Receptionist called a 'lazy b***h' by co-worker says apology wasn't ‘genuine'
The worker, Gwen Doyle, has complained that the apology she got from her colleague after a workplace investigation was 'not genuine' and that the other worker was simply 'told what to say'.
In a complaint under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, Ms Doyle has alleged she was constructively dismissed in October 2024 from the Athboy Family Practice in Co Meath, where she had worked for 19 years.
Her trade union, Siptu, told the
Workplace Relations Commission
(WRC) at a hearing on Tuesday that the clinic's management denied her natural justice in investigating her formal grievance about the incident and failed to address a 'toxic' workplace environment
READ MORE
That left her with 'no other option' except to consider herself constructively dismissed, it was submitted on her behalf.
The employer is contesting the case – its solicitor, Terry Gorry, stating that it made 'strenuous efforts' to resolve the formal grievance.
Giving evidence to the WRC on Tuesday, Ms Doyle said that on a date in April 2024, she was on a call dealing with a repair of a computer when her colleague turned to her and said: 'Answer the phone, you lazy b***h.'
Ms Doyle said her reply was: 'Sorry, what did you say?'
Her colleague then said: 'Answer the phone, you lazy b***h, you do nothing in here,' the complainant said.
She said she went and reported the remark to the practice manager, Kirsty Sanderson, who sent her to the canteen.
'I couldn't speak. I was in bits over the whole thing,' Ms Doyle said. She said she agreed when Ms Sanderson proposed getting the other receptionist to apologise.
The other receptionist then came to the canteen and Ms Sanderson told her: 'You'll have to apologise,' Ms Doyle said.
'I've no intention of apologising. You are a lazy b***h,' was the other worker's reply, the complainant said.
Ms Sanderson then made reference to 'numerous complaints' about Ms Doyle, the complainant added. The practice manager then said: 'You have no interest in your job. You're bringing your family life into it,' the complainant added.
'I was put in a back room and told to stay there. [The other receptionist] was told to go to reception,' Ms Doyle said.
Ms Doyle said she remained in the room until lunchtime, when Ms Sanderson went to her and asked whether she was going to for her lunch.
On her return, Ms Doyle said she told Ms Sanderson: 'I need a list of the complaints against me.'
'She said: 'You're not getting them.' I said: 'I want a written apology,'' Ms Doyle added.
She said she then returned to her normal place of work at the clinic's reception and worked until 5pm, but that it was a 'toxic environment'.
The tribunal heard Ms Doyle took sick leave and remained on sick leave thereafter, except for one day when she was persuaded by a colleague to return because the clinic was 'stuck'.
'It was absolutely horrendous,' she said.
Ms Doyle said both Ms Sanderson and the other receptionist apologised to her following a formal grievance process that was completed in July 2024.
She said the other receptionist told her: 'Sorry for what I said.'
'That was it, and she just walked out,' Ms Doyle said. 'Kirsty said: 'I'm sorry for what I said, but I refute some of the things you said in your report,'' she added. 'They were not genuine. Both apologies were not genuine. They were told what to say,' the complainant said.
'I could not go back into the work environment. It was too toxic. It wouldn't have been good for my health, mentally or physically,' she said.
Ms Doyle's trade union advocate, Peter Glynn said the grievance investigation was 'shallow and lacked substance'.
He added that when Ms Doyle took issue with the grievance outcome, she received correspondence stating that the incident had been 'dealt with' and the matter was 'closed'.
This remained the position after Ms Glynn got her trade union got involved, Mr Glynn submitted, though the employer did state that it was 'willing to look at rosters to identify the best working environment', he added.
Ms Doyle's position was that no matter what hours she was given, she would still be required to work with Ms Sanderson.
The tribunal heard the employer objected when the union referred the case to the WRC for consideration under the Industrial Relations Act 1969 in September last year.
'Mediation was sought and offered. The employer failed to engage,' Mr Glynn said. At this stage, Ms Doyle was left 'no other option' except to conclude she had been constructively dismissed, he added.
Adjudication officer Michael McEntee has adjourned the matter to later in the summer, when Mr Gorry is expected to continue with his cross-examination of the complainant.
Ms Sanderson is expected to give evidence at a later stage in the case, as are Dr Anthony Ryan and another member of the clinic's staff, Catherine Dolan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
A night with Dublin's taxi drivers: ‘If somebody decides to run, you can't control it'
Shortly after midnight, Haider Zaman is parked on Balfe Street in Dublin 's city centre, presumably waiting on someone in the nearby Bruxelles bar to call it a night. He is more than halfway through his shift as a taxi driver and will likely continue until 3am or 4am, depending on the amount of work available. 'I would love to leave this as soon as my kids start going to school,' he says. The 32-year-old father of two young children originally moved to Ireland from Pakistan in 2007. READ MORE He has been working as a taxi driver for nearly two years, saying it is a 'really tough job' but one that provides flexibility and allows him to help out with the children at home. He works 80, and sometimes 90, hours each week, he says. The money he makes from the first 40 or so hours offsets costs associated with the job, including rent for his car, insurance, petrol and weekly cleaning. Taxi driver Haider Zaman: 'I don't want to fall into a situation to try save €50 or €60 worth of fare where they could stab me and still run away.' Photograph: Jack White 'That means I need another 40 hours to cover the same amount to bring home, I literally have to.' One of his app accounts, through which members of the public can book rides, was recently suspended for 10 hours after a passenger reported him for having a faulty seat belt, he says, still frustrated at the thought of it. 'I found out the belts were fine and she was plugging it into the wrong one.' Unlike others who spoke to The Irish Times on a recent Wednesday night, he has 'thankfully' never been attacked while working. He has, however, like seemingly all drivers, experienced 'a lot of runners' – or those who leave the vehicle without paying. There is 'no way to control it', he says, describing the loss of significant fares, in particular, as 'devastating'. 'You can't tie anybody to your car, even using a child lock. If somebody decides to run, they come prepared, and I don't want to fall into a situation to try save €50 or €60 worth of fare where they could stab me and still run away.' There have been moments where he was close to being 'battered out', he says, noting on one occasion a man, who refused to pay on arriving at Newbridge, Co Kildare, from Tallaght hospital, phoned two of his friends to come outside. 'Luckily, he got out before his friends arrived and I was able to lock my taxi. I asked if he could at least pay me something, and they all came together and started hammering the car, kicking the car and told me to get out of there,' he says. 'I had no choice, that was an €80 loss of fare and I had to come back to Dublin. There's nothing you can do, you can't force people to pay.' The recent attacks on Indian men in Ireland are provoking a palpable sense of anxiety among some taxi drivers. Photograph: iStock Several drivers remarked how taxi drivers are 'vulnerable' and 'easy targets' due to the nature of their work, unsure of who is sitting behind them or what their intentions are. 'It could be a criminal, a murderer or it could be the nicest person in the world, it could be anybody,' says Zaman. The vast majority of those working late at night, who spoke to The Irish Times, are originally from abroad, and feel as though they are being 'targeted'. They list off recent assaults and attacks on Indians living in the capital as examples, such as that of a man who was violently assaulted and partially stripped by a group in Tallaght on July 19th. Others mentioned the violent assault of Dr Santosh Yadav, who said he was left 'bleeding everywhere' after being attacked from behind by a group of teenagers in Clondalkin on July 27th. These attacks are provoking a palpable sense of anxiety among taxi drivers like Owais, a 49-year-old originally from Pakistan who wished to give his surname only. [ One Night in Dublin ... with the bouncers at Copper Face Jacks: Once you're gone, you're gone Opens in new window ] He has worked a variety of jobs in Ireland over the past 25 years, most recently as a security officer in a psychiatric hospital, before becoming a taxi driver. 'It's very uncertain,' he says as a large group of Camden Street revellers passes his taxi heading towards Wexford Street, adding: 'It's very rough, especially for the foreigner drivers.' 'I'm here the last 25 years in Dublin and I've never been this frustrated and anxious as much as now. 'Most of the time, I'm worried to come out for work, I'm worried about my own health and safety because I don't know who I'm taking or what will happen.' On Dame Street the week prior, several young men surrounded his car and tried to open the doors before shaking, punching and spitting at it, he says. They appeared as though they were going to attack him, he adds. 'They tried to break the side mirror and I managed to move the car and get away. 'I didn't work the last few days,' he says. He has reported the incident to gardaí. Pointing to a nearby spot on Wexford Street, Owais says his windscreen was smashed in June. 'He punched it. The fella looked not well. I asked him where he was going and he was aggressive and then he smashed my screen.' He has become increasingly anxious on hearing of attacks and prefers to drive his children rather than allow them to take public transport. His children, aged between 11 and their early 20s, have lately tried to stop him from going to work. 'They say I'm not safe, they are really worried about me. 'As much as you feel Irish, I feel myself [I] am Irish after living in this country for 25 years, legally, and paying tax, so I deserve to be safe,' he says. [ One Night in Dublin ... out with the city's street cleaners: Smashed bottles, vomit, urine and worse Opens in new window ] Several drivers from African countries, in particular, say they have experienced racism while working in Dublin. 'You have to deal with it and move on,' says one man parked on Dame Street. Originally from Nigeria, he has worked as a taxi driver in the capital for almost two decades. 'You meet more drunk people in the night. That makes it more difficult and more challenging,' he adds, as alerts ring from his phone indicating several people nearby wish to go home. This is alongside a perceived rise in anti-immigrant sentiment. 'When people say: 'You people came into my country', I hate that, but we have to be very patient, we cannot fight with someone,' says Zahid Abbasi, originally from Pakistan. At the nearby base of George's Street, the midweek nightlife is more alive and almost hectic. Taxis pass in flurries in both directions, bringing those leaving bars home. Several people appear frustrated that their attempts to flag down a taxi was unsuccessful. Impatience is on the rise among passengers, drivers say. With the advent of apps such as FreeNow, Uber and Bolt, prospective passengers impatiently cancel trips if drivers are more than several minutes away, they say. Many drivers take jobs only through these apps now, having built up a lack of trust in those who flag from the side of the road and might fail to pay. Other drivers, on the other hand, say the vast majority of customers are 'decent'. Dan Marcu says he feels safe as a taxi driver. Photograph: Jack White Some, like Dan Marcu, originally from Romania, who has worked as a taxi driver for eight years in Dublin, almost exclusively at night, have had 'no issues so far'. Parked a few cars up from Owais's, he says he never feels unsafe or anxious, pointing to his bicep and laughing. [ A night with the Dublin Fire Brigade: 'I didn't recognise my former colleague until he was pronounced dead' Opens in new window ] [ One Night in Dublin ... at the museum: A nocturnal walkabout at the Irish Museum of Modern Art Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
CCTV finally installed to catch dumpers in Dublin's worst litter black spot
CCTV cameras, due to be erected last January to catch illegal dumpers in Dublin's north inner city, have finally been installed. Dublin City Council last September announced plans to use CCTV to identify illegal dumpers for the first time in almost a decade. The north inner city is regularly ranked the dirtiest area in the State. Three streets in the area were chosen as pilot locations for the scheme: Belvedere Place, Sherrard Street Lower and Summer Street North. New CCTV cameras have been installed on three streets in Dublin's north inner city to catch illegal dumpers. Photograph: Olivia Kelly These streets, off the North Circular Road close to Mountjoy Square, are in Dublin's worst litter black spot, regularly cited as the State's dirtiest urban area by anti-litter organisation Irish Business Against Litter (Ibal). READ MORE The council had planned to install the CCTV last January, but the project was delayed after it emerged the cameras could not be attached to existing public lighting poles, as had been planned by the waste management division. Some cabling powering street lights also powered traffic lights, and the council's lighting section was concerned that vandalism to the cameras could 'knock out the traffic lights', Barry Woods, the council's head of waste management, told councillors earlier this year. New poles have instead been erected on the three streets and have been equipped with solar-powered cameras. The cameras have been switched on in recent days and are now 'fully operational', the council said. Signs warning that the cameras are in use for the 'prevention, deterring, detection and prosecution' of illegal dumping have been attached to each pole. Illegal dumpers face fines of €150 or up to €4,000 if convicted in the District Court. A new CCTV camera has been installed on Belvedere Place to catch illegal dumpers. Photograph: Olivia Kelly On Wednesday morning, the three streets appeared to be free of any obvious illegally-dumped bags or other significant signs of fly-tipping, although some litter had accumulated on Sherrard Street Lower in a gap between newly installed planters and the footpath. The council used CCTV a decade ago to combat illegal dumping, with significant success achieved in reducing litter levels. In 2014, it began installing CCTV at litter black spots, mostly in the north inner city, as part of a crackdown on dumping. It subsequently erected a poster featuring 12 dumpers with their faces blurred. However, the move aroused the attention of the Data Protection Commission , which questioned the proportionality of the scheme and the dumpers' rights to privacy. The commission in 2018 undertook an investigation of CCTV use by local authorities nationally and concluded that existing litter pollution and waste management law did not provide for using CCTV to identify dumpers. New legislation, the Circular Economy and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 2022, amended the Litter Pollution Acts to allow CCTV use. The council spent two years working with various State agencies to develop a new scheme. Data-protection impact assessments were subsequently approved for the three pilot streets. Following the north inner-city pilot, the council plans to extend CCTV to bottle and textile banks, where there is a high level of illegal dumping, before considering some suburban areas for the scheme.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Policing the traffic
Sir, – As a retired orthopaedic surgeon I have spent a considerable amount of my professional life dealing with road traffic victims. According to the recent, as yet unpublished Crowe report, 'gardaí working in road policing were openly 'hostile' towards doing their jobs', In most instances policing for speeding and 'jumping' red lights can be fully automated with existing technology, freeing up gardaí for other duties. All roads in London and other English cities are monitored by such technology. My daughter recently received a speeding ticket in London for driving at 21 mph in a 20mph zone! READ MORE Over the past year, having driven some 7,000 miles, I am aware of only seeing two speed vans. As a so-called country designated for hi-tech we remain in the dark ages. – Yours, etc, JAMES M SHEEHAN(FRCS), Blackrock, Co Dublin.
