Leeds parents 'consumed' by struggle to find school transport
Richard is a single father who looks after his daughter Poppy, 16. She has Down's syndrome, autism and complex learning needs, and for the past five years Leeds City Council has provided transport from their home in Otley to John Jamieson, a specialist inclusive learning centre in east Leeds. This support has meant he could work full-time to provide for his family. In June, following the local authority's decision to only provide home to school transport to young people with SEND in "exceptional circumstances", Poppy's case was assessed. Leeds City Council offered to provide some financial assistance but Richard said it meant he would still have to drive her himself. "It would mean I would get to work at 10:00 and have to leave at 14:30, which would impact the family - and the business I work for, it just isn't viable and has consequences."He has appealed against the decision but does not believe he will get an answer until after schools go back in September, which means he will have to drive Poppy and "catch up on work in the evening, which will impact on my life".Richard believes the council's policy is "hurting lots of people", adding: "Instead of spending the summer holidays with our children, we're having to spend the holiday trying to find out if we'll get transport to school in September."
Rachel Ashton has found herself in a similar situation. Her daughter Bella has learning difficulties, autism and the learning age of a five-year-old. Bella has had a place on council transport from her home in Horsforth to Boston Spa since she was 11 and her parents have paid a contribution of £300 a month as well. However, now she is 16 the family have been told she is "no longer eligible".Ms Ashton said that because she and her husband both work, they can't drive her there themselves, and she can't give up her job because the family need her income. She added: "She can't do a journey alone, she will need an escort and the quotes we have for an escort are £25,000 a year, which is not sustainable". The family have already appealed Leeds City Council's decision once, but it was rejected and they are preparing a second appeal.Ms Ashton said: "This means Bella will not be able to start her post-16 education in September, so she will be out of education."
According to campaign group Save Our School Transport, more than 1,000 children will be affected by the policy changes.Ailith Harley-Roberts is part of the campaign group hoping to reverse the authority's decision. Her daughter has also turned 16.Ms Harley-Roberts is the service manager for Sunshine and Smiles, a Down's syndrome support network in Leeds. She accepts that helping children to travel independently is "fantastic" for students who are able to, but for a "large number of young people it is just not viable".She said a number of parents who are part of the campaign are in a similar position to Richard and may have to cut the number of hours they work.Ms Harley-Roberts cited the statutory guidance around transport and said the "transport provided has to be reasonable and take into account all relevant matters".She added that some parents in the group believed the alternatives offered to them were not reasonable.A review is due in the autumn on how the policy is impacting families, but she feared this was "too little too late".
Hayden, the council's executive member for children and families, said continuing to offer "discretionary" transport for over-16s was no longer financially viable.She added that the policy was being implemented based on the needs of children, rather than the ability of parents to take them to their educational setting.She said that there was no definitive list of the "exceptional circumstances" that would entitle families to continue receiving travel assistance as the council wanted to keep the criteria "as flexible as possible".Hayden also explained that the appeals process was paused in July because the authority had made some changes to it.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Teaser 3281
Square Dates Each year when I get my new diary, I like to look at the dates to see if they have any interesting properties. When I looked at this year's diary, I was pleased to find two dates that are 'square' in the following way. If the date is expressed with one or two digits for the day (ie, no leading zero is allowed), followed by two digits for the month and then the year in full, then 1.09.2025 is a square date, since 1092025 is the square of 1045. The only other square date this year is 27.09.2025, since 27092025 is the square of 5205. Using the same method of expressing the date, what is the first square date after 2025? Send your solution to: The Sunday Times Teaser 3281, PO Box 29, Colchester, Essex CO2 8GZ or email The first two correct solutions opened after next Saturday each win a £20 Waterstones voucher. Open to 18+ UK & ROI residents only. Solution to Teaser 3279 6432 The winners are: RA England, London W3; G Smithers, Holt, Norfolk.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Full-fat faith: the young Christian converts filling our churches
S queezing through the thronging and startlingly youthful crowd in search of a decent place to sit at the 11am service at St Bartholomew the Great, next to Smithfield meat market in central London, you wouldn't guess that the Anglican Church had spent the past few decades apologetically imploding in an unregarded corner of our national life. The congregation is more than 200 on this unexceptional Sunday. A decade ago, I'm told, it might have been 50 or 60. St Barts owes its success and a measure of online fame (one congregant drily remarks that it is something of a 'meme church') to its embrace of beautiful and traditional worship. But the young crowd is not just here for a cultural Christianity of hymns and picturesque ritual. They are remarkably fervent: genuflecting, bowing and crossing themselves. Most pray on their knees with their hands clasped together and their eyes squeezed shut.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Time to overhaul a university system that has ceased to serve the country's needs
SIR – The post-school education system of the late 1960s and early 1970s was perfectly suited to the country's needs (' Universities 'putting bums on seats' as high A-level grades rise', report, August 15). Universities were for academic excellence; polytechnics combined the technical and the academic; and technical colleges provided Higher National Diploma courses. The system has since been degraded by the proliferation of universities, leading to many degrees becoming worthless. It needs to change. To declare an interest, I was a polytechnic student in the early 1970s; attached to the poly was a technical college offering courses for trades such as plumbing and bricklaying. Some of the teachers there supplied the technical support for my estate management course. Jonathan Youens Bucharest, Romania SIR – It is now in the interests of schools to encourage students to go to university, as that is effectively how their performance is assessed. Young people between the ages of 16 and 18 are given little advice on their options other than: 'Get a degree.' My son, who has just finished his degree, is fortunate to have worked part-time in another field during his studies. He now has a full-time job, unrelated to what he studied. He describes university as an expensive mistake. Britain needs young people to work, to pay tax. That more are not encouraged to start doing this at 16 or 18, rather than several years later after incurring debts in excess of £50,000, is a scandal. Mark Scrimshaw Northwood, Middlesex SIR – This year's A-level results have revealed shocking inequalities. In London, more than 32 per cent were A or above, compared with only 22.9 per cent in the North East. Such disparities extend beyond education. Life expectancy, other health outcomes and transport infrastructure are also poorer in the North East and some other regions. When are these going to be addressed? Dr Robert McKinty Darlington, Co Durham
