Zelensky warns against ‘rewarding' Russia after Trump urges concessions
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said ahead of talks with Donald Trump on Monday that Russia should not be 'rewarded' for its invasion, after the US leader pressed Ukraine to make concessions in exchange for peace.
The talks, in which European leaders will also take part, follows a Friday summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska that failed to produce a ceasefire in the nearly three-and-a-half-year war.
Trump, who dropped his insistence on a ceasefire in favor of a final peace deal after meeting Putin, said Sunday that Zelensky could end the war 'almost immediately, if he wants to' but that, for Ukraine, there was 'no getting back' Crimea and 'NO GOING INTO NATO.'
European leaders join the negotiations
Kyiv and European leaders have warned against making political and territorial concessions to Russia, whose assault on Ukraine since February 2022 has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths.
'Russia should not be rewarded for its participation in this war…. And it is Moscow that must hear the word: Stop,' Zelensky said in a Facebook post early Monday.
Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet one-on-one before being joined by the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Finland, as well as NATO chief Mark Rutte and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, according to the White House.
The European leaders will also hold a preparatory meeting with Zelensky ahead of talks with Trump, the European Union said.
Ahead of Monday's meeting, China called for 'all parties' to agree to peace 'as soon as possible.'
It will be the first visit by Zelensky to Washington since a February bust-up with Trump and Vice President JD Vance, when the two men berated the Ukrainian leader for being 'ungrateful.'
Russian strikes intensify ahead of talks
Russia kept up its attacks on Ukraine ahead of the new talks, firing at least 140 drones and four ballistic missiles at the country between late Sunday and early Monday, the Ukrainian air force said.
ALSO READ: Trump-Putin summit: What we know
A Russian drone attack on a five-storey apartment block in the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv just before dawn killed at least seven people, including a one-and-a-half year old girl, authorities said.
Zelensky called the strikes an attempt to 'humiliate diplomatic efforts.'
Ukrainian shelling attacks in the Russian-occupied parts of the Kherson and Donetsk regions meanwhile killed two people, Moscow-installed authorities said.
Territories at stake
Russia currently occupies a fifth of Ukraine.
It annexed Crimea in 2014 following a referendum denounced as a sham by Kyiv and the West, and did the same in 2022 in four Ukrainian regions — Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia — even though its forces have not fully captured them.
Russia controls Crimea and is largely in control of the Lugansk region, but not the other three regions.
Russia has suggested it might 'freeze' the front line in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions in exchange for getting control of land not already captured in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions.
A source briefed on a phone call between Trump and European leaders on Saturday told AFP that the US leader was 'inclined to support' this proposal.
ALSO READ: Trump to meet Putin in high-stakes Alaska summit
But Zelensky has repeatedly shot down the notion of ceding territory to Moscow, and says he is constitutionally bound not to give away Crimea.
Yevgeniy Sosnovsky, a photographer from the captured Ukrainian city of Mariupol, said he 'cannot understand' how Ukraine would cede land already under its control.
'Ukraine cannot give up any territories, not even those occupied by Russia,' he told AFP.
Trump envoy Steve Witkoff said Moscow had made 'some concessions' on territory, and that there was an 'important discussion with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.'
'That discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday,' he told CNN, without giving details.
Security guarantees and NATO concerns
Washington has not placed extra sanctions on Moscow, and the lavish welcome offered to Putin in Alaska on his first visit to the West since he invaded Ukraine in 2022 was seen as a diplomatic coup for Russia.
But Trump has raised the possibility of a collective defense guarantee for Ukraine similar to the one in place for NATO members, once the war is over.
The promise would be outside of the framework of the Western military alliance that Ukraine wants to join and which is seen as an existential threat by Russia.
Speaking in Brussels on the eve of his visit to the United States, Zelensky said he was keen to hear more about what Putin and Trump discussed in Alaska.
He also hailed Washington's offer of security guarantees to Ukraine as 'historic.'
NOW READ: Russia suggests Trump is emboldening Ukraine, delaying peace
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
Trump says semiconductor tariffs coming soon
US President Donald Trump said Friday he plans to announce tariffs on steel and semiconductors in the coming weeks. US President Donald Trump said Friday he plans to announce tariffs on steel and semiconductors in the coming weeks. "I'll be setting tariffs next week and the week after, on steel and, I would say, chips. Chips and semiconductors, we'll be setting sometime next week, the week after," Trump said onboard Air Force One as he headed to Alaska for a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump said the levy rate would be "lower at the beginning" but "very high after a certain period of time," as a way to encourage businesses to relocate operations to the United States.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump's performance politics and the cost to South Africa
Charles Matseke 15 August 2025 | 11:31 Donald Trump Racism Foreign policy FILE: US President Donald Trump Donald Trump's political fabric has always been woven with threads of populist theatrics, racial grievance politics, and an impulse-driven approach to governance. Nowhere is this more evident than in his treatment or lack thereof of South Africa. From the start of his presidency, Trump displayed neither a coherent foreign policy for Africa nor an appreciation of South Africa's strategic role on the his engagement was dominated by misinformation and disinformation, most notably his amplification of the so-called 'white genocide' narrative raising the question: was this ignorance, calculated malice, or simply a lack of diplomatic interest?For Trump, foreign policy toward Africa has never been a matter of strategic planning but rather a stage for identity politics and symbolic gestures aimed at his domestic base. His failure to engage meaningfully with President Cyril Ramaphosa particularly during the controversy over farm killings was not just a scheduling oversight. It was a symptom of a deeper perception problem: Trump does not see African leaders as equal political counterparts deserving of diplomatic caution or respect. This mindset reflects his white nationalist worldview, where Black-majority nations are viewed not as strategic partners but as geopolitical traditional U.S. foreign policy, South Africa occupies a vital position as the gateway to African markets, a regional security partner, and a voice within multilateral forums such as BRICS, the African Union, and the G20. Under Trump, however, this relationship shifted from engagement to neglect. His administration largely abandoned Africa-focused policy frameworks in favor of ad-hoc interventions, driven more by ideological posturing than geopolitical calculus. The 'Prosper Africa' initiative ostensibly aimed at boosting U.S. trade and investment barely touched South Africa meaningfully, while Trump's transactional worldview reduced diplomacy to short-term deals, ignoring long-term strategic vacuum allowed domestic and foreign actors to weaponize disinformation. Afrikaner nationalist groups such as AfriForum, with strong networks in the U.S. conservative ecosystem, saw Trump's impulsiveness as a strategic opportunity. Drawing from Melissa Steyn's analysis in Whiteness Just Isn't What It Used to Be, these groups have long grappled with the erosion of white political dominance in post-apartheid South Africa. The 'white genocide' narrative provided them with an emotional hook appealing to Trump's base and bypassing nuanced diplomatic understand why such narratives find resonance, one must examine the historical architecture of Afrikaner nationalism. As T. Dunbar Moodie argues in The Rise of Afrikanerdom, Afrikaner nationalism was more than a political movement it was a quasi-religious civil religion, sanctifying racial separation as divine mandate and framing political dominance as a sacred duty. This belief system provided the moral and ideological scaffolding for apartheid and still echoes today in pockets of Afrikaner society, where victimhood narratives are deployed as political capital. Similarly, Dan O'Meara in Forty Lost Years shows how the National Party meticulously engineered a political order that consolidated Afrikaner economic and cultural power from 1948 to 1994. While apartheid's political edifice collapsed, the psychological and institutional residues of this power-seeking ideology survived. The mobilization of the 'white genocide' discourse in U.S. conservative circles is not a spontaneous phenomenon, it is a strategic continuation of this long tradition of using fear, identity, and international lobbying to protect white minority while Trump amplified the plight of white farmers, he never once addressed the existence of Orania, a whites-only enclave in South Africa, a relic of apartheid's ideology of 'separate development.' Orania is the physical embodiment of white privilege and autonomy in a Black-majority democracy, yet it escapes both U.S. diplomatic scrutiny and international condemnation. That such a place exists without sustained challenge from Washington underscores the selective outrage in U.S. foreign policy where white victimhood narratives are amplified, while systemic racial privilege is 'white genocide' discourse is not merely rhetorical it aligns with potential economic objectives. By casting South Africa as a country hostile to white farmers and foreign investors, it creates diplomatic pressure to dilute Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policies, opening the door for U.S. linked tech and infrastructure projects tied to white economic networks. One cannot ignore that projects like Starlink championed in conservative U.S. circles could benefit from a South African policy environment stripped of its transformation South Africa, the Trump era offers sobering lessons. First, the U.S. even as a self-styled global moral leader is not immune to racialized foreign policy. Second, populist leaders will readily sacrifice diplomatic consistency for domestic political theater, especially when racial narratives resonate with their base. Third, foreign disinformation campaigns, particularly from well-organized minority interest groups, can gain traction when amplified by a superpower's head of response must be more assertive. It should challenge the weaponization of racial narratives by foreign actors and call out selective U.S. outrage. Domestically, it must engage Afrikaner nationalist organizations both at home and abroad on the reality that South Africa is a constitutional democracy belonging 'to all who live in it,' and those seeking preferential treatment on the basis of race have no legitimate diplomatic disregard for South Africa is not simply an extension of domestic U.S. polarization, it is a demonstration of how identity politics now shapes global diplomacy. In this paradigm, facts are subordinate to ideology, and policy is subordinate to populist performance. For South Africa, engaging with such a superpower requires both strategic communication and an unflinching commitment to safeguarding its sovereignty against racialized policy interference. Trump's South Africa 'policy' was never about policy at all it was about politics. And in that theatre, the truth was not a casualty of war; it was an afterthought in a performance aimed not at Pretoria, but at Pennsylvania, Texas, and Florida. Charles Matseke (MPhil in Politics and International Relations) is a researcher and writer with a keen interest in contemporary political dynamics. His research focuses on electoral politics, foreign policy analysis, and international relations, with a particular emphasis on the Global South and Africa's role in global affairs.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'Great honour' to host European leaders, says Trump ahead of Ukraine meeting
US President Donald Trump on Monday foreshadowed his meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European officials at the White House over Russia's war in Ukraine, posting online: 'Let's see what the results will be.' 'A big day at the White House. We have never had so many European leaders here at one time. A great honour for America!!' he wrote.
