logo
Democrats say Trump is illegally blocking them from visiting Ice detention: ‘The goal is to bully us'

Democrats say Trump is illegally blocking them from visiting Ice detention: ‘The goal is to bully us'

The Guardian5 days ago
The Arizona representative Yassamin Ansari toured a detention facility in May where immigrants rounded up as part of the Trump administration's campaign of mass deportation were being housed. She described what she saw inside as 'sickening' and 'worse than prison' – immigrant detainees were held in overcrowded, moldy cells and many reported that they did not have reliable access to food, water or medical care.
Two months later, Ansari returned to the remote desert complex to conduct another congressional oversight visit. This time, she was denied entry.
It wasn't an isolated incident. From New York to California, Democratic members of Congress have been repeatedly blocked from entering Ice detention facilities where thousands of noncitizens – many with no criminal convictions – are being held.
Democratic officials' legislative checks – a legal right for members of Congress – have consistently confirmed reports that immigrant detainees are being kept in 'filthy' and 'inhumane' conditions with little regard for due process. Now, the facilities have become a battleground in the intensifying standoff between the Trump administration and Democratic lawmakers over the president's supercharged immigration agenda.
'The administration's goal is to intimidate us and bully us, bully us out of doing our jobs for sure,' Representative LaMonica McIver, a New Jersey Democrat who has been accused of assaulting federal agents during a confrontation at the Delaney Hall detention center, told the Guardian. 'If they can get away with doing this to me, they can get away with doing it to anyone. But more importantly, imagine what they're doing in the dark to others who are not of an elected status, who are not in public eye view.'
McIver, who has pleaded not guilty, said her concerns took on new resonance when, a month later, detainees at the hastily-converted jailhouse pushed down a dormitory wall – an act advocates described as an outcry against hunger and overcrowding.
Republicans accuse Democrats of failing to follow protocol, and say their unannounced visits are more political grandstanding than genuine congressional oversight. But Democrats counter that it is their responsibility to shed light on the most hidden aspects of Trump's deportation agenda, which has ensnared Daca recipients, legal residents and even US citizens.
A report released last week by Democratic senator Jon Ossoff's office, compiled in part from site visits, found widespread human rights abuses in immigrant detention centers, including the mistreatment of pregnant women and children. 'Obstruction of Congressional oversight by the Department of Homeland Security has been an impediment to site visits and interviews with detainees,' the report noted. The DHS sought to debunk the report, calling its allegations 'garbage' and saying Ossoff and his staff have never been denied oversight visits.
Last month, a dozen Democratic members of Congress filed suit over a Trump-era DHS policy requiring members of Congress and their staff to provide a week's notice before any requested visit. They say the requirement is more than red tape – it is unconstitutional. The rule, the lawmakers argue in their suit, unlawfully restricts their oversight authority and prevents a co-equal branch of government from doing its job.
Under a provision of federal law that funds Ice, the government may not prevent a member of Congress 'from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens'. Requiring advance notice, Democrats say, gives the administration time to create a misleading picture of daily operations.
'This is kind of like general oversight 101,' Colorado representative Jason Crow, a Democrat and one of the plaintiffs, told the Guardian. 'You announce a visit, and they roll out what they want you to see, and things are dressed up and cleaned up.'
Crow has conducted site inspections at immigration detention sites in his district since 2019 – and he helped pass the law that solidified Congress's right to make unannounced inspections. In July, he was blocked from entering a center in Aurora.
Similar confrontations are playing out nationwide. On Wednesday, a delegation of Democratic representatives from New York, including the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Adriano Espaillat, were turned away from a center in Brooklyn now housing detained immigrants under a new agreement with the Bureau of Prisons.
'This blatant lack of respect towards the legislative branch is a deterioration of checks and balances,' Espaillat said after the encounter. 'All while they hide their atrocities from the public.'
In a response posted on X, the DHS called the lawmakers' efforts 'deeply unserious'. 'These members did not follow proper protocol and schedule their visit. Instead they brought a gaggle of media to drive clicks and fundraising emails,' the department said.
In a statement, department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said Ice had imposed the new visitation policy to protect the president's constitutional authority to carry out immigration enforcement and protect agency personnel from 'a surge in assaults, disruptions, and obstructions to enforcement – including by member of Congress themselves'.
'A week is sufficient to ensure no intrusion on the President's constitutional authority,' she said.
As relatives and lawyers struggle to locate and contact people in Ice custody, advocates say congressional visits are essential to building a public record of conditions inside facilities that operate far from public view.
'We are not talking about a mistake here and there,' said Clarissa Martínez De Castro, vice-president of the Latino Vote Initiative at UnidosUS. 'We're talking about a pattern of abuse that is happening in multiple communities, and bearing witness to that, and building that record so that members who may want to … are not able to say that this is happenstance or anecdotal.'
Ice arrests and detentions rose sharply in the first six months after Trump returned to the White House. In Democratic-leaning states masked Ice agents are frequently arresting immigrants at worksites, in the streets and in mass roundups – aggressive tactics that triggered protests in cities such as Los Angeles. Their targets are increasingly people with no criminal records at all.
As arrests soar to record numbers, the nation's immigration detention system – a patchwork of government-run and private facilities – is buckling under the strain. By late June, it was over capacity by more than 13,500 people, according to a Guardian analysis of public data from the Deportation Data Project. Ten immigration detainees have died in federal custody so far this year, compared to 11 deaths in all of 2024.
McLaughlin called claims of overcrowding and poor conditions at Ice detention centers 'categorically false'. The agency, she added, has 'worked diligently to obtain greater necessary detention space' to accommodate the Trump administration's mass arrest and incarceration operation.
The scramble to create more detention beds has seen the agency sign new contracts with private prisons companies, as well as federal and state prisons. The secretary of the DHS, Kristi Noem, recently touted plans to open a detention center in Indiana it calls the 'Speedway Slammer', following the opening of 'Alligator Alcatraz', a facility built in the middle of the Florida Everglades. Last week, the Pentagon said Fort Bliss, an army base in Texas, was prepared to accept as many as 1,000 immigrant detainees by the end of the month.
On Tuesday, the Trump administration was ordered to improve conditions inside an immigration holding facility in New York City, after advocates filed a lawsuit on behalf of detainees who described being kept in unsanitary and overcrowded cells, without access to basic necessities, including hygiene products.
Shortly after immigration raids swept Los Angeles in June, triggering days of tense protests, Congresswoman Judy Chu of California said her office began receiving urgent requests from advocates and worried family members asking for help locating people believed to be held at a center in the remote desert town of Adelanto.
Chu had visited the facility several times during her years in office. But on 8 June, guards scrambled to lock the fence when she arrived with California congressmen Gil Cisneros and Derek Tran, she recounted. The trio shouted their names and held up signs identifying themselves as members of Congress – but they were turned away.
'It was illegal, of course, because we have this right to go in,' Chu said in an interview.
More than a week later, Chu and a larger delegation of California Democrats were granted access to the facility and were able to meet with people detained during the raids, including a Daca recipient. Some said they had gone days without a change of clothes and were, in many cases, unable to call their families or legal representatives.
'We must keep on trying, because otherwise we don't know what will happen to these detainees,' Chu said, vowing to push for more access. 'The less attention that is being given through our oversight inspections, the more [DHS] thinks it can get away with the worst conditions possible.'
Congressman Jay Obernolte, a Republican of California, came away with a different impression when he toured the Adelanto facility in July, days after Trump deployed the national guard and active duty marines to quell the immigration protests that had erupted across Los Angeles. In a statement, he said that those in custody at the facility have 'access to medical care, legal counsel, meals, and the full rights guaranteed under federal law'.
'Facilities like Adelanto exist to help Ice enforce our immigration laws and keep our communities safe,' he said. 'The vast majority of detainees housed here have committed serious crimes in addition to being present in our country illegally. They are being processed quickly, fairly, and humanely.'
In a statement,​ a spokesman​ for the private prison firm GEO Group said that​ the detention facilities it operates, like Adelanto in California and elsewhere across the country, provide 'around-the-clock access to medical care​' as well as 'in-person and virtual​ legal and family visitation' in addition to other services. ​The detention centers adhered to strict federal detention standards on safety, food and medical care in addition to the facility's capacity, the spokesman said, stating: 'Simply put, our facilities are never overcrowded.​'
As Democratic officials continue to face barriers, they have started sharing best practices for securing access.
Before visiting a facility in Eloy, Arizona, to check on a local restaurant owner held there in Ice custody, Congressman Greg Stanton consulted another member of Congress for advice. He brought a copy of the law that affirms members' oversight rights and asked to speak with senior officials on site.
Still, he was refused entry.
'I think others feel the same way I do, which is, you don't get to pick and choose which laws you follow,' Stanton said. 'And it may be inconvenient to have a member of Congress show up and try to do their duty of oversight, but that doesn't matter. This is what the law says, and you've got to follow the law.'
Brian Todd, a spokesman for the private prison contractor CoreCivic, which operates the Eloy Detention Center, said that while the company endeavors to be 'as accommodating and transparent as possible,' all congressional visits must be coordinated through Ice's office of congressional relations. He also said that the facilities were closely monitored by federal observers to ensure compliance and said claims of poor food or water quality at the center were 'patently false'.
'We know this is a highly charged, emotional issue for many people,' Todd said, 'but the fact is we operate safe, secure facilities that provide high quality services for our government partners at Ice'.
Crow, the Colorado congressman, began inspections of a privately operated immigration facility outside Denver in 2019, following repeated community reports about poor conditions, disease outbreaks, access to medical care and poor food storage.
'I represent a lot of immigrants and refugees, and frequently we're dealing with their families or with constituents and checking on individual conditions or access to counsel for residents of our district,' he said.
At first, access was limited – prompting his push to strengthen protections for members of Congress. He eventually created a toolkit complete with a template for oversight visits, which he now shares with other members of Congress.
'There are egregious abuses occurring on a daily basis around the country, everything from unmarked vans with masked agents jumping out and grabbing people … to the lack of access to legal counsel and a variety of abuses,' he said. 'So that's what we're worried about. And clearly this administration wants to hide their activities.'
McIver, whose charges stem from an attempt to shield Newark mayor Ras Baraka from arrest during a protest at the facility, said she still has a right to conduct oversight visits – she remains a member of Congress and serves on a homeland security committee. But with a serious legal case pending, she has opted not to return – for now.
'They're using me as an example to try to be as cruel as possible to me and humiliate me and intimidate me, hoping that that will carry over to other people,' she said.
Despite the risks, other Democratic members of Congress are still showing up – even when doors are slammed in their faces – because, as McIver put it, 'it's their job'.
'They're not stopping.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democratic lawmakers end walkout, setting stage for vote on redrawn map
Texas Democratic lawmakers end walkout, setting stage for vote on redrawn map

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Texas Democratic lawmakers end walkout, setting stage for vote on redrawn map

Aug 18 (Reuters) - Democratic lawmakers in Texas returned to the state on Monday, ending a two-week walkout that broke quorum and temporarily blocked Republican efforts to redraw congressional maps at the behest of U.S. President Donald Trump. Texas House of Representatives Minority Leader Gene Wu, chairperson of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said in a statement that Democrats returned because they had achieved their two main goals. The first was to block a vote on new congressional maps in a first special legislative session that ended Friday. The second goal was to prompt California and other Democratic-led states to consider redrawing their own maps to offset any seats Republicans might gain in Texas. "We're returning to Texas more dangerous to Republicans' plans than when we left," Wu said. "Our return allows us to build the legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court, take our message to communities across the state and country." Speaker of the House Dustin Burrows, a Republican, gaveled in the session at 12 p.m. local time on Monday, with enough Democrats present to have a quorum. "We are done waiting. We have a quorum. Now is the time for action," Burrows said on opening the session. Burrows said that the Democrats who had left the state but whom were present on Monday would only be allowed to leave the House chambers if they agreed to be released into the custody of an agent from the Texas Department of Public Safety, who would ensure they are present at House sessions going forward. More than 50 Texas House Democrats left the state on August 3 and most headed to Illinois, aiming to deny Republicans enough lawmakers in attendance to hold a vote on redistricting legislation - a tactic used several times in the past, mostly without success. Republican leaders in Texas issued civil arrest warrants for the Democrats, which could only be acted on within the borders of the state, and sought their extradition from Illinois, which a judge in that state rejected. Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Friday called a second special legislation session in another attempt to rework the state's congressional maps in an effort to give Republicans another five seats in Congress. With Republicans dominating the Texas House and Senate, quick passage of the new maps is almost certain. Abbott didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the Democrats' return. Trump believes redistricting would help maintain Republicans' slim control of Congress in midterm elections next year. But Democrats are threatening retaliation, launching what could build into an all-out national redistricting war across several states. Gavin Newsom, California's Democratic Governor, on Thursday unveiled his own redistricting plan that he said would give Democrats there five more congressional seats. Legislation that would allow California voters to approve new maps is expected to be introduced on Monday.

Zelensky shows up to White House in all-black suit - but no tie - after Trump complained about his previous attire
Zelensky shows up to White House in all-black suit - but no tie - after Trump complained about his previous attire

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Zelensky shows up to White House in all-black suit - but no tie - after Trump complained about his previous attire

Volodymyr Zelensky arrived for his meeting with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office wearing an all black suit, but no tie – months after he was derided for his lack of formal dress during his previous, and now infamous, visit to the White House. The Ukrainian president wore the same black jacket he wore to a June NATO summit in the Netherlands, which sources described as being 'suit-style' but not a full suit. He also wore a black shirt, but no tie. That summit marked the first time Zelensky had donned a business-style jacket since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in Ukraine in 2022 — and the fashion choice reportedly impressed Trump. The White House asked Ukrainian officials if Zelensky would wear a suit ahead of Monday's meeting in D.C. with top European leaders and Trump, two sources told Axios. One Trump advisor jokingly told the outlet that 'it would be a good sign for peace' if Zelensky dressed up on Monday, but added, 'We don't expect him to do it.' They also did not expect the Ukrainian leader to wear a tie. The high-stakes meeting comes months after the president welcomed Zelensky into the West Wing in February, and made jabs about his customary military-style attire, jokingly telling the press, 'he's all dressed up today.' He also faced questions about his lack of suit from the media. However, it was Vice President JD Vance who more annoyed than Trump by the Ukrainian leader's understated fashion choices on that occasion, particularly that he was without a tie, according to Axios. Trump's irritation during Zelensky's last visit, which descended into a shouting match, was about more than just his fashion choices, and the president's advisors say this time should go more smoothly. "They've traveled very, very far, both of them. Zelensky will not show him pictures of dead children and then act like it's somehow his fault. The president has learned to just sort of like, you know, file away any irritations and go forward,' a Trump advisor told Axios. Zelensky will be joined by neighboring European leaders in a show of unity. The meeting is set to be held Monday at 3 p.m. EST, and comes after Trump met with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Trump is now pushing Zelensky to strike a peace deal without Crimea and NATO membership instead of an immediate ceasefire – backing Moscow 's position. During the meeting, Putin agreed to let the U.S. and its European allies offer Ukrainian security guarantees, Steve Witkoff said. At least 10 people were killed in Ukraine after Russia launched 144 drones and missiles overnight, Kyiv said, in an attack described by Zelensky as 'demonstrative and cynical.'

White House sending social media teams with FBI on some arrests in D.C., sources say
White House sending social media teams with FBI on some arrests in D.C., sources say

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

White House sending social media teams with FBI on some arrests in D.C., sources say

WASHINGTON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - The White House has dispatched social media teams alongside FBI agents executing arrest warrants in the nation's capital to generate videos that promote U.S. President Donald Trump's crackdown on crime in the District of Columbia, according to two people briefed on the matter. The highly unusual arrangement runs afoul of longstanding Justice Department norms which seek to insulate criminal investigations from political influence. It could hamstring prosecutors' ability to try their cases by generating pre-trial publicity and raise constitutional questions about suspects' rights to privacy in cases involving arrests carried out in non-public areas, legal experts say. The White House has been playing an outsized role in the FBI's operations since Trump announced on August 11 that he was initiating a federal takeover of the District of Columbia's police department and calling in the National Guard to help patrol the streets. Critics have decried his actions as an authoritarian-like abuse of power. The White House posted a highly produced promotional video, opens new tab on its X account on Thursday documenting the arrest of Sean Charles Dunn, a now-former Department of Justice employee who is facing an assault charge after he hurled a Subway sandwich at a federal agent. In the video, armed agents can be seen storming Dunn's apartment and putting him in handcuffs. The video was taken by a social media team sent by the White House, one of the sources said, speaking anonymously to discuss personnel matters. According to X, it has received 2.4 million views. The social media team that filmed Dunn's arrest remained embedded with the same FBI squad throughout the evening, the source said. Reuters could not determine whether the people who produced the video are White House employees, nor could it determine on how many occasions the White House has sent people to film arrests since the operation began. The White House declined to answer those questions. "This is not a standard law enforcement posture because this is action directed by the president deeming what is necessary and appropriate under the law. Of course the White House is involved in highlighting our hugely successful efforts to stop violent crime in Washington, DC," a White House official said. "As the most transparent administration in history, we will continue sharing these efforts with the press and the American people," the official added. Spokespeople for the FBI declined to comment. Dunn's attorney Sabrina Shroff declined comment about the White House's role in filming the arrest, which took place just outside the doorway of Dunn's residence inside what appears to be an apartment-style building. "These are political media influencers who are there for a sole purpose, which is to document things in a light most favorable to a political agenda," said defense attorney Bradley Moss. "It has nothing to do with law and order." The White House has also stationed employees inside the FBI's command post overseeing the federal operation who are tasked with reporting back with arrest numbers, the two sources said. A social media post from the Drug Enforcement Administration on Saturday featured Stephen Miller and White House Deputy Homeland Security Advisor Tony Salisbury appearing at the command post alongside Justice Department officials. In recent days, the FBI and the Metropolitan Police Department have referred media inquiries about arrests involving federal agents to the White House. Legal experts said embedding social media teams who are not employed by law enforcement agencies to film arrests could in some instances run afoul of people's Fourth Amendment right to privacy during the execution of a criminal warrant. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1999 that deputy federal marshals and local sheriffs seeking publicity for their actions violated a suspect's constitutional rights when they invited members of the media to witness an arrest inside the person's home. "It's just kind of an outrageous tactic for promotional purposes, but it does cross the line in terms of constitutional and ethical conduct by police," said Bennett Gershman, a former New York state prosecutor who teaches at Pace University School of Law. The FBI has sometimes allowed the media to do ride-alongs, generally for recruitment purposes, said James Davidson, a former FBI agent who has since formed the nonprofit The FBI Integrity Project, which aims to safeguard the bureau from undue political influence. Both Davidson and Stacey Young, a former Justice Department lawyer who founded the group Justice Connection to advocate for current and former DOJ employees, expressed concerns that filming arrests could undermine confidence in the FBI. 'It erodes the FBI's integrity and the perception of impartiality, which are required for the bureau to maintain any credibility," Young said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store