BEE is at a Crossroads - But Who Benefits from Its Destruction?
Gumede is right to point to the recycling of beneficiaries, the political gatekeeping, and the elite capture of empowerment deals. But he is wrong, dangerously wrong, if his insight is used to argue for scrapping BEE altogether.
Let me be clear: BEE, as it has been implemented in too many cases, has failed to meet the aspirations of the majority.
It is a critique we cannot afford to ignore. But neither can we afford to allow this critique to be weaponised by those who have always opposed transformation, to delegitimise the very idea of economic justice in post-apartheid South Africa.
The recent critique by Professor William Gumede that over R1 trillion has been 'transferred' under Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) to fewer than 100 politically connected individuals is a sobering wake-up call.
It is ironic that the same voices calling BEE 'racist' rarely propose solutions to white economic over-representation.
Here are the facts: 8 of the top 10 richest South Africans remain white men. Over 70% of agricultural land remains under white ownership. Access to venture capital, export markets, and finance remains racially skewed.
The idea that 'BEE is the biggest scam in post-apartheid SA' dangerously distracts from the real structural crisis: the continued racial and gendered concentration of wealth.
Certainly not the millions of unemployed black youth in townships and rural villages. Not the historically disadvantaged communities who still lack access to capital, land, and markets. And not the African, Indian and Coloured women who remain structurally excluded from the mainstream economy.
We must ask ourselves: who benefits when BEE is destroyed instead of reformed?
Reset restore all settings to the default values Done
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
The only ones who benefit from the collapse of BEE are those who were never in favour of transformation in the first place the economic oligarchs who would be thrilled to return to a status quo of white dominance wrapped in the language of meritocracy.
Despite limitations, BEE is not a failure:
Over 6 million black South Africans now hold direct or indirect ownership in companies through broad-based share schemes (e.g. MTN Zakhele, SASOL Inzalo, Phuthuma Nathi at MultiChoice).
Black ownership on the JSE has grown from less than 1% in 1994 to an estimated 25–30% today (direct + indirect via funds and B-BBEE schemes).
Over 50,000 black-owned SMEs have been supported via enterprise and supplier development obligations.
BEE has enabled the creation of black industrialists, catalysed youth training schemes, and expanded procurement access.
The BEE scorecard includes ownership, skills development, employment equity, socio-economic development, and procurement. It is a multidimensional framework, not simply elite enrichment. However now that we know better , we must do better.
Acknowledge the Failures, But Don't Abandon the Mission
As a former Member of Parliament and lifelong activist for social and economic justice, I have seen first-hand how some BEE deals were little more than rent-seeking schemes. Politically connected figures often acted as fronts for white capital, offering legitimacy without empowerment. These are not just moral failings they are strategic betrayals of the people.
But the answer is not abandonment. It is reform, accountability, and reorientation toward true broad-based empowerment. We must ask: What models have worked? What does inclusive, community-rooted BEE look like? And how do we ensure that BEE no longer becomes a revolving door for the same elite, but instead a ladder for the many?
What Broad-Based Empowerment Really Looks Like
The idea of broad-based empowerment is not hypothetical. I have checked ,it actually exists though often drowned out by the noise of scandal. Let us spotlight real, replicable models that show us what is possible.
1. Sasol Inzalo Trust (2011) – R26 Billion Empowerment for the Public
One of the largest and most ambitious empowerment transactions in South African history. Over 200,000 South Africans from nurses to pensioners acquired shares in Sasol via the Inzalo Trust. This was not an elite project, but a mass participation vehicle offering dividends, ownership, and dignity.
Yes, the deal had flaws (especially when Sasol's share price dropped), but the intent and structure were inclusive. We must learn from and build on this.
2. Absa Employee and CSI Trust (2023) – A New Vision for BEE
In 2023, Absa created a model that should become the new gold standard. It allocated 7% of its ownership to: 3% for over 35,000 employees; 4% to a Community Trust focused on healthcare, education, and township upliftment.
This is real empowerment linking productivity with ownership, and profit with community reinvestment.
3. PepsiCo / SimbPioneer Foods (2020) – Worker Trust
PepsiCo's merger with Pioneer Foods resulted in a R1.66 billion worker trust benefiting over 12,000 employees 90% of whom are black. It wasn't politically brokered. It was structurally designed to include workers at scale.
4. Heineken's 'Bokamoso' Trust (2021)
When Heineken acquired Distell, it was required by the Competition Tribunal to create a broad-based employee share scheme. 'Bokamoso' gave 6% equity to workers a model where empowerment was made a regulatory condition of doing business in South Africa.
These are not isolated cases. They are models for the future evidence that BEE can work, and work for the people. Why can the JSE Top 100 Listed Companies not follow this and give shares to their workers, their customers and communities they serve?
B-BBEE That Serves the Nation, Not the Network
For BEE to be legitimate, it must:
Stop recycling elites: No individual or consortium should benefit from more than one major BEE deal.
Impose sunset clauses: Empowerment credentials must expire after a certain period.
Create a National BEE Beneficiary Registry: All deals and beneficiaries must be publicly disclosed and tracked.
Mandate community participation: At least 30% of all future equity deals must be routed through community trusts, worker funds, and township co-operatives.
Align with the District Development Model: BEE must build local economies not extract value from them.
We must turn BEE into a mechanism for building black productive capacity, not just redistributing shares. That means more funding for black industrialists, township-based manufacturing, rural cooperatives, and tech-enabled youth entrepreneurship.
A Call to Action: Reclaim Empowerment from the Few, for the Many
To comrades, policymakers, business leaders, and community activists: we are at a crossroads. Either we allow the failures of the past to paralyse us or we reclaim the transformative promise of BEE and remake it to serve all who were historically disadvantaged: Black Africans, Coloured South Africans, Indian South Africans, women, youth, people with disabilities, and the rural poor.
I call on the ANC to:
Codify a new generation of community-based empowerment deals
Reject individual-based enrichment without public impact
Strengthen the oversight powers of the B-BBEE Commission
Incentivise cooperatives, worker-ownership, and community reinvestment
We must restore the moral authority of economic redress by placing THE PEOPLE not political patrons at the centre of empowerment.
Conclusion: Build, Don't Burn
Professor Gumede has done us a service by exposing what went wrong. But let us not allow this moment to be hijacked by reactionaries who wish to dismantle BEE altogether. Let us not abandon the house of transformation because the roof leaked.
Instead, let us rebuild it, repair it, and expand it, so that it shelters all South Africans who have for too long lived on the margins.
We don't need to scrap BEE. We need to liberate it from the few and make it finally work for the many.
That is the real empowerment and economic justice we must fight and struggle for.
This opinion piece was first published in ANC Today
* Faiez Jacobs is a former MP, Public Policy Strategist and Advocate for Economic Justice
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
British, South African companies forge new partnership with WP Deaf Cricket Team
The Western Province Deaf Cricket Team proudly show off their new kit from their sponsors. In a groundbreaking initiative that champions inclusivity and empowerment, Outsource-SA, a premier talent and strategic outsourcing firm, has joined forces with TCC Cricket Bats UK to sponsor the Western Province Deaf Cricket Team. This collaboration marks a pivotal moment for the sport in South Africa, aiming to enhance the sporting landscape for deaf athletes across the country. Percival Topley, vice chairman of Deaf Cricket South Africa, conveyed heartfelt appreciation for the sponsorship during a recent press conference. 'We are incredibly thankful for Outsource-SA and TCC Cricket Bats UK stepping up to support our deaf cricketers. This partnership will make a real difference, providing our athletes with the resources they need to excel.' His statement emphasises the need for support systems that help deaf athletes overcome barriers in competitive sports. Shaun Smith, CEO of Outsource-SA, along with Warren Jackson, owner of TCC Cricket Bats UK, expressed profound enthusiasm for the initiative. Smith articulated their commitment: 'We are immensely proud to be involved in such a wonderful partnership.' Jackson added: 'It's truly gratifying to know we're making a tangible impact on people's lives through this collaboration,' highlighting the positive ripple effects that such partnerships can have on communities. Beyond supporting the Western Province Deaf Cricket Team, Outsource-SA is deeply invested in broader social responsibility goals. The company actively champions initiatives aimed at creating a more inclusive society, focusing on diversity, empowerment, and the eradication of unemployment. Their multifaceted approach spans various sectors, addressing the immediate needs of a rapidly expanding South African population while fostering long-term sustainability. One of the key pillars of Outsource-SA's mission includes the programme 'Connecting Companies with Top Women In Tech,' which seeks to bridge the gender gap in the technology sector. By connecting forward-thinking businesses with skilled female IT professionals, Outsource-SA is helping to build a more equitable workforce environment. Furthermore, their commitment to 'Youth Empowerment' enables young South Africans to seize opportunities that provoke positive societal change, thus enhancing the nation's future. Additionally, Outsource-SA advocates for the 'Importance of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging,' fostering work environments where everyone feels appreciated and valued—a critical aspect of cultivating a successful and innovative workforce. As Outsource-SA embarks on this partnership with TCC Cricket Bats UK, it sets a precedent for future collaborations within sport that support and empower historically underrepresented communities. Through these comprehensive efforts, the company continues to make a lasting positive impact, championing a more inclusive and equitable future for all South Africans.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Lower wage workers being exploited as 43% of South Africans buy food on credit
Buying food on credit is regarded as a sure sign that you are battling financially, but it is often the only way to feed your family. South Africans are living in a credit crunch, with 43% buying food on credit, considered a sure sign of a struggling consumer economy. It is common knowledge that too many South Africans cannot make ends meet and rely on credit for basics such as transport, groceries and other essentials. Finmark Trust data indicates that in 2024, 43% of adults used credit to buy food. The same report found 12 million adults, including those who borrow from informal sources, are in financial distress. In addition, FinMark Trust data from 2022 shows that 90% of adults are financially included, which means they have access to financial products and services appropriate to their needs. Despite this, FinMark says, many rely on informal services due to barriers such as high fees and lack of documentation. 'These informal services include loan sharks (mashonisas) who charge much higher interest rates than the formal providers are allowed to of 30% to 50% per month. This means a R500 payday loan could end up costing the consumer up to R250 in interest,' Caroline van der Merwe, co-founder and chief product officer at Jem, says. ALSO READ: Employed South Africans working hard for financial freedom Lower wage earners end up owing too much She points out that lower wage workers borrow money to pay for food or transport and end up owing much more than they needed to borrow. 'These are South Africa's deskless workers. They serve on the frontlines of local businesses. 'Research shows nearly half of these workers often run out of money before payday and are forced to borrow at extortionate rates.' Typically earning between R6 000 and R12 000 a month, they frequently have no credit history and no collateral. Van der Merwe warns this, combined with their low earnings, makes them invisible to the financial services sector and ripe for exploitation from informal lenders. However, she says, tackling this issue requires a multi-pronged approach. 'Fintech solutions such as low-cost mobile banking offer a pathway to secure, affordable financial access and are becoming more widespread. 'Stronger enforcement of credit regulations and targeted consumer education would help as well. Mashonisas often charge exorbitant interest of up to 50% per month, far exceeding the National Credit Act limits. 'South Africa's poorest would benefit considerably if efforts to formalise informal lending and penalise illegal practices were intensified.' ALSO READ: Household food basket stable, but price of meat eating into consumers' budgets Financial literacy education Van der Merwe says employers could assist by providing financial literacy education for their employees and giving them sponsored or subsidised access to tools to help them better understand and manage their money. 'This would deliver social and economic returns for the company and country. Workers who are stressed about money are more likely to miss work, underperform or quit. This means addressing workers' financial needs can save the business money in lost productivity and hiring costs.' She says another approach that employers can consider is earned wage access (EWA), which gives employees access to money they have already earned. Although it is not a silver bullet, it is a tactic to help workers manage a bigger problem that their wages are not increasing with inflation or the cost of living. 'People are poorer today than they were five or 10 years ago. The real solution is to provide fair increases and if employers are unable to, EWA allows deskless workers to meet unexpected and necessary expenses without diving deeper and deeper into debt or exposing themselves to predatory lenders.' Until we can tackle the real wages growth issue, we will not be able to get people to a point where they can stop paying high fees for emergency funds, start saving and financially plan for their futures, Van der Merwe says.
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Gayton McKenzie responds to racism accusations
It has just been confirmed that political organisation Action SA has reported minister Gayton McKenzie to the South African Human Rights Commission for alleged racist remarks. According to the statement, McKenzie is said to have 'repeatedly used hateful slurs from the Apartheid era, along with other offensive references that served to degrade and dehumanise black South Africans'. 'Earlier this week, ActionSA joined South Africans in condemning vile and repugnant remarks directed toward the coloured community,' a statement read. 'Today, we do the same in confronting racism in all its forms by holding a sitting Cabinet Minister accountable for comments that no reasonable person can defend as anything other than racist and demeaning.' On social media, some users referenced posts allegedly made by McKenzie back in 2013. On Friday, he took to social media to state: 'This whole campaign to find something racist I ever said is hilarious because you have now gone 13 years back and can't bring out one racist thing I ever said. I always and still fight that Coloureds and Blacks are one people being treated differently mistakenly. 'You are more offended by our outrage as Coloured ppl against the vile racism that was directed at us, you find excuses for these young people who hurt a whole race. You are encouraging future racist instead of nipping this in the bud. We are not you.' This comes in the same week that McKenzie revealed plans to sue podcasters who made disparaging comments about the coloured community in an episode posted on their social media. What are your thoughts on this story? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
