Grand Forks Herald wins four special awards at North Dakota Newspaper Association event
The results were announced Friday evening at the NDNA's annual convention, this year held at the Avalon in Fargo. The convention capped an eventful spring for Herald staff members, many of whom were entered in other contests as well.
The Herald took first for public notice journalism, First Amendment reporting and community service, as well as the General Excellence Award, determined by judging news, sports and feature coverage, editing, opinion pages, advertising, photography, design and "overall product," according to the contest guidelines.
The Herald's "focus on community was evident throughout the pages," wrote the General Excellence judge, representing the West Virginia Newspaper Association.
The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead won the Sweepstakes Award, given to the newspaper that accumulates the most award points throughout the day, while former Herald intern Maeve Hushman, a UND graduate, won the NDNA's Rookie of the Year Award. She won the award while writing for the Bismarck Tribune.
Also, Herald reporter Sav Kelly finished second in a new special category that focused on investigative journalism. Her entry included continued coverage of a shooting death in rural East Grand Forks.
The Community Service Award was given to the Herald team of Kelly, Matthew Voigt and Korrie Wenzel for the newspaper's coverage of a deadly traffic crash on Highway 2 west of town, and continued coverage about the safety of that intersection. It also included a number of letters to the editor that the Herald encouraged readers to submit, providing their opinions on what should be done about the intersection.
The Public Notice Journalism Award went to the team of Joshua Irvine and Wenzel, while the First Amendment Reporting Award went to the team of Delaney Otto, Kelly and Wenzel.
In addition to the NDNA special awards, Herald staff members and teams earned 18 first-place awards and finished with 55 awards overall. The individual awards were handed out during lunch-time ceremonies, while the major awards were announced during a banquet-style event at the end of the day.
"Well, this has been quite a day," said Wenzel, the Herald's publisher. "I thought we did very well in the afternoon for the individual awards, but then to see this kind of success at the end of the day — and in the really coveted categories — was very special."
Eric Hylden won three first-place awards in photography, while other individual first-place winners included Chuck Haga (serious column), Abby Sharpe (sports feature), Brad Schlossman (sports series), Irvine (spot news) and Wenzel (government reporting).
The Herald's advertising department earned 16 awards, including seven first-place finishes and nine seconds. All of the advertising awards were team efforts and thus generally attributed to "staff."
Also in recent weeks, the Herald also won sports-related awards in contests sponsored by two other associations.
In late April, Hylden won first place nationally in the Associated Press Sports Editors Association Division D for a feature photo he took at Kings Walk Golf Course. Also, Schlossman earned three Top 10 awards, finishing second in both explanatory writing and for his beat coverage of the UND hockey team. He also finished in the Top 10 in column writing.
Sharpe placed fifth nationally in two APSE categories, including breaking news coverage and feature reporting.
Herald Sports Editor Tom Miller was named the 2024 North Dakota Associated Press Sportscasters and Sportswriters Association Sportswriter of the Year. Miller received the honor for the third time in the last seven years.
And on May 9, Pamela Knudson, a features reporter for the Herald, had seven first-place finishes, eight second-place finishes, a third-place finish and an honorable mention
at the North Dakota Professional Communicators spring conference and awards ceremony
.
Following are the Herald's individual news awards from the NDNA contest, announced Friday in Fargo:
General Excellence: First place.
Public notice journalism: First place, team of Joshua Irvine and Korrie Wenzel.
First Amendment reporting: First place, team of Sav Kelly, Delaney Otto and Korrie Wenzel.
Community service: First place, Herald staff.
Investigative journalism: Second place, Sav Kelly.
News reporting: Sav Kelly, third place; Joshua Irvine, honorable mention.
News series: Sav Kelly, second place.
Feature reporting: Herald staff, honorable mention.
Feature series: Delaney Otto, third place; Herald staff, honorable mention.
Government reporting: Korrie Wenzel, first place; Sav Kelly, honorable mention.
Government reporting series: Delaney Otto, honorable mention.
Spot news: Joshua Irvine, first place; Delaney Otto, honorable mention.
Sports section: Grand Forks Herald sports staff, first place.
Sports reporting: Brad Schlossman, third place.
Sports series: Brad Schlossman, first place; Tom Miller/Abby Sharpe, second place.
Sports feature: Abby Sharpe, first place.
Sports column: Brad Schlossman, third place.
Editorial writing: Korrie Wenzel, third place.
Editorial page: Korrie Wenzel, third place.
Ag coverage: Sav Kelly, honorable mention.
Column, serious: Chuck Haga, first place; Brad Dokken, second place; honorable mention, Korrie Wenzel.
Column, humorous: Chuck Haga, second place.
Special section: Brad Schlossman, second place.
Best headline: Hannah Shirley, third place; Joshua Irvine, honorable mention.
Info graphic: Matthew Voigt, third place.
Best website: Herald staff, third place.
Online coverage: Sav Kelly, third place.
Overall design: Herald, first place.
News photo: Eric Hylden, third place.
Spot news photo: Eric Hylden, third place.
Feature photo: Korrie Wenzel, honorable mention.
Sports photo: Eric Hylden, second place.
Picture story: Eric Hylden, first place.
Portrait photo: Eric Hylden, first place.
Outdoor recreation photo: Eric Hylden, first place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
15 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Why 17-year-olds are exempt from new Indy youth curfew passed after mass shooting
Indianapolis officials have made the youth curfew two hours earlier for all children younger than 17 for at least the rest of this year. About a month after a July 5 mass shooting left two teenagers dead, the Indianapolis City-County Council voted Aug. 11 to make the youth curfew stricter effective immediately. An initial proposal that included 17-year-olds was amended at the last minute by Democratic councilors who felt that older teens should be granted more independence. The new rules mean that children ages 15 and 16 won't be allowed in public unsupervised past 11 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and past 9 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays. Children under 15 will face a 9 p.m. curfew every day. The city's emergency curfew will remain in place for 120 days, which means the council must decide in early December whether to extend or relax the policy. Teens who are 17 will still be subject to the state curfew of 1 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and 11 p.m. on Sundays through Thursdays. The 25-person council's Democratic majority passed the amendment that excluded 17-year-olds from the new curfew despite the opposition of all six Republican councilors. "The sun doesn't even go down in the summer until near 10 p.m., and I don't think we're putting ourselves in a good position pushing 17-year-olds to break curfew at 10-10:30 p.m.," said Councilor Jared Evans, who introduced the amendment at Monday's council meeting. Republicans like Councilor Joshua Bain said that excluding 17-year-olds from the new policy weakens the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's efforts to keep people safe. "It is not the goal of IMPD to go around arresting every 17-year-old that's out at night," Bain said. "This is a targeted way for them to get in between a 17-year-old that's about to make a really bad decision and possibly ruin the rest of their life." The ordinance doesn't create a criminal offense for children who break curfew, but it does grant police the authority to detain them. The policy carves out several exceptions for kids who are returning home from work, a school activity, a religious event or activities protected by the First Amendment such as political protests, among others. IMPD Chief Christopher Bailey said he was unbothered by the change exempting 17-year-olds from a stricter curfew. (He mentioned in jest that his daughter, who is nearly 17 and has been criticizing her father at home over the new curfew, would be "very pleased.") "My direction to the officers is not some sweep of everyone that's out," Bailey said. "It's really behavioral-based." Democratic Councilor Dan Boots spoke bluntly in support of more leniency for 17-year-olds. "Seventeen-year-olds are rising seniors in high school, a step away from being able to vote and be drafted and killed for our country," Boots said. "I think they have a right to stay out past 9 to go to a movie and come back." Republican Councilor Michael-Paul Hart, who also voted against the last-minute change, introduced a new proposal Monday night that would fine parents whose children violate curfew. State law allows the city to impose thousands of dollars in fines, according to city attorney Brandon Beeler, but it's unclear how harshly violators would be prosecuted. Hart's proposal would give parents one written warning for a first violation, followed by a $500 fine for a second time and a $1,500 fine for each subsequent occurrence. Councilors will consider the proposal in committee later this month before a likely vote in September. The harsher curfew change comes after hundreds of unsupervised teens lingered downtown in the hours following the Fourth of July fireworks show, culminating in a mass shooting after midnight that killed Xavion Jackson, 16, and Azareaon S. Cole, 15. Two other teens and three adults were also injured. Four teenagers ranging from 13 to 17 years old have been charged in connection with the shooting for illegally carrying guns.
Miami Herald
19 hours ago
- Miami Herald
As Trump targets cities post-D.C. takeover, he's only looking for ‘blue' crime
President Donald Trump's take-over of the Washington, D.C., police and the deployment of the National Guard there are political power moves that he made clear on Monday he will not hesitate to use on other cities. Let's be clear — probably on other democratic-leaning cities. Because Trump doesn't see plain old crime; he sees blue crime, only. Part of this excessive action is Trump needing to generate a distraction, to turn the focus away from his negative approval ratings, voters' dissatisfaction with his handling of the economy, his political base's rebellion over the Jeffrey Epstein case, stubborn inflation and unpopular cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. What's better than scaring Americans about rampant crime one moment, then purportedly solving it the next? Certainly, crime has long been an issue in D.C., and the city, in response to large street brawls, has even instituted a teenage curfew. There's no excuse for the horrendous recent beating of a former federal staffer in an attempted carjacking (two 15-year-old suspects have been arrested in connection with it). But crime rates in D.C., as in most of the U.S., have been trending down since the pandemic, including for violent crimes, which have reached their lowest point in 30 years, the Miami Herald reported. The crime situation in the nation's capital looks complex, not easily explainable by Trump's hyperbole and fearmongering. While saying the city is suffering from 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump hasn't presented any evidence that federal intervention is needed. And he won't do that the next time he sends the National Guard to another blue city. 'We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C.,' Trump said at a Monday press conference at the White House. Trump didn't offer any metrics on what will prompt him to intervene in another city's policing, the Herald reported. But he suggested what his political calculations will be. On Monday, he focused his ire on blue bastions that didn't vote for him — New York, Los Angeles, Baltimore, Oakland and Chicago — while ignoring the crime rate in red cities like St. Louis and New Orleans. Perhaps luckily for South Florida, our largest law-enforcement agency, the Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office, is run by a Republican endorsed by Trump, and the county has done well managing crime. But who's to say Trump, egged on by Gov. Ron DeSantis, could not find a reason to intervene in some of the region's Democratic areas, such as Broward County? Trump's point isn't to lend a hand to a local police department to address crime. If it were, he would look for cooperation with local law enforcement, which the D.C. police chief said Monday is nothing new. This move furthers Trump's narrative that everything is terrible, crime is awful and he's the only one who can save us. It tramples on home rule, and it keeps making the federal government bigger, not smaller, the opposite of what Republicans and DOGE claim to be doing, with power more concentrated in his hands. Trump knows that looking tough on crime is good for his brand and bad for Democrats still trying to find their messaging strategy ahead of the 2026 midterms. By constantly shifting the narrative and creating a new controversy almost daily, Trump forces his opponents to keep up. But they would be fools to take the bait each time. A large section of the American public, meanwhile, feels overwhelmed with the barrage of presidential actions coming from the White House, many choosing to disengage from the political process. All they probably hear are the sound bites and social media headlines that Trump is saving the nation's capital from 'thugs.' And that's exactly what Trump probably wants: not to properly solve issues, but to show Americans he's the new sheriff in town.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defense lawyer argues arrest of accused teen drug dealer was built on flimsy search warrant
PALMER — A lawyer for a Hampden teen accused of dealing drugs from his home and in the parking lot of Minnechaug Regional High School is challenging the search warrants local police filed and led to an arrest. Nicholas Shea, formerly of Wilbraham, was 18 when he was arrested at school and charged with 22 criminal counts related to drug sales and firearms in January. Wilbraham police charged Shea with possession of a Class B substance (Oxycodone and Adderall), possession of a Class C substance (Psilocybin mushrooms), and possession of a Class E substance (Xanax). He also faces charges of possession of a Class B substance (cocaine and crack cocaine), and possession of illegal firearms. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges and was released on house arrest. He was arrested early on a Friday morning as school was set to begin. Police executed two separate search warrants for his car and his home on Raymond Drive. Defense attorney Daniel D. Kelly on Friday argued to a judge in Palmer District Court the evidence gleaned from the searches should be tossed since the applications for the search warrants were flimsy, built on speculation and conjecture. For one, the applications cited carrying a backpack as a matter of suspicion. 'We know that drug dealers often utilize backpacks,' Kelly said, quoting one application. 'People who also use backpacks are students going to school. Every single person of this age walking to Minnechaug High School were using backpacks,' Kelly told Judge Michael Mulcahy. He also pointed out that one of the key things that led police to pursue an investigation was an anonymous letter from a 'concerned citizen,' who told investigators there was a fair amount of traffic going to and from Shea's home. 'The letter was not tested for basis on knowledge or veracity,' Kelly argued. Police said that during physical surveillance at Shea's home, they spotted him coming out carrying a bag of 'brick-like' substances and stash it in his trunk. They also said students had met Shea at school, and jumped in his car briefly before jumping back out again. Kelly countered that the police had not conducted any 'controlled buys' of narcotics using their own operatives. Assistant Hampden District Attorney Andrew Gilbert argued the defense's motion to suppress evidence should be denied. Mulcahy took the matter under advisement. However, the judge granted a motion to relax the conditions of Shea's pretrial release — namely, the house arrest. Mulcahy eased the 'round the clock curfew to 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. This led to a mini-celebration by Shea in the parking lot after the hearing. 'Free at last!' he said while throwing his arms out before climbing into his Mercedes. 'I love you, but you need to be home by 8,' his mother responded. More Western Mass. Content As Mary Lane demolition begins, Ware group fights for health care at that site, local control of trust funds Holyoke Chamber seeks criminal investigation of former executive director Reputed gangster Ralph Santaniello back in court over road rage incident Government should be partner with private business, not patsy to it | Paul Chiampa Why I treasure the Pledge of Allegiance that made me an American (Viewpoint) Read the original article on MassLive.
