LGBTQ+ visibility sparks debate at Waterloo school board meeting
WATERLOO, N.Y. (WROC) — In Waterloo, there has been recent discussion on social media surrounding LGBTQ+ visibility in the school district. Wednesday, these folks brought the conversation to the school board.
From what News 8 has seen online, there are a couple different perspectives on LGBTQ+ visibility inside Waterloo schools.
Those in support of students and faculty talking about the topic — and others saying these discussions should not be happening in schools whatsoever.
It was a full house Wednesday night at the Waterloo Board of Education meeting.
Almost half of those in attendance, holding signs or wearing shirts, advocating for the visibility and support of transgender students and faculty.
Many came from outside the community to be at this meeting, including Rocco Vallerand, who is the founder of the support alliance for fairness and equality for transgender youth, or S.A.F.E.T.Y.
'There are children out there that the only safe space they have is at school. Their home life isn't that great, and if they see some of this stuff going on at school, where do they go? Where are they feeling safe?,' Vallerand said.
Folks including Vallerand chose to attend the meeting following a string of comments made by members of the Waterloo community on a Facebook post, discussing LGBTQ+ visibility among staff members in their schools.
There were residents who commented on the post in opposition of LGBTQ+ discussion within the district. However, these folks did not speak during public comment at Wednesday's board meeting.
However, residents supporting these discussions including Nikki Slater chose to voice their perspective to the board.
'All are valued refers to all students and all staff. It's not just the ones that look like us, that sound like us, who think like us and have the same beliefs as we it's all students and all staff,' Slater said.
Waterloo Superintendent of Schools Sarah Cupelli acknowledged the online discussion following public comment. Superintendent Cupelli provided a statement which is currently the first thing to appear on your screen when visiting the district's website.
'Recognizing that misinformation unfortunately often spreads on social media, the Board of Education and I, Superintendent of Schools, wish to clarify that the district is an equal opportunity employer. The district has not and will not terminate or discipline any employee or individual due to protected viewpoint, affiliation or status,' Superintendent Cupelli said.
Recognizing that misinformation unfortunately often spreads on social media, the Board of Education and I, Superintendent of Schools, wish to clarify that the District is an equal opportunity employer. The District has not and will not terminate or discipline any employee or individual due to protected viewpoint, affiliation or status. While the District is unable to share specific details related to any personnel matter, all decisions related to termination and discipline are based solely on legitimate business reasons, such as serious violations of Board of Education Policies and/or the District's Code of Conduct and/or neglect of duty. The District reserves all rights and will defend itself against defamatory statements and false claims.
Sarah CupelliSuperintendent of Schools
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Land grab conspiracies spread alongside Canadian wildfires
"This isn't just wildfire policy -- it's a global land control strategy operating through 'sustainability' language," a June 1, 2025 Facebook post claims. The text claims the "Rio Law" is a global framework established to encourage sustainability that can be used to reclassify land in Canada for resource extraction and forbid residents from returning home after they are evacuated due to wildfires. The text spread across Facebook, Instagram and X partly echoing debunked theories about Agenda 21 and moves to push fire-displaced residents into "smart cities" where they will be subjected to strict technology surveillance or face restriction of movement. Simultaneously, users on Facebook and TikTok made additional claims about land grabs precipitated by wildfire evacuations invoking either controversy over Ontario province's Bill 5 or images of a possible pipeline route, which would supposedly cross Manitoba to reach Hudson's Bay. Conditions are primed for another massive wildfire season in Canada, as the over 3.6 million hectares (13.8 thousand square miles) of area burned so far in 2025 has already surpassed the year-to-date average for the past decade (archived here). More than 30,000 people have evacuated their homes in western Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba provinces, including remote Indigenous communities fleeing south. But as of June 12, some 7,000 evacuees in Saskatchewan province began returning home. Media report people will also soon be allowed to go back to communities Manitoba, but many areas remain under evacuation orders there and in neighboring Ontario. The fires hit as trade tensions with the United States have triggered the new federal government to open discussions about access to Canadian natural gas and coveted minerals. But the potential projects, including pipelines, raise concerns of environmental impact and Indigenous consent. Nevertheless, experts told AFP it was highly improbable for a wildfire to be used to intentionally target specific areas for resource exploitation. Mike Flannigan a professor of wildland fire at Thompson Rivers University (archived here) said a wildfire is defined by three factors: how it starts, what it can burn through, and the weather conditions around it. Many fires are started -- mostly unintentionally -- by humans, he said, but fuel and weather play too large of a role in where flames spread, making it nearly impossible to start a wildfire that could successfully target a premeditated location. Flannigan also pointed out that climate change creates conditions that suck up moisture from vegetation and generate stronger wind, a mix conducive to more unwieldy fires. "The drier the fuel, the easier it is for a fire to start," he told AFP on June 5. Wildland firefighters use burning techniques to impede the path of smaller and less intense fires and keep them away from populated areas (archived here), but Flannigan said once the blazes reach the tops of the trees -- also known as a crown fire (archived here) -- response becomes limited. "There's only two options then: one is evacuate, get out of the way until the weather changes or the fuels change, or do a burnout operation, which is where you get in front, where the wildfire is spreading, start a new fire that's fighting against it," he said. Hossein Bonakdari, an associate professor of civil engineering at the University of Ottawa (archived here), analyzed indicators such as leaf coverage and winter snow area to predict the probability of wildfire in certain parts of Canada. Even with these prediction tools, Bonakdari noted, a plethora of minute variables dictating a wildfire's spread exist, making it impossible to foresee whether it could reach a certain location. "I need a dataset of today to do the prediction for tomorrow," he said on June 6. While the claim that wildfires could be used to clear certain areas for resource extraction may be unsubstantiated, concerns about infringement on Indigenous treaty rights in relation to Ontario's Bill 5 exist (archived here). The legislation gives the province authority to declare "special economic zones" (archived here), overriding local laws for resource projects in a move that Indigenous leaders say will conflict with the government's treaty obligations. Ontario Premier Doug Ford plans, for example, on extracting minerals from the Ring of Fire deposit in the north of the province. Other Canadian premiers also recently floated the idea of a pipeline through Manitoba to end in Hudson's Bay, similar to what has been referenced in some land grab claims online. Using reverse image search, AFP traced the map in those posts to a 2023 blog proposing a path for pipelines (archived here). However, no formalized proposals for such a project could be found. The posts also misrepresent the 1992 Rio Declaration (archived here). The document produced at the United Nations' Earth Summit does not mention removing people from land. Rather, it lays out principles of protecting environmental and developmental systems, to which it says states should agree. AFP previously debunked claims about resident displacement to extract resources following hurricane evacuations. Read more of AFP's reporting on wildfire misinformation here.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Governor Morrisey puts the National Guard and West Virginia State Police on standby for planned protests in West Virginia
CHARLESTON, WV (WVNS) — Governor Morrisey put the National Guard and State Police on standby for planned protests in West Virginia. 'No Kings' protests scheduled across the nation and in West Virginia are in opposition to President Donald Trump's policies on immigration and ICE detainments and his scheduled military parade in Washington, D.C. for the Army's 250th birthday on June 14, which also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday. According to a post on Governor Patrick Morrisey's Facebook page, Governor Morrisey stated that the National Guard and the West Virginia State Police on standby due to planned political demonstrations in parts of the Mountain State on the weekend of June 14, 2025 and June 15, 2025. I support the constitutional right to free speech and assembly, but West Virginia will uphold law and order. We will not tolerate looting, destruction, vandalism, or any violence toward law enforcement. Governor Morrisey In the post, Governor Morrisey also stated that the National Guard and West Virginia State Police will be on standby to stop any of the protests from going from peaceful to violent. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Did Senator John Kennedy draw a comparison between ICE protests and Harvey Weinstein?
Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy appeared on Fox News with host Sean Hannity on Wednesday and drew comparisons between anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, California and disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein. On "Hannity," Kennedy discussed the protests in Los Angeles against the Trump administration's immigration policies and Governor Gavin Newsom's response to the riots. "I've listened to so many of my colleagues and members of the media say that these things are mostly peaceful protests," Kennedy stated. "That's like saying that that's saying that Harvey Weinstein is mostly a feminist because he didn't rape every woman came into his office. He only raped some of them." Los Angeles witnessed protests on June 6, reacting to immigration raids that occurred at workplaces, traffic stops, and routine legal check-ins. President Donald Trump sent 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles protests, followed up by a deployment of 700 U.S. Marines. California Governor Newsom censured Trump's decision to deploy troops to the state, criticizing it as an overreach of governmental power, unconstitutional, and a deliberate provocation. The state filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block Trump's deployment. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer is expected to hear Newsome's motion for a temporary restraining order that would limit the activities of the 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to protecting federal buildings in a small area of downtown Los Angeles where most of the protests have taken place. During Kennedy's segment on "Hannity," he stated that Newsom has flip-flopped on issues but has been consistent on his antipathy towards the lives and feelings of ordinary Americans, including public safety. "Governor Newsome is, his record shows this, he's the dictionary definition of weenie," Kennedy stated. "He thinks cops are a bigger problem than criminals. He thinks if a cop has to shoot a criminal, it's automatically and always a cop's fault. But if a criminal shoots a cop, it's automatically and always the gun's fault." "Here's a tip, cops don't leave you alone unless you do illegal stuff. That's what we're seeing in California." Follow Ian Robinson on Twitter @_irobinsonand on Facebook at This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Did Sen. John Kennedy compare protests against ICE to Harvey Weinstein?
