agreement. — Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025 This is because the land border will allow those arriving by air access to the European Schengen free travel area unchecked once they are in Gibraltar. The UK and Gibraltar insisted the changes would not affect the British overseas territory's sovereignty. The airport will operate under a model similar to London's St Pancras station, where passengers pass through both UK and French passport checks to board international trains. Goods and customs checks will also eventually be removed in both directions under the agreement. The move could also see airlines start to add flights to Gibraltar from countries other than the UK in a boost to tourism. Officials say a hard border would have been introduced under the EU's incoming exit and entry control system if no deal was reached, causing delays for some 15,000 people who cross the border every day as every individual passport was checked. Talks on rules governing the border have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the previous Tory government left behind a situation that 'put Gibraltar's economy and way of life under threat'. He said the agreement was a 'breakthrough' after years of uncertainty. He said: 'Alongside the government of Gibraltar, we have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again. 'I thank the chief minister and his government for their tireless dedication throughout the negotiations. The UK's commitment to Gibraltar remains as solid as The Rock itself.' Spanish foreign minister Jose Albares said the deal marked 'a new beginning' in the relationship between the UK and Spain. He said that Spain 'will guarantee free movement of people and goods', adding that Gibraltar would now be linked to the Schengen Area with Spanish authorities controlling entry and exit. I have always said nothing about Gibraltar, without Gibraltar. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 11, 2025 President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen welcomed the deal. In a post on X, she said: 'It safeguards the integrity of Schengen and the single market, while ensuring stability, legal certainty and prosperity for the region.' Gibraltar's chief minister Fabian Picardo said the deal would 'protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty'. 'Now is the time to look beyond the arguments of the past and towards a time of renewed co-operation and understanding. Now the deal is done, it's time to finalise the treaty,' he said. The Conservatives have said they will carefully review the UK's agreement with the EU on Gibraltar's border to see if it crosses any 'red lines' the party set out during its own negotiations when in government. Shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said: 'Gibraltar is British, and given Labour's record of surrendering our territory and paying for the privilege, we will be reviewing carefully all the details of any agreement that is reached.' Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning. Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory. The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Spending review: will Rachel Reeves's huge fiscal gamble yield electoral dividends?
Rachel Reeves has gambled billions of pounds of infrastructure spending on 'renewing Britain' ahead of the next election but faces a battle to convince voters that Labour can deliver change amid deep cuts to everyday spending. The chancellor admitted that 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the change they voted for when Labour was swept to power with a huge majority last year. With many Labour MPs already feeling unsettled about the electoral threat of Reform UK, she has already launched a charm offensive to persuade them that her spending review on Wednesday was not a return to austerity. Economists warned that mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel payments for pensioners and Labour MPs' backlash against disability benefit cuts, meant that Reeves could be forced to raise taxes or look for more savings in the autumn. There could also be other tax increases ahead, with the Treasury's calculations being based on assumptions that local authorities will put up council tax by the maximum 4.99% a year for three years to fund services, including adult social care. Writing in the Guardian , Keir Starmer said that departmental budgets, which will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, showed the government had 'entered a new stage' in its efforts to transform the country. 'It is an investment in Britain's renewal, so working people have more money in their pocket, more pride in their community and more hope for their children's future,' he added. The NHS and defence were the big winners of the spending review, with 90% of the increase in the day-to-day budget over the next three years going to health and 80% of the boost in capital spending going to defence, according to the Resolution Foundation. However, it means that other Whitehall departments, including the Home Office, Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, and the departments of culture, transport and environment all face real terms cuts to their everyday budgets, as well as the Foreign Office, mainly as a result of aid cuts. Ministers have been chastened by polls which suggest that Labour's decision to increase spending overall at the autumn budget has not yet filtered through to voters, after a bumpy first year in power and contentious decisions over welfare cuts and a national insurance for employers. A growing clamour for change has been reflected in a surge in support for Reform UK. In her statement to MPs, Reeves reminded them that Nigel Farage, the party's leader, had described Liz Truss's disastrous mini budget as 'the best Conservative budget since the 1980s'. She added that Reform UK was now 'itching to do the same thing all over again' and had already racked up £80bn in unfunded spending commitments since the last election. 'They are simply not serious,' she said. In what will be interpreted as a response to a threat from the right, the chancellor made a high-stakes promise to cut spending on asylum hotels by the end of the parliament, which she said would save £1bn. There was also £280m more a year for the new Border Security Command. But the Home Office will receive a budget cut which will extend beyond the asylum savings, causing alarm from police officers and the London mayor Sadiq Khan. The government also set out its own version of Elon Musk's 'Doge' efficiency pledges, suggesting they would make cuts of £14bn to through operational improvements, digital transformation, cutting consultants and AI. Despite free school meals being expanded to at least 500,000 more pupils, lifting 100,000 out of poverty, schools budgets will be squeezed. Teachers will get a 4% pay rise next year, with additional funding of £615m. But schools will still have to fund about a quarter of it themselves. The spending review marked the culmination of months of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet colleagues, with negotiations with home secretary Yvette Cooper going down to the wire. In the days running up to the announcement, ministers announced £15bn for transport outside London, £14.2bn to build a new nuclear power station and an almost doubling of government spending – nearly £40bn – on affordable housing over the next 10 years. After months of speculation over the government's commitment to the net zero agenda, Reeves confirmed that ministers would not cut Labour's landmark £13.2bn fund to fix draughty homes. Reeves drew a comparison with the 2.9% cut in the austerity years under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition – a retort to her critics who have accused her of a return to austerity. 'Austerity was a destructive choice for the fabric of our society, and it was a destructive choice for our economy too, choking off investment and demand,' she said. 'Creating a lost decade for growth, wages and living standards that is their legacy. My choices are different. My choices are Labour choices.' Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) hailed the 'genuinely big sums,' the chancellor has set aside for investment projects; but warned that some departments' day-to-day spending plans look tight. 'The funding increases for health and defence are substantial. The corollary, of course, is a less generous settlement elsewhere,' he said. Reeves changed her fiscal rules in last autumn's budget to pave the way for a £113bn uplift in investment spending, and Wednesday's statement set out details of where this funding will be allocated – much of it aimed outside London and the South East. Beneficiaries include green energy, social housing and transport. The Treasury hopes such projects will create jobs, including in deprived areas, and help to make the UK's sluggish economy more productive and kickstart growth. As well as changing Treasury rules to support investment in England's regions, the spending review would provide £52bn for Scotland, £20bn for Northern Ireland and £23bn for Wales. 'We are renewing Britain. But I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it,' Reeves said. 'My task as chancellor and the purpose of this spending review is to change that. To ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs, and on their high streets.' With the chancellor insisting she would stick to her 'fiscal rules' – including meeting day-to-day spending through tax receipts – experts warned that any economic shock could push her plans off course. Andrew Goodwin, chief economist at consultancy Oxford Economics, said, 'considering the government's recent U-turn on winter fuel payments could be a precursor to higher government spending in other areas, it looks increasingly likely that substantial tax increases will be needed'. Ruth Curtice, director of the Resolution Foundation, said, 'after a summer of spending, the budget this autumn will be far more challenging. The economic outlook is looking weaker – not stronger – since the spring, and that will require more tax rises or welfare cuts for the chancellor to meet her fiscal rules'. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said 'this is the spend-now, tax-later review' adding that Reeves 'knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes and a cruel summer of speculation awaits'.
