Soviet Union and South Africa: Allies in World War II
Roman Ambarov, Ambassador of Russia to South Africa.
Image: MFA of Russia
Russia's Ambassador Ambarov on the 80th anniversary of the victory that crushed Nazism, liberated Europe, and laid the foundations of the African national freedom movement
May 9, 2025 marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945, the most important and dramatic part of World War II, a triumph that came at an immense human cost and shaped the course of modern history.
These days, we are celebrating the decisive contribution of the Soviet Union to the victory over Hitler's Germany and the liberation of Europe from Nazism. Lest we forget that nearly 90% of all Nazi military casualties occurred on the Eastern Front, and it was the Red Army that stormed and single-handedly captured Berlin.
We are honouring not only a military victory, but also the extraordinary courage and sacrifice of the Soviet people who endured the deadliest conflict in human history. Nearly 27 million lives were lost in the Soviet Union alone – one in every seven citizens.
In contemporary Russia, it is almost impossible to find a family whose relatives did not go through ordeals of the war. Practically everyone has some kind of personal connection to that era of righteous struggle and sacrifice.
Even though my own grandfather did not serve on the front lines, he was one of the principal designers of the T-34, a legendary Soviet-made battle tank. His expertise and persistence enabled the creation of one of the most reliable and efficient combat vehicles of its time. Mass production and deployment of tens of thousands of T-34 tanks had literally turned the tide of the war.
As the world celebrates the 80th anniversary of the defeat of the Nazi Germany by the Red Army and its allies, I would like to seize this opportunity to recall another significant chapter of WWII history – South Africa's contribution to our common victory.
Lend-Lease transit, arctic convoys, and tea in Crimea
We will always remember that during World War II South Africa was our ally and an important member of the Anti-Hitler Coalition. South African waters were of strategic importance during the period when the supply route through the Dardanelles was closed. Cape Town, for example, played a crucial role in the Lend-Lease freight, being a principal port of call for Anglo-American ships delivering war goods to the Soviet Union via the Persian Gulf.
'Crush the Fascist Reptile!', a poster by The Medical Aid for Russia, a South African charity (early 1940s)
Image: DISA
Around 3,000 South African seamen served in the Royal navy, many of them – on board Allied vessels carrying valuable supplies to our northern ports of Murmansk and Arkhangelsk to relieve besieged Leningrad. Those long and perilous sea journeys were carried out in harsh weather conditions and under constant threat of being attacked and sank. I have warm memories of my encounters with South African veterans of the Arctic Convoys, whom I had a privilege to meet while serving as Russia's Consul General in Cape Town in 2015–2019.
In late January 1945, SAAF's DC-3 transport airliner flew a secret mission from Cairo to Soviet Russia via Libya's Tobruk and Athens. The job was to transfer passengers and observe weather during some top brass talks. Oddly enough, South African aircrew found themselves in the recently liberated Crimea to witness the historic Yalta Conference of Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill. Held in the imperial Livadia Palace, the meeting shaped Europe's geopolitical landscape for decades to come. Many years later, the flight engineer of that mission shared his Crimea reminiscences in a brief interview. Not to forget, he told a journalist that the wife of Simferopol airfield's officer-in-command invited the South Africans for tea and cake.
Grassroots humanitarian aid and Shostakovich's African premiere
Moscow and Pretoria re-established diplomatic relations on 21 February 1942, just weeks after Hitler had failed to capture Russia's capital city. Due to the unprecedentedly fierce resistance put up by the Soviet troops, the Red Army repelled the Nazi onslaught and went into a massive counter offensive. At that dramatic time ,more than 9,000km away from the Eastern Front, in South Africa, a number of local pro-Soviet groups were running prominent campaigns of solidarity with the USSR and its people.
Between 1942 and 1945, South African charities such as the Medical Aid for Russia and the Friends of the Soviet Union, raised about £1m (approximately R1.2 billion today) to purchase and donate to the Soviet Red Cross much needed medications, surgical equipment, food, clothes, footwear, and other essential goods. In the fall of 1943, for instance, we received 2,200 tons of such aid delivered by the Hoperange cargo ship. South African humanitarian relief, especially anti-typhoid vaccine and blood serum, reached many hospitals and orphanages in war-torn areas of the USSR, helping to save thousands of lives.
In our embassy in Pretoria, we keep a stack of copies of declassified diplomatic correspondence dating those years. Looking through these faded typewritten pages gives me a peculiar moving feeling. Among the reports of Soviet Consul General's encounters with top officials of the Union of South Africa like Prime Minister J.C. Smuts and Secretary of External Affairs D.D. Forsyth, there are numerous records regarding public diplomacy and fundraising events organised by pro-Soviet groups all around South Africa.
To name a few. In July 1944, the University of the Witwatersrand hosted the two-day African-Soviet friendship congress attended by 600 delegates from SA and some neighbouring countries. In November 1944, in Johannesburg, the Friends of the Soviet Union launched the Soviet Pavilion with exhibition halls, open-air tea garden, and, of course, a vodka bar. Up to 250,000 people visited the pavilion to learn more about life and the struggle of the USSR during World War II.
The Medical Aid for Russia, run by its relentless chairman Haim Schneier, a physiologist from Johannesburg, organised anti-fascist rallies, screened Soviet feature films and documentaries, and even introduced Russian classical music to local audiences. Dmitri Shostakovich's Seventh 'Leningrad' Symphony, a work that became a musical manifesto of resistance to Nazism, was premiered on 9 July 1944 in Joburg and, two months later, in Cape Town. The proceeds from the ticket sales were donated to the Soviet Union's war effort.
Such solidarity events were often attended by South Africans of all races, including prominent activists of the CPSA and ANC.
Victory that secured our future
Today, it is frustrating to see that some people begin to perceive Nazism as some sort of abstract evil of the past. In fact, the ideology of Nazism has always been rooted in particular concepts of racial superiority and European colonialism, things that South Africans may understand better than anyone else.
Given this vile nature of Nazism, its ultimate defeat in 1945 laid the foundations of the world as we used to know it. The UN Charter, the era of decolonisation and independence in Africa and Asia, the fall of apartheid, and the rise of the Global South – none of these, indeed, would be possible without our victory in the Great Patriotic War 80 years ago.
Written by Roman Ambarov, Ambassador of Russia to South Africa
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of The Star, IOL or Independent Media.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
BEE is at a Crossroads - But Who Benefits from Its Destruction?
BEE, as it has been implemented in too many cases, has failed to meet the aspirations of the majority, writes the author. Gumede is right to point to the recycling of beneficiaries, the political gatekeeping, and the elite capture of empowerment deals. But he is wrong, dangerously wrong, if his insight is used to argue for scrapping BEE altogether. Let me be clear: BEE, as it has been implemented in too many cases, has failed to meet the aspirations of the majority. It is a critique we cannot afford to ignore. But neither can we afford to allow this critique to be weaponised by those who have always opposed transformation, to delegitimise the very idea of economic justice in post-apartheid South Africa. The recent critique by Professor William Gumede that over R1 trillion has been 'transferred' under Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) to fewer than 100 politically connected individuals is a sobering wake-up call. It is ironic that the same voices calling BEE 'racist' rarely propose solutions to white economic over-representation. Here are the facts: 8 of the top 10 richest South Africans remain white men. Over 70% of agricultural land remains under white ownership. Access to venture capital, export markets, and finance remains racially skewed. The idea that 'BEE is the biggest scam in post-apartheid SA' dangerously distracts from the real structural crisis: the continued racial and gendered concentration of wealth. Certainly not the millions of unemployed black youth in townships and rural villages. Not the historically disadvantaged communities who still lack access to capital, land, and markets. And not the African, Indian and Coloured women who remain structurally excluded from the mainstream economy. We must ask ourselves: who benefits when BEE is destroyed instead of reformed? Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. The only ones who benefit from the collapse of BEE are those who were never in favour of transformation in the first place the economic oligarchs who would be thrilled to return to a status quo of white dominance wrapped in the language of meritocracy. Despite limitations, BEE is not a failure: Over 6 million black South Africans now hold direct or indirect ownership in companies through broad-based share schemes (e.g. MTN Zakhele, SASOL Inzalo, Phuthuma Nathi at MultiChoice). Black ownership on the JSE has grown from less than 1% in 1994 to an estimated 25–30% today (direct + indirect via funds and B-BBEE schemes). Over 50,000 black-owned SMEs have been supported via enterprise and supplier development obligations. BEE has enabled the creation of black industrialists, catalysed youth training schemes, and expanded procurement access. The BEE scorecard includes ownership, skills development, employment equity, socio-economic development, and procurement. It is a multidimensional framework, not simply elite enrichment. However now that we know better , we must do better. Acknowledge the Failures, But Don't Abandon the Mission As a former Member of Parliament and lifelong activist for social and economic justice, I have seen first-hand how some BEE deals were little more than rent-seeking schemes. Politically connected figures often acted as fronts for white capital, offering legitimacy without empowerment. These are not just moral failings they are strategic betrayals of the people. But the answer is not abandonment. It is reform, accountability, and reorientation toward true broad-based empowerment. We must ask: What models have worked? What does inclusive, community-rooted BEE look like? And how do we ensure that BEE no longer becomes a revolving door for the same elite, but instead a ladder for the many? What Broad-Based Empowerment Really Looks Like The idea of broad-based empowerment is not hypothetical. I have checked ,it actually exists though often drowned out by the noise of scandal. Let us spotlight real, replicable models that show us what is possible. 1. Sasol Inzalo Trust (2011) – R26 Billion Empowerment for the Public One of the largest and most ambitious empowerment transactions in South African history. Over 200,000 South Africans from nurses to pensioners acquired shares in Sasol via the Inzalo Trust. This was not an elite project, but a mass participation vehicle offering dividends, ownership, and dignity. Yes, the deal had flaws (especially when Sasol's share price dropped), but the intent and structure were inclusive. We must learn from and build on this. 2. Absa Employee and CSI Trust (2023) – A New Vision for BEE In 2023, Absa created a model that should become the new gold standard. It allocated 7% of its ownership to: 3% for over 35,000 employees; 4% to a Community Trust focused on healthcare, education, and township upliftment. This is real empowerment linking productivity with ownership, and profit with community reinvestment. 3. PepsiCo / SimbPioneer Foods (2020) – Worker Trust PepsiCo's merger with Pioneer Foods resulted in a R1.66 billion worker trust benefiting over 12,000 employees 90% of whom are black. It wasn't politically brokered. It was structurally designed to include workers at scale. 4. Heineken's 'Bokamoso' Trust (2021) When Heineken acquired Distell, it was required by the Competition Tribunal to create a broad-based employee share scheme. 'Bokamoso' gave 6% equity to workers a model where empowerment was made a regulatory condition of doing business in South Africa. These are not isolated cases. They are models for the future evidence that BEE can work, and work for the people. Why can the JSE Top 100 Listed Companies not follow this and give shares to their workers, their customers and communities they serve? B-BBEE That Serves the Nation, Not the Network For BEE to be legitimate, it must: Stop recycling elites: No individual or consortium should benefit from more than one major BEE deal. Impose sunset clauses: Empowerment credentials must expire after a certain period. Create a National BEE Beneficiary Registry: All deals and beneficiaries must be publicly disclosed and tracked. Mandate community participation: At least 30% of all future equity deals must be routed through community trusts, worker funds, and township co-operatives. Align with the District Development Model: BEE must build local economies not extract value from them. We must turn BEE into a mechanism for building black productive capacity, not just redistributing shares. That means more funding for black industrialists, township-based manufacturing, rural cooperatives, and tech-enabled youth entrepreneurship. A Call to Action: Reclaim Empowerment from the Few, for the Many To comrades, policymakers, business leaders, and community activists: we are at a crossroads. Either we allow the failures of the past to paralyse us or we reclaim the transformative promise of BEE and remake it to serve all who were historically disadvantaged: Black Africans, Coloured South Africans, Indian South Africans, women, youth, people with disabilities, and the rural poor. I call on the ANC to: Codify a new generation of community-based empowerment deals Reject individual-based enrichment without public impact Strengthen the oversight powers of the B-BBEE Commission Incentivise cooperatives, worker-ownership, and community reinvestment We must restore the moral authority of economic redress by placing THE PEOPLE not political patrons at the centre of empowerment. Conclusion: Build, Don't Burn Professor Gumede has done us a service by exposing what went wrong. But let us not allow this moment to be hijacked by reactionaries who wish to dismantle BEE altogether. Let us not abandon the house of transformation because the roof leaked. Instead, let us rebuild it, repair it, and expand it, so that it shelters all South Africans who have for too long lived on the margins. We don't need to scrap BEE. We need to liberate it from the few and make it finally work for the many. That is the real empowerment and economic justice we must fight and struggle for. This opinion piece was first published in ANC Today * Faiez Jacobs is a former MP, Public Policy Strategist and Advocate for Economic Justice ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.


Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SANDF says troops returning from DRC to undergo demobilisation process
JOHANNESBURG - The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) said troops returning from the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) would undergo a four-day demobilisation process to help them reintegrate into society. The first group of 249 personnel landed at Waterkloof Air Force Base outside Pretoria on Friday, following a six-hour delay. ALSO READ: - Officials confident all SANDF troops deployed to DRC will be back home by end of June - First flight carrying 249 SANDF troops from DRC arrives in SA - SA blames SADC for the delayed return of 249 SANDF troops from Tanzania They had been deployed to Goma since December 2023 as part of a regional peacekeeping mission in the conflict-ridden North Kivu province. As the troops disembarked from the Tanzanian aircraft, they broke out in song, a moment of emotion and relief following months of battle with M23 rebels in eastern DRC. Their return follows a ceasefire agreement reached between the M23 and the DRC military during a summit in Tanzania in March. Fourteen South African soldiers lost their lives during the deployment. "The South African National Defence Force troops that have just come back from southeast DRC. They are in a very, very good, high spirit," said SANDF spokesperson Prince Tshabalala. "We have seen them on visual search, having enjoyment and singing songs of enjoyment. It's an atmosphere of jubilation, if I can put it that way, in a nutshell." The remainder of the deployed army personnel are expected to return home by the end of June.

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Herman Mashaba questions Helen Zille's fitness for Johannesburg mayoralty
Democratic Alliance (DA) Federal Council Chairperson Helen Zille has put her hand up for the Johannesburg mayoral position, but ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba accused her of being too anti-poor for the position. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba has launched a scathing attack on DA Federal Council chairperson Helen Zille's bid to become the City of Johannesburg mayor, saying she was not fit for the position as she did not have the interest of poor communities at heart. Zille, whose party is infamous for opposing pro-black transformation policies, was reported to have said that she had been approached to contest to become the mayor of Johannesburg, which is the hub of the country's biggest economy. It was reportedly said that she would consult her family before deciding on whether to enter the race. However, Mashaba, who resigned as the city's mayor and also dumped the DA in 2019 in protest against Zille's return to the party position as the federal council chairperson, said that as a South African citizen, Zille has every right to contest any position. But he questioned her ability to deliver services to the black and white areas equally. The former Western Cape premier did not waste much of her breath responding to Mashaba's attack. 'Not many people take Herman seriously anymore, I am afraid. 'All the data and evidence show that poor people in Cape Town have better service delivery than in any metro in the country,' said Zille. Mashaba stated that the DA-governed City of Cape Town continues to uphold the legacy of apartheid, as townships remain neglected. 'Helen shows a lack of interest in providing services to poor communities. 'In Khayelisha, Gugulethu, and Langa, the situation is worse than it was before 1994,' said Mashaba during his visit to Durban to collect views from the communities about the performance of the Government of National Unity this weekend. He stated that when he was still the mayor of Johannesburg under the DA, his efforts to deliver services to poor communities would be met with resistance from Zille. 'Anybody to say Cape Town is successful, is Khayelisha and Gugulethu not part of Cape Town? 'I resigned (as the mayor) because Helen was pressuring DA white councillors to put pressure on me, including approaching the ANC, to remove me as she had problems with providing services to poor communities.' Mashaba said ActionSA had to facilitate the removal of DA's Cilliers Brink as the City of Tshwane mayor because of an imbalance of service delivery. 'He was governing with ActionSA's support, but he was refusing to provide services to the black townships. 'That is why we said no, we cannot allow this man because they are not ready to change their act. 'My experience of Helen Zille is that she still suffers from the Verwoerd mentality, the system under which she was brought up, and unfortunately, it is the DA's DNA,' said Mashaba. He was referring to the apartheid mentality, whose architecture was former prime minister Hendrik Verwoerd. [email protected]