Russia's former transport minister dies from gunshot hours after sacking
The body of Roman Starovoit, the ex-minister, was found in his car in a Moscow suburb. He appeared to have killed himself, Russia's investigative committee said in a statement.
The Kremlin published an order signed by Putin to remove Starovoit from his position as transport minister on Monday morning, shortly before news of his death was made public. No reason was given for his dismissal in the order, which was dated 7 July at 9.15am.
But Russian media, including the local edition of Forbes, have reported that Starovoit may have died as early as Friday evening, before the order to dismiss him was published. The timeline of his death and dismissal has not been confirmed by investigators. A member of the State Duma, Andrei Kartapolov, told Russian journalists that Starovoit had died 'quite long ago'.
Starovoit was a prominent official in the Putin government who had previously served from 2018 to 2024 as the governor of the Kursk region, where he oversaw the construction of defensive fortifications for the region on the border with Ukraine after the Russian invasion.
The subsequent governor was arrested in a corruption scandal after investigators claimed that more than 1bn roubles (nearly £10m) had been embezzled from federal funds designated to protect the region from a potential incursion by Ukrainian forces.
Kommersant, a leading Russian business newspaper, reported that other Kursk officials targeted in the embezzlement case had given testimony against Starovoit, indicating that he may also have faced scrutiny or arrest. Top officials who are dismissed from the Russian government can often face criminal charges as they lose the political backing that previously may have protected them from inquiries into their business or political dealings.
Part of the Kursk region was occupied by Ukraine's army last August in a counteroffensive that was deeply embarrassing for the Kremlin, which has sought to keep the war out of Russia and minimise the impact of the conflict on Russian citizens.
Kommersant reported that Starovoit was found with a Makarov pistol that he had been awarded in 2003 for his service 'ensuring public safety' in his role as the governor of the Kursk region.
Dmitry Peskov, Putin's spokesperson, denied that Starovoit's sacking was due to a 'lack of trust' but did not answer questions on why he had been dismissed.
Also on Monday, a senior official at Russia's federal roads agency, Andrei Korneichuk, died at work of an apparent heart attack. There was no clear connection between the two transport officials' deaths.
The Kremlin announced Starovoit's dismissal after hundreds of flights were cancelled across Russia due to a mass disruption caused by Ukrainian drone attacks over the weekend.
As of Monday, nearly 500 flights had been cancelled in Russia and another 1,500 were delayed, according to official statistics. Russia and Ukraine struck each other with hundreds of long-range drones on Sunday as Ukraine said it would scale up drone production in collaboration with western countries. Russia's defence ministry claimed to have shot down more than 150 long-range drones over the weekend.
The strikes on Russia led to what local media described as a 'transport collapse', with photos of travellers stranded in transport hubs including Moscow's Sheremetyevo and St Petersburg's Pulkovo airports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
30 minutes ago
- NBC News
Europeans are still wary of Trump's promises to Ukraine despite apparent U-turn on Putin
President Donald Trump's increasing turn against his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin has inspired hopes in U kraine and among its supporters that he is starting to believe what they've been telling him all along: Moscow is the antagonist and the only way to stop it is with cash and military equipment. But while Monday's apparent U-turn was dramatic, other Ukraine supporters, former officials and other foreign policy experts are wary at least and deeply skeptical at worst. 'The question that Europeans and Ukrainians are asking,' according to Ivo Daalder, former United States ambassador to NATO, is 'how real is this change? And how lasting is this change? And what does it really mean in terms of American policy toward the region?' 'This is the second time that the Trump administration has moved the goal posts,' having briefly cut off aid to Ukraine in February, he said. 'So there are a lot of questions here.' Trump has previously lavished praise on Putin while scorning Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But on Monday in the Oval Office, sitting next to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, he said he was 'very unhappy' with the Kremlin and that the United States would sell 'top-of-the-line weapons' to NATO allies — including the much-demanded Patriot missiles — so that they can be used in Ukraine. Alongside that, if Putin does not agree to a peace deal in 50 days, Trump said, he will slap 100% tariffs on any country that buys Russian goods. That lag time has been criticized across Europe, with officials and experts asking why Trump is giving additional time to an autocrat who has hardly wavered in his desire to subjugate Ukraine. The anxiety is fueled further by the widespread perception in Europe and elsewhere that Trump is a president who makes decisions on a whim and is prone to changing them. Trump himself hinted at this propensity to change his mind quickly. He recalled going home one night and telling first lady Melania Trump, ''I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.'' To which she responded, ''Oh, really, another city was just hit'' in Ukraine by Russia's missiles. The exact details of Trump's new direction are as yet unclear. He said that the shopping list included Patriot missiles, the state-of-the-art American defensive system that Ukraine says it desperately needs to fend off Russia's nearly nightly aerial assaults. European NATO allies were going to buy 'billions of dollars worth of military equipment' from the U.S. 'and that's going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield' in Ukraine, he added. The Patriot missiles could arrive in Ukraine 'very soon — within days, actually,' expedited by European nations giving their existing weapons to Ukraine and replacing them with the new systems delivered by the U.S., he said. 'This is really big,' said Rutte, a man who often heaps praise on Trump. 'It will mean that Ukraine can get its hands on really massive numbers of military equipment, both for air defense, but also missiles, ammunition, etc.' He added, 'if I'm Ukraine, I think this is really great news.' Zelenskyy, who has clashed several times with Trump and his team, posted on X thanking the president 'for the willingness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace.' Other endorsements came with caveats. The U.S. has 'realized that Russia does not really want peace, so in order to have peace, we need to support Ukraine and we need to put the pressure on Russia,' Kaja Kallas, the European Union's foreign policy chief, told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday. However she suggested that waiting almost two months to impose tariffs was too long: 'Fifty days is a very long time if we see that they are killing innocent civilians every day.' That's a view also held by Yuriy Boyechko, CEO and founder of Hope for Ukraine, a nonprofit organization based in Portland, Oregon, that supports Ukrainian refugees in the U.S. 'This is way too long,' he said . 'Unless significant pressure is applied on Putin and the Russian economy immediately, more innocent civilians will die.' Russian officials mixed grave condemnation with mockery. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called Trump's statements 'very serious' because it was 'addressed personally to President Putin.' Whereas former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called it a 'theatrical ultimatum' about which 'Russia didn't care.' A senior Kremlin official told NBC News that Putin may not rush to respond. 'We need to analyze the situation,' he said. 'It might take some time.' Ultimately, the optimism of Ukraine's supporters will be dictated by what's actually in Trump's weapons deal — and whether he sticks with his renewed direction of thinking on the conflict. 'We need to be a bit cautious as to whether this is a sea change in Trump's opinion or if it's just another part of a whiplash effect as he veers backwards and forwards,' Matthew Savill, , director of military sciences at London's Royal United Services Institute think tank, told NBC News' British partner, Sky News. 'His overriding goal is to get credit for ending the fighting.'
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump asked Zelensky if Ukraine could strike Moscow
Donald Trump asked Volodymyr Zelensky if Ukraine was capable of striking Moscow in encouragement of more long-range strikes inside Russia. The US president told Mr Zelensky that he wanted Ukraine to 'make them [Russians] feel the pain' and force Putin to the negotiation table, sources told the Financial Times. 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? ... Can you hit St Petersburg too?' the US president reportedly asked on the July 4 call. The Ukrainian president replied: 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons.' Following the call, Kyiv received a list from US aides of long-range strike systems that could be made available via third-party transfers. Mr Trump has considered sending Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, according to reports. The strike cruise missiles are capable of hitting targets 1,600km away, which would allow Ukraine to strike Moscow. His proposal to arm Ukraine was unveiled on Monday, when he announced plans to supply billions of dollars of weapons to Ukraine by selling them to members of the Nato alliance, including the UK, France and Germany, who would then transfer them to Kyiv. Mr Trump threatened to punish Russia's main trading partners – countries such as China and India – with 100 per cent tariffs if Putin does not sign a peace deal within 50 days. On Tuesday, Reuters reported that Putin intended to keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engaged on his terms for peace. Three sources close to the Kremlin said that Putin believes Russia's economy and its military are strong enough to weather any additional Western measures. 'Putin thinks no one has seriously engaged with him on the details of peace in Ukraine, including the Americans, so he will continue until he gets what he wants,' one of the sources told Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the situation. Despite several telephone calls between Mr Trump and Putin, and visits to Russia by Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy, the Russian leader believes there have not been detailed discussions of the basis for a peace plan, the source said. 'Putin values the relationship with Trump and had good discussions with Witkoff, but the interests of Russia come above all else,' they added. Putin's conditions for peace include a legally binding pledge that Nato will not expand eastwards, Ukrainian neutrality and limits on its armed forces, protection for Russian speakers who live there, and acceptance of Russia's territorial gains, the sources said. Mr Zelensky has said Ukraine will never recognise Russia's sovereignty over its conquered regions and that Kyiv retains the sovereign right to decide whether it wants to join Nato. In a phone call with the BBC on Tuesday, Mr Trump said he was 'disappointed, but not done with Putin'. 'I thought we had a deal done four times and then you go home and you see he just attacked a nursing home or something in Kyiv,' the president told the BBC. When pressed on whether he trusts the Russian leader, Mr Trump replied: 'I trust almost no-one.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Republicans turn on Trump over $10bn Ukraine weapons pledge
Republicans have turned on Donald Trump over his decision to help supply Ukraine with billions of dollars worth of military equipment. In a surprise move on Monday, the US president pledged to sell a 'full complement' of weapons to Nato allies, which will then be turned over to Ukraine. They include Patriot air defence missiles and batteries, as well as short-range missiles and Howitzer rounds in a deal worth as much as $10 billion (£7.4bn). In a further sign of his frustration with the Kremlin, Mr Trump threatened to impose 100 per cent tariffs on Russian trading partners if Vladimir Putin does not sign a peace deal to end the war in 50 days. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a firebrand Republican and Trump ally, harshly criticised the deal saying it goes against the president's campaign promise to avoid the US becoming involved in foreign entanglements. 'Maga did not vote for more weapons to Ukraine,' she wrote on X, in her strongest rebuke of the president to date. 'Maga voted for no more US involvement in foreign wars.' Ms Taylor Greene argued that by funnelling aid to Ukraine, Mr Trump is turning his back on the America First principles that got him elected. 'It's not just Ukraine; it's all foreign wars in general and a lot of foreign aid,' she told The New York Times. 'This is what we campaigned on. This is what I promised also to my district. This is what everybody voted for. And I believe we have to maintain the course.' Under the terms of the deal, announced in the Oval Office alongside Nato secretary general Mark Rutte, Mr Trump said that European nations would purchase 'top of the line' weapons from the US and then transfer them to Ukraine. In some cases, Nato countries will immediately send supplies already in their arsenals to Ukraine and purchase arms from the US to backfill them. However, Ms Taylor Greene remained unconvinced, claiming that US taxpayers would end up footing the bill. 'Without a shadow of a doubt, our tax dollars are being used,' the Georgia representative said, arguing that US troops would need to provide training on the weapons being sent and, given America is the biggest contributor to Nato, US citizens would indirectly be burdened with the cost. 'And so it is US involvement,' she said. Mr Trump's more bellicose foreign policy stance of late, first towards Iran and now Russia, has rankled with isolationists in his Maga base who have called for the US to withdraw from overseas conflicts. In his inaugural address, Mr Trump cast himself as a 'peacemaker' and pledged to end the war in Ukraine on 'day one' of his presidency. 'I said it on every rally stage: 'No more money to Ukraine. We want peace.' We just want peace for those people,' Ms Greene told the New York Times, highlighting the extent to which this message resonated on the campaign trail. She added: 'And guess what? People haven't changed.' 'Overlooked by Washington elites' Addressing the concerns of people in her district, Ms Taylor Greene said the Ukraine deal risks perpetuating a sense of working-class voters being overlooked by Washington elites. 'No one's walking around thinking about Ukraine. No one's walking around thinking about Russia. They're just not,' she told the newspaper. 'They walk around and all they think about is their bills, their problems and the road that may look like crap in front of their house – or they can't buy a house.' Mr Trump's shift in stance has been driven by his frustration with Putin, whom he suggested was 'all talk' about ending the war. However, a significant portion of his Maga supporters remain bewildered by the speed with which Mr Trump has transitioned from berating Ukraine's president Volodomyr Zelensky for being ungrateful to approving new weapons to support his war effort. One former Trump campaign official told the Telegraph that Maga supporters 'hate' the deal. 'The European money mitigates it,' they said. 'But we still hate it. This is not our war, and escalation isn't in America's interest.' Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser and host of the War Room podcast, condemned the announcement, claiming that Mr Zelensky's 'number one priority' was luring Mr Trump deeper into the conflict. 'We're about to arm people we have literally no control over,' Mr Bannon said. 'This is not [the] global war on terror. This is old-fashioned, grinding war in the bloodlands of Europe – and we're being dragged into it.'
