Viral Beauty Routines Are Damaging Tween and Teen Skin, Study Warns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
"Get ready with me" videos are overflowing on TikTok, drawing millions to watch influencers and the like walk through their skincare routines.
But lately, a new wave of content creators is entering the frame: middle schoolers or even children as young as seven layering serums, eye creams and exfoliants onto already delicate, youthful skin.
Now, new research has confirmed these types of videos can put teens at risk of lifelong skin allergy.
Young teenager recording 'Get Ready With Me' beauty blog from cozy bedroom applying clay facial mask.
Young teenager recording 'Get Ready With Me' beauty blog from cozy bedroom applying clay facial mask.
Mariia Vitkovska
The new peer-reviewed study from Northwestern Medicine, published today on June 9 in Pediatrics, is raising red flags about the popular trend of teen skincare routines shared on social media.
The study is the first of its kind to examine the dermatological and psychological risks tied to these viral beauty regimens.
Authors found girls between the ages of seven and 18 are applying an average of six different skincare products daily, with some layering more than a dozen.
"It's problematic to show girls devoting this much time and attention to their skin," said corresponding author Dr. Molly Hales, a postdoctoral research fellow and board-certified dermatologist in the department of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
The financial cost is also concerning. The average teen skincare routine costs $168 a month, according to the study, with some reaching upward of $500.
Despite the hype, the routines often neglect the basics: only 26 percent of daytime regimens included sunscreen—a critical oversight, especially for developing skin.
Yet it's not just money being wasted. The study found that the top-viewed skincare videos featured an average of 11 potentially irritating active ingredients.
This cocktail of acids, retinoids and fragrances increases the risk of allergic contact dermatitis—a lifelong skin allergy that can permanently restrict a person's use of certain soaps, shampoos and cosmetics.
"That high risk of irritation came from both using multiple active ingredients at the same time, such as hydroxy acids, as well as applying the same active ingredient unknowingly over and over again when that active ingredient was found in three, four, five different products," Hales said.
In one analyzed video, a content creator applied 10 separate products in just six minutes. By the end of the clip, her face was visibly red and irritated.
"As she's applying the products, she begins to express discomfort and burning, and in the final few minutes, she develops a visible skin reaction," said senior author Dr. Tara Lagu, adjunct lecturer of medicine and medical social sciences at Feinberg and a former Northwestern Medicine hospitalist.
The researchers also observed an unsettling pattern in the aesthetics and messaging of these viral videos.
"We saw that there was preferential, encoded racial language in some cases that really emphasized lighter, brighter skin," Lagu said. "I think there also were real associations between use of these regimens and consumerism."
The videos tend to offer little to no health benefit for the children watching them, researchers concluded. Yet they're virtually impossible for parents or pediatricians to monitor, thanks to the untrusted algorithms that power TikTok's "For You" page.
"We're setting a very high standard for these girls," Hales said. "The pursuit of health has become a kind of virtue in our society, but the ideal of 'health' is also very wrapped up in ideals of beauty, thinness and whiteness. The insidious thing about 'skin care' is that it claims to be about health."
Funding for the study was provided by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (grant number 5T32AR060710-11). Other Northwestern authors include Drs Amy Paller and Walter Liszewski, and medical student Sarah Rigali.
Newsweek reached out to TikTok via email on 06/06/2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Where People Are Being Removed From Health Care Plan
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly every U.S. state has seen a drop in Medicaid enrollment since the spring of 2023, when COVID-era health care provisions were first rolled back. Only North Carolina has seen an increase in enrollment between March 2023 and January 2025, while South Dakota's Medicaid enrollment levels on average have remained the same. Why It Matters After federal health care provisions were expanded during the COVID pandemic, Medicaid enrollees have since been continuously pushed off the program as part of the "unwinding" process to roll back pandemic-era provisions. During the three years of the pandemic, states paused Medicaid disenrollment, but after March 2023, they each re-started the process of overseeing and reviewing enrollees' eligibility for the program, meaning many have lost their health care coverage. This could be due to a change in income but also because of paperwork errors, missed deadlines, or outdated contact information. Health experts have warned about the impact the unwinding process can have on America's most vulnerable populations, such as worsening health outcomes, increasing costs in emergency care and many other issues. What To Know States' decline in Medicaid enrollment between March 2023 and January 2025 has been happening at varying rates. Montana was the state with the sharpest drop, with Medicaid enrollment shrinking by 37 percent between March 2023 and January 2025. Texas, Colorado and Utah were other states that saw Medicaid enrollment rates drop by more than 30 percent in the same time period. California and Oregon saw much less significant changes to Medicaid coverage - seeing drops of less than 10 percent each. While most states have seen a decrease in enrollment since the spring of 2023, overall, many have not yet had Medicaid enrollment rates return to pre-pandemic levels. The unwinding process has resulted in millions of Americans losing their Medicaid coverage across the country—a total of around 16 million between March 2023 and January 2025. What People Are Saying Paul Shafer, a professor in health law, policy and management at Boston University, told Newsweek: "Nearly all states had already completed their unwinding by the end of 2024 so continued declines are concerning, especially when accelerating relative to months prior. Data on the uninsured rate hasn't quite caught up, bouncing between 7.7 and 8.5 percent from mid-2023 to September 2024. ACA Marketplace enrollment was up nearly 3 million for 2025 versus 2024 so some of those losing Medicaid are finding other coverage, but we know that many likely aren't. However, these coverage losses are only the beginning if the Medicaid cuts proposed in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act are passed. We would expect to see 7 to 11 million more Americans lose Medicaid and more hospital closures, particularly in rural areas." He added: "Losing health insurance coverage can have both short and long-term impacts, from delayed care to not refilling prescriptions to later diagnoses of cancer and higher mortality rates—none of which we want to see. The underlying health needs won't go away and in fact will get worse if untreated, so we are risking a continued decline in life expectancy and further increasing the divide between have and have-nots when it comes to health. Safety net and rural hospitals also rely more on Medicaid payments than others, and if they close, everyone suffers, not just those on Medicaid." What Happens Next With new policies still being finalized and debated in Congress, changes to the Medicaid program and eligibility are expected to result in further disenrollment—with the Congressional Budget Office predicting more than 13 million Americans could lose their Medicaid coverage by 2034.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Three States Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Junk food purchases using SNAP benefits have been banned in three more states, taking the national total to six. Arkansas, Idaho and Utah have all had waivers approved that will ban unhealthy purchases from being made using Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced on Tuesday. They join three states who had their waiver requests approved in May: Indiana, Iowa and Nebraska. Why It Matters Across Arkansas, Idaho and Utah, about 540,000 people collect SNAP benefits to help them pay for groceries. Several other Republican states are considering limitations on what SNAP recipients can buy using their benefits as part of the Make America Healthy Again movement. What To Know A waiver grants flexibility by modifying specific USDA program rules, enabling states to administer the SNAP program in different ways. Various states currently have SNAP waivers in place, and they were widely implemented during the coronavirus pandemic to enhance access to food benefits. According to the USDA press release, each waiver will come into force in 2026. In Arkansas and Idaho, the ban covers soft drinks and candy purchases. In Utah, the ban is only for soft drinks. Stock image/file photo: A woman looks at shelves stocked with soft drinks in a grocery store. Stock image/file photo: A woman looks at shelves stocked with soft drinks in a grocery store. GETTY Governors have cited concerns over obesity and the pressure poor health puts on other taxpayer-funded programs like Medicaid. According to Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders, 23 percent of food stamps—$27 billion annually—spent by recipients goes toward soft drinks, unhealthy snacks, candy and desserts. Critics of the purchase limitations have said such policies are paternalistic and fail to address the fact that many low-income communities face disparities in accessing healthy, affordable food options. What People Are Saying Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said in a statement sent to Newsweek: "States have always been the greatest laboratories of democracy, and I am confident the best ideas will come from them. Whether demonstration pilots on allowable purchases, or newfound ways to connect work-capable adults to jobs, or even new ways to get food to communities, I will continue to encourage states to be bold and enact change." Idaho Governor Brad Little: "Idaho proudly welcomes the MAHA movement because it is all about looking for new ways to improve nutrition, increase exercise, and take better care of ourselves and one another, especially our children. We are excited to partner with the Trump administration in bringing common sense to the government's food assistance program with the approval of our SNAP waiver." Kavelle Christie, a health policy and advocacy expert, told Newsweek: "The issue isn't about individuals misusing their benefits, but their limited choices. In many rural areas and food deserts, convenience stores and fast-food chains are often the only available options. For many families, fresh produce and healthy meals are luxuries that are unattainable, not because they do not want these foods, but because they are unavailable or too expensive." Valerie Imbruce, director of the Center for Environment and Society at Washington College, previously told Newsweek: "Controlling how the poor eat is a paternalistic response to a problem that is not based in SNAP recipients' inability to make good decisions about healthy foods, it is a problem of the price differential in choosing healthy or junk foods. Soda and candy are much cheaper and more calorie dense than 100 percent fruit juices or prebiotic non-artificially sweetened carbonated beverages, thanks to price supports and subsidies by the federal government to support a U.S. sugar industry." What Happens Next Lawmakers in several other states—Arizona, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Texas, and West Virginia—are all considering making similar bans. Some have submitted waiver requests to the USDA while others are considering bills.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Nearly 700,000 Americans Lose Health Care Coverage in 2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Almost 700,000 Americans lost Medicaid coverage in one month at the start of this year, according to new enrollment data compiled by KFF. The significant drop in Medicaid enrollment in January from December 2024 is part of a long-term trend amid the continuation of the federal program's "unwinding" process, which began after pandemic-era protections ended. Enrollment was still higher in January than it was in February 2020. Why It Matters The data highlights the continued ripple effects of the Medicaid policy shift, with millions more likely to be affected in the months ahead—particularly low-income families, children, and older adults who rely on Medicaid for basic care access. Health care experts and advocates warn that the unwinding process is opening large gaps in the U.S. health care system, with many falling through the cracks due to administrative barriers or lack of communication, not because they no longer qualify. File photo: people block a street during a protest over proposed cuts to Medicaid funding. File photo: people block a street during a protest over proposed cuts to Medicaid funding. Rick Bowmer/AP What to Know Data collected by KFF shows that from December 2024 to January 2025, Medicaid enrollment dropped by 669,938, bringing the total number of Americans enrolled in Medicaid to around 71.2 million. While this number remains high, it reflects a steady monthly decline that began in 2023 when states resumed redeterminations, where they checked whether enrollees were still eligible for benefits. The process had been paused during the COVID-19 public health emergency alongside an expansion to the federal protection available for vulnerable Americans with limited income and resources. When those protections were lifted following the pandemic, millions faced the risk of being disenrolled—not just due to income changes, but because of paperwork errors, missed deadlines, or outdated contact information. According to KFF's data, more than 16 million people have been disenrolled from Medicaid since the unwinding began in the spring of 2023. An April 2024 survey by KFF of 1,227 U.S. adults who had Medicaid coverage in prior to April 1, 2023, found that 28 percent of former enrolees found other forms of health coverage, while 47 percent were eventually re-enrolled to Medicaid. Around a quarter of enrolees reported as remaining uninsured. States like Montana, Tennessee and Colorado have seen some of the largest decreases in enrollment, with levels in January 2025 dropping below pre-pandemic levels. What People Are Saying William Schpero, assistant professor of population health sciences at Weill Cornell Medicine, told Newsweek: "This is evidence that we are likely still seeing the effects of the end of the continuous coverage provisions in place during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency that paused redeterminations of Medicaid eligibility. During the 'unwinding' of continuous coverage through September 2024, close to 70 percent of those who lost coverage were disenrolled for purely procedural reasons—for example, they missed a required renewal form because of a change in address. Many of these people likely remained eligible for Medicaid." He added: "It would be particularly concerning if procedural terminations continue to underlie the latest reported decreases in Medicaid enrollment. It suggests that states can be doing more to prevent avoidable losses of coverage. Research has estimated that a large portion of individuals who have lost Medicaid in recent months have become uninsured or experienced gaps in coverage. We have consistent evidence that loss of Medicaid coverage interrupts access to care — without coverage, people forgo visiting the doctor or taking their prescribed medications due to cost. Ultimately this will hurt health outcomes." Kathleen Adams, professor of health policy and management at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health, Georgia, told Newsweek: "We are always concerned with the loss of insurance coverage, especially among the lower income and vulnerable groups traditionally served by Medicaid. If these individuals are not able to find a source of other coverage such as Employer Sponsored Insurance (ESI) or through the subsidized exchanges, they will have lower access to needed health care, face higher costs if they obtain care and could impose costs on the health care system as they are forced to seek care in ERs or other publicly subsidized sources of care." She added: "The unwinding has taken place over a year and as the report notes, Medicaid enrollment is still higher now than in the pre-pandemic period. It is also important to note the differences seen across states. Some states that had not expanded Medicaid under the ACA did so recently and many of them show the largest increases in enrollment from their pre-pandemic levels. Currently, the concerns with Medicaid enrollment are with the administration's proposed changes to Medicaid eligibility which some states are already seeking to implement." What's Next Unless policies change, experts project that millions more Americans may lose health coverage through 2025, not just due to changes in eligibility requirements, but also because of bureaucratic hurdles.
