logo
To Identify Suspect in Idaho Killings, F.B.I. Used Restricted Consumer DNA Data

To Identify Suspect in Idaho Killings, F.B.I. Used Restricted Consumer DNA Data

New York Times25-02-2025

As investigators struggled for weeks to find who might have committed the brutal stabbings of four University of Idaho students in the fall of 2022, they were focused on a key piece of evidence: DNA on a knife sheath that was found at the scene of the crime.
At first they tried checking the DNA with law enforcement databases, but that did not provide a hit. They turned next to the more expansive DNA profiles available in some consumer databases in which users had consented to law enforcement possibly using their information, but that also did not lead to answers.
F.B.I. investigators then went a step further, according to newly released testimony, comparing the DNA profile from the knife sheath with two databases that law enforcement officials are not supposed to tap: GEDmatch and MyHeritage.
It was a decision that appears to have violated key parameters of a Justice Department policy that calls for investigators to operate only in DNA databases 'that provide explicit notice to their service users and the public that law enforcement may use their service sites.'
It also seems to have produced results: Days after the F.B.I.'s investigative genetic genealogy team began working with the DNA profiles, it landed on someone who had not been on anyone's radar: Bryan Kohberger, a Ph.D. student in criminology who has now been charged with the murders.
The case has shown both the promise and the unregulated power of genetic technology in an era in which millions of people willingly contribute their DNA profiles to recreational databases, often to hunt for relatives. In the past, law enforcement officials would need to find a direct match between DNA at the crime scene and that of a specific suspect. Now, investigators can use consumer DNA data to build family trees that can zero in on a person of interest — within certain policy limits.
While some companies have allowed users to choose whether their DNA information may be used to help criminal investigations, the decision by the authorities to skirt those limits could mean that the companies' privacy assurances are essentially meaningless.
Erin Murphy, a law professor at New York University who focuses on DNA and new policing methods, said she was surprised that the F.B.I. might have violated rules that the federal government had spent so much time working to establish. She was also concerned that investigators seemingly had no repercussions for doing so.
'I think what we are teaching law enforcement is that the rules have no meaning,' she said.
Steve Kramer, a former F.B.I. lawyer who has specialized in genetic genealogy investigations, said the rules were designed as a framework, not a legal limitation. They can help guide typical investigative work, he said, but when it comes to a serious case where other investigative options are limited, such as the Idaho case, investigators may need to take additional steps.
'We'll never know, thank God, what Bryan Kohberger would have done had he not been caught,' he said.
On the morning of Nov. 13, 2022, four University of Idaho students — Madison Mogen, 21; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Ethan Chapin, 20 — were found dead in an off-campus home, the victims of a vicious stabbing spree. The police spent weeks looking for a suspect as residents of the small college town of Moscow, Idaho, waited in fear.
Behind the scenes, investigators were examining a wide range of people: classmates, people charged with prior assaults and some people with the thinnest connections to Idaho. On a knife sheath found next to two of the victims, investigators found DNA. But when they put the sample into the federal law enforcement database CODIS, there was no match.
In recent testimony from a closed-door court hearing, Idaho officials described how on Nov. 22, investigators brought the DNA sample to Othram, a company near Houston that specializes in genetic genealogy, often helping law enforcement solve decades-old cold cases by taking a modern analysis of the DNA profile. Othram began doing genetic genealogy and building a family tree, apparently following the protocols of Justice Department policy.
Mr. Kramer said the policy had been put into place after he and other investigators used genetic genealogy to solve the Golden State Killer case in 2018. In that case, investigators had used online services to identify a new suspect. Those services were uncomfortable with the intrusion, but some, such as GEDmatch, have since allowed users to consent to having their data included as part of a DNA analysis tool that can be used by law enforcement.
While the Justice Department policy prohibits use of DNA genetic databases that object to law enforcement access, the policy offers a broad footnote, saying that it 'does not impose any legal limitations on otherwise lawful investigative' techniques.
In the Idaho case, according to the recent testimony, a preliminary report produced by Othram said the closest match it was working with shared 70.7 centimorgans of DNA with the crime scene sample. Mr. Kramer said that was a low match, typically representing two people who would perhaps share a great-great grandparent.
To enhance the family tree, Othram hoped to expand the DNA data available by approaching someone on the tree — one of four brothers — to see if they would be willing to contribute their DNA to help determine whether the team was on the right path. The identity of the brothers was not disclosed in the publicly available records, though their last name was not Kohberger.
Matthew Gamette, the director of forensic services for the Idaho State Police, testified that the brother was not interested in participating and had asked not to be contacted again. Othram was eventually asked to stop its work on Dec. 10, with the F.B.I. expected to take over the genealogy search.
In a memo, according to the testimony, the F.B.I. acknowledged turning to MyHeritage and a broader version of GEDmatch that includes people who have not opted in to law enforcement searches.
The two companies did not respond to messages seeking comment.
Leah Larkin, a genealogist working with Mr. Kohberger's defense team, testified that investigators discovered a match of 250 centimorgans somewhere on the family tree, a level of comparison that offers much more potential to uncover a final match. Photos showed that investigators had built a family tree on a white board, Ms. Larkin said, with handwritten notes mapping out lines of relatives.
What they found appears to have led to Mr. Kohberger on Dec. 19. Days later, investigators went to his family home in Pennsylvania, where he was staying with his parents during the winter holidays, and collected trash from the home that better connected the crime scene DNA to him.
Mr. Kohberger's defense team has challenged much of the state's evidence and sought to undermine the DNA evidence by arguing that the authorities violated his constitutional rights by failing to obtain warrants before searching the DNA data. But a judge in the case has rejected those arguments as the case moves toward trial this summer.
Mr. Kramer, the former F.B.I. lawyer, said that the use of genetic genealogy could prevent other kinds of law enforcement intrusions by helping narrow the scope of an investigation. In the Kohberger case, he noted, a white Hyundai Elantra had been seen driving near the victims' home, and that kind of evidence could lead detectives to examine the lives of many Elantra drivers who had done nothing wrong.
But Ms. Murphy, the law professor, noted that many people's DNA could be shed at what might later become the scene of a crime, and that the widening tools had the potential to bring innocent people under extensive scrutiny or false charges, without clear rules.
She says there are growing calls for legislation and legal review to establish mandatory parameters for the use of genetic genealogy.
'If this is a method that we want to use as a society, we should be able to come up with rules we can agree on, then expect people to follow them,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

37 months in prison for ex-CIA analyst who leaked docs on Israeli strike
37 months in prison for ex-CIA analyst who leaked docs on Israeli strike

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

37 months in prison for ex-CIA analyst who leaked docs on Israeli strike

A former CIA analyst who leaked top secret US intelligence documents about Israeli military plans for a retaliatory strike on Iran was sentenced to 37 months in prison on Wednesday, the Justice Department said. Asif Rahman, 34, who worked for the Central Intelligence Agency since 2016 and held a top secret security clearance, was arrested by the FBI in Cambodia in November. In January, Rahman pleaded guilty at a federal courthouse in Virginia to two counts of willful retention and transmission of national defense information. He faced a potential sentence of up to 20 years in prison. Iran unleashed a wave of close to 200 ballistic missiles on Israel on October 1 in retaliation for the killings of senior figures in the Tehran-backed Hamas and Hezbollah militant groups. Israel responded with a wave of strikes on military targets in Iran in late October. According to a court filing, on October 17 Rahman printed out two top secret documents "regarding a United States foreign ally and its planned kinetic actions against a foreign adversary." He photographed the documents and used a computer program to edit the images in "an attempt to conceal their source and delete his activity," it said. Rahman then transmitted the documents to "multiple individuals he knew were not entitled to receive them" before shredding them at work. The documents, circulated on the Telegram app by an account called Middle East Spectator, described Israeli preparations for a possible strike on Iran but did not identify any actual targets. According to The Washington Post, the documents, generated by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, described aviation exercises and movements of munitions at an Israeli airfield. The leak led Israeli officials to delay their retaliatory strike. cl/jgc

Louisville did not delay police reform order, say mayor, chief in response to criticism
Louisville did not delay police reform order, say mayor, chief in response to criticism

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Louisville did not delay police reform order, say mayor, chief in response to criticism

Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg talks with attendees of The Louisville Forum at Vincenzo's in downtown Louisville. June 11, 2025. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Sarah Ladd) LOUISVILLE — Louisville Mayor Craig Greenberg and Louisville Police Chief Paul Humphrey said the city should not be blamed for delaying a court order to correct civil rights abuses by Louisville police and to reform the department. During the monthly meeting of The Louisville Forum Wednesday, Humphrey pointed to federal 'bureaucracy' while Greenberg acknowledged that 'a lot of people … think that our administration and the LMPD was the reason' a consent decree mandating police reforms was not signed before the Republican Trump administration killed the agreement as expected. The mayor insisted that is not the case. Responding to an audience question, Greenberg told the gathering that it took more than 11 months for the Justice Department under Democratic President Joe Biden to get the city a draft agreement after then-Attorney General Merrick Garland came to Kentucky in 2023 to discuss the police department's civil rights violations. Greenberg said the city at that time offered to provide an initial draft of a consent decree. 'They insisted that they would provide us with the first draft. Notwithstanding our weekly requests (of) when that draft was coming, we got the first draft of the consent decree 11 and a half months later,' Greenberg said. 'So we waited basically a year to see a first draft of the consent decree after Attorney General Garland came to our city.' Trump Justice Department moves to end consent decree aimed at reforming policing in Louisville The agreement was announced in December 2024, the month before President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term. In May, the Trump administration's U.S. Department of Justice pulled back from the consent decree, saying such actions are 'handcuffing local leaders.' The consent decree came in response to the 2020 police killing of Breonna Taylor, an unarmed Black woman, and a subsequent federal investigation that exposed a pattern of constitutional violations by Louisville police. Taylor's mother criticized the mayor, Louisville Public Media reported in May, accusing him of 'dragging his feet' on the issue. Louisville Metro Council member J.P. Lyninger, a Democrat, also has voiced disappointment with Democrat Greenberg's administration. 'The findings were announced two years ago,' he told Louisville Public Media last month. 'If we had more speedily entered into agreement with the Department of Justice, this would already be on the books and we wouldn't be talking about this today.' A consent decree is a negotiated agreement that avoids a trial by spelling out requirements that a federal judge signs and enforces. On Wednesday, Greenberg said, 'Louisville Metro government was not the reason why this took time.' Instead, he said, the police department and city had 'worked day and night with getting this done as their primary focus.' Humphrey agreed, saying there are 'a lot of things that could be improved about that process' at the federal level to expedite the consent decree process. The federal government, Humphrey said, was 'more concerned with protecting the case than they were with improving the police department.' On the same day the Trump administration moved to let LMPD off the hook for reform, Greenberg and Humphrey announced the city would move forward with its own Community Commitment, a 214-page handbook with goals similar to those outlined in the proposed consent decree. 'If we were using delay as a negotiating tactic, we would not have voluntarily signed the community commitment within hours of the Department of Justice announcing they were dropping the case,' Greenberg said at the Louisville Forum. 'It would have been a very different response.' Under the Community Commitment, the city will issue a request for proposals (RFP) seeking candidates to fill the role of an independent monitor. The public will be able to weigh in on monitor candidates via an online survey and at community listening sessions. The independent monitor will cost Louisville around $750,000, Greenberg said, and will have a five-year contract. 'We have our community commitment that we're moving forward with, and so … looking back at what the federal government did or didn't do is a waste of time, in all honesty,' Humphrey said. 'Let's move forward and … make this community better.' The city has several listening sessions already scheduled where the public can weigh in on reforms. 'I encourage you to be a part of the solution,' Greenberg said. 'It's very easy to criticize, it's very easy to observe and talk to friends. We want (people) across the community to be a part of the solution.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Feds arrest 14 of transnational crime ring accused of stealing $30M in COVID-19 relief funds, loans
Feds arrest 14 of transnational crime ring accused of stealing $30M in COVID-19 relief funds, loans

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds arrest 14 of transnational crime ring accused of stealing $30M in COVID-19 relief funds, loans

When the COVID-19 pandemic reached the U.S. in early 2020, it spurred an instant economic crisis. Non-essential businesses were forced to close their doors for weeks on end as Americans were urged to stay home and keep their distance from one another. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) In response to the crisis, lawmakers passed the CARES Act, which distributed stimulus checks to struggling Americans, boosted unemployment benefits, and provided loans for small businesses that needed a financial lifeline to stay afloat and pay their employees. Billions of dollars of these taxpayer-funded relief funds were stolen, according to the Justice Department, which has been investigating and prosecuting pandemic relief fraud. As of April last year, it had slapped criminal charges against more than 3,500 defendants for losses of over $2 billion and $1.4 billion had been seized or forfeited. And the work continues. Recently it announced 14 people were arrested for allegedly obtaining more than $25 million in COVID-19 relief funds and small business loans with fraudulent applications. A total of 18 defendants were charged, but four are believed to be in Armenia. Fox 11 reported $30 million was stolen. 'This transnational criminal network sought to defraud the government of millions of dollars and almost succeeded,' said Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Los Angeles Acting Special Agent in Charge John Pasciucco. 'HSI is continuing to identify these criminal groups looking to profit from the pandemic and will use all available resources to criminally prosecute or remove them from the country.' 'Today's enforcement action is intended to send a message to all criminals who take advantage of government programs designed to help those who need them most,' said U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli. 'If you took COVID-19 or SBA money you weren't entitled to, your door could be the next one we visit.' Fox 11 reported that Vahe Margaryan, a.k.a. 'William McGrayan,' 42, was the brains of the fraud ring that applied for $47 million in federal funds and managed to get approved for $30 million. He and his co-conspirators allegedly made false documents, including fake bank statements and tax returns, for sham companies that supposedly needed the money. Some of the charges the suspects face are conspiracy to defraud the government, wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. 'Some of the money was spent on homes and luxury goods, the rest was wired to Armenia, making it harder for the U.S. to trace … Most were born in Armenia, but have become naturalized here in the U.S.,' said Fox 11 reporter Matt Finn. The press release says law enforcement seized about $20,000 in cash, two money-counting machines, paper cash bands or currency straps in denominations of $2,000 and $10,000, multiple cell phones, multiple laptops, two loaded semi-automatic 9mm handguns, and boxes of 9mm ammunition. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it Crisis profiteering is the concept of making money from a crisis situation in an unethical or illegal manner. And it can take on different forms. In some cases, it can mean exploiting consumers through price gouging. In the case above, it means stealing funds that were earmarked to help struggling consumers and businesses through a major crisis. As The New York Times reported, lawmakers approved stimulus bills during the pandemic that resulted in roughly $5 trillion of dollars in funding — the largest flood of federal money into the economy in recorded history. An estimated $349 billion went into the Economic Injury Disaster Loan program, while $835 billion went into the Paycheck Protection Program. The problem is that lawmakers didn't impose strict requirements for small business aid, allowing it to benefit some companies that didn't need a financial lifeline at the time. Worse yet, funding was so rushed that lawmakers didn't have ample time to put adequate fraud measures in place. In June of 2023, the Small Business Administration's Office of Inspector General released a report estimating it gave out more than $200 billion in potentially fraudulent pandemic relief funds, including EIDL and PPP loans. All told, that would mean that 17% of all COVID-19 EIDL and PPP funds were distributed to potentially fraudulent actors. And this isn't the first time this sort of thing has happened. The U.S. Government Accountability Office said that improper and fraudulent relief payments following Hurricanes Rita and Katrina are estimated at $600 million to $1.4 billion out of the total $6 billion in payments made through the Individuals and Households Program (IHP) program. The same occurred in the post-9/11 days. Disaster relief funds were made available to New York City residents and businesses impacted by the attack. But relaxed requirements on FEMA's part "may have increased the likelihood of fraud in the Individual and Family Grant Program," said the Government Accountability Office. Similarly, 2.6% of the $1.6 billion disbursed after Hurricane Sandy may have been "improper or fraudulent." The problem, of course, is that the more federal relief funds that are lost to fraud, the more money it costs taxpayers. Overall, the federal government loses $233 billion–$521 billion annually to fraud, based on data from 2018-2022. The challenge is that in situations like the pandemic, major hurricanes, and events like 9/11, time is of the essence. Relief dollars often need to be disbursed quickly, so there's not ample time to put guardrails in place to prevent fraud. What the government can try to do, though, is be proactive in identifying those who took advantage of the crisis. While there may not be a 100% recovery rate for stolen funds, the more money the government can recoup, the better. Anyone with information about fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at (866) 720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store