logo
‘Define mixed development'

‘Define mixed development'

The Star17-05-2025

PETALING JAYA: Consumers and stakeholders have called for the proposed Real Property Development Act (RPDA) to clearly define what constitutes mixed development, which currently lacks protection under the law.
Voicing their support for the government's proposal to introduce the RPDA, they say it is a long-overdue effort to protect buyers of commercial and mixed-use properties.
They said mixed developments such as retail, commercial, small office/home office (Soho), small office/flexible office (Sofo) and small office/versatile office (Sovo) developments lack legal protection under the existing Housing Development Act (Act 118).
Federation of Malaysian Consumers Association's (Fomca) chief executive officer Saravanan Thambirajah, emphasised the critical need for the RPDA to clearly define what constitutes mixed development.
'The Act must clearly state what qualifies as mixed development and ensure that all such projects are fully regulated – just like residential ones.
'This clarity is essential to ensure comprehensive regulation and protection for buyers in this evolving sector of the property market,' he said in an interview yesterday.
Saravanan noted that robust safeguard measures are necessary to protect buyers from abandoned projects.
'We need mandatory developer licensing and financial checks, regulated accounts for buyer payments, strong and transparent Sale and Purchase Agreements, and a clear 'Option to Purchase' system to let buyers exit if a project is delayed.'
He also advocated for the establishment of a dedicated tribunal or complaints platform for buyers affected by such issues.
Reiterating the need for proper enforcement, he said: 'Laws are only as good as their enforcement.'
'We need a system that monitors projects, penalises rogue developers, and gives buyers timely updates and help when problems arise,' he said.
Despite the support for the RPDA, Saravanan cautioned against hasty implementation.
He stressed the importance of thorough consultation with all stakeholders – buyers, NGOs, legal experts and developers – to prevent unintended consequences or market instability.
PMC Facilities & Real Estate chief executive officer Paul Puah Chee Keong lauded the RPDA, and called for the standardisation of assessment rates for commercial and residential developments.
He highlighted a pressing issue where consumers are currently paying commercial rates for properties intended for residential or dwelling purposes.
'Even though it's a commercial title, many Soho, Sovo and service apartments are designed for dwelling purposes.
'It's only fair that these should fall under residential categories for taxes and utilities. The quit rent, assessment and utilities should be adjusted accordingly,' he said.
Puah noted the RPDA's potential benefits in extending purchaser protections to commercial properties.
'If the new Act can extend protections similar to those in the Housing Development Act (HDA), it would be a significant improvement,' he said, referencing the HDA's existing safeguards like accrual accounts and transparent billing processes as 'sufficient.'
He highlighted the importance of aligning the RPDA with the Strata Management Act to ensure seamless implementation by property management practitioners.
'The Act should clearly spell out management components for mixed developments. This includes service charges and other operational standards,' he said.
Puah also stressed the necessity of clearly defining mixed developments within the RPDA.
'We need clarity to avoid confusion, as the market is already complicated by various terms like Soho, Sofo and Sovo.
'They are essentially the same,' he said, cautioning against being swayed by commercial interests that might manipulate definitions for profit.
Strata Property Owners Association Selangor & KL advisor Law Hock Hua weighed in on the proposed Building Managers Act, which aims to tackle the widespread issue of inadequate property and building management.
'The chronic issue of poor property and building management is due to the quality and commitment of the building managers, not the quantity of licences,' he said.
To address this, Law proposed property management exams at different levels, like the LCCI for accounting, to help employers assess candidates' academic qualifications.
'This structured approach would enhance the evaluation of managerial capabilities.'
Secondly, he suggested that licensed property managers should place a bond when handling finances.
'Unlike unlicensed managers who must post a bond, licensed ones don't, which affects their commitment,' he said, pointing out the imbalance in the current system.
Meanwhile, The Housing and Local Government Ministry had earlier said it is considering introducing a law to address abandoned commercial properties and to improve consumer rights protection, says its minister Nga Kor Ming.
He said Sofo and Sovo properties are not covered under the current Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act, which is limited to residential developments.
'Due to the absence of legal protection, buyers affected by abandoned projects under these categories often find themselves with no legal avenue for recourse.
'Following extensive engagements with industry professionals, NGOs and other stakeholders, the ministry has decided to study a new law known as the Real Property Development Act (RPDA) to resolve this issue,' said Nga in his speech at the StarProperty Real Estate Developers Awards 2025 on Thursday.
Nga said the RPDA will include certain commercial developments which will safeguard the rights of property purchasers.
Nga also said his ministry is mulling the Building Managers Act to address the chronic issue of poor property and building management.
At present, he said there are only 594 firms licensed to practise management, serving 26,334 strata schemes or 2.91 million strata units in Malaysia.
'This highlights a serious gap where there are insufficient licensed firms to effectively manage all existing strata schemes. As a result, many property owners and tenants face significant challenges due to declining property values caused by poor property management,' he said.
'With the Building Managers Act, along with the soon-to-be tabled Urban Renewal Act, we are committed to addressing the root problem of aged, dilapidated urban buildings,' he added.
As of March, the ministry, through the Taskforce on Sick and Abandoned Private Housing Projects, has successfully revived 1,044 private housing projects nationwide worth RM100.1bil in total, benefiting 124,539 homebuyers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bursa slaps 5 directors of real estate company with RM350,000 fine
Bursa slaps 5 directors of real estate company with RM350,000 fine

Free Malaysia Today

time2 days ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Bursa slaps 5 directors of real estate company with RM350,000 fine

Bursa Malaysia Securities said it views the breach seriously, as an immediate announcement was crucial to shareholders and investors in that it related to Meridian Bhd's level of operations to warrant continued trading or listing on the Official List. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd has fined five directors of real estate services company Meridian Bhd a total of RM350,000 for failure to immediately announce that the company had an insignificant business or operations. Bursa said Meridian had been publicly reprimanded for breach of the Main Market Listing Requirements following the announcement of the unaudited quarterly report for the financial period ended June 30, 2023 (Q4 2023) on Aug 29 that year. 'Meridian had an insignificant business or operations based on Q4 2023, where the company's revenue of RM2.738 million on a consolidated basis represented 0.93% of the company's share capital of RM294.021 million as at June 30. 'Meridian only made the first announcement on Sept 26 after a delay of 28 days,' it said in a statement. Bursa named the five directors as former CEO Yap Ting Hau, who resigned on Dec 29, 2023, Tang Boon Koon, Chew Shin Yong, Ng Kok Hok and Kunamony S Kandiah. Yap and Tang were fined RM100,000 each, while Chew, Ng and Kunamony were fined RM50,000 each. 'Bursa Malaysia Securities views the breach seriously, as the first announcement was crucial to shareholders and investors in that it related to Meridian's level of operations to warrant continued trading or listing on the Official List,' said the bourse. It said there will be possible suspension and delisting if Meridian fails to regularise its level of operations within the timeframes prescribed by the listing requirements. 'Timely disclosure is important towards facilitating informed investment decisions,' it said.

All job contracts must be stamped from next year, says LHDN
All job contracts must be stamped from next year, says LHDN

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

All job contracts must be stamped from next year, says LHDN

PUTRAJAYA: The Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) has announced that all employment contracts between employers and employees must be stamped with effect from Jan 1 next year. This directive is in line with the phased implementation of the Stamp Duty Self-Assessment System as outlined in Budget 2025, it said in a statement on Friday (June 6). ALSO READ: 'Stamp duty for job contracts another burden for businesses' LHDN said comprehensive stamp duty audit activities had already been conducted nationwide since January this year, following the issuance of the Stamp Duty Audit Framework. "Through the audit activities and compliance operations, one of the key findings has been that many employment contract documents between employers and employees have not been stamped as required under Item 4, First Schedule of the Stamp Act 1949, where the stamp duty is set at RM10," the statement read. It said that to ease the burden on employers, the Finance Ministry has agreed to exempt employment contracts executed before Jan 1 this year from stamp duty obligations. ALSO READ: Job contracts stamping rule could hurt SMEs This requirement is enforced based on the powers granted to the Finance Minister under subsection 80(1A) of the Stamp Act 1949 and the authority to remit late stamping penalties provided to the Collector of Stamp Duty under subsection 47A(2) of the same Act. In addition, employment contracts finalised from Jan 1 to Dec 31 this year will be subject to stamp duty. However, a remission of late stamping penalties will be granted, provided that the employment contracts are stamped on or before Dec 31, under the powers of the Collector under subsection 47A(2) of the Act. ALSO READ: Stamp duty on employment contracts burdens businesses, says association According to LHDN, employment contracts finalised from Jan 1 next year will be subject to stamp duty, and any delays in stamping will result in penalties being imposed. It urged all employers to review and update existing and upcoming employment contracts to ensure full compliance with stamping requirements as stipulated under the Act. – Bernama

Ilham Tower seized again by MACC
Ilham Tower seized again by MACC

The Star

time2 days ago

  • The Star

Ilham Tower seized again by MACC

PETALING JAYA: The iconic Ilham Tower (pic) has been seized again by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) – this time under a different Act. The anti-graft body did so after receiving legal authorisation for the seizure from the deputy public prosecutor's office. The tower, owned by the family of the late former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, whose widow Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid is facing charges in court, had been seized in 2023 but the order expired recently. With the new order, all dealings related to the 274m-tall tower's transfer of ownership will be prohibited. The MACC said it had ordered the immediate seizure of the 60-storey skyscraper under Section 51(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. 'Through a notice of seizure of immovable property under the section on June 4, the authorisation for seizure was granted pursuant to the powers conferred upon the Public Prosecutor under Section 376(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593). 'This means the deputy public prosecutor is satisfied with the information provided by the MACC related to an offence under subsection 4(1) of the AMLATFPUAA 2001 for this case,' it said in a statement yesterday. The tower was originally seized by the MACC in December 2023 due to an offence under the MACC Act 2009. That seizure order expired after 18 months. The seizure is believed to be part of an anti-money laundering probe that started in late May this year over a RM2.3bil (US$500mil) corporate transaction in November 1997 involving public-listed Renong Bhd and United Engineers Malaysia Bhd (UEM), both Umno-linked entities. Meanwhile, lawyers for Na'imah has issued a statement, labelling the seizure as 'pure harassment'. 'The same building has already been seized by the MACC and yet, is now being seized again. 'In short, they want to keep seizing our client's property even though there is no evidence of corruption. 'We will, on behalf of our client, challenge the seizure of Ilham Tower in court immediately,' said lawyers Rajesh Nagarajan and Sachpreetraj Singh Sohanpal. On May 22, MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said eight investigation papers had been opened into the assets owned by Daim, his family and proxies, which had not been declared to the MACC during the initial 2023 investigation. On Wednesday, the High Court allowed an application by the MACC to freeze £132mil worth of assets in London that were also allegedly linked to Na'imah and her family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store